AzTrials
AzTrials

Refractory EpilepsyNCT03636958

Efficacy and Safety of Perampanel in Combination in Glioma-refractory Epilepsy

A study testing Perampanel and conventional antiepileptic treatment in people with Refractory Epilepsy, run by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille at 2 sites in France.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Gliomas are primitive brain tumors frequently associated with epilepsy. In a significant number of these patients epilepsy is resistant to antiepileptic drugs. There are currently no recommendations for the management of these drug-resistant epilepsies associated with glioma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Refractory Epilepsy
What is being tested?
Perampanel and conventional antiepileptic treatment
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
2 sitesFrance
Study dates
15 Feb 2021to 1 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient, male or female, over 18 years old
  • Glioma confirmed by histology
  • Not in progression (clinico-radiological criterion RANO, (Wen et al., 2014), see appendix 1)
  • No clinical worsening (excluding epileptic seizures)
  • No increase greater than 25% in contrast enhancement after gadolinium injection
  • No increase in the T2 / FLAIR hyper signal
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Absence of new lesion
  • Diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy according to international epilepsy definitions (Fisher 2014 and Kwan 2010, see Appendices 2 and 3)
  • o Repeated epileptic seizures despite testing of two effective dose antiepileptic drugs tried at least 3 months
  • With at least 2 attacks per month (to ensure visibility on the duration of the study of the antiepileptic effect, see below)
  • Patient with epileptic seizures not limited to only subjective signs

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or lactating woman
  • Minor
  • Impossibility of signing consent
  • No affiliation to a social security scheme (beneficiary or beneficiary)
  • Person in emergency,
  • Person of legal age subject to a legal protection measure (major under guardianship, guardianship or court order), or unable to express his or her consent
  • Patient with at least 2 generalized tonic-clonic seizures per month.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

France2 sites
  • Assistance Publique Des Hopitaux de Marseille

    Marseille, PACA, 13354

  • Department of Epileptology and Cerebral Rhythmology, Hôpital La Timone, APHM

    Marseille, 13385

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Perampanel in Combination in Glioma-refractory Epilepsy

Gliomas are primitive brain tumors frequently associated with epilepsy. In a significant number of these patients epilepsy is resistant to antiepileptic drugs. There are currently no recommendations for the management of these drug-resistant epilepsies associated with glioma. In addition, few studies have addressed the subject and no treatment appears to be superior to others in the literature for this indication. In addition, many antiepileptic drugs pose problems of tolerance or interaction with chemotherapy in these patients.

Fundamental studies on glioma-associated epilepsies have shown that there is a major dysregulation of glutamatergic systems involved in epileptogenesis and tumor growth. Targeting this glutamatergic system seems particularly interesting from a physiopathological point of view. Perampanel is a recent antiepileptic treatment with a novel mode of action targeting AMPA glutamate receptors. It has been shown to be effective in patients with drug-resistant epilepsies. He has demonstrated his tolerance in these patients. He has obtained a marketing authorization and is therefore used in routine epileptology without serious problems of tolerance being reported. It is neither an inducer nor an enzyme inhibitor, avoiding the problems of interaction with chemotherapy and is used in a daily dose facilitating compliance.

Read more

Therefore, there may be specific antiepileptic efficacy of perampanel in patients with glioma. Nevertheless, the only current data is limited to a retrospective study of 12 patients.

The objective of this protocol is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perampanel in patients with glioma with drug-resistant epilepsy.

a prospective randomized study with two parallel arms: antiepileptic combination therapy with perampanel and antiepileptic combination therapy without perampanel (free choice of the practitioner). The main criterion of judgment will be the decrease of the monthly frequency of crisis. Secondary endpoints will assess tolerance, efficacy on responder rate (at least 50% decrease in seizure frequency), seizure severity (secondary generalization, loss of consciousness), and quality. patients' lives (quality of life questionnaires, side effects and anxiety / depression). The duration of participation per patient will be 23 weeks (6 weeks of baseline, 5 weeks of titration and 12 weeks of maintenance). The recruitment period will be 3 years. Investigators plan to recruit 120 patients.

In the context of no recommendation in the management of these patients, superior efficacy of perampanel compared with other antiepileptic drugs is expected. This would allow targeted treatment in this population and confirm the tolerance of this treatment in these patients.

Read the detailed description

Background: Gliomas are primitive brain tumors frequently associated with epilepsy. In a significant number of these patients epilepsy is resistant to antiepileptic drugs. There are currently no recommendations for the management of these drug-resistant epilepsies associated with glioma. In addition, few studies have addressed the subject and no treatment appears to be superior to others in the literature for this indication. In addition, many antiepileptic drugs pose problems of tolerance or interaction with chemotherapy in these patients.

Rational: Fundamental studies on glioma-associated epilepsies have shown that there is a major dysregulation of glutamatergic systems involved in epileptogenesis (= perpetuation of epileptic seizures) and tumor growth (Huberfeld and Vecht, 2016). Targeting this glutamatergic system seems particularly interesting from a physiopathological point of view. Perampanel is a recent antiepileptic treatment with a novel mode of action targeting AMPA glutamate receptors. It has been shown to be effective in patients with drug-resistant epilepsies. He has demonstrated his tolerance in these patients. He has obtained a marketing authorization and is therefore used in routine epileptology without serious problems of tolerance being reported. It is neither an inducer nor an enzyme inhibitor, avoiding the problems of interaction with chemotherapy and is used in a daily dose facilitating compliance.

Therefore, there may be specific antiepileptic efficacy of perampanel in patients with glioma. Nevertheless, the only current data is limited to a retrospective study of 12 patients.

The objective of this protocol is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perampanel in patients with glioma with drug-resistant epilepsy.

The investigators want to perform a prospective randomized study with two parallel arms: antiepileptic combination therapy with perampanel and antiepileptic combination therapy without perampanel (free choice of the practitioner). The main criterion of judgment will be the decrease of the monthly frequency of crisis. Secondary endpoints will assess tolerance, efficacy on responder rate (at least 50% decrease in seizure frequency), seizure severity (secondary generalization, loss of consciousness), and quality. patients' lives (quality of life questionnaires, side effects and anxiety / depression). The duration of participation per patient will be 23 weeks (6 weeks of baseline, 5 weeks of titration and 12 weeks of maintenance). The recruitment period will be 3 years. The investigators plan to recruit 120 patients.

Expected benefits: In the context of no recommendation in the management of these patients, the investigators hope to demonstrate superior efficacy of perampanel compared with other antiepileptic drugs. This would allow targeted treatment in this population and confirm the tolerance of this treatment in these patients.

Being tested
Perampanel, conventional antiepileptic treatment
Medical subject headings
Drug Resistant Epilepsy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PerampanelDrug

    Perampanel is an antiepileptic with a novel mechanism of action as it targets post-synaptic AMPA receptors. It has been shown to be effective as adjunctive therapy (dual therapy) for partial / focal epilepsy seizures and generalized in patients over 12 years of age.

  • conventional antiepileptic treatmentDrug

    choice of the molecule is left to the discretion of the clinician excluding the following benzodiazepines: clobazam, clonazepam, diazepam. Antiepileptic drugs allowed are therefore: lamotrigine, levetiracetam, lacosamide, sodium valproate, carbamazepine, oxcarbabazepine, slicarbazepine, pregabalin, gabapentin, topiramate, phenytoin, phenobarbital, zonisamide, vigabatrin.

Study groups in NCT03636958
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
control groupActive comparatorthey will receive conventional antiepileptic treatment (antiepileptic combination therapy) without perampanel
Receives: Drug: conventional antiepileptic treatment
experimental groupExperimentalthey will receive conventional antiepileptic treatment (antiepileptic combination therapy) with perampanel
Receives: Drug: Perampanel; Drug: conventional antiepileptic treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Numbers of crisis at baseline

    The monthly frequency of crisis

    Measured: 6 weeks

  2. Numbers of crisis under treatment

    The monthly frequency of crisis during treatment period

    Measured: 5 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Aug 2018
  2. Study start15 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Why it stopped: concomitant decision of the sponsor and the PI, lack of patients

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03636958
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-13
Status last verified
Jun 2022
First submitted
16 Aug 2018
Last updated
27 Jun 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Perampanel and conventional antiepileptic treatment in people with Refractory Epilepsy, run by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille at 2 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Numbers of crisis at baseline (time frame: 6 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in