NeoplasmPhase 1/2NCT03637764
Safety, Preliminary Efficacy and PK of Isatuximab (SAR650984) Alone or in Combination With Atezolizumab in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
A Phase 1/2 study testing Isatuximab SAR650984 and Atezolizumab in people with Neoplasm, run by Sanofi at 26 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
Primary Objectives: Phase 1: To characterize the safety and tolerability of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab in participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), platinum-resistant/refractory… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neoplasm
- What is being tested?
- Isatuximab SAR650984 and Atezolizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 107 participants
- Where
- 26 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- 6 Aug 2018to 11 May 2022
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants must have a known diagnosis of either unresectable HCC, platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic SCCHN, platinum-resistant/refractory EOC with evidence of measurable disease or recurrent GBM.
- Greater than or equal to (>=)18 years of age.
- For participants with HCC: Documentation of progressive disease (PD) during or after treatment with either sorafenib or lenvatinib, or intolerance to the therapy.
- For participants with SCCHN: Received and failed up to 2 lines of prior systemic anti-cancer therapy with documentation of tumor recurrence or PD within 6 months of last platinum-based therapy in primary, recurrent, or metastatic setting.
- For participants with EOC: Received up to 3 lines of prior platinum-containing therapy when the disease was platinum-sensitive, and the participants should not have received any systemic therapy for platinum-resistant/refractory disease. Specific to France only: Documentation of PD on or after 1 line of anti-cancer therapy for platinum resistant/refractory disease (unless participants are ineligible or intolerant to standard of care for platinum-resistant/refractory disease).
- For participants with GBM: Documentation of PD or first recurrence during or after temozolomide maintenance therapy for newly diagnosed GBM treated with 1st line radiotherapy plus concurrent temozolomide.
Who cannot join
- Prior exposure to agent that blocks CD38 or participation in clinical studies with isatuximab.
- For participants with HCC, SCCHN, EOC or GBM prior exposure to any agent (approved or investigational) that blocks the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway.
- Evidence of other immune related disease /conditions.
- History of non-infectious pneumonitis requiring steroids or current pneumonitis; history of the thoracic radiation.
- Received a live-virus vaccination within 28 days of planned treatment start. Seasonal flu vaccines that do not contain live virus are permitted.
- Prior solid organ or bone marrow transplantation.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >=2 for participants with HCC, SCCHN or EOC or Karnofsky performance score less than or equal to (<=) 70 for participants with GBM.
- Poor bone marrow reserve.
- Poor organ function.
- The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
26 sites in 8 countries.
26 sites in 8 countries
Spain6 sites
Investigational Site Number :7240001
Barcelona, Barcelona [Barcelona], 08035
Investigational Site Number :7240006
Hospitalet de Llobregat, Castille and León, 08908
Investigational Site Number :7240004
Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad de, 28050
Investigational Site Number :7240007
Madrid, 28041
Investigational Site Number :7240003
Madrid / Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad de, 28040
Investigational Site Number :7240008
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Taiwan6 sites
Investigational Site Number :1580005
Kaohsiung City, 807
Investigational Site Number :1580002
Tainan, 704
Investigational Site Number :1580003
Taipei, 104
Investigational Site Number :1580006
Taipei, 112
Investigational Site Number :1580004
Taipei, 114
Investigational Site Number :1580001
Taipei
Italy4 sites
Investigational Site Number :3800007
Meldola, Forlì-Cesena, 47014
Investigational Site Number :3800009
Milan, 20141
Investigational Site Number :3800004
Padova, 35128
Investigational Site Number :3800003
Rozzano, Milano, 20089
United States3 sites
Investigational Site Number :8400007
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Investigational Site Number :8400002
Houston, Texas, 77030
Investigational Site Number :8400004
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Czechia3 sites
Investigational Site Number :2030001
Brno, 65653
Investigational Site Number :2030003
Olomouc, 77900
Investigational Site Number :2030002
Prague, 12808
Belgium2 sites
Investigational Site Number :0560001
Brussels, 1200
Investigational Site Number :0560002
Ghent, 9000
About this study
Official title: A Phase 1/2 Open-label, Multi-center, Safety, Preliminary Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of Isatuximab (SAR650984) in Combination With Atezolizumab or Isatuximab Alone in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Primary Objectives:
- Phase 1: To characterize the safety and tolerability of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab in participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), platinum-resistant/refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), or recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D).
- Phase 2: To assess response rate (RR) of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab in participants with HCC or SCCHN or EOC.
- Phase 2: To assess the progression free survival rate at 6 months (PFS-6) of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab, or as a single agent in participants with GBM.
Read more
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the safety profile of isatuximab monotherapy (GBM only), or in combination with atezolizumab in Phase 2.
- To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab and atezolizumab.
- To characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of isatuximab single agent (GBM only) and atezolizumab in combination with isatuximab.
- To assess the overall efficacy of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab, or single agent (GBM only).
Read the detailed description
The total study duration per participant was up to 28 months including up to 28 days screening period, up to 24 months treatment period, and a 3 month safety follow up period.
- Conditions
- Neoplasm
- Being tested
- Isatuximab SAR650984, Atezolizumab
- Keywords
- Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Isatuximab SAR650984Drug
Also called Sarclisa
Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion
Route of administration: intravenous
AtezolizumabDrug
Also called Tecentriq®
Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion
Route of administration: intravenous
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: HCC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Experimental | Participants with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams, every 3 weeks (Q3W), intravenous (IV) infusion along with isatuximab 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events (AE), participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks). Receives: Drug: Isatuximab SAR650984; Drug: Atezolizumab |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Experimental | Participants with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams,Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 108 weeks). Receives: Drug: Isatuximab SAR650984; Drug: Atezolizumab |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Experimental | Participants with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) received atezolizumab 1200 mg, Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 61 weeks). Receives: Drug: Isatuximab SAR650984; Drug: Atezolizumab |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Experimental | Participants with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) received atezolizumab 1200 mg, Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 54 weeks). Receives: Drug: Isatuximab SAR650984; Drug: Atezolizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
DLTs: AEs occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause which included: hematological abnormalities: Grade(G) 4 neutropenia(N) for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever (temperature greater than or equal to [>=] 38.5 degree Celsius on more than 1 occasion) or microbiologically/radiographically documented infection, G3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding/ G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G >=2 Aspartate transaminase (AST)/ Alanine transaminase (ALT) elevation simultaneous with G >=2 total bilirubin elevation without initial findings of cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting greater than (>)3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 >14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE. Any other AE that study committee deemed to be dose-limiting, regardless of grade, was also considered DLT.
Measured: Cycle 1 (21 days)
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)
RP2D was the starting dose selected for Phase 2 part of the study. RP2D was the selected dose at which no more than 1 out of 6 participants (starting dose or dose level minus -1 [DL-1]) or 2 out of 12 participants (starting dose) experienced a DLT related to the investigational medicinal product. DLTs: Adverse Event (AE) occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause included: hematological abnormalities: G4 N for 7/ more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever, G3/G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G>=2 AST/ALT elevation simultaneous with G >=2 total bilirubin elevation without cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting >3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 >14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE.
Measured: Cycle 1 (21 days)
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which no more than 1 out of 6 participants (starting dose or DL-1) or 2 out of 12 participants (starting dose) experienced a DLT related to the investigational medicinal product. DLTs: AE occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause included: hematological abnormalities: G4 N for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever, G3 or G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G>=2 AST/ ALT elevation simultaneous with G >=2 total bilirubin elevation without cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting >3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 >14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities or AEs.
Measured: Cycle 1 (21 days)
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR): For HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts
OR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) as best overall response, assessed per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Best overall response was derived per RECIST 1.1 criteria using disease assessments performed from the first dose of treatment throughout the study excluding any assessments performed after the cut-off date or following the initiation of a further anticancer treatment. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, pathological lymph nodes (target/non-target)- reduction in short axis <10 mm; PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum, sum with an absolute increase of diameter of at least 5 mm and appearance of >1 new lesion.
Measured: From randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Probability of Participants With Progression Free Survival at 6 Months (PFS-6): GBM Cohort
PFS-6 was defined as the probability of participants alive without disease progression at 6 months as assessed by RANO criteria. Participants who didn't experience documented progression or death before analysis cut-off date or date of initiation of new anticancer treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing progression performed prior to initiation of further anticancer treatment or analysis cut-off date, whichever was 1st. Per RANO criteria, progressive disease was defined as >=25% increase size of T1- gadolinium enhancing disease, or increased T2/FLAIR signal, or presence of new lesion, or worsening clinical status. PFS-6 was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From randomization until 6 months after the last participant's first treatment in the GBM Cohort D-1
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment).
Measured: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities
Hematological parameters assessed were anemia, white blood cell (WBC) decreased, platelet count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Measured: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters
Electrolyte parameters assessed were hyponatremia, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Measured: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities
Abnormal renal parameters assessed were creatinine clearance (CrCl), creatinine increased and hyperuricemia. Creatinine clearance was assessed in categories: >=60 - less than (<) 90 milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meter (mL/min/1.73m^2), >=30 - <60 mL/min/1.73m^2, >=15 - <30 mL/min/1.73m^2 and <15 mL/min/1.73m^2. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Measured: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities
Abnormal liver function parameters assessed were AST increased, ALT increased, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased, blood bilirubin (BB) increased. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Measured: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Secondary outcomes (16)
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Isatuximab
ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA (including participants without pretreatment samples).
Measured: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure:106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Atezolizumab
ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA (including participants without pretreatment samples).
Measured: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
Cmax was defined as the maximum concentration observed after the first administration calculated using the noncompartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Measured: At start of infusion (SOI), end of infusion (EOI), EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Concentration Observed at the End of Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab
Ceoi is the plasma concentration observed at the end of intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Measured: At end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
Tmax was defined as the time to reach Cmax, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Measured: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
Clast was defined as the last concentration of isatuximab observed above the lower limit of quantification.
Measured: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
Tlast was defined as the time of last concentration observed above the lower limit of quantification, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Measured: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration versus time curve calculated from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration. AUClast was calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Measured: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168h) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
AUC0-168h was defined as the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 168 hours post dose calculated using non-compartmental analysis after first infusion of isatuximab.
Measured: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab
Ctrough was the plasma concentration of isatuximab observed just before treatment administration during repeated dosing.
Measured: Pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Plasma Concentration of Atezolizumab
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 8 Day 1 and Cycle 16 Day 1
Best Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden
Best tumor burden change was defined as the best percent-change from baseline in a sum of the diameters (longest for non-nodal lesion, short axis for nodal lesions) for all target lesions.
Measured: From randomization until progression or death or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) >=6 Months
DC: percentage of participants with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) \& stable disease (SD) rate. RANO criteria, CR: no change in size of T1-gadolinium-enhancing (T1-Gd+) disease, stable/ reduced (red) T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion (NL), no corticosteroid use (CU) \& stable/ red clinical status (CS); PR: >=50% change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/red T2/FLAIR signal, no NL, stable/ red CU \& stable/ improved CS (ICS). SD: <50% reduction to <25% increase (inc) size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/red T2/FLAIR signal, no NL, stable/red CU \& stable/ICS. Progressive disease (PD): >=25% inc size of T1-Gd+ disease/ inc T2/FLAIR signal/ presence of NL/ worsening CS. RECIST criteria: CR: Disappearance of target lesions. Reduction in short axis to <10 mm of lymph nodes; PR: 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions; PD: 20% inc in sum of diameters of target lesions; SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage from baseline study to qualify for PR nor sufficient inc to qualify for PD.
Measured: From the date of first response to disease progression or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time from date of 1st response until date of first documented recurrent/progressive disease (PD) or death whichever occurred 1st. In absence of disease progression or death before analysis cut-off date or date of initiation of further anticancer treatment, DOR was censored at date of last valid response. RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for assessment in HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts and RANO criteria for GBM Cohort. Per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target lesions; PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions. Per RANO criteria; CR: no change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, no corticosteroid use, and stable/improved status; PR: >=50% change in size of T1-Gd+, stable/reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, stable/reduced corticosteroid use, and stable/improved status. PD:>=25% increase size of T1-Gd+/increased T2/FLAIR signal/presence of new lesion/worsening status.
Measured: From the date of first response until disease progression or death, or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as time (in months) from 1st study treatment administration to date of 1st documented radiographic progression or date of death from any cause, whichever was 1st. Participants who didn't experience progression or death before analysis cut-off date/date of initiation of new anticancer treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing progression performed prior to initiation of further anticancer treatment or analysis cut-off date, whichever was 1st. RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for assessment in HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts and RANO criteria for GBM Cohort. Per RECIST 1.1 criteria, PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study. Appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression. Per RANO criteria, PD: >=25% increase in product of perpendicular diameters of any target lesion, or worsening neurologic status not explained by causes unrelated to tumor progression.
Measured: From date of first study treatment administration until disease progression or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Response as Per Response Assessment for Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria: GBM Cohort
Response rate for participants with GBM was defined as percentage of participants with CR \& PR as best overall response (BOR), assessed by Investigators using RANO criteria. BOR was derived per RANO criteria using disease assessments performed from 1st dose of treatment through study excluding any assessments performed after cut-off date or following initiation of further anticancer treatment. Per RANO criteria; CR was defined as no change in size of T1-gadolinium-enhancing (T1-Gd+) disease, stable or reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, no corticosteroid use, and stable or improved clinical status; PR was defined as >=50% change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable or reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, stable or reduced corticosteroid use, and stable or improved clinical status. Progressive disease was defined as >=25% increase size of T1-Gd+ disease, or increased T2/FLAIR signal, or presence of new lesion, or worsening clinical status.
Measured: From randomization until progression, or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Aug 2018
- Study start6 Aug 2018
- Primary completion11 May 2022
- Study completion11 May 2022
Why it stopped: Study was stopped after interim analysis for 4 cohorts (HCC, SCCHN, EOC, and GBM) indicated that the results did not fulfill the preplanned interim analysis criteria to move to Phase 2 stage 2 in all 4 cohorts.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for NeoplasmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03637764
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACT15377
- Other IDs
- 2018-000390-67, U1111-1202-0839, 2018
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 5 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 10 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Publications
Simonelli M, Garralda E, Eskens F, Gil-Martin M, Yen CJ, Obermannova R, Chao Y, Lonardi S, Melichar B, Moreno V, Yu ML, Bongiovanni A, Calvo E, Rottey S, Machiels JP, Gonzalez-Martin A, Paz-Ares L, Chang CL, Mason W, Lin CC, Reardon DA, Vieito M, Santoro A, Meng R, Abbadessa G, Menas F, Lee H, Liu Q, Combeau C, Ternes N, Ziti-Ljajic S, Massard C. Isatuximab plus atezolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors: results from a phase I/II, open-label, multicenter study. ESMO Open. 2022 Oct;7(5):100562. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100562. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
PubMed 35987165
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 1/2 Open-label, Multi-center, Safety, Preliminary Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of Isatuximab (SAR650984) in Combination With Atezolizumab or Isatuximab Alone in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03637764
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACT15377
- Conditions
- Neoplasm
- Keywords
- Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Study was stopped after interim analysis for 4 cohorts (HCC, SCCHN, EOC, and GBM) indicated that the results did not fulfill the preplanned interim analysis criteria to move to Phase 2 stage 2 in all 4 cohorts.
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 6 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 May 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 8 Jun 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary Objectives:
- Phase 1: To characterize the safety and tolerability of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab in participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), platinum-resistant/refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), or recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D).
- Phase 2: To assess response rate (RR) of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab in participants with HCC or SCCHN or EOC.
- Phase 2: To assess the progression free survival rate at 6 months (PFS-6) of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab, or as a single agent in participants with GBM.
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the safety profile of isatuximab monotherapy (GBM only), or in combination with atezolizumab in Phase 2.
- To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab and atezolizumab.
- To characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of isatuximab single agent (GBM only) and atezolizumab in combination with isatuximab.
- To assess the overall efficacy of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab, or single agent (GBM only).
Detailed description
The total study duration per participant was up to 28 months including up to 28 days screening period, up to 24 months treatment period, and a 3 month safety follow up period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: HCC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Experimental | Drug: Isatuximab SAR650984, Drug: AtezolizumabParticipants with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams, every 3 weeks (Q3W), intravenous (IV) infusion along with isatuximab 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events (AE), participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks). |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Experimental | Drug: Isatuximab SAR650984, Drug: AtezolizumabParticipants with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams,Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 108 weeks). |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Experimental | Drug: Isatuximab SAR650984, Drug: AtezolizumabParticipants with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) received atezolizumab 1200 mg, Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 61 weeks). |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Experimental | Drug: Isatuximab SAR650984, Drug: AtezolizumabParticipants with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) received atezolizumab 1200 mg, Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 54 weeks). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Participants must have a known diagnosis of either unresectable HCC, platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic SCCHN, platinum-resistant/refractory EOC with evidence of measurable disease or recurrent GBM.
- Greater than or equal to (>=)18 years of age.
- For participants with HCC: Documentation of progressive disease (PD) during or after treatment with either sorafenib or lenvatinib, or intolerance to the therapy.
- For participants with SCCHN: Received and failed up to 2 lines of prior systemic anti-cancer therapy with documentation of tumor recurrence or PD within 6 months of last platinum-based therapy in primary, recurrent, or metastatic setting.
- For participants with EOC: Received up to 3 lines of prior platinum-containing therapy when the disease was platinum-sensitive, and the participants should not have received any systemic therapy for platinum-resistant/refractory disease. Specific to France only: Documentation of PD on or after 1 line of anti-cancer therapy for platinum resistant/refractory disease (unless participants are ineligible or intolerant to standard of care for platinum-resistant/refractory disease).
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Prior exposure to agent that blocks CD38 or participation in clinical studies with isatuximab.
- For participants with HCC, SCCHN, EOC or GBM prior exposure to any agent (approved or investigational) that blocks the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway.
- Evidence of other immune related disease /conditions.
- History of non-infectious pneumonitis requiring steroids or current pneumonitis; history of the thoracic radiation.
- Received a live-virus vaccination within 28 days of planned treatment start. Seasonal flu vaccines that do not contain live virus are permitted.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab SAR650984Also: SarclisaPharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous | Drug | Cohort A: HCC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab, Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab, Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab, Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab |
| AtezolizumabAlso: Tecentriq®Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous | Drug | Cohort A: HCC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab, Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab, Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab, Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)
DLTs: AEs occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause which included: hematological abnormalities: Grade(G) 4 neutropenia(N) for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever (temperature greater than or equal to [>=] 38.5 degree Celsius on more than 1 occasion) or microbiologically/radiographically documented infection, G3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding/ G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G >=2 Aspartate transaminase (AST)/ Alanine transaminase (ALT) elevation simultaneous with G >=2 total bilirubin elevation without initial findings of cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting greater than (>)3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 >14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE. Any other AE that study committee deemed to be dose-limiting, regardless of grade, was also considered DLT.
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)
Time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)
RP2D was the starting dose selected for Phase 2 part of the study. RP2D was the selected dose at which no more than 1 out of 6 participants (starting dose or dose level minus -1 [DL-1]) or 2 out of 12 participants (starting dose) experienced a DLT related to the investigational medicinal product. DLTs: Adverse Event (AE) occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause included: hematological abnormalities: G4 N for 7/ more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever, G3/G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G>=2 AST/ALT elevation simultaneous with G >=2 total bilirubin elevation without cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting >3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 >14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE.
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
Time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)
MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which no more than 1 out of 6 participants (starting dose or DL-1) or 2 out of 12 participants (starting dose) experienced a DLT related to the investigational medicinal product. DLTs: AE occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause included: hematological abnormalities: G4 N for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever, G3 or G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G>=2 AST/ ALT elevation simultaneous with G >=2 total bilirubin elevation without cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting >3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 >14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities or AEs.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR): For HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
OR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) as best overall response, assessed per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Best overall response was derived per RECIST 1.1 criteria using disease assessments performed from the first dose of treatment throughout the study excluding any assessments performed after the cut-off date or following the initiation of a further anticancer treatment. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, pathological lymph nodes (target/non-target)- reduction in short axis <10 mm; PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum, sum with an absolute increase of diameter of at least 5 mm and appearance of >1 new lesion.
Probability of Participants With Progression Free Survival at 6 Months (PFS-6): GBM Cohort
Time frame: From randomization until 6 months after the last participant's first treatment in the GBM Cohort D-1
PFS-6 was defined as the probability of participants alive without disease progression at 6 months as assessed by RANO criteria. Participants who didn't experience documented progression or death before analysis cut-off date or date of initiation of new anticancer treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing progression performed prior to initiation of further anticancer treatment or analysis cut-off date, whichever was 1st. Per RANO criteria, progressive disease was defined as >=25% increase size of T1- gadolinium enhancing disease, or increased T2/FLAIR signal, or presence of new lesion, or worsening clinical status. PFS-6 was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment).
Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Hematological parameters assessed were anemia, white blood cell (WBC) decreased, platelet count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Electrolyte parameters assessed were hyponatremia, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Abnormal renal parameters assessed were creatinine clearance (CrCl), creatinine increased and hyperuricemia. Creatinine clearance was assessed in categories: >=60 - less than (<) 90 milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meter (mL/min/1.73m^2), >=30 - <60 mL/min/1.73m^2, >=15 - <30 mL/min/1.73m^2 and <15 mL/min/1.73m^2. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Abnormal liver function parameters assessed were AST increased, ALT increased, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased, blood bilirubin (BB) increased. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
16 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Isatuximab
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure:106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Atezolizumab
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
Time frame: At start of infusion (SOI), end of infusion (EOI), EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Concentration Observed at the End of Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab
Time frame: At end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
Time frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
Time frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
Time frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
Time frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168h) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
Time frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab
Time frame: Pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Plasma Concentration of Atezolizumab
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 8 Day 1 and Cycle 16 Day 1
Best Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden
Time frame: From randomization until progression or death or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) >=6 Months
Time frame: From the date of first response to disease progression or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time frame: From the date of first response until disease progression or death, or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From date of first study treatment administration until disease progression or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Response as Per Response Assessment for Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria: GBM Cohort
Time frame: From randomization until progression, or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jul 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 35987165Simonelli M, Garralda E, Eskens F, Gil-Martin M, Yen CJ, Obermannova R, Chao Y, Lonardi S, Melichar B, Moreno V, Yu ML, Bongiovanni A, Calvo E, Rottey S, Machiels JP, Gonzalez-Martin A, Paz-Ares L, Chang CL, Mason W, Lin CC, Reardon DA, Vieito M, Santoro A, Meng R, Abbadessa G, Menas F, Lee H, Liu Q, Combeau C, Ternes N, Ziti-Ljajic S, Massard C. Isatuximab plus atezolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors: results from a phase I/II, open-label, multicenter study. ESMO Open. 2022 Oct;7(5):100562. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100562. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Related trials for Neoplasm
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
26 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Isatuximab SAR650984 and Atezolizumab in people with Neoplasm, run by Sanofi at 26 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 26 sites in Spain, Taiwan, Italy, United States, Czechia and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jun 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) (time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03637764, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2023.