AzTrials
AzTrials

CancerNCT03641222

Group Versus Individual Acupuncture for Cancer Pain

A study testing Acupuncture in people with Cancer and Pain, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Typically, in North America, acupuncture is performed on an individual basis. However, community acupuncture, also known as group acupuncture, is an emerging method of treating patients. Cancer patients, post-treatments were given acupuncture treatments to help alleviate pain, in a two-arm randomized trial. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cancer, Pain
What is being tested?
Acupuncture
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
76 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
2 Oct 2017to 30 Sep 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult cancer patients (≥18 years old), both male and female.
  • Experiencing pain with a minimum worst pain score (in the previous week) ≥3 on the 10-point Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).
  • All tumor groups, including metastatic patients.
  • Participant's pain can originate from any source, including postoperative, malignancy related, and neuropathic pain.
  • Must be willing to be randomized into either group, and must be able to attend a minimum of nine treatment sessions within a six-week period.

Who cannot join

  • Use of acupuncture within the previous six months.
  • Currently on or within one-month of active treatment (chemotherapy or radiation).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Psychosocial Oncology, Cancer Control Alberta

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 3C1

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Community (Group) Acupuncture to Individual Acupuncture to Alleviate Cancer Pain

Typically, in North America, acupuncture is performed on an individual basis. However, community acupuncture, also known as group acupuncture, is an emerging method of treating patients. Cancer patients, post-treatments were given acupuncture treatments to help alleviate pain, in a two-arm randomized trial.

Read the detailed description

Typically, in North America, acupuncture is performed on an individual basis. However, community acupuncture, also known as group acupuncture, is an emerging method of treating patients. Although the practice can vary, community acupuncture is performed in a group setting, typically with reclining chairs dispersed around a large room, and one practitioner treating up to six people per session.

The outcomes of this this randomized controlled trial will allow the researchers to assess whether group acupuncture is a viable treatment option for people with cancer who are suffering from pain, especially those who are either resistant to or looking to avoid the side effects of opioids.

Objectives Examine the efficacy of community acupuncture for alleviating cancer pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances and distress when compared to individual acupuncture.

Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of community acupuncture compared to individual acupuncture.

Conditions
Cancer, Pain
Being tested
Acupuncture
Keywords
Acupuncture, Group, Community Based, Individual, Randomized
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AcupunctureDevice

    Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Acupuncture

Study groups in NCT03641222
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group AcupunctureExperimentalGroup acupuncture sessions take place in a multipurpose room, with 3-6 participants, each session lasts 30-45 minutes, occurring twice-weekly, over the course of six weeks, for a total of twelve treatments. The acupuncture was administered by a Naturopathic Doctor.
Receives: Device: Acupuncture
Individual AcupunctureActive comparatorIndividual acupuncture sessions take place in a multipurpose room, privately each session lasts 30-45 minutes, occurring twice-weekly, over the course of six weeks, for a total of twelve treatments. The acupuncture was administered by a Naturopathic Doctor.
Receives: Device: Acupuncture

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form

    The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPISF) is a widely used self-report measure, originally developed for cancer pain, which measures both pain severity and pain interference

    Measured: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. The Profile of Mood States-Short Form

    The Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS-SF) is a validated measure of psychological distress, which calculates Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) using six subscales: fatigue, vigor, tension, depression, anger and confusion (Shacham, 1983). The 37-item questionnaire asks patients to rate how various adjectives relate to how they have felt in the past week, on a Likert scale from zero (not at all) to four (extremely).

    Measured: 6 weeks

  2. Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index

    The Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is 19-item questionnaire that measures quality of sleep and sleep disturbances

    Measured: 6 weeks

  3. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General

    The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) is a 20-item questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life (HRQOL) within the cancer population. The questionnaire contains four subscales: physical, social/family, emotional and functional well-being.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  4. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Fatigue

    The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) comprised of the FACT-G, plus an additional 13 questions related to fatigue

    Measured: 6 weeks

  5. The Inventory of Socially Supportive Behaviours

    The Inventory of Socially Supportive Behaviours (ISSB) Short Form is an 18-item questionnaire designed to measure social support, which asks participants to indicate the number of times they have experienced particular behaviours in the past month

    Measured: 6 weeks

  6. Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

    The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) is a simple screening measure that can be used to assess various physical and psychological symptoms, originally designed for palliative care patients

    Measured: 6 weeks

  7. A Pain Visual Analog Scale

    The pain visual analog scale (VAS) consists of a 10 centimetre line on a slip of white paper, with the indicators "no pain at all" on the far-left end, and "worst pain imaginable" on the far-right end

    Measured: 6 weeks

  8. The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions

    This utility scoring instrument is intended to provide an overall quality of life evaluation with a scale from 1 (perfect health) to 0 (death) and allows for the calculation of quality adjusted life years (QALYs)

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2018
  2. Study start2 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Aug 2018
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
76 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03641222
Sponsor's protocol ID
HREBA.CC-17-0237
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
10 Jul 2018
Last updated
18 Mar 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Oberoi D, Reed EN, Piedalue KA, Landmann J, Carlson LE. Exploring patient experiences and acceptability of group vs. individual acupuncture for Cancer-related pain: a qualitative study. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022 Jun 13;22(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12906-022-03600-6.

    PubMed 35698124
  • Oberoi DV, Longo CJ, Reed EN, Landmann J, Piedalue KL, Carlson LE. Cost-Utility of Group Versus Individual Acupuncture for Cancer-Related Pain Using Quality-Adjusted Life Years in a Noninferiority Trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2021 May;27(5):390-397. doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0386. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

    PubMed 33904784
  • Oberoi D, McLennan A, Piedalue KA, Wayne PM, Jones JM, Carlson LE. Factors Influencing Preference for Intervention in a Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery and Tai Chi/Qigong in Cancer Survivors. J Altern Complement Med. 2021 May;27(5):423-433. doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0400. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

    PubMed 33902334

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Acupuncture in people with Cancer and Pain, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03641222, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in