General AnesthesiaNCT03643029
The Accuracy of the Performance and Placement Test for Predicting Supraglottic Airway Device (SAD) Position in the Hypopharynx as Confirmed With Video Laryngoscopy
A study testing Video-laryngoscopy following SAD insertion in people with General Anesthesia and Supraglottic Airway Device, run by University of Malaya.
Trial summary
The supraglottic airway device (SAD) is currently widely used in patients undergoing general anaesthesia as a method of securing the airway. The usage of SAD does not require the patient to be paralysed prior to insertion, as opposed to an endotracheal tube. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- General Anesthesia, Supraglottic Airway Device, Laryngeal Mask Airway
- What is being tested?
- Video-laryngoscopy following SAD insertion
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 2018to Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients scheduled for procedures under general anaesthesia in the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) who are amenable to supraglottic airway management.
Who cannot join
- - American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class IV and above
- - morbid obesity (BMI > 40kg/m2)
- - high risk of regurgitation or aspiration (e.g. symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux, hiatus hernia)
- - respiratory tract pathology (e.g. preoperative sore throat)
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
The supraglottic airway device (SAD) is currently widely used in patients undergoing general anaesthesia as a method of securing the airway. The usage of SAD does not require the patient to be paralysed prior to insertion, as opposed to an endotracheal tube.
Five tests have been recommend to ensure that the SAD can be used for advanced procedure after a blind insertion. These tests however are not confirmed with visual validation and hence the confirmation of optimal position can be misleading.
Read more
This study is conducted to validate by video laryngoscopy the five recommended tests for confirming the placement and efficacy of a SAD, thus enabling its safe application in institutions with limited availability of video laryngoscopes.
Subjects for this study will consist of patients scheduled for procedures under general anaesthesia in the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) who are amenable to supraglottic airway management.
Read the detailed description
The five tests are divided into placement and performance tests.
The placement tests are:-
- Suprasternal notch test: a gel plug is inserted in the proximal one centimetre of the gastric drain outlet. Gentle tapping of the suprasternal notch will cause the gel to pulsate. This confirms the location of the gastric outlet tip is behind the cricoid cartilage.
- Bubble test: when ventilating the SAD, the gel plug in the gastric drain outlet will not move. This confirms the location of the gastric outlet tip is behind the cricoid cartilage.
- Insertion of 14G gastric tube (Ryle's tube) into the gastric drain outlet. Ease of insertion grading:-
1 - Easy 2 - Difficult 3 - Impossible
Confirmation of correct gastric tube placement is through detection of injected air by auscultation of the epigastrium and/or aspiration of gastric contents.
The performance tests are:-
- Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP): measured by closing the adjustable pressure-limiting (APL) valve at 30cmH2O with a fresh gas flow of 3 L/min, noting the airway pressure at equilibrium or when there is an audible air leak detected from the throat.
- Maximum minute ventilation (MMV) test: performed by hand-ventilating the SAD with four maximal insufflations within 15 seconds (APL valve set to 30cmH2O) to obtain the exhaled tidal volume.
MMV (in L/min):- 4 x (breaths/15 seconds) x (exhaled tidal volume)
The visual-guided grading system for the placement of SAD is divided into optimal (Grade 1) and suboptimal (Grade 2 and 3) views.
Optimal view is recorded when the direct view of SAD in the hypopharynx fulfils all these conditions:-
- The epiglottis is in upright position
- The distal cuff of SAD is in the oesophagus
- The rim of proximal cuff and tip of epiglottis is aligned
- The epiglottis is resting on outside of the proximal cuff
- The proximal cuff is fully deployed after cuff inflation
Suboptimal view is recorded when the direct view of SAD in the hypopharynx follows these conditions:-
- The epiglottis is downfolded or folded sideways
- The distal cuff is folded over backwards or the distal cuff is between and across the vocal cords
- The rim of proximal cuff and the tip of the epiglottis are not aligned
- The epiglottis is sitting in the bowl of the SAD
- The proximal cuff is distorted after cuff inflation
- Being tested
- Video-laryngoscopy following SAD insertion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Video-laryngoscopy following SAD insertionDevice
Following insertion of a supraglottic airway device (SAD), the placement and performance tests are carried out. If the tests are successful, a video-laryngoscopy will be performed to confirm the placement of the SAD in the hypopharynx.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To evaluate the accuracy of the performance and placement tests for predicting SAD position in the hypopharynx as confirmed with video laryngoscopy
If all five placement and performance tests are successful, optimal (Grade 1) view of the SAD from video-laryngoscopy is expected.
Measured: Intraoperative (from commencement of SAD insertion until confirmation of satisfactory SAD placement via video-laryngoscopy)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Aug 2018
- Study startSep 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for General AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Malaya
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Md Ariff bin Md Yusof, University of Malaya
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03643029
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018517-6295
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 20 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 23 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Timmermann A, Bergner UA, Russo SG. Laryngeal mask airway indications: new frontiers for second-generation supraglottic airways. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Dec;28(6):717-26. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000262.
PubMed 26539790Van Zundert AAJ, Gatt SP, Kumar CM, Van Zundert TCRV, Pandit JJ. 'Failed supraglottic airway': an algorithm for suboptimally placed supraglottic airway devices based on videolaryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2017 May 1;118(5):645-649. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex093. No abstract available.
PubMed 28510747Chaw SH, Shariffuddin II, Md Yusof MA, Wong CW, Ruslan SR, Hussain NA, Zainal Abidin MF, van Zundert A. Predicting optimal supraglottic airway device placement: do placement and performance tests measure up? BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Oct 14;25(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03278-6.
PubMed 41087887
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Accuracy of the Performance and Placement Test for Predicting Supraglottic Airway Device (SAD) Position in the Hypopharynx as Confirmed With Video Laryngoscopy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03643029
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2018517-6295
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MalayaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The supraglottic airway device (SAD) is currently widely used in patients undergoing general anaesthesia as a method of securing the airway. The usage of SAD does not require the patient to be paralysed prior to insertion, as opposed to an endotracheal tube.
Five tests have been recommend to ensure that the SAD can be used for advanced procedure after a blind insertion. These tests however are not confirmed with visual validation and hence the confirmation of optimal position can be misleading.
This study is conducted to validate by video laryngoscopy the five recommended tests for confirming the placement and efficacy of a SAD, thus enabling its safe application in institutions with limited availability of video laryngoscopes.
Subjects for this study will consist of patients scheduled for procedures under general anaesthesia in the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) who are amenable to supraglottic airway management.
Detailed description
The five tests are divided into placement and performance tests.
The placement tests are:-
- Suprasternal notch test: a gel plug is inserted in the proximal one centimetre of the gastric drain outlet. Gentle tapping of the suprasternal notch will cause the gel to pulsate. This confirms the location of the gastric outlet tip is behind the cricoid cartilage.
- Bubble test: when ventilating the SAD, the gel plug in the gastric drain outlet will not move. This confirms the location of the gastric outlet tip is behind the cricoid cartilage.
- Insertion of 14G gastric tube (Ryle's tube) into the gastric drain outlet. Ease of insertion grading:-
1 - Easy 2 - Difficult 3 - Impossible
Confirmation of correct gastric tube placement is through detection of injected air by auscultation of the epigastrium and/or aspiration of gastric contents.
The performance tests are:-
- Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP): measured by closing the adjustable pressure-limiting (APL) valve at 30cmH2O with a fresh gas flow of 3 L/min, noting the airway pressure at equilibrium or when there is an audible air leak detected from the throat.
- Maximum minute ventilation (MMV) test: performed by hand-ventilating the SAD with four maximal insufflations within 15 seconds (APL valve set to 30cmH2O) to obtain the exhaled tidal volume.
MMV (in L/min):- 4 x (breaths/15 seconds) x (exhaled tidal volume)
The visual-guided grading system for the placement of SAD is divided into optimal (Grade 1) and suboptimal (Grade 2 and 3) views.
Optimal view is recorded when the direct view of SAD in the hypopharynx fulfils all these conditions:-
- The epiglottis is in upright position
- The distal cuff of SAD is in the oesophagus
- The rim of proximal cuff and tip of epiglottis is aligned
- The epiglottis is resting on outside of the proximal cuff
- The proximal cuff is fully deployed after cuff inflation
Suboptimal view is recorded when the direct view of SAD in the hypopharynx follows these conditions:-
- The epiglottis is downfolded or folded sideways
- The distal cuff is folded over backwards or the distal cuff is between and across the vocal cords
- The rim of proximal cuff and the tip of the epiglottis are not aligned
- The epiglottis is sitting in the bowl of the SAD
- The proximal cuff is distorted after cuff inflation
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients scheduled for procedures under general anaesthesia in the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) who are amenable to supraglottic airway management.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- - American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class IV and above
- - morbid obesity (BMI > 40kg/m2)
- - high risk of regurgitation or aspiration (e.g. symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux, hiatus hernia)
- - respiratory tract pathology (e.g. preoperative sore throat)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Video-laryngoscopy following SAD insertionFollowing insertion of a supraglottic airway device (SAD), the placement and performance tests are carried out. If the tests are successful, a video-laryngoscopy will be performed to confirm the placement of the SAD in the hypopharynx. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
To evaluate the accuracy of the performance and placement tests for predicting SAD position in the hypopharynx as confirmed with video laryngoscopy
Time frame: Intraoperative (from commencement of SAD insertion until confirmation of satisfactory SAD placement via video-laryngoscopy)
If all five placement and performance tests are successful, optimal (Grade 1) view of the SAD from video-laryngoscopy is expected.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Aug 2018.
- Background: PubMed 26539790Timmermann A, Bergner UA, Russo SG. Laryngeal mask airway indications: new frontiers for second-generation supraglottic airways. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Dec;28(6):717-26. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000262.
- Background: PubMed 28510747Van Zundert AAJ, Gatt SP, Kumar CM, Van Zundert TCRV, Pandit JJ. 'Failed supraglottic airway': an algorithm for suboptimally placed supraglottic airway devices based on videolaryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2017 May 1;118(5):645-649. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex093. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41087887Chaw SH, Shariffuddin II, Md Yusof MA, Wong CW, Ruslan SR, Hussain NA, Zainal Abidin MF, van Zundert A. Predicting optimal supraglottic airway device placement: do placement and performance tests measure up? BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Oct 14;25(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03278-6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for General Anesthesia
RecruitingPhase 3
Sevoflurane vs. Propofol for General Anesthesia in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Endovascular Therapy
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Large Vessel Occlusion
Recruiting
Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh Style Blades for Intubation in Obstetric Patients
Obstetric, Cesarean Birth
Active, not recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia in Pulsed-Field Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal)
Recruiting
Moni-Patch Temperature Data Collection for Algorithm Development During Surgery
Body Temperature Monitoring
Recruiting
Processed Electroencephalography-guided General Anesthesia and Outcomes in Major Abdominal Surgery
Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Video-laryngoscopy following SAD insertion in people with General Anesthesia and Supraglottic Airway Device, run by University of Malaya.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Md Ariff Md Yusof, Dr (+6012-6066704, mamy2517@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To evaluate the accuracy of the performance and placement tests for predicting SAD position in the hypopharynx as confirmed with video laryngoscopy (time frame: Intraoperative (from commencement of SAD insertion until confirmation of satisfactory SAD placement via video-laryngoscopy)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03643029, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Aug 2018.