AzTrials
AzTrials

Ankle ArthritisNCT03650010

Total Ankle Replacement: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes

An observational study of Ankle Arthritis, run by I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio at 1 site in Italy.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This retrospective and prospective study intends to evaluate the epidemiology and effectiveness of ankle joint surgery in patients operated from January 2011 to March 2026, evaluating the results both clinically and radiographically. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Ankle Arthritis
What is being tested?
Total ankle replacement
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
1,066 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
11 May 2016to 31 Mar 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: 1066 patients who underwent total ankle replacement

Who may be able to join

  • Males and females
  • age ≥ 18 years at the time of surgery
  • patients who underwent ankle replacement surgery from January 2011 to March 2026

Who cannot join

  • age < 18 years at the time of surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Irccs Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi

    Milan, Milano, 20156

    Federico Usuelli, MD, +39‭335 7351838‬, fusuelli@gmail.com

    Federico Usuelli, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Epidemiology and Radiological and Clinical Outcomes in Total Ankle Prosthesis

This retrospective and prospective study intends to evaluate the epidemiology and effectiveness of ankle joint surgery in patients operated from January 2011 to March 2026, evaluating the results both clinically and radiographically.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to evaluate radiographically and clinically using clinical and radiographic outcomes . Few studies exist in the literature and rarely report fix-bearing and mobile-bearing prosthetics [1-4]. Therefore the data related to this study can be considered a reference in the literature.

Patients who performed and will perform ankle prosthesis surgery from January 2011 to March 2026 and who underwent a clinical evaluation (also using questionnaires and scores) and radiographic evaluation.

The clinical data and radiological parameters were collected together with the visits and the procedures prescribed according to the clinical routine of the department.

Conditions
Ankle Arthritis
Being tested
Total ankle replacement

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Total ankle replacementProcedure or surgery

    total ankle prosthesis through a lateral or an anterior approach

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in American orthopaedic foot and ankle society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score

    The American orthopaedic foot and ankle society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score combines subjective scores of pain and function provided by the patient with objective scores based on the surgeon's physical examination of the patient (to assess sagittal motion, hindfoot motion, ankle-hindfoot stability and alignment of the ankle-hindfoot). The scale includes nine items that can be divided into three subscales (pain, function and alignment). Pain consists of one item with a maximal score of 40 points, indicating no pain. Function consists of seven items with a maximal score of 50 points, indicating full function. Alignment consists of one item with a maximal score of 10 points, indicating good alignment. The maximal score is 100 points, indicating no symptoms or impairments.

    Measured: Pre operatively, 2 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, 24-36-48-60-72-84-96-108-120 months post-operatively

  2. Changes in Short form 12 (SF 12)

    The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form survey with 12 questions, all selected from the SF-36 Health Survey (Ware, Kosinski, and Keller, 1996). The questions were combined, scored, and weighted to create two scales that provide glimpses into mental and physical functioning and overall health-related-quality of life. Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS \& MCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.

    Measured: Pre operatively, 2 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, 24-36-48-60-72-84-96-108-120 months post-operatively

  3. Anterior distal tibial angle

    (ADTA: normal value 83.0 ± 3.6 degrees). The angle is subtended by the anatomic axis of the tibia and the line connecting the distal points on the anterior and posterior tibial articular surface on the anterior side (Figure 1). The tibia axis was defined as the line connecting the centres of two circles designed over the proximal and the distal tibia adjusting their radius to the anterior and posterior tibial cortices.

    Measured: Pre operatively

  4. Changes in beta angle

    β-angle (normal value 85.0 ± 2.0 degrees). This angle is subtended anteriorly by the longitudinal axis of the tibia and the articular surface of the tibial component on the lateral view

    Measured: 2 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, 24-36-48-60-72-84-96-108-120 months post-operatively

  5. Changes in alpha angle

    the α-angle is formed by the angle between the anatomic axis of the tibia and the articular surface of the tibial component on the AP view (normal value 90.0 ± 2.0 degrees)

    Measured: 2 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, 24-36-48-60-72-84-96-108-120 months post-operatively

  6. Medial distal tibial angle

    It is the angle between the anatomic axis of the tibia and the line connecting the distal point on the medial and lateral articular surface. (normal value 92.4 ± 3.1 degrees).

    Measured: Pre operatively

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Changes in visual analogue scale

    The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale (VAS) is a psychometric response scale. When responding to a VAS item, respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points.

    Measured: Pre operatively, 2 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, 24-36-48-60-72-84-96-108-120 months post-operatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Aug 2018
  2. Study start11 May 2016
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
1,066 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03650010
Sponsor's protocol ID
Tarus
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
8 Dec 2017
Last updated
28 Aug 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Ankle Arthritis, run by I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in American orthopaedic foot and ankle society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score (time frame: Pre operatively, 2 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, 24-36-48-60-72-84-96-108-120 months post-operatively). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in