Fungal InfectionNCT03650439
Fungal Infections in Patients With Hematological Malignancies
An observational study of Fungal Infection, run by Assiut University.
Trial summary
Report the prevalence of fungal infections among patients with hematological malignancies in South Egypt Cancer Institute. * Detect the most endemic fungal pathogen isolated from patients with hematological malignancies in South Egypt Cancer Institute. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Fungal Infection
- What is being tested?
- culture on Sabouraud's Dextrose Agar (SDA)
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2018to 31 Oct 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: study design that is intended to include adult patients with fungal infections as acomplication in hematologicayl malignant patients who would be recruited from South Egypt Cancer Institute outpatient clinic or inpatient ward
Who may be able to join
- Immunocompromised adult patient with hematological malignancy , risky to fungal infection as
- patients receiving cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy. Patients with prolonged and deep neutropenia.
- patients exposed to prolonged use of antibiotic , prolonged Foley catheter drainage peripheral I.V catheters, corticosteroid use
- patients have presentations of fungal infection such as pulmonary infections ( pneumonia , sinusitis). and disseminated infection manifested commonly as skin lesions or soft tissue involvement .
Who cannot join
- Non hematologicaly malignant patients .
- Any contraindication regarding procedure as:
- Local infection or distorted anatomy at the potential puncture site (eg, from previous surgical interventions,congenital or acquired malformations, or burns)
- Severe peripheral vascular disease of the limb involved
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Fungal Infections In Patients With Hematological Malignancies In South Egypt Cancer Institute
- Report the prevalence of fungal infections among patients with hematological malignancies in South Egypt Cancer Institute. * Detect the most endemic fungal pathogen isolated from patients with hematological malignancies in South Egypt Cancer Institute. *Antifungal susceptibility testing which guide the optimal approach to treat fungal infections. * detection of resistant gene expression by real time PCR. * Fungal genome sequencing analysis to determine the genetic back ground upon which mutation and resistance occur.
Read the detailed description
Patients with hematologi¬cal malignancies are at increased risk of infections, not only because of the malignancy itself, but also because of neutropenia induced by intensive chemotherapy and its cyto¬toxic effect on the cells that line the gastrointestinal tract [1].
Invasive fungal infection (IFI) causes morbidity and mortality among patients with hematological malignancy.
The incidence of IFI has increased worldwide over the last two decades[2]. Major risk factors for IFI include neutropenia <500 neutrophils/ml for more than 10 days, bone marrow transplantation, prolonged (>4 wk) treatment with corticosteroids; prolonged (>7 days) stays in intensive care, chemotherapy, HIV infection, invasive medical procedures, and the newer immune suppressive agents. Other risk factors are malnutrition, solid organ transplantation, severe burns and major surgery [3].
Invasive aspergillosis (IA) and invasive candidiasis are the main invasive fungal diseases associated with bloodstream Infections. Although invasive yeasts, such as Candida spp., and molds, such as Aspergillus spp., are the predominant pathogens of IFIs, other uncommon and difficult-to-treat molds, such as Mucorales, Fusarium spp., and phaeohyphomycetes, have emerged in patients with hematological malignancies [4].
Early initiation of the correct antifungal therapy has been demonstrated to have a direct impact on the patient's outcome[5]. The increased use of antifungals has induced a higher selective pressure on fungal strains and resistance has emerged in two main ways: several species have developed secondary resistance and susceptible species have been replaced by resistant ones,changing the epidemiology of fungal infections[6]. Among the most common mechanisms of antifungal drug resistance are changes in the biosynthetic pathways targeted by drugs [7]. Genomics technology and the use of DNA microarrays have facilitated the identification of targets of novel antifungal drugs[8]. the molecular understanding of resistance mechanisms may identify fungal genes with mutations associated with resistance. Resistance mediated by alterations in Erg11/Cyp51 (targets of azoles) has been widely documented, involving either mutations or upregulation of their genes in Candida or Aspergillus species [9]. Up regulation of CDR1, CDR2, and MDR1 has been demonstrated in azole-resistant C. albicans [10]. Genome sequencing can type known drug resistance mutations , in some cases suggesting whether particular drugs will fail to control an infection .Whole genome variants could be screened for point mutations in specific drug targets that are highly correlated with resistance . for example , specific mutations in the target of azole drugs [11] .or in the transcription factors that control the expression of drug efflux transporters [12] can be identified from whole genome sequence data only in isolates that display drug resistance [13]. There are two general approaches for genomic analysis of fungal pathogens. One involves generation of a genome assembly de novo, such as for a species that has not been previously sequenced and assembled. In the other approach, commonly termed re-sequencing, variants are identified between an existing reference assembly and a sequenced isolate via alignment of sequence reads to the reference. However, the choice of technology selected to generate the sequence is influenced both by the approach selected and by the goals of the study .[14]
- Conditions
- Fungal Infection
- Being tested
- culture on Sabouraud's Dextrose Agar (SDA)
- Medical subject headings
- Mycoses
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
culture on Sabouraud's Dextrose Agar (SDA)Diagnostic test
Also called E test
- Clinical samples will be cultured onto Sabouraud's Dextrose Agar (SDA) plates supplemented with chloramphenicol. the culture was incubated at 25 C° and at 37° C (for yeasts and moulds isolation )
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
identification of endemic fungal pathogen in patients with hematological malignancies south Egypt cancer institute.
Detect the most endemic fungal pathogen isolated from clinical sampels of patients with hematological malignancies in South Egypt Cancer Institute.
Measured: one year study
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Aug 2018
- Study start1 Oct 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Sep 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Oct 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Fungal InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ahmed Qwashty, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03650439
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- fungal infections
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 28 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Fungal Infections In Patients With Hematological Malignancies In South Egypt Cancer Institute
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03650439
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- fungal infections
- Conditions
- Fungal Infection
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
- Report the prevalence of fungal infections among patients with hematological malignancies in South Egypt Cancer Institute. * Detect the most endemic fungal pathogen isolated from patients with hematological malignancies in South Egypt Cancer Institute. *Antifungal susceptibility testing which guide the optimal approach to treat fungal infections. * detection of resistant gene expression by real time PCR. * Fungal genome sequencing analysis to determine the genetic back ground upon which mutation and resistance occur.
Detailed description
Patients with hematologi¬cal malignancies are at increased risk of infections, not only because of the malignancy itself, but also because of neutropenia induced by intensive chemotherapy and its cyto¬toxic effect on the cells that line the gastrointestinal tract [1].
Invasive fungal infection (IFI) causes morbidity and mortality among patients with hematological malignancy.
The incidence of IFI has increased worldwide over the last two decades[2]. Major risk factors for IFI include neutropenia <500 neutrophils/ml for more than 10 days, bone marrow transplantation, prolonged (>4 wk) treatment with corticosteroids; prolonged (>7 days) stays in intensive care, chemotherapy, HIV infection, invasive medical procedures, and the newer immune suppressive agents. Other risk factors are malnutrition, solid organ transplantation, severe burns and major surgery [3].
Invasive aspergillosis (IA) and invasive candidiasis are the main invasive fungal diseases associated with bloodstream Infections. Although invasive yeasts, such as Candida spp., and molds, such as Aspergillus spp., are the predominant pathogens of IFIs, other uncommon and difficult-to-treat molds, such as Mucorales, Fusarium spp., and phaeohyphomycetes, have emerged in patients with hematological malignancies [4].
Early initiation of the correct antifungal therapy has been demonstrated to have a direct impact on the patient's outcome[5]. The increased use of antifungals has induced a higher selective pressure on fungal strains and resistance has emerged in two main ways: several species have developed secondary resistance and susceptible species have been replaced by resistant ones,changing the epidemiology of fungal infections[6]. Among the most common mechanisms of antifungal drug resistance are changes in the biosynthetic pathways targeted by drugs [7]. Genomics technology and the use of DNA microarrays have facilitated the identification of targets of novel antifungal drugs[8]. the molecular understanding of resistance mechanisms may identify fungal genes with mutations associated with resistance. Resistance mediated by alterations in Erg11/Cyp51 (targets of azoles) has been widely documented, involving either mutations or upregulation of their genes in Candida or Aspergillus species [9]. Up regulation of CDR1, CDR2, and MDR1 has been demonstrated in azole-resistant C. albicans [10]. Genome sequencing can type known drug resistance mutations , in some cases suggesting whether particular drugs will fail to control an infection .Whole genome variants could be screened for point mutations in specific drug targets that are highly correlated with resistance . for example , specific mutations in the target of azole drugs [11] .or in the transcription factors that control the expression of drug efflux transporters [12] can be identified from whole genome sequence data only in isolates that display drug resistance [13]. There are two general approaches for genomic analysis of fungal pathogens. One involves generation of a genome assembly de novo, such as for a species that has not been previously sequenced and assembled. In the other approach, commonly termed re-sequencing, variants are identified between an existing reference assembly and a sequenced isolate via alignment of sequence reads to the reference. However, the choice of technology selected to generate the sequence is influenced both by the approach selected and by the goals of the study .[14]
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- study design that is intended to include adult patients with fungal infections as acomplication in hematologicayl malignant patients who would be recruited from South Egypt Cancer Institute outpatient clinic or inpatient ward
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Immunocompromised adult patient with hematological malignancy , risky to fungal infection as
- patients receiving cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy. Patients with prolonged and deep neutropenia.
- patients exposed to prolonged use of antibiotic , prolonged Foley catheter drainage peripheral I.V catheters, corticosteroid use
- patients have presentations of fungal infection such as pulmonary infections ( pneumonia , sinusitis). and disseminated infection manifested commonly as skin lesions or soft tissue involvement .
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Non hematologicaly malignant patients .
- Any contraindication regarding procedure as:
- Local infection or distorted anatomy at the potential puncture site (eg, from previous surgical interventions,congenital or acquired malformations, or burns)
- Severe peripheral vascular disease of the limb involved
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| culture on Sabouraud's Dextrose Agar (SDA)Also: E test• Clinical samples will be cultured onto Sabouraud's Dextrose Agar (SDA) plates supplemented with chloramphenicol. the culture was incubated at 25 C° and at 37° C (for yeasts and moulds isolation ) | Diagnostic test | – |
Primary outcome
identification of endemic fungal pathogen in patients with hematological malignancies south Egypt cancer institute.
Time frame: one year study
Detect the most endemic fungal pathogen isolated from clinical sampels of patients with hematological malignancies in South Egypt Cancer Institute.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Aug 2018.
Related trials for Fungal Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About How a New Pneumococcal Vaccine Works in Infants
Pneumococcal Disease
Not yet recruiting
Early Pathophysiology of Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Prediction of the Risk of Progression: a Prospective Cohort
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Dosing of Brentuximab Vedotin for Mycosis Fungoides, Sezary Syndrome Patients
Mycosis Fungoides, Lymphomatoid Papulosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Fungal Infection, run by Assiut University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact fatma adel (00201065703188, fatmahaseib@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
identification of endemic fungal pathogen in patients with hematological malignancies south Egypt cancer institute. (time frame: one year study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2018.