Pediatric OncologyNCT03650530
The Family Talk Intervention in Pediatric Oncology
A study testing The Family Talk Intervention in people with Pediatric Oncology, run by Ersta Sköndal University College at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
Even though most children with cancer now survive the ill child has to go through painful treatments which include suffering and uncertainty for all family members. The overall aim is to evaluate a modified version of the Family Talk Intervention (FTI) among families affected by childhood cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pediatric Oncology
- What is being tested?
- The Family Talk Intervention
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 27 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2018to 31 Aug 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- One of the children in the family, the ill child or the sibling(s), have to be between 6-19 years old
- At least one adult and one child in the age 6-19 from the same family have to participate
- The family members have to understand and talk Swedish
Who cannot join
- Families with children only under 6 years or over 19 years
- Families were only the parent(s) or the children want to participate
- Families that do not speak and write Swedish.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Family Talk Intervention Among Families With Childhood Cancer
Even though most children with cancer now survive the ill child has to go through painful treatments which include suffering and uncertainty for all family members. The overall aim is to evaluate a modified version of the Family Talk Intervention (FTI) among families affected by childhood cancer. The goals of FTI are to increase family communication, the family members' resilience, knowledge about the illness, and thereby reduce the family members' long-term psychosocial well-being. Specific aims are to assess the feasibility (Aim 1) and the possible effects of the FTI (Aim 2).
Two to three months after diagnosis families at one of six pediatric oncology units in Sweden will be recruited to FTI. All families at this unit who have a child (with cancer and/or sibling) in the age of 6 to 19 will be asked to participate. The recruitment will continuing for 9 months.
Read more
The core elements in the intervention are to support: 1) the families in talking about the illness and related subjects, 2) the parents in understanding the needs of their children and how to support them, and 3) the families in identifying their strengths and how to use them. FTI entails six meetings with two interventionists (with the whole family and with the individual members of the family) at 1-2 weekly intervals.
Questionnaires, interviews and field notes will be used to evaluate the intervention. Time points for data collection: before the intervention starts (baseline), directly after the intervention (follow-up 1) and 6 months after baseline (follow-up 2).
Since few intervention studies (if any) of this kind have been carried out in pediatric oncology in Sweden to date, this study fills a knowledge gap. Research has described how cancer affects the whole family, and the importance of an open and honest communication about the illness in order to reduce the psychological suffering. The interventions presented here are likely to improve communication within the family, which may reduce the risk of long-term psychological distress for all family members.
Read the detailed description
Previous research in pediatric oncology and evaluations from the Swedish Childhood Foundation, which focusing on parents', the ill child's, and the siblings' experiences, conclude that much remains to be done regarding support to families affected by childhood cancer. As there is no scientifically evaluated family-centered psychosocial intervention in pediatric oncology in Sweden intervention studies are needed. This present study, described below, fills a part of this knowledge gap. The overall aim is to evaluate a modified version of the Family Talk Intervention (FTI) among families affected by childhood cancer. The goals of FTI are to increase family communication, the family members' resilience, knowledge about the illness, and thereby reduce the family members' long-term psychosocial well-being. Specific aims are to assess the feasibility (Aim 1) and the possible effects of the FTI (Aim 2).
This is an intervention study that primarily focuses on feasibility. It will consist of an intervention group based on families affected by childhood cancer. One of the children in the family, the ill child or the sibling(s), have to be between 6-19 years old and the inclusion of families will be conducted approximately 2-3 months after the cancer diagnosis or relaps. The whole family or a part of the family can participate in the intervention. A minimum is that at least one adult and one child in the age 6-19 can participate. To participate, the family members have to understand and talk Swedish. All families that meet the inclusion criteria at the pediatric oncology unit at Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital will be asked for participation from September 2018 to May 2019. Nurses at the clinic will identify the families that meet the inclusion criteria's. Information about the study will be sent home to the families by the researchers. One to two weeks later the interventionists will contact the families by phone, inform them about the study, and asked them about participation. Those who are willing to participate will be asked for informed consent.
FTI is a preventive method originally developed for families with a parent with an affective disorder who had children aged 6-18 years. The over-arching aims of the method are not traditional psychotherapeutic intervention. They are instead to support an open, honest and child-centered family communication, and increase understanding of the disease. The intervention also aims to promote parental awareness concerning protective factors (as well as identification of such), such as well-functioning school life, relationships and hobbies among their children. Even if the intervention was developed for families with a parent with depression it has also been tested among families with a severely ill parent who has young children, with positive results. The core elements in the intervention are to: 1) support the families in talking about the illness and related subjects 2) support the parents in understanding the needs of their children and how to support them, and, 3) support the families in identifying their strengths and how to use them. One of the most important principles is respect for the parents. It is important to emphasize the parents' expertise regarding their children.
Since pediatric oncology is yet another context, the intervention has been slightly modified by the research group together with individuals who educate persons in FTI in Sweden. The modified FTI entails six meetings at 1-2 weekly intervals with five extra meetings. The interventionists, who work in pairs, are educated in FTI and have clinical experiences of working with families affected by seriously illness (e.g. as a nurse, counselor, etc.). To support the interventionists a supervisor/educator in FTI will be available. The FTI is manual-based and the interventionists are following a special protocol (here called the logbook). The meetings with the families are held at a place chosen by the families.
Meetings 1-2: include only the parent(s) and focus on the parents' experiences of their situation as well as the consequences of the cancer diagnosis for each family member. During the meeting, each child's situation will be discussed including strengths, problems, worries, the situation in school and with friends, and their social network. The knowledge of the disease will also be a focus. The parent(s) will formulate the goal of the intervention. They can also formulate questions that the interventionist(s) will ask the children in meetings 3.
Meeting 3: interviews will be held with each child (without the parents) concerning the child's life situation, feelings, understanding of the disease, questions and hobbies. The relationship with their parents is discussed as well as the child's social network. The interventionist(s) identifies protective factors from the child's narrative (e.g. well-functioning school life and relationships with friends) as well as risk factors (e.g. poor social network). The child can also formulate questions for the parents and what he/she wants to discuss during the family meeting.
Meeting 4: includes the parent(s) and focuses on the planning of the family meetings. The child's thoughts and questions serve as a guide for the upcoming family meeting.
Meeting 5: is preferably led by the parent(s) to facilitate ongoing and continuous communication within the family, and consists of questions and issues raised earlier by each family member. This family meeting can be seen as a starting point for communication within the family.
Meeting 6: is a follow-up with all family members, held preferably within a month of meeting 5. The meeting is guided by the family members' needs, e.g. communication and parenting.
Various strategies will be implemented during the different meetings including conversation technique, books and different techniques of expression such as drawing and writing. For example the interventionist(s) will use mapping of the children's social network as one technique to assess the support that children receive.
In case of that the intervention not can be finished due to special circumstances extra meetings will be available (meeting 7-11).
Mixed methods, i.e. questionnaires, interviews and notes, will be used to evaluate the FTI.
The primary focus for this study is on the feasibility (Aim 1). Interviews and notes from the logbooks will be analyzed with content analysis and the study process will be observed. As this is a first study in this context, the results of the potential effects (Aim 2) will indicate the direction for further studies. The potential effects will be explored with descriptive statistics (data from the questionnaires) focusing on within effects where descriptive trends of e.g. family communication will be explored. However, the main part of Aim 1 will be answered by interview data from the families, the interventionist and by observations. This study will also contribute to a power calculation for a larger study in this context.
- Conditions
- Pediatric Oncology
- Being tested
- The Family Talk Intervention
- Keywords
- Family-centred intervention, Support program, The Family Talk Intervention
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
The Family Talk InterventionOther
Also called Beardslee's Family Intervention
The family meets two interventionists at six time points.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| The Family Talk Intervention | Experimental | These families will participate in a psychosocial support program. Receives: Other: The Family Talk Intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Survey data on family communication
Changed family Communication will be measured with the Family Communication Scale. The minimum possible score is 10 points, and the maximum possible score is 50 points. A higher score indicates a better level of family communication. Total score of 10-29 represent very low level of communication, 30-35 low level of communication, 36-39 moderate level of communication, 40-44 high level of communication and 45-50 very high level of communication. A step within the framework of very high/high/moderate/low/very low represents a change. Study-specific questions will also be used.
Measured: Baseline (before the intervention start), follow-up 1 (after the end of the intervention, approximately 2 months after baseline) and follow-up 2 (approximately 6 months after baseline)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Survey data on psychosocial health
For the children: Changed psychosocial wellbeing using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0. To create the Psychosocial Health Summary Score, the mean is computed as the sum of the items over the number of items answered in the Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Scales. A 4.5 change in PedsQL score for Child self-report has been determined as a minimum Clinical meaningful difference.
Measured: Baseline (before the intervention start), follow-up 1 (after the end of the intervention, approximately 2 months after baseline) and follow-up 2 (approximately 6 months after baseline)
Survey data regarding knowledge about the illness
Changed knowledge about the illness: Study specific questions will be used, for example open-ended questions to children about the namn of the illness, if someone has talked to them about the treatment, the prognosis, etc.
Measured: Baseline (before the intervention start), follow-up 1 (after the end of the intervention, approximately 2 months after baseline) and follow-up 2 (approximately 6 months after baseline)
Survey data on family satisfaction
Changed family satisfaction measured by the Family Satisfaction Scale. The sum of all items represents a total score ranged 10-50. Total score of 10-29 represent very low satisfaction, 30-35 low satisfaction, 36-39 moderate satisfaction, 40-44 high satisfaction and 45-50 very high satisfaction. A step within the framework of very high/high/moderate/low/very low represents a change.
Measured: Baseline (before the intervention start), follow-up 1 (after the end of the intervention, approximately 2 months after baseline) and follow-up 2 (approximately 6 months after baseline)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Aug 2018
- Study start1 Sep 2018
- Primary completion31 Aug 2019
- Study completion31 Aug 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pediatric OncologyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- An intervention study with a single group design.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ersta Sköndal University College
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Malin Lövgren, Ersta Sköndal University College
- Investigators
- Malin Lövgren, PhD, Principal investigator, Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03650530
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ErstaSUC
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 20 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 3 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: IPD is not planed to be shared with other researchers outside the group.
Publications
Eklund R, Lovgren M. The Family Talk Intervention in Pediatric Oncology: Ill Children's Descriptions of Feasibility and Potential Effects. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Nurs. 2022 May-Jun;39(3):143-154. doi: 10.1177/27527530221068423. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
PubMed 35467434Iveus K, Eklund R, Kreicbergs U, Lovgren M. Family bonding as a result of the family talk intervention in pediatric oncology: Siblings' experiences. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Mar;69(3):e29517. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29517. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
PubMed 34971075Lovgren M, Kreicbergs U, Udo C. Family talk intervention in paediatric oncology: a pilot study protocol. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019 Jan 31;3(1):e000417. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000417. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 30815590
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Family Talk Intervention Among Families With Childhood Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03650530
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ErstaSUC
- Conditions
- Pediatric Oncology
- Keywords
- Family-centred intervention, Support program, The Family Talk Intervention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ersta Sköndal University CollegeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Even though most children with cancer now survive the ill child has to go through painful treatments which include suffering and uncertainty for all family members. The overall aim is to evaluate a modified version of the Family Talk Intervention (FTI) among families affected by childhood cancer. The goals of FTI are to increase family communication, the family members' resilience, knowledge about the illness, and thereby reduce the family members' long-term psychosocial well-being. Specific aims are to assess the feasibility (Aim 1) and the possible effects of the FTI (Aim 2).
Two to three months after diagnosis families at one of six pediatric oncology units in Sweden will be recruited to FTI. All families at this unit who have a child (with cancer and/or sibling) in the age of 6 to 19 will be asked to participate. The recruitment will continuing for 9 months.
The core elements in the intervention are to support: 1) the families in talking about the illness and related subjects, 2) the parents in understanding the needs of their children and how to support them, and 3) the families in identifying their strengths and how to use them. FTI entails six meetings with two interventionists (with the whole family and with the individual members of the family) at 1-2 weekly intervals.
Questionnaires, interviews and field notes will be used to evaluate the intervention. Time points for data collection: before the intervention starts (baseline), directly after the intervention (follow-up 1) and 6 months after baseline (follow-up 2).
Since few intervention studies (if any) of this kind have been carried out in pediatric oncology in Sweden to date, this study fills a knowledge gap. Research has described how cancer affects the whole family, and the importance of an open and honest communication about the illness in order to reduce the psychological suffering. The interventions presented here are likely to improve communication within the family, which may reduce the risk of long-term psychological distress for all family members.
Detailed description
Previous research in pediatric oncology and evaluations from the Swedish Childhood Foundation, which focusing on parents', the ill child's, and the siblings' experiences, conclude that much remains to be done regarding support to families affected by childhood cancer. As there is no scientifically evaluated family-centered psychosocial intervention in pediatric oncology in Sweden intervention studies are needed. This present study, described below, fills a part of this knowledge gap. The overall aim is to evaluate a modified version of the Family Talk Intervention (FTI) among families affected by childhood cancer. The goals of FTI are to increase family communication, the family members' resilience, knowledge about the illness, and thereby reduce the family members' long-term psychosocial well-being. Specific aims are to assess the feasibility (Aim 1) and the possible effects of the FTI (Aim 2).
This is an intervention study that primarily focuses on feasibility. It will consist of an intervention group based on families affected by childhood cancer. One of the children in the family, the ill child or the sibling(s), have to be between 6-19 years old and the inclusion of families will be conducted approximately 2-3 months after the cancer diagnosis or relaps. The whole family or a part of the family can participate in the intervention. A minimum is that at least one adult and one child in the age 6-19 can participate. To participate, the family members have to understand and talk Swedish. All families that meet the inclusion criteria at the pediatric oncology unit at Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital will be asked for participation from September 2018 to May 2019. Nurses at the clinic will identify the families that meet the inclusion criteria's. Information about the study will be sent home to the families by the researchers. One to two weeks later the interventionists will contact the families by phone, inform them about the study, and asked them about participation. Those who are willing to participate will be asked for informed consent.
FTI is a preventive method originally developed for families with a parent with an affective disorder who had children aged 6-18 years. The over-arching aims of the method are not traditional psychotherapeutic intervention. They are instead to support an open, honest and child-centered family communication, and increase understanding of the disease. The intervention also aims to promote parental awareness concerning protective factors (as well as identification of such), such as well-functioning school life, relationships and hobbies among their children. Even if the intervention was developed for families with a parent with depression it has also been tested among families with a severely ill parent who has young children, with positive results. The core elements in the intervention are to: 1) support the families in talking about the illness and related subjects 2) support the parents in understanding the needs of their children and how to support them, and, 3) support the families in identifying their strengths and how to use them. One of the most important principles is respect for the parents. It is important to emphasize the parents' expertise regarding their children.
Since pediatric oncology is yet another context, the intervention has been slightly modified by the research group together with individuals who educate persons in FTI in Sweden. The modified FTI entails six meetings at 1-2 weekly intervals with five extra meetings. The interventionists, who work in pairs, are educated in FTI and have clinical experiences of working with families affected by seriously illness (e.g. as a nurse, counselor, etc.). To support the interventionists a supervisor/educator in FTI will be available. The FTI is manual-based and the interventionists are following a special protocol (here called the logbook). The meetings with the families are held at a place chosen by the families.
Meetings 1-2: include only the parent(s) and focus on the parents' experiences of their situation as well as the consequences of the cancer diagnosis for each family member. During the meeting, each child's situation will be discussed including strengths, problems, worries, the situation in school and with friends, and their social network. The knowledge of the disease will also be a focus. The parent(s) will formulate the goal of the intervention. They can also formulate questions that the interventionist(s) will ask the children in meetings 3.
Meeting 3: interviews will be held with each child (without the parents) concerning the child's life situation, feelings, understanding of the disease, questions and hobbies. The relationship with their parents is discussed as well as the child's social network. The interventionist(s) identifies protective factors from the child's narrative (e.g. well-functioning school life and relationships with friends) as well as risk factors (e.g. poor social network). The child can also formulate questions for the parents and what he/she wants to discuss during the family meeting.
Meeting 4: includes the parent(s) and focuses on the planning of the family meetings. The child's thoughts and questions serve as a guide for the upcoming family meeting.
Meeting 5: is preferably led by the parent(s) to facilitate ongoing and continuous communication within the family, and consists of questions and issues raised earlier by each family member. This family meeting can be seen as a starting point for communication within the family.
Meeting 6: is a follow-up with all family members, held preferably within a month of meeting 5. The meeting is guided by the family members' needs, e.g. communication and parenting.
Various strategies will be implemented during the different meetings including conversation technique, books and different techniques of expression such as drawing and writing. For example the interventionist(s) will use mapping of the children's social network as one technique to assess the support that children receive.
In case of that the intervention not can be finished due to special circumstances extra meetings will be available (meeting 7-11).
Mixed methods, i.e. questionnaires, interviews and notes, will be used to evaluate the FTI.
The primary focus for this study is on the feasibility (Aim 1). Interviews and notes from the logbooks will be analyzed with content analysis and the study process will be observed. As this is a first study in this context, the results of the potential effects (Aim 2) will indicate the direction for further studies. The potential effects will be explored with descriptive statistics (data from the questionnaires) focusing on within effects where descriptive trends of e.g. family communication will be explored. However, the main part of Aim 1 will be answered by interview data from the families, the interventionist and by observations. This study will also contribute to a power calculation for a larger study in this context.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- An intervention study with a single group design.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| The Family Talk Intervention | Experimental | Other: The Family Talk InterventionThese families will participate in a psychosocial support program. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- One of the children in the family, the ill child or the sibling(s), have to be between 6-19 years old
- At least one adult and one child in the age 6-19 from the same family have to participate
- The family members have to understand and talk Swedish
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Families with children only under 6 years or over 19 years
- Families were only the parent(s) or the children want to participate
- Families that do not speak and write Swedish.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| The Family Talk InterventionAlso: Beardslee's Family InterventionThe family meets two interventionists at six time points. | Other | The Family Talk Intervention |
Primary outcome
Survey data on family communication
Time frame: Baseline (before the intervention start), follow-up 1 (after the end of the intervention, approximately 2 months after baseline) and follow-up 2 (approximately 6 months after baseline)
Changed family Communication will be measured with the Family Communication Scale. The minimum possible score is 10 points, and the maximum possible score is 50 points. A higher score indicates a better level of family communication. Total score of 10-29 represent very low level of communication, 30-35 low level of communication, 36-39 moderate level of communication, 40-44 high level of communication and 45-50 very high level of communication. A step within the framework of very high/high/moderate/low/very low represents a change. Study-specific questions will also be used.
3 secondary outcomes
Survey data on psychosocial health
Time frame: Baseline (before the intervention start), follow-up 1 (after the end of the intervention, approximately 2 months after baseline) and follow-up 2 (approximately 6 months after baseline)
Survey data regarding knowledge about the illness
Time frame: Baseline (before the intervention start), follow-up 1 (after the end of the intervention, approximately 2 months after baseline) and follow-up 2 (approximately 6 months after baseline)
Survey data on family satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline (before the intervention start), follow-up 1 (after the end of the intervention, approximately 2 months after baseline) and follow-up 2 (approximately 6 months after baseline)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Feb 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35467434Eklund R, Lovgren M. The Family Talk Intervention in Pediatric Oncology: Ill Children's Descriptions of Feasibility and Potential Effects. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Nurs. 2022 May-Jun;39(3):143-154. doi: 10.1177/27527530221068423. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34971075Iveus K, Eklund R, Kreicbergs U, Lovgren M. Family bonding as a result of the family talk intervention in pediatric oncology: Siblings' experiences. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Mar;69(3):e29517. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29517. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30815590Lovgren M, Kreicbergs U, Udo C. Family talk intervention in paediatric oncology: a pilot study protocol. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019 Jan 31;3(1):e000417. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000417. eCollection 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. IPD is not planed to be shared with other researchers outside the group.
Related trials for Pediatric Oncology
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingObservational study
Psychological Benefits of a Normalized Camping Experience for Children With Cancer
Pediatric Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
An Extension Study Evaluating 6-week Treatment Cycles of Rozanolixizumab in Pediatric Study Participants With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
RecruitingObservational study
The Decision To Enroll In Therapeutic Clinical Trials In A Pediatric Cancer Clinical Network
Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Malin Lövgren, PhD principal investigator
Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing The Family Talk Intervention in people with Pediatric Oncology, run by Ersta Sköndal University College at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Survey data on family communication (time frame: Baseline (before the intervention start), follow-up 1 (after the end of the intervention, approximately 2 months after baseline) and follow-up 2 (approximately 6 months after baseline)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03650530, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Feb 2021.