Orthodontic Appliance ComplicationNCT03653078
Root Proximity During Mini-Screw Insertion Using a Digital Three-Dimensional Printed Guide
A study testing Three dimensional printed digital guide in people with Orthodontic Appliance Complication, run by Cairo University.
Trial summary
Although mini screw insertion is considered as a simple and non-invasive technique, it's a critical procedure which requires precision and accuracy. The placement of mini-screw poses a challenge to the orthodontist, particularly if the space available for mini-screws is limited.4 The proximity to the vital structures… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Orthodontic Appliance Complication
- What is being tested?
- Three dimensional printed digital guide
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2018to 15 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 45 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Orthodontic patients with Angle's Class I bimaxillary protrusion • Patients having average mandibular plane angle
Who cannot join
- Mixed dentition patients
- Smoker patients
- Patients with Increased lower facial height
- Patients with missing posterior teeth
- Bleeding disorders or anticoagulant therapy
- Patients with cleft lip \& palate
- Patients with facial asymmetry
- Patients with transverse maxillary deficiency
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Root Proximity During Mini-Screw Insertion Using a Digital Three-Dimensional Printed Guide Versus Conventional Free Hand Placement Technique in Adult Orthodontic Patients A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
Although mini screw insertion is considered as a simple and non-invasive technique, it's a critical procedure which requires precision and accuracy. The placement of mini-screw poses a challenge to the orthodontist, particularly if the space available for mini-screws is limited.4 The proximity to the vital structures surrounding the proposed mini-screw position necessitates the precise knowledge of the anatomy of the insertion area.5 The incidence of mini-screw to tooth contact in the placement of inter-radicular region was 27%.6 Although failure of mini screw is considered a multi-factorial concern, many studies reported the proximity of a mini-screw to tooth structures is a major risk factor for failure, especially in the inter-radicular inserted mini-screws. guided insertion was believed to give more favorable results. Above all, the recent technology of the scanning and three-dimensional printing could pave the way to construct a simple accurate guide. Additionally all previous studies assessed the insertion accuracy using CBCT post-operatively, that can't be applied on human subjects for ethical reasons. Thus a non-invasive method for assessment of mini-screw insertion should be implemented.
Read the detailed description
PICOs P: Adult orthodontic patients need mini screws in maxillary arch bilaterally for anchorage I: Three dimensional printed digital guide for mini screw insertion C: Conventional free hand insertion technique
- O: Primary outcome: Root proximity
Secondary outcomes:
- Patient discomfort during insertion 17
- Insertion accuracy
- Angular deviation
- Linear deviation
- Failure 18 S: Split Mouth Randomized clinical Trial
- Conditions
- Orthodontic Appliance Complication
- Being tested
- Three dimensional printed digital guide
- Keywords
- Surgical guide, Surgical stent, orthodontic mini screw, temporary anchorage device
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Three dimensional printed digital guideDevice
Also called surgical guide, surgical stent
A CAD/CAM printed plate with a channel for mini-screw insertion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Three dimensional printed digital guide | Experimental | one mini-screw will be inserted in the buccal interradicular space between upper second premolar and first molar using Three dimensional printed digital guide, which is a device deisgned and printed through CAD/CAM technology, it's a printed plate fit on the teeth and buccal mucosa with a channel for mini- screw insertion, mini-screw will be inserted through the plate's channel Receives: Device: Three dimensional printed digital guide |
| Conventional free hand insertion | No intervention | one mini-screw will be inserted in the buccal interradicular space between upper second premolar and first molar using conventional free hand insertion of mini-screw, which is a technique using the guiding anatomy for mini-screw insertion using the driver and the operator's skill. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Root proximity
Distance between inserted mini screw and the adjacent roots in microns
Measured: immediately after mini-screw insertion (T0)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Patient discomfort:
Likert scale, it is scale divided into five points to measure the degree of patient discomfort maximum value(5) strongly discomfort, discomfort, neutral, little discomfort, and minimum value (0)no discomfort
Measured: immediately after mini-screw insertion (T0)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2018
- Study start15 Nov 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion15 Dec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Jan 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Orthodontic Appliance ComplicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- adult orthodontic participants
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hadir Aboshady, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03653078
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CEBD-CU-2018-08-27
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 28 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 31 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Bae MJ, Kim JY, Park JT, Cha JY, Kim HJ, Yu HS, Hwang CJ. Accuracy of miniscrew surgical guides assessed from cone-beam computed tomography and digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jun;143(6):893-901. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.018.
PubMed 23726340Suzuki EY, Suzuki B. Accuracy of miniscrew implant placement with a 3-dimensional surgical guide. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jun;66(6):1245-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.047.
PubMed 18486791
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Root Proximity During Mini-Screw Insertion Using a Digital Three-Dimensional Printed Guide Versus Conventional Free Hand Placement Technique in Adult Orthodontic Patients A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03653078
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CEBD-CU-2018-08-27
- Conditions
- Orthodontic Appliance Complication
- Keywords
- Surgical guide, Surgical stent, orthodontic mini screw, temporary anchorage device
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Although mini screw insertion is considered as a simple and non-invasive technique, it's a critical procedure which requires precision and accuracy. The placement of mini-screw poses a challenge to the orthodontist, particularly if the space available for mini-screws is limited.4 The proximity to the vital structures surrounding the proposed mini-screw position necessitates the precise knowledge of the anatomy of the insertion area.5 The incidence of mini-screw to tooth contact in the placement of inter-radicular region was 27%.6 Although failure of mini screw is considered a multi-factorial concern, many studies reported the proximity of a mini-screw to tooth structures is a major risk factor for failure, especially in the inter-radicular inserted mini-screws. guided insertion was believed to give more favorable results. Above all, the recent technology of the scanning and three-dimensional printing could pave the way to construct a simple accurate guide. Additionally all previous studies assessed the insertion accuracy using CBCT post-operatively, that can't be applied on human subjects for ethical reasons. Thus a non-invasive method for assessment of mini-screw insertion should be implemented.
Detailed description
PICOs P: Adult orthodontic patients need mini screws in maxillary arch bilaterally for anchorage I: Three dimensional printed digital guide for mini screw insertion C: Conventional free hand insertion technique
- O: Primary outcome: Root proximity
Secondary outcomes:
- Patient discomfort during insertion 17
- Insertion accuracy
- Angular deviation
- Linear deviation
- Failure 18 S: Split Mouth Randomized clinical Trial
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- adult orthodontic participants
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Three dimensional printed digital guide | Experimental | Device: Three dimensional printed digital guideone mini-screw will be inserted in the buccal interradicular space between upper second premolar and first molar using Three dimensional printed digital guide, which is a device deisgned and printed through CAD/CAM technology, it's a printed plate fit on the teeth and buccal mucosa with a channel for mini- screw insertion, mini-screw will be inserted through the plate's channel |
| Conventional free hand insertion | No intervention | –one mini-screw will be inserted in the buccal interradicular space between upper second premolar and first molar using conventional free hand insertion of mini-screw, which is a technique using the guiding anatomy for mini-screw insertion using the driver and the operator's skill. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Orthodontic patients with Angle's Class I bimaxillary protrusion • Patients having average mandibular plane angle
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Mixed dentition patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Three dimensional printed digital guideAlso: surgical guide, surgical stentA CAD/CAM printed plate with a channel for mini-screw insertion | Device | Three dimensional printed digital guide |
Primary outcome
Root proximity
Time frame: immediately after mini-screw insertion (T0)
Distance between inserted mini screw and the adjacent roots in microns
1 secondary outcome
Patient discomfort:
Time frame: immediately after mini-screw insertion (T0)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Aug 2018.
- Background: PubMed 23726340Bae MJ, Kim JY, Park JT, Cha JY, Kim HJ, Yu HS, Hwang CJ. Accuracy of miniscrew surgical guides assessed from cone-beam computed tomography and digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jun;143(6):893-901. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.018.
- Background: PubMed 18486791Suzuki EY, Suzuki B. Accuracy of miniscrew implant placement with a 3-dimensional surgical guide. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jun;66(6):1245-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.047.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Recruiting
Bacterial Diversity Study Using 16S rRNA Sequencing of Periodontal Samples From Patients With Orthodontic Retainers
Fixed Orthodontic Retainer, Orthodontic Appliances, Removable
Recruiting
Comparison of MI Paste Plus and Resin Infiltration in White Spot Lesions Following Orthodontic Treatment
White Spot Lesions, Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Recruiting
The Effect of Intraoral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Orthodontics Pain
Orthodontic Appliance, Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of a 3-step Bonding System (Transbond™ XT) and a 2-step System (GC Ortho Connect™) on Demineralization Around Maxillary Orthodontic Brackets
Tooth Demineralization, White Spot Lesion
Recruiting
Microbial Adherence, Surface Roughness, Effectiveness and Impact on Patients Between Conventional and 3D Printed Twin Block Appliances
Orthodontic Appliances, Removable, Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Three dimensional printed digital guide in people with Orthodontic Appliance Complication, run by Cairo University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hadir Abo shady, MD (00201001937931, hadiraboshady@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Root proximity (time frame: immediately after mini-screw insertion (T0)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03653078, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.