AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal CarcinomaPhase 2LAVA-CRLMNCT03654131

Microwave Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases in Oligometastatic Disease: a Prospective, Randomised, Phase 2 Trial

A Phase 2 study testing MWA and SBRT in people with Colorectal Carcinoma and Liver Metastases, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The LAVA-CRLM trial (Local Ablation Versus Ablative radiotherapy in ColoRectal Liver Metastases) is a prospective, randomised, phase 2 study designed to compare local control and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) versus stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)in patients with colorectal liver metastases and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Carcinoma, Liver Metastases
What is being tested?
MWA and SBRT
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
25 Jul 2018to 3 Dec 2029
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Colorectal cancer patients with oligo metastatic disease in the liver (1 to 3 tumors), and where metastases are found unsuitable for resection because of
  • non-resectability
  • small metastasis localized deep in the liver, where a parenchyma sparing intervention is preferred over an extensive resection
  • previous extensive liver surgery
  • comorbidity
  • The multidisciplinary team should all agree that both percutaneous or open surgical MW-ablation and SBRT are safe as first treatment choice for the individual patient.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Tumor sizes ≤4.0 cm
  • Age > 18 years
  • Signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Previous radiotherapy to the liver
  • Liver volume < 700 ml
  • Another active cancer disease within the past 36 months
  • Not able to understand written or oral protocol information

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Righospitalet

    Copenhagen

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy vs. Microwave Ablation for Colorectal Cancer Patients With Metastatic Disease in the Liver - a Randomized Phase II Trail

The LAVA-CRLM trial (Local Ablation Versus Ablative radiotherapy in ColoRectal Liver Metastases) is a prospective, randomised, phase 2 study designed to compare local control and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) versus stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)in patients with colorectal liver metastases and oligometastatic disease. Primary endpoint is freedom form local lesion progression.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancer patients with 1-3 liver metastases (diameter ≤4.0 cm) found unsuitable for resection are randomized 1:1 to either MWA or SBRT. Chemotherapy is allowed. Curative treatment of extrahepatic disease must be initiated in patients with lung metastases and/or primary tumors. Patients will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

Being tested
MWA, SBRT
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MWADevice

    Patients are allocated to one of the two arms in a 1:1 randomization

  • SBRTRadiation

    Patients are allocated to one of the two arms in a 1:1 randomization

Study groups in NCT03654131
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MWAActive comparatorPercutaneous ultrasound-guided MWA or open surgery MWA. The patient is fully anesthetized during the treatment.
Receives: Device: MWA
SBRTActive comparator3 fractions of 15 Gy (in total 45 Gy), 3 fractions per week. The dose is prescribed to the PTV encompassing 67% isodose. The SBRT plan is normalized such that the mean dose to the GTV is 100% = 67.5 Gy.
Receives: Radiation: SBRT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Freedom from local lesion progression (analyzed on patient-level)

    • Defined as the time from randomization to local progression
    • Censoring: death from any cause, last follow-up
    • No censoring on disease progression outside of the treated lesions
    • Local lesion progression is defined as >20% increase in the longest diameter and minimum 5 mm increase talking as reference the smallest longest diameter recorded since the treatment started in any of the treated lesions

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Overall survival

    • Defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause
    • Censoring: last follow-up

    Measured: From enrollment to 01/01/2026 - minimum follow-up 1 year after treatment for all randomised patients.

  2. ≥ grade 3 toxicity potentially associated with the treatment

    • Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0

    Measured: 1 month after treatment

  3. Toxicity profile as descriptive statistics

    Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 5.0

    Measured: From enrollment to last follow-up 5 years after treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Aug 2018
  2. Study start25 Jul 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2026
  4. Study completion3 Dec 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
SBRT for oligometastases in the liver from colorectal cancer patients. Standard considered MWA.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03654131
Sponsor's protocol ID
H-18000085
Acronym
LAVA-CRLM
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
27 Aug 2018
Last updated
19 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual participant data will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author after publication of all analyses of the primary and secondary trial endpoints

Publications

  • Risumlund SL, Stick LB, Appelt A, Vogelius IR, Nyhuus B, Schultz NA, Penninga L, van Overeem Felter M, Josipovic M, Larsen PN. Microwave ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic colorectal liver metastases (LAVA-CRLM): a prospective, randomised, phase II trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2026 Sep 25;71:101879. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101879. eCollection 2026 Dec.

    PubMed 42829779

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing MWA and SBRT in people with Colorectal Carcinoma and Liver Metastases, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Freedom from local lesion progression (analyzed on patient-level) (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03654131, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in