AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic PainNCT03654235

Pain Neuroscience Education and Physical Exercise Program in Chronic Back Pain

A study testing Health Education and Physical exercise in people with Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Pain, run by Fundacion para la Investigacion y Formacion en Ciencias de la Salud at 1 site in Spain.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates the effects of a pain neuroscience education (PNE) and physical exercise (PE) program in patients with chronic back pain. Half of participants receive PNE and PE program supervised by a physiotherapist and the other half receive usual physiotherapy care supported by physiotherapy protocols in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain, Back Pain
What is being tested?
Health Education and Physical exercise
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
170 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
1 Feb 2017to 30 Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Nonspecific back pain of at least 6 months.
  • Accept to participate in the study and sign the informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Oncological pain.
  • Spine fracture or surgical intervention in last year.
  • Neurological cognitive alteration that prevents understanding the contents of PNE program (In case of doubt, assesment with Minimental test)
  • Motor control alteration that prevents the execution of the planned PE program (Minimum requirement: execution in normal time of the Timed Up and Go test)
  • Pregnancy.
  • Bladder or bowel incontinence.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Saddle anesthesia.
  • Patients presenting other clinical conditions that may aggravate chronic spinal pain (chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia and complex regional pain syndrome).
  • Patients with associated pathologies that make it impossible to perform physical exercise program.
  • Patients under treatment with alternative therapies.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Federico Montero Cuadrado contact

+34 651529993

fmonteroc@saludcastillayleon.es

Miguel Á. Galán Martín contact

+34 609686744

magalanm@saludcastillayleon.es

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Unidad de estrategias de Afrontamiento Activo para el dolor. Sacyl

    Valladolid, 47011

    Miguel Angel Galán-Martín, 983255400 ext. 88870, magalanm@saludcastillayleon.es

    Federico Montero Cuadrado

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Pain Neuroscience Education and Physical Exercise Program in Patients With Chronic Back Pain. Intervention From Primary Care Physiotherapy Units

This study evaluates the effects of a pain neuroscience education (PNE) and physical exercise (PE) program in patients with chronic back pain. Half of participants receive PNE and PE program supervised by a physiotherapist and the other half receive usual physiotherapy care supported by physiotherapy protocols in primary care.

Read the detailed description

Justification: Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) affects more than 20% of the population, its prevalence is increasing, generating suffering and high health expenditure. The current knowledge of neurophysiology of pain shows that the painful experience in CMP is not necessarily associated with peripheral tissue damage and is due more to an alteration of central mechanisms of pain processing and to the dysfunction of endogenous pain inhibitory mechanisms. Physical exercise (PE) has been shown to be effective in CMP. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) improves the levels of pain catastrophism, Kinesiophobia, quality of life, disability and also modifies maladaptive cognitions that favour a painful response.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of a PNE and PE in patients with chronic back pain (CBP). Changes in pain intensity, pain thresholds, Catastrophism, kinesiophobia, disability, central sensitization and quality of are measured.

Material and methods: Multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) with 170 patients. Intervention group receive 6 sessions of PNE and a 6 weeks PE program (18 sessions) aimed at improving functional capacity, neurogenesis and cerebral plasticity. Control group receive usual physiotherapy treatment (supported by the current protocols in Primary Care in the Health System of Castilla y León). The outcome variables are measured by Visual Analog Scale (EVA), Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), Kinesiophobia Tampa Scale (TKS-11), Central Sensitization Questionnaire (CSC), Pain Catastrophism Questionnaire (CCD), disability (Roland-Morris), Quality of life (SF-36) and satisfaction (CSQ-8). An initial assessment, post-intervention (week 10), at six months and at year is performed. Patients Evaluator and Outcomes Assessor are masked.

Applicability of results: The proposed intervention is simple and reproducible. It can be performed in the Primary Care Physiotherapy Units. It requires few resources, and it can produce changes in pain intensity, functionality and quality of life of patients with CBP

Being tested
Health Education, Physical exercise, Usual care in Primary Care Physiotherapy Units
Medical subject headings
Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain, Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Health EducationOther

    6 pain neuroscience education sessions (10 hours) and delivery of printed reinforcement material.

  • Physical exerciseOther

    Group physical exercise program (18 sessions; 3 sessions/week) leaded by a physiotherapist. It includes exercises to improve strength, coordination, balance and aerobic capacity. Work with double tasks, recreational activities to overcome kinesiophobia and activities to do at home are used in the program.

  • Usual care in Primary Care Physiotherapy UnitsOther

    Treatment supported by the protocol of primary care of physiotherapy in the health service of Castilla y León that was in force at the time of the intervention.

    Patients receive 15 sessions of analgesic electrotherapy, thermotherapy and standardized physical exercise

Study groups in NCT03654235
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PNE and PE programExperimentalPain neuroscience education (Health education) and Physical exercise program.
Receives: Other: Health Education; Other: Physical exercise
Usual care in Primary Care PhysiotherapyActive comparatorUsual care in Primary Care Physiotherapy Units
Receives: Other: Usual care in Primary Care Physiotherapy Units

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Health-related Quality of Life at different time points

    Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) V2. Spanish version. The SF-36 is a 36-item scale constructed to survey health status and quality of life. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate better overall quality of life.

    Measured: Change from baseline to post-treatment, to 6 months and at 12 months follow-up

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Change in Pain assessment at different time points

    Visual analog scale (VAS) scale. The VAS is a 100 mm long horizontal line ranging from '0: no pain at all' on one end to '100: worst pain imaginable' on the other end. Participants mark a point along the line that best represents the pain they are experiencing at that moment. A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.

    Measured: Change from baseline to post-treatment, to 6 months and at 12 months follow-up

  2. Pressure pain threshold.

    Pressure pain threshold (PPT). A digital pressure algometer is used at four standardized points to measure the pressure pain thresholds. Higher values represent a better tolerance to pressure pain.

    Measured: Change from baseline to post-treatment, to 6 months and at 12 months follow-up

  3. Change in Pain Catastrophism at different time points

    Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS). Spanish version. PCS is a short 13-item measure which evaluates the pain-related catastrophizing behaviours and cognitions of individuals. Score range from 0 - 52. A higher score indicates a higher level of catastrophism.

    Measured: Change from baseline to post-treatment, to 6 months and at 12 months follow-up

  4. Change in Kinesiophobia at different time points

    Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11). Spanish version. TSK-11 is a self-report measure that contains 11 questions designed to assess a client's fear of movement and re-injury. Score range from 11 - 44. A higher score indicates a higher level of Kinesiophobia.

    Measured: Change from baseline to post-treatment, to 6 months and at 12 months follow-up

  5. Change in Disability at different time points

    Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Spanish version. It is a self-administered disability questionnaire consisting of 24 questions that are specifically related to physical functions that may be affected by back pain. Score range from 0 - 24. A higher score indicates a higher level of Disability.

    Measured: Change from baseline to post-treatment, to 6 months and at 12 months follow-up

  6. Change in Central sensitization levels at different time points

    Central sensitization Inventory (CSI). Spanish version. Self-report instrument to detect the presence of central sensitization. It is a 25-item questionnaire that records the frequency of each symptom on a Likert scale from 0 (never) to 4 (always), resulting in a possible total score of 100. Higher scores are associated with higher levels of central sensitization.

    Measured: Change from baseline to post-treatment, to 6 months and at 12 months follow-up

  7. Change in Drugs consumption

    Record of consumption by types of drugs. Consumption is evaluated through a survey. The results are expressed in weekly doses per drug type.

    Measured: Change from baseline to post-treatment, to 6 months and at 12 months follow-up

  8. Satisfaction survey. Satisfaction with the treatment

    Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Spanish version. It is is a self-report instrument used to assess satisfaction with health services and it is used to assess participant satisfaction with the treatment. Scores range from 8 - 32. Higher scores are associated with higher satisfaction.

    Measured: at 10 weeks

  9. Modifications of body mass index.

    modification of the body mass index (BMI). Weight in Kg. and Height ill be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2.

    Measured: Change from baseline to post-treatment, to 6 months and at 12 months follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Aug 2018
  2. Study start1 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
170 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03654235
Sponsor's protocol ID
GRS 1396/A/16
Status last verified
Feb 2020
First submitted
24 Aug 2018
Last updated
21 Feb 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Galan-Martin MA, Montero-Cuadrado F, Lluch-Girbes E, Coca-Lopez MC, Mayo-Iscar A, Cuesta-Vargas A. Pain neuroscience education and physical exercise for patients with chronic spinal pain in primary healthcare: a randomised trial protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 3;20(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2889-1.

    PubMed 31679512

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Health Education and Physical exercise in people with Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Pain, run by Fundacion para la Investigacion y Formacion en Ciencias de la Salud at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Federico Montero Cuadrado (+34 651529993, fmonteroc@saludcastillayleon.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Health-related Quality of Life at different time points (time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, to 6 months and at 12 months follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03654235, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in