AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Lung InjuryASTERSNCT03654352

The ASTERS Study: Assessing the Role of Sphingolipids in AcuTE Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

An observational study of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Sturgill at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Acute lung injury (ALI) and the more severe manifestation, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) describe syndromes of acute onset, bilateral, inflammatory pulmonary infiltrates and impaired oxygenation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
8 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
17 Apr 2019to 12 Mar 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit

Who may be able to join

  • Admission to the medical intensive care unit Mechanically ventilated for less than 48 hours Able to consent in English. -

Who cannot join

  • Unable to obtain consent Mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hours Moribund Prisoner or ward of the state Pregnant Less than 18 years old, Metastatic lung cancer.
  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40536

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Assessing the Role of Sphingolipids in AcuTE Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Acute lung injury (ALI) and the more severe manifestation, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) describe syndromes of acute onset, bilateral, inflammatory pulmonary infiltrates and impaired oxygenation. ARDS/ALI are a continuum of disease which results in a life threatening, rapidly progressive illness and occurs in critically ill patients. Recent reports in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) highlight the significant public health impact ARDS/ALI has on the critically ill population in that despite robust research efforts, these illnesses continue to be under diagnosed, under treated, and continue to have a high mortality rate (≥ 40% of all confirmed diagnoses). The estimates for ARDS/ALI incidence vary due to inconsistencies with proper diagnosis and lack of valid biomarkers of disease; however, it is expected that anywhere from 20-50% of patients on mechanical ventilation will develop this disease. Previous work by our group has shown that sphingolipids play a multifaceted role in lung inflammation. Sphingolipid are a class of bioactive lipids that play a role in cellular processes such as apoptosis, cell migration, and adhesion. Ceramide is one species of sphingolipid the investigators have examined in both man and mouse. Our laboratory has shown that ceramide is up-regulated in pulmonary inflammation in mouse models of pneumonitis and is elevated in the exhaled breath condensate of mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ARDS/ALI. Our work coupled with the work of others highlighting a role for ceramide in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), surfactant dysfunction, and infectious disease make ceramide a logical candidate biomarker that warrants further investigation. To our knowledge, there are no studies examining the role of ceramide as a biomarker in ARDS/ALI. Thus, our overarching hypothesis is that ceramide is elevated in the lungs of patients who develop ARDS/ALI. This lipid dysregulation accounts for the pathophysiology seen in this disease and may be a potential pharmacologic target for clinical treatment. Thus the purpose of this exploratory research is to maximize existing specimens to further evaluate ceramide as a biomarker for acute lung injury.

Read the detailed description

Since it was first described in 1967 by Ashbaugh et al, ARDS/ALI remains a global clinical problem resulting in high morbidity and mortality. These lung syndromes are life threatening, rapidly progressive disease occurring in critically ill patients characterized by hypoxemia, alterations in lung mechanics, and edema. Recent reports in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) highlight the significant public health impact ARDS/ALI has on the critically ill population in that despite robust research efforts, ARDS continues to be under diagnosed, under treated, and continues to have a high mortality rate (= 40% of all confirmed diagnoses). The estimates for ARDS/ALI incidence vary due to inconsistencies with proper diagnosis and lack of valid biomarkers of disease; however, it is expected that anywhere from 20-50% of patients on long term mechanical ventilation will develop this disease. Despite this robust effort to better improve patient care, clinicians are still lacking biomarkers of disease and a strong understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of ARDS/ALI. Thus, research is warranted in this area. Many research efforts have been aimed at unifying diagnoses of the disease with clinical criteria, thus the ARDS Task force implemented the Berlin definition of disease in 2012 but despite this, recent data from the Lung SAFE trial showed that clinical recognition of disease was only 34.1% on initial presentation, again emphasizing the need for objective measures of disease.

The oxygenation threshold set forth by the Berlin definition are critical for understanding of ARDS/ALI disease severity and progression. Oxygenation is calculated by the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P/F) which is the the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) as determined by arterial blood gas to fractional inspired oxygen setting on the mechanical ventilator (FiO2). This P/F ratio is also important to distinguish both diagnosis of ARDS but disease severity. A normal healthy P/F ratio is between 400-500 whereas ALI is below 300 (aka Mild ARDS by Berlin definition), ARDS is below 200, and severe ARDS is below 100. These are the same clinical parameters used by our medical intensive care unit (MICU). The current treatment modalities for ARDS/ALI are primarily supportive care in the form of lung protective ventilator management, fluid management, prone positioning, and neuromuscular blockage in severe ARDS. Clinical studies have examined potential pharmacologic therapies including the use of albuterol, anti-platelet therapies, statins, aspirin, and steroids - none of which had any significant benefit on clinical outcomes. Our data in mouse models and preliminary data in a small cohort of patients at risk for ARDS/ALI highlight a novel role for ceramide in the pathophysiology of this disease. Our preliminary data indicate that ceramide may not only be a key player in the underlying pathology of ARDS/ALI, but may also serve as a useful biomarker. Additionally, as there is a currently FDA approved drug that targets ceramide formation and actions as the investigators have demonstrated, the work outlined herein has significant translational potential. Thus, this proposal will examine the premise that ceramide is a new critical player in ARDS/ALI and identify ceramide as a biomarker for individualized medicine to optimize diagnosis and improve treatments. Given the large numbers of individuals affected by ARDS/ALI, the outcomes of this research have the potential to change the paradigm of how clinicians and researchers perceive inflammatory airway disease and may then translate into better, targeted approaches for the management for millions worldwide. This pilot study will be conducted as a prospective descriptive, cross-sectional study with a single data collection. This design allows for greater control over the measurements and maximization of data completeness. While a cross-sectional study design does not allow us to examine causality, it does allow us to examine associations among the variables/domains of interest, which align with the aim of the study. This design is appropriate and scientifically rigorous while meeting the budgetary and time constraints of the grant mechanism. The investigators have developed a state of the science, non-invasive technique which can be utilized to assess sphingolipid levels in the breath of mechanically ventilated subjects. Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is collected using a commercially available device, RTubeVent™ (Respiratory Research Inc., Austin, TX). The RTubeVent™, covered by a frozen aluminum sleeve and fabric cloth sleeve, allows for the cooling of exhaled breath into a condensed liquid form and is a safe, easy, relatively inexpensive, repeatable, non-invasive approach to collect a biological fluid that is hypothesized to be more specific to pulmonary biology changes compared to systemically collected biological fluids such as serum or plasma. The RTubeVENT™ breath condensate collection device is designed for ease of use in the ICU. It can be placed in-line in the expiratory limb of the breathing circuit or at the ventilator exhaust port. This non-invasive device is fully self-contained and disposable. As the subject is ventilated, the RTubeVENT™ gathers breath condensate in a special cartridge designed exclusively for ventilator use. EBC has been identified by the National Institutes of Health as an emerging source for biomarker research thus highlighting another innovative aspect of this proposal. Once patients are enrolled in the study, the investigators will collect EBC from the ventilator for approximately 20 minutes under the guidance of respiratory therapy and take a 5cc blood draw for plasma isolation. Samples will be immediately taken to the laboratory for processing where both EBC and plasma will be aliquoted, and stored at -80°C until analysis. Liquid chromatography electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) will be used to detect sphingolipid levels and samples will be batch processed to minimize variability. The investigators predict that patients in the ARDS/ALI group will have significantly elevated ceramide levels as compared to those in the control group.

Keywords
lung, ceramide, sphingolipid, inflammation, pulmonary, ARDS, ALI
Medical subject headings
Acute Lung Injury, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Inflammation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03654352
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High Risk for ARDS/ALIMechanically ventilated patients with risk factors for the development of ARDS/ALI. These factors are classified into two categories: pulmonary insults, such as pneumonia and extrapulmonary insults such as sepsis.
Low Risk for ARDS/ALIMechanically ventilated patients with low risk factors for the development of ARDS/ALI. These factors include mechanical ventilation for airway protection, pain management, or procedure.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ceramide levels in exhaled breath condensate

    Ceramide is a candidate bio marker we plan to examine to describe patterns of risk factors associated with ARDS/ALI.

    Measured: We plan to do a single time point data collection. Exhaled breath will be collected for 20 minutes.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Aug 2018
  2. Study start17 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion12 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion12 Mar 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
8 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03654352
Sponsor's protocol ID
44569
Acronym
ASTERS
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
29 Aug 2018
Last updated
16 Mar 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Sturgill at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ceramide levels in exhaled breath condensate (time frame: We plan to do a single time point data collection. Exhaled breath will be collected for 20 minutes.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in