Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides FarinaePhase 3MAPITNCT03654976
Mite Asthma Pediatric Immunotherapy Trial
A Phase 3 study testing HDM SLIT-tablet in people with Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides Farinae and Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus, run by ALK-Abelló A/S at 64 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
The trial aims to demonstrate efficacy of the House Dust Mite SLIT-tablet versus placebo as add-on treatment in children and adolescents (5-17 years) with House Dust Mite allergic asthma based on clinically relevant asthma worsening. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides Farinae, Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus, Allergic Rhinitis Due to House Dust Mite
- What is being tested?
- HDM SLIT-tablet
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 533 participants
- Where
- 64 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- 22 Feb 2018to 31 May 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent
- Male or female of any race/ethnicity aged 5-17 years
- A female subject of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test and be willing to practise appropriate contraceptive methods
- A clinical history of HDM allergic asthma
- Use of low daily dose of ICS plus LABA or medium/high daily dose of ICS with or without LABA for the control of asthma symptoms
- A clinical history of asthma exacerbations in the past two years
Show all 17Show fewer
- One or more of the following within the past 4 weeks prior to randomisation:
- Daytime asthma symptoms more than twice/week
- Any nocturnal awakening due to asthma
- SABA rescue medication needed for treatment of asthma symptoms
- Any activity limitation due to asthma
- Lung function measured by FEV1 ≥ 70% of predicted value or according to local requirements
- Clinical history of HDM AR within the last year prior to randomisation
- An average TCRS>0 during the baseline period
- Positive specific IgE (defined as ≥class 2, ≥0.70 kU/l) against D. pteronyssinus and/or D. farinae at screening
- Positive SPT to D. pteronyssinus and/or D. farinae at screening
- Subject willing and able to comply with trial protocol
Who cannot join
- Is sensitised and regularly exposed to animal dander, molds, and/or cockroach or other perennial allergen
- Has experienced a life-threatening asthma attack
- Within the last month before the randomisation visit (visit 3), has had an occurrence of any clinical deterioration of asthma that resulted in emergency treatment, hospitalisation, or treatment with systemic corticosteroids
- Within the last 3 months before the randomisation visit (visit 3) while on high dose ICS treatment, has had an occurrence of any clinical deterioration of asthma that resulted in emergency treatment, hospitalisation, or treatment with systemic corticosteroids
- Any SLIT or SCIT treatment with D. pteronyssinus or D. farinae within the previous 12 months
- Ongoing treatment with any allergy immunotherapy product
Show all 19Show fewer
- Any clinically relevant condition or chronic disease incl. malignancy that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with the trial evaluations or the safety of the subject
- Has a diagnosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis
- A relevant history of systemic allergic reactions
- Ongoing treatment with OCS
- Treatment with restricted and prohibited concomitant medication
- Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days/5 half-lives of the drug (which ever longest) prior to screening
- A history of allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to any of the excipients or active substance of the IMP (except D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae) or to any excipient of the rescue medication provided in this trial
- A business or personal relationship with trial staff or sponsor who is directly involved with the conduct of the trial
- A history of alcohol or drug abuse
- Has previously been randomised into this trial, is participating in this trial at another investigational site or is participating or planning to participate in any other clinical trial during the duration of this trial
- Has a history or current evidence of any condition, treatment, laboratory values out of range or other circumstance that in the opinion of the investigator are clinically relevant and might expose the subject to risk by participating in the trial, confound the results of the trial, or interfere with the subject's participation for the full duration of the trial
- Has a condition or treatment that increase the risk of the subject developing severe adverse reactions after adrenaline/epinephrine administration
- Is unable to or will not comply with the use of adrenaline/epinephrine auto-injectors for countries where this is a regulatory requirement
Trial locations and contacts
64 sites in 9 countries.
64 sites in 9 countries
Poland15 sites
NZOZ E-Vita
Bialystok
Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska Gabinet Pediatryczno-Alergologiczny
Bialystok
Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska
Katowice
Centrum Medyczne PROMED
Krakow
Centrum Nowoczesnych Terapii
Krakow
WWCOiT
Lodz
ALERGOTEST s.c. Specjalistyczne Centrum Medyczne
Lublin
Uniwersytecki Szpital Dzieciecy w Lublinie
Lublin
Ostrowieckie Centrum Medyczne S.C.
Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski
Prywatny Gabinet Lekarski
Rzeszów
NSZOZ Puls
Skarżysko-Kamienna
ETG Skierniewice
Skierniewice
ALERGO-MED Specjalistyczna
Tarnów
Dobrostan
Wroclaw
Specjalist.
Zabrze
Russia11 sites
Kazan State Medical University 138
Kazan'
First Moscow State Medical University
Moscow
Clinical and Diagnostic Centre "Zdorovie"
Rostov-on-Don
Rayzan Regional Children Hospital
Ryazan
City children's polyclinic #35
Saint Petersburg
GBUZ "Children Municipal Polyclinic #45"
Saint Petersburg
LLC ArsVite Severo-Zapad
Saint Petersburg
LLC Kurator
Saint Petersburg
GBUZ "Samarskiy oblastnoy detskiy sanatoriy "Yunost" 9-proseka
Samara
LLC 'ArsVitae Samara'
Samara
Siberian State Medical University
Tomsk
Bulgaria8 sites
MHAT
Plovdiv
UMBAL "St. Georgy"
Plovdiv
SHATPPD
Rousse
Medical Center-1-Sevlievo EOOD
Sevlievo
Alitera-Med-Medical Center EOOD
Sofia
MBAL Tokuda Hospital Sofia
Sofia
Medical Center Excelsior
Sofia
DCC Ritam 2010
Stara Zagora
United States7 sites
Private Clinic
Bangor, Pennsylvania, 04401
TTS research
Boerne, Texas, 78006
Columbus Regional Research Institute
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
Miami Clinical Research
Miami, Florida, 33155
STAAMP Research
San Antonio, Texas, 78251
Allergy Consultants
Verona, Pennsylvania, 07044
Respiratory Medicine Research Institute of MI
Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197
Spain7 sites
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona
Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón
Barcelona
Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga
Málaga
Hospital de Sagunto
Sagunto
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander
Hospital de Conxo
Santiago de Compostela
Hospital de la Plana
Villarreal
Hungary6 sites
Bajai Szent Rókus Kórház
Baja
Heim Pal Children's Hospital
Budapest
Semmelweis Egyetem
Budapest
Kanizsai Dorottya Korhaz
Nagykanizsa
Szent István Rendelő és Patika
Ráckeve
Aranyklinika Kft
Szeged
France5 sites
Hopital Augustin Morvan
Brest
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen
Caen
Centre hospitalier intercommunal
Créteil
Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre
Lille
Groupe hospitalier Armand Trousseau - La Roche Guyon
Paris
Germany3 sites
Kinderarzt-Praxis Bramsche
Bramsche
Kinderarztpraxis Ludwigsfelde
Ludwigsfelde
Kinderarztpraxis
Wuppertal
United Kingdom2 sites
Royal Manchester Children's Hospital - Paediatrics Oxford Road
Manchester
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the House Dust Mite (HDM) Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT)-Tablet in Children and Adolescents (5-17 Years) With HDM Allergic Asthma
The trial aims to demonstrate efficacy of the House Dust Mite SLIT-tablet versus placebo as add-on treatment in children and adolescents (5-17 years) with House Dust Mite allergic asthma based on clinically relevant asthma worsening.
Read the detailed description
The trial aims to demonstrate efficacy of the HDM SLIT-tablet versus placebo as add-on treatment in children and adolescents (5-17 years) with HDM allergic asthma based on clinically relevant asthma exacerbations.
Additionally, the trial will investigate if the treatment has an effect on asthma symptoms including nightly awakenings due to asthma, asthma medication use, asthma control, lung function, allergic rhinitis and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
Finally, quality of life (QoL) for subjects and caregivers will be measured.
The trial is a randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-national phase III trial conducted in Europe and North America. The treatment period will be approximately 2 years. Subjects will receive a written asthma action plan.
- Conditions
- Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides Farinae, Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus, Allergic Rhinitis Due to House Dust Mite
- Being tested
- HDM SLIT-tablet, Placebo
- Keywords
- Allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, HDM, pediatric
- Medical subject headings
- Rhinitis, Allergic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HDM SLIT-tabletBiological
Also called Acarizax, Odactra
Sublingual allergy immunotherapy tablet, for daily administration (1 tablet per day)
PlaceboOther
Placebo sublingual tablet, for daily administration (1 tablet per day)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active treatment | Experimental | Subject's ICS or ICS/LABA background medication plus HDM SLIT-tablet Receives: Biological: HDM SLIT-tablet |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Subject's ICS or ICS/LABA background medication plus placebo oral tablet Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Annualized Rate of Clinically Relevant Asthma Exacerbations
The primary endpoint of the trial was the annualized rate of clinically relevant asthma exacerbations calculated as the number of exacerbations per year per participant during the efficacy evaluation period of 20 months. A clinically relevant asthma exacerbation had to be medically confirmed and was defined as asthma worsening leading to at least 1 of the following criteria:
- Doubling of ICS dose compared to background treatment
- Systemic corticosteroids for treatment of asthma symptoms for at least 3 days
- Emergency room visit due to asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids
- Hospitalization for more than 12 hours due to asthma, requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids
The outcome measure (by treatment group) is an adjusted annualized rate of clinically relevant asthma exacerbations.
Measured: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)
Secondary outcomes (5)
Proportion of Days With Nocturnal Awakenings Due to Asthma Requiring SABA Rescue Medication
The days with nocturnal awakenings due to asthma requiring SABA rescue medication were entered in an eDiary by the participant/caregiver in a 2-week period every 4 months. The proportion of days with nocturnal awakenings due to asthma requiring SABA was presented on a range from 0 to 1 (1 indicating that all days in the eDiary period were with nocturnal awakenings due to asthma requiring SABA rescue medication). The efficacy assessment was based on data collected over the 20 months efficacy assessment period.
The outcome measure (by treatment group) is an estimated proportion of days with nocturnal awakenings due to asthma requiring SABA rescue medication.
Measured: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)
Proportions of Days With SABA Use
The days with SABA use were entered in an eDiary by the participant/caregiver in a 2-week period every 4 months. The proportion of days with SABA use was presented on a range from 0 to 1 (1 indicating that all days in the eDiary period were with SABA use). The efficacy assessment was based on data collected over the 20 months efficacy assessment period.
The outcome measure (by treatment group) is an estimated proportion of days with SABA use.
Measured: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)
Percentage Predicted FEV1
The outcome measure (by treatment) is an average of the percentage predicted FEV1 measured at visits 5 to 11 (every 4 months during the 20 months efficacy assessment period), analyzed using MMRM (mixed-effect model repeated measurement).
FEV1 (forced expired volume in 1 second) is assessed by use of spirometry and is a measure for lung function. Percentage predicted FEV1 is derived from the predicted FEV1, which is the expected value of FEV1 for a person of a certain age, race, height and gender with healthy lungs.
Measured: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)
Global Evaluation of Allergic Asthma as Having an Improved Outcome
At the end of trial visit, the subject was asked, when compared to their asthma before IMP treatment, how they felt overall. Subjects who answered 'much better' or 'better' were categorized as having improved allergic asthma. At the end of trial visit, subjects had been treated for 24-30 months (including a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period).
The outcome measure (by treatment) is an adjusted odds of experiencing improved allergic asthma.
Measured: Assessment done at the end of trial visit (after 24-30 months of treatment)
Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis as Having an Improved Outcome
At the end of trial visit, the subject was asked, when compared to their rhinitis before IMP treatment, how they felt overall. Subjects who answered 'much better' or 'better' were categorized as having improved allergic rhinitis. At the end of trial visit, subjects had been treated for 24-30 months (including a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period).
The outcome measure (by treatment) is an adjusted odds of experiencing improved allergic rhinitis.
Measured: Assessment done at the end of trial visit (after 24-30 months of treatment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2018
- Study start22 Feb 2018
- Primary completion18 May 2022
- Study completion31 May 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides FarinaeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel-group
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 533 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ALK-Abelló A/S
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Graham Roberts, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03654976
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MT-11
- Other IDs
- 2016-004363-39, 2016
- Acronym
- MAPIT
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 24 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Roberts G, Just J, Nolte H, Hels OH, Emeryk A, Vidal C. SQ House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablet in Children With Allergic Asthma: A Randomised Phase III Trial. Allergy. 2025 Dec;80(12):3401-3411. doi: 10.1111/all.70073. Epub 2025 Oct 9.
PubMed 41064908
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the House Dust Mite (HDM) Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT)-Tablet in Children and Adolescents (5-17 Years) With HDM Allergic Asthma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03654976
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MAPIT / MT-11
- Conditions
- Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides Farinae, Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus, Allergic Rhinitis Due to House Dust Mite
- Keywords
- Allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, HDM, pediatric
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 533 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ALK-Abelló A/SIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 22 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 May 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 19 Oct 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The trial aims to demonstrate efficacy of the House Dust Mite SLIT-tablet versus placebo as add-on treatment in children and adolescents (5-17 years) with House Dust Mite allergic asthma based on clinically relevant asthma worsening.
Detailed description
The trial aims to demonstrate efficacy of the HDM SLIT-tablet versus placebo as add-on treatment in children and adolescents (5-17 years) with HDM allergic asthma based on clinically relevant asthma exacerbations.
Additionally, the trial will investigate if the treatment has an effect on asthma symptoms including nightly awakenings due to asthma, asthma medication use, asthma control, lung function, allergic rhinitis and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
Finally, quality of life (QoL) for subjects and caregivers will be measured.
The trial is a randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-national phase III trial conducted in Europe and North America. The treatment period will be approximately 2 years. Subjects will receive a written asthma action plan.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel-group
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active treatment | Experimental | Biological: HDM SLIT-tabletSubject's ICS or ICS/LABA background medication plus HDM SLIT-tablet |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboSubject's ICS or ICS/LABA background medication plus placebo oral tablet |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Written informed consent
- Male or female of any race/ethnicity aged 5-17 years
- A female subject of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test and be willing to practise appropriate contraceptive methods
- A clinical history of HDM allergic asthma
- Use of low daily dose of ICS plus LABA or medium/high daily dose of ICS with or without LABA for the control of asthma symptoms
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Is sensitised and regularly exposed to animal dander, molds, and/or cockroach or other perennial allergen
- Has experienced a life-threatening asthma attack
- Within the last month before the randomisation visit (visit 3), has had an occurrence of any clinical deterioration of asthma that resulted in emergency treatment, hospitalisation, or treatment with systemic corticosteroids
- Within the last 3 months before the randomisation visit (visit 3) while on high dose ICS treatment, has had an occurrence of any clinical deterioration of asthma that resulted in emergency treatment, hospitalisation, or treatment with systemic corticosteroids
- Any SLIT or SCIT treatment with D. pteronyssinus or D. farinae within the previous 12 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HDM SLIT-tabletAlso: Acarizax, OdactraSublingual allergy immunotherapy tablet, for daily administration (1 tablet per day) | Biological | Active treatment |
| PlaceboPlacebo sublingual tablet, for daily administration (1 tablet per day) | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Annualized Rate of Clinically Relevant Asthma Exacerbations
Time frame: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)
The primary endpoint of the trial was the annualized rate of clinically relevant asthma exacerbations calculated as the number of exacerbations per year per participant during the efficacy evaluation period of 20 months. A clinically relevant asthma exacerbation had to be medically confirmed and was defined as asthma worsening leading to at least 1 of the following criteria: * Doubling of ICS dose compared to background treatment * Systemic corticosteroids for treatment of asthma symptoms for at least 3 days * Emergency room visit due to asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids * Hospitalization for more than 12 hours due to asthma, requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids The outcome measure (by treatment group) is an adjusted annualized rate of clinically relevant asthma exacerbations.
5 secondary outcomes
Proportion of Days With Nocturnal Awakenings Due to Asthma Requiring SABA Rescue Medication
Time frame: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)
Proportions of Days With SABA Use
Time frame: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)
Percentage Predicted FEV1
Time frame: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)
Global Evaluation of Allergic Asthma as Having an Improved Outcome
Time frame: Assessment done at the end of trial visit (after 24-30 months of treatment)
Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis as Having an Improved Outcome
Time frame: Assessment done at the end of trial visit (after 24-30 months of treatment)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41064908Roberts G, Just J, Nolte H, Hels OH, Emeryk A, Vidal C. SQ House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablet in Children With Allergic Asthma: A Randomised Phase III Trial. Allergy. 2025 Dec;80(12):3401-3411. doi: 10.1111/all.70073. Epub 2025 Oct 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides Farinae
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of SLIT in Patients With Rhinitis/RC With/Without Mild-moderate Asthma, Due to Dpt and/or Df
Rhinitis, Rhinoconjunctivitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Noninterventional Study on Tolerability and Safety of One Strength Updosing With Novo-Helisen Depot House Dust Mites
Allergic Rhinitis Due to House Dust Mite, Allergic Conjunctivitis Due to Dermatophagoides Farinae
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Graham Roberts, MD principal investigator
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation
64 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing HDM SLIT-tablet in people with Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides Farinae and Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus, run by ALK-Abelló A/S at 64 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 64 sites in Poland, Russia, Bulgaria, United States, Spain and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Oct 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Annualized Rate of Clinically Relevant Asthma Exacerbations (time frame: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03654976, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2023.