AzTrials
AzTrials

FallNCT03656458

Effects of Balance Training on Fall Risk and Mobility in the Elderly

A study testing Warm Up, Conventional Balance Training and Biodex Balance Training in people with Fall, run by Foundation University Islamabad at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pakistan is a country devoid of health-care facilities and training programs on fall prevention. There is lack of research, awareness and implication of geriatric rehabilitation on elderly population addressing balance and fall risk assessment however very few cross-sectional studies of poor quality evidence are… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Fall
What is being tested?
Warm Up, Conventional Balance Training and Biodex Balance Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
105 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
Mar 2016to 15 Feb 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Individuals of age 60 -80 years
  • Both male and females

Who cannot join

  • Musculoskeletal conditions
  • Fractures
  • Severe arthritis
  • Neurological conditions
  • Epilepsy
  • Parkinson
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Impaired cognition
  • Other systemic diseases or co-morbidities

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Foundation University Islamabad

    Islamabad, Federal, 46000

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Pakistan is a country devoid of health-care facilities and training programs on fall prevention. There is lack of research, awareness and implication of geriatric rehabilitation on elderly population addressing balance and fall risk assessment however very few cross-sectional studies of poor quality evidence are available on this issue. To best of investigators' knowledge, no interventional studies have been conducted in our country so far on this topic. . We aim to use a integrated method of balance training that uses patients judgment, visual feedback, proprioception and balance training with the help of new technology/devices to improve balance. And compare it to conventional treatment. We also aim to assess risk factors of fall in geriatric population, decreasing risks of falls and increasing awareness regarding geriatric rehabilitation and balance training.

Read the detailed description

Balance is use of multiple systems of the body including auditory, motor, visual, vestibular and nervous to keep body staying inside limits of stability. It includes maintaining posture under different conditions in standing or sitting, ability to facilitate movement and to recover and stay in limits of stability after external (Trip, push, slip) and internal (body movements) protuberance. Impaired balancing system of body results in increased risk of fall which is major cause of mortality and morbidity in geriatric population.

A report of 2014 stated that Pakistan has 12.13 million population of Age 60 years and above which is expected to rise to 17.53 Million by year 2025. According to a study 30-50 % of population of age 65 years and above have some problems with balance. Another study states that 75 % of people aging 70 years and above have balance impairments which leads to fall. Additionally number of conditions including poly pharmacy, female gender, visual problems, environmental problems and cognitive issue contribute to in fall risk and balance problems. One of the major goal of Balance re-education is to decrease fall risk. Literature has suggested that one of the most effective methods of reducing falls in geriatric population is to prophylactically intervene on multiple risks factors of fall. This includes outpatient balance training and fall risk assessment.

Force plate systems and mirrors which are the part of visual biofeedback are often used for treatment of balance disorders but are found to have no difference in educating compared to conventional management. In current era technology has advances to a great extend and new systems that quantifies balance and provide a reliable and valid data regarding balance which then can be used in formation of balance training plan. These systems can also be used for treatment purposes and also have various visual feedback systems for more educational benefits. One of these systems is Biodex balance system which is used for balance and postural reduction, increase proprioception, somatosensory and neuromuscular control. It incorporates patient data saving and printing system for record management and uses an integrated system which involves patient in activities of re-education with relation to visual feedback to accommodate body accordingly.

As mentioned earlier Falls result in high morbidity and mortality among geriatric population which leads to increased costs and need for rehabilitation services. Falls are brought about by detrimental effects of aging on postural control as a result of deterioration in neuromuscular and sensory mechanisms, physical inactivity, pre-existing pathology and use of medications. However, balance training and exercise interventions tend to decrease risk of falling and eventually fall itself. Moreover, conventional balance training programs have decreased adherence; hence, sensor-based training programs have been advocated. These programs have quiet good advantages including visual feedback with interactive environment and targeted interventions. This exercise system incorporates human-computer interface providing a three-dimensional and real-time feedback.

Conditions
Fall
Being tested
Warm Up, Conventional Balance Training, Biodex Balance Training
Keywords
Impaired Balance, Geriatrics, Balance Training, Dynamic Stability Training, Fall Risk, Berg Balance Scale, Physical Therapy, Forward Reach Test

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Warm UpOther

    10 low jumps 5 Illiopoase Stretches 5 L/L Abductor Stretches 10 Trunk rotations 10 Should Circumduction Clock wise/Counter clockwise 10 Cervical Rotations Clockwise/Counter Clockwise

  • Conventional Balance TrainingOther

    Internal Protuberances:

    1. Looking up/Looking down/looking over the shoulder (Rt. /Lt.) 10 Reps Each
    2. Looking behind over the shoulder (Rt. /Lt.)10 Reps
    3. Looking Up with overhead Upper Limb Flexion. 5 Reps
    4. Reaching out of Base of support (Rt. /Lt. / midline Cross) 10 Reps Each
    5. Side to Side weight Shifting 10 Reps
    6. Standing on toes/Heels 10 Reps each

    External Protuberance:

    1. Tuck forward/ Backward/ Sideways(Rt. /Lt.) 10 reps Each
    2. Bosu Ball Training
  • Biodex Balance TrainingOther

    Biodex Balance Training Using Biodex Balance System SD

Study groups in NCT03656458
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control Group AActive comparatorWarm Up followed by Conventional Balance Training (Internal and External Perturbations)
Receives: Other: Warm Up; Other: Conventional Balance Training
Control Group BNo interventionControl group. No intervention given to participants.
Experimental GroupExperimentalWarm Up followed by Biodex Balance Training
Receives: Other: Warm Up; Other: Biodex Balance Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Berg balance scale - Change is being assessed

    Measured: Pre-treatment (Base line), First Follow Up (2 weeks), Second Follow Up (4 weeks), Third Follow Up (6 weeks) and at Final Follow Up (8 weeks)

  2. Quantitative measure of balance via Biodex balance system - Change is being assessed

    Measured: Pre-treatment (Base line), First Follow Up (2 weeks), Second Follow Up (4 weeks), Third Follow Up (6 weeks) and at Final Follow Up (8 weeks)

  3. Forward reach test - Change is being assessed

    Measured: Pre-treatment (Base line), First Follow Up (2 weeks), Second Follow Up (4 weeks), Third Follow Up (6 weeks) and at Final Follow Up (8 weeks)

  4. Timed Up and Go Test - Change is being assessed

    Measured: Pre-treatment (Base line), First Follow Up (2 weeks), Second Follow Up (4 weeks), Third Follow Up (6 weeks) and at Final Follow Up (8 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Sep 2018
  2. Study startMar 2016
  3. Primary completion15 Feb 2017
  4. Study completion15 Feb 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
105 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03656458
Sponsor's protocol ID
FUI/CTR/2018/1
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
13 Aug 2018
Last updated
4 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Mancini M, Horak FB. The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Jun;46(2):239-48.

    PubMed 20485226
  • Sibley KM, Straus SE, Inness EL, Salbach NM, Jaglal SB. Balance assessment practices and use of standardized balance measures among Ontario physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2011 Nov;91(11):1583-91. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110063. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

    PubMed 21868613
  • Ambrose AF, Paul G, Hausdorff JM. Risk factors for falls among older adults: a review of the literature. Maturitas. 2013 May;75(1):51-61. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

    PubMed 23523272
  • Tinetti ME, Kumar C. The patient who falls: "It's always a trade-off". JAMA. 2010 Jan 20;303(3):258-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.2024.

    PubMed 20085954
  • Geiger RA, Allen JB, O'Keefe J, Hicks RR. Balance and mobility following stroke: effects of physical therapy interventions with and without biofeedback/forceplate training. Phys Ther. 2001 Apr;81(4):995-1005.

    PubMed 11276182
  • Schoene D, Valenzuela T, Lord SR, de Bruin ED. The effect of interactive cognitive-motor training in reducing fall risk in older people: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2014 Sep 20;14:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-107.

    PubMed 25240384
  • Schwenk M, Grewal GS, Honarvar B, Schwenk S, Mohler J, Khalsa DS, Najafi B. Interactive balance training integrating sensor-based visual feedback of movement performance: a pilot study in older adults. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Dec 13;11:164. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-164.

    PubMed 25496052

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Warm Up, Conventional Balance Training and Biodex Balance Training in people with Fall, run by Foundation University Islamabad at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Berg balance scale - Change is being assessed (time frame: Pre-treatment (Base line), First Follow Up (2 weeks), Second Follow Up (4 weeks), Third Follow Up (6 weeks) and at Final Follow Up (8 weeks)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03656458, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in