AzTrials
AzTrials

Enlarged Lymph Nodes (Excluding Infective)NCT03657849

Evaluation of 19-gauge vs 21-gauge EBUS TBNA in Assessing Thoracic Lymphadenopathy

A study testing EBUS TBNA in people with Enlarged Lymph Nodes (Excluding Infective), run by HealthPartners Institute at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study compares the yield of 19-gauge needles vs 21-gauge needles during EBUS TBNA procedures. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
EBUS TBNA
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
18 Jul 2018to 31 Aug 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Referred for EBUS TBNA sampling at Regions Hospital

Who cannot join

  • On therapeutic warfarin, Plavix, or ticagrelor in the past 5 days
  • INR>1.8 or platelets <50K

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Regions Hospital

    Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study compares the yield of 19-gauge needles vs 21-gauge needles during EBUS TBNA procedures.

Read the detailed description

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspirate (EBUS-TBNA) is a technique used to take samples of body tissue inside the chest without having to undergo an operation.

During this procedure, a special telescope (called a bronchoscope) is inserted through the mouth into the airways. Ultrasound technology allows the doctor to see the structures just outside the airway. By being able to see the structures outside the airway, the doctor is able to safely pass a fine needle through the airway to take samples of abnormal tissue.

EBUS-TBNA is used to take samples of tissue from the mediastinum. The mediastinum is the part of the chest between the lungs, and contains the heart, gullet, windpipe and lymph nodes. This area of the body is usually difficult to access without open surgery, hence the use of EBUS-TBNA. EBUS-TBNA may be used to investigate enlarged lymph nodes. This may be due to tuberculosis, sarcoidosis or cancer.

Currently, smaller 21-gauge and larger 19-gauge needles are used during the EBUS-TBNA procedure at Regions Hospital. The purpose of this study is to find out which needle is better in finding the explanation for the enlarged lymph nodes, and any follow up procedures that may be necessary if the investigators are unable to get enough tissue during the EBUS-TBNA procedure (surgical sampling, radiological sampling, and/or follow-up imaging).

Being tested
EBUS TBNA
Medical subject headings
Lymphadenopathy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EBUS TBNADevice

    All patients undergo EBUS TBNA with two needle sizes

Study groups in NCT03657849
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sampling with 19-gauge and 21-gaugeExperimentalAll patients will be allocated to the same arm. All patients will have EBUS TBNA done with both 19-gauge and 21-gauge needles during the procedure.
Receives: Device: EBUS TBNA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic Yield

    Diagnostic yield refers to the proportion of tissue samples collected by each needle (19 gauge vs 21 gauge) that were of sufficient quantity and quality to yield (i.e. produce) an accurate diagnosis for the patient's enlarged lymph nodes. Characterization of diagnostic category (true positive, true negative, false negative, false positive) were made by comparing the patient's presumed diagnosis/initial indication for presentation in comparison to their final diagnosis as determined by a combination of pathological findings of EBUS-TBNA, follow up imaging, surgical sampling, or clinical follow up. The diagnostic yield of each needles was reported as a ratio of true positives and true negatives added together, divided by the total number of lymph nodes sampled (141).

    Diagnostic yield of 19-gauge needle: 89.4% Diagnostic yield of 21-gauge needled: 88.7%

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Diagnostic Yield

    Diagnostic yield refers to the proportion of tissue samples collected by each needle (19 gauge vs 21 gauge) that were of sufficient quantity and quality to yield (i.e. produce) an accurate diagnosis for the patient's enlarged lymph nodes. Characterization of diagnostic category (true positive, true negative, false negative, false positive) were made by comparing the patient's presumed diagnosis/initial indication for presentation in comparison to their final diagnosis as determined by a combination of pathological findings of EBUS-TBNA, follow up imaging, surgical sampling, or clinical follow up. The diagnostic yield of each needles was reported as a ratio of true positives and true negatives added together, divided by the total number of lymph nodes sampled (141).

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Sep 2018
  2. Study start18 Jul 2018
  3. Primary completion25 Jan 2019
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Prospective diagnostic accuracy study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03657849
Sponsor's protocol ID
A18-177
Status last verified
Aug 2019
First submitted
31 Jul 2018
Last updated
21 Mar 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EBUS TBNA in people with Enlarged Lymph Nodes (Excluding Infective), run by HealthPartners Institute at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Mar 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic Yield (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in