Problem;Behaviour;ChildNCT03658122
Integrating Behavioral Treatment in Primary Care
A study testing Parent-Child Care in people with Problem;Behaviour;Child and Parent-Child Relations, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study seeks to assess the usefulness of Parent-Child Care (PC-CARE), a brief behavioral intervention for children with difficult behaviors. It will test whether PC-CARE can help families who talk to their pediatricians about behavior problems by improving parent-child relationships, decreasing disruptive… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 10 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Problem;Behaviour;Child, Parent-Child Relations
- What is being tested?
- Parent-Child Care
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 18 Sep 2018to 30 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 10 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Caregiver-child dyads in which the child has been in the custody or care of the caregiver for at least one month.
- Children at least 2 years old and no older than 11 years.
- Caregivers participating in this study must complete all measures assessing the child's functioning pre-intervention and the behavioral observation.
- Caregiver-child dyads participating in this study must agree to be video-taped.
- The caregiver must be able to read at a 4th grade reading level.
Who cannot join
- Caregiver-child dyads will be excluded from the study if the child has been in the custody or care of the caregiver less than a month.
- Caregiver-child dyads will be excluded from the study if there were any missing pre-treatment assessment measures.
- Caregiver-child dyads will be excluded from the study if the dyad did not consent to be video-taped.
- Caregiver-child dyads will be excluded from the study if the caregiver is unable to receive treatment in English.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UC Davis Children's Hospital
Sacramento, California, 95820
About this study
This study seeks to assess the usefulness of Parent-Child Care (PC-CARE), a brief behavioral intervention for children with difficult behaviors. It will test whether PC-CARE can help families who talk to their pediatricians about behavior problems by improving parent-child relationships, decreasing disruptive behaviors, and improving parents' knowledge and use of effective parenting strategies. Pediatricians who observe or are told their 2-10-year-old patients have difficult behaviors, such as aggression, disobedience, tantrums, trouble focusing, and/or angry and irritable behaviors, will refer patients to this study.
At a first assessment, parents will complete questionnaires about the child's behaviors, parents and children will participate in a 12-minute play observation, and children will have their heart rate and blood flow measured during a 6-minute play observation. After this assessment, families will be randomly assigned either to begin PC-CARE right away or to wait about two months to begin PC-CARE.
Read more
Those who begin right away will attend weekly one-hour appointments for six weeks. During appointments, parents and children report on difficult behaviors from the week, learn new positive communication, regulation, and behavior management skills, are observed during a 4-minute play observation, are coached to use the skills (i.e., have the therapist tell the parent how to use skills while interacting with the child), and discuss how to incorporate these skills at home. Parents and children are also asked to play together for five minutes daily at home. At the end of the six weeks, parents and children will complete the same assessments they did at the beginning.
Those who wait to begin PC-CARE will be asked to complete the same questionnaires and observations again before beginning PC-CARE. They will then receive the same treatment as families who began PC-CARE right away. All families will be called one- and six- months after ending PC-CARE to complete a brief questionnaire about the child's behaviors.
Main study hypotheses include:
- Parents' positive communication with children will improve with PC-CARE
- Parents will report less parenting stress after PC-CARE
- Parents will report fewer child behavior problems after PC-CARE
- Children will show lower stress reactivity (heart rate and blood flow) after PC-CARE
- Parents will report similar levels of child behavior problems one- and six-months after completing PC-CARE
Read the detailed description
The current study proposes offering Parent-Child Care (PC-CARE; Timmer et al., 2018), a brief (6-session) behavioral intervention, to children from 2-10 years of age within the primary care building with the goal of improving parent-child relationships, decreasing child disruptive behaviors, and improving parents' knowledge and use of effective parenting strategies, as well as better integrating behavioral health treatments within the primary care setting. To assess the acceptability of integrating these services within primary care, the investigators will examine the proportion of families who participate in treatment out of the total number referred, and the proportion of families completing treatment. To determine the efficacy of PC-CARE in meeting treatment goals, this study uses a randomized control trial study design with a PC-CARE treatment group and a waitlist control group. To better understand the effects of the intervention and potential mechanisms related to improvements in children's disruptive behaviors, the study uses multiple assessment modalities, including parent-report questionnaires, behavioral observations, and physiological data during parent-child interactions. The investigators will additionally assess maintenance of treatment gains by conducting follow-up assessments at one- and six-months post-treatment.
The following hypotheses will be tested:
Hypothesis 1: Increase acceptability of integrative primary care.
- The proportion of families who agree to treatment with be at least 75% of those who are referred, and the retention rate for completing PC-CARE will be at least 90%.
- Caregiver-child dyads that receive PC-CARE when compared to the waitlist control group will report higher levels of satisfaction with their primary care provider and medical office (as measured by the Pediatrics Satisfaction Survey).
Hypothesis 2: Improve pediatricians' ability to detect child mental health service needs.
A: The total number of referrals per month will increase over the two-year grant period; demonstrating pediatricians' enhanced ability to recognize the need for behavioral services.
Hypothesis 3: Improve parenting skills
- Caregiver-child dyads that receive PC-CARE when compared to the waitlist control group will show significant increases in positive communication skills (as measured by PC-CARE observational coding) from pre to post treatment.
- Caregivers that receive PC-CARE will report higher levels of parenting competence (as measured by the Brief Parenting Stress Index [PSI4-SF]) compared to the waitlist control group
Hypothesis 4: Improve child behavioral problems and self-regulation
- PC-CARE trained parents, compared to the waitlist control group, will report significant decreases in levels of child behavior problems (as measured by the Weekly Assessment of Child Behavior [WACB] and Behavior Assessment Schedule for Children, 3rd Edition [BASC-3]) from pre to post treatment.
- For children with trauma histories, those who complete PC-CARE with their caregivers, compared to the waitlist control group, will show improvements in trauma symptoms from pre- to post-intervention (as measured by the Early Childhood Traumatic Stress Screen [ECTSS] or the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener [CATS]).
- After completing PC-CARE with their caregivers, children will show lower levels of autonomic stress reactivity compared to their pre-treatment levels and compared to the waitlist control group (as measured using the Biopac MP150 acquisition unit).
Hypothesis 5: Maintain positive treatment effects
- Caregivers will report similar levels of child behavior problems (as measured by the WACB) one and six months after treatment as they did at the post-treatment assessment, indicating the treatment gains were maintained.
Before starting recruitment, the investigators will meet with physicians at the pediatrics clinic to discuss the value of integrated primary care, explain the PC-CARE program, and discuss observed behaviors or parent concerns that would warrant referral to the program, and teach them how to make referrals. The investigators will provide the primary care physician (PCP) with information about our research study and intervention and will educate them on appropriate clients. When a PCP feels a child would meet criteria for this study, the PCP will provide the caregiver with the recruitment flier and ask for consent to provide the client's information to the research team.
Caregivers that consent to participate in this research study will complete the pre-treatment assessment with their children and then be placed in either the waitlist control group or in the treatment group. Those placed in the treatment group will actively participate in 6 weekly sessions of PC-CARE treatment and respond to a one-month and six month follow-up phone call to provide support and check up on the child's functioning. Caregivers placed in the waitlist control group will participate in the pre-treatment assessment and after approximately two months will be contacted to complete another pre-treatment assessment and to participate in 6 weekly sessions of PC-CARE treatment and afterward will respond to a one-month and six month follow up phone call to provide support and check up on the child's functioning.
For the pre-treatment assessment, parents will complete various questionnaires related to child behavior, parenting stress, and satisfaction with the pediatrics clinic. Parents and children will participate in a video-recorded 12-minute observational assessment of parent-child dyads as they play together in three semi-structured play situations that are analogs of typical parent-child interactions. Each of the 4-minute scenarios will be coded in the moment by the therapist, and later by a research assistant who is blind to the dyad's treatment group. While the therapist introduces PC-CARE to the caregiver, a trained researcher will work with the child to acquire cardiac physiological signals. Using a combination of age-appropriate explanations, books, and/or puppets, the researcher will explain how the device listens to the child's heart and how it is attached with stickers. Pediatric-grade adhesive electrodes will be applied to the child's torso and connected to an amplifier to record the signals using flexible wires. Physiological signals will be collected using a Biopac MP150 acquisition unit. The ECG100C amplifier will be used to collect electrocardiogram data. Children will then watch a 2-min neutral film clip in order to collect a resting measure of autonomic activity. Following this, they will complete two challenging tasks. First, children will have 3-minutes to work on a difficult puzzle on their own. Second, children will spend 3-minutes working on a difficult tangram puzzle with their caregivers. The difficulty of the materials will be age-adjusted. At the end of the assessment, the therapist will provide information about PC-CARE, identify treatment goals, and indicate whether the family has been assigned to waitlist control group or the treatment group.
During the treatment phase of this study, parents and children will attend weekly one-hour PC-CARE sessions for six weeks. At the beginning of these sessions, parents will complete a brief measure of child behaviors for the week. Then parents, children, and therapist will discuss behaviors from the week and identify behavioral goals for the session. The therapist will then teach new positive communication, self-regulation, and/or behavior management strategies to the parent and child together. The parent-child dyad will then be observed from behind a two-way mirror while they play for four minutes. The therapist will then coach the parent to use the newly learned skills by speaking to the parent via an ear-piece from behind the mirror. The session ends with the therapist reviewing progress with the parent and child and identifying a plan for incorporating new skills into the home environment. Parents and children are also assigned 'Daily CARE' to spend five minutes playing together daily and to use the new skills throughout the day.
A power analysis showed that in order to detect a large-sized effect (i.e., f=0.40, eta-squared = .138) with a power of 80, which is appropriate for a wait-list control design, this study would need a sample size of at least 25 families per group (Cohen, 1988). With an estimated attrition rate of 10%, the investigators plan to recruit 28 dyads for each group, comparison and control (Total N = 56) over the two-year study period. Information will be entered and stored in a Microsoft Access database, designed to score standardized measures and store all information relevant for data analysis. Standardized measures will be double-entered to ensure accuracy of scoring; reliability estimates will be assessed for all information that is "judged" or "coded." Each dyad (parent and child) will be identified by a unique ID composed of the child/participant's assigned subject identification (ID), the time in treatment (should the child receive PC-CARE more than once), and an indicator of which caregiver at any particular time in treatment is the participant in question (e.g., primary participant is mother, secondary participant is father). Data are stored on a secure University of California Davis Children's Hospital server, which is password-protected and backed up daily. Physiological data will be acquired using a University of California Davis issued laptop computer and identified only with the unique ID. Raw data files will be uploaded to a secure University of California Davis Children's Hospital server.
- Conditions
- Problem;Behaviour;Child, Parent-Child Relations
- Being tested
- Parent-Child Care
- Keywords
- Parent-Child Care, Parent-Child Relationship, Disruptive Behavior, Brief Intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Problem Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Parent-Child CareBehavioural
Parent-Child Care (PC-CARE) is a 6-week parenting intervention for children aged 1-10 years and their caregivers. This behavioral intervention involves weekly behavioral assessments, teaching of new skills, in-the-moment practice using the new skills, and discussion of how to incorporate skills at home.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Parent-Child Care Treatment | Experimental | Participants receive PC-CARE treatment immediately following the pre-treatment assessment. Receives: Behavioral: Parent-Child Care |
| Waitlist Control then Parent-Child Care | Other | Participants wait approximately 2 months with no intervention before completing another pre-treatment assessment (post-waitlist assessment) and receiving PC-CARE treatment. Receives: Behavioral: Parent-Child Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in positive communication skills parents use during observations with children.
Parents' use of positive communication (PRIDE) skills and statements to avoid (Avoid), as coded with the PC-CARE Observational Coding, will be coded during observations with the child at pre-treatment, each weekly session, and post-treatment.
Measured: 7-16 weeks
Changes in child behavior problems and improved adaptive functioning on the Behavior Assessment Schedule for Children, 3rd Edition (BASC-3), a parent-reported measure of child behavior.
BASC-3 composite scales = Externalizing, Internalizing, Behavioral Symptoms, Adaptive Skills. Subscales = Hyperactivity, Aggression, Conduct Problems, Anxiety, Depression, Somatization, Atypicality, Withdrawal, Attention Problems, Adaptability, Social Skills, Leadership, Activities of Daily Living, Functional Communication. Scores are converted to T-scores. T-scores are standardized, with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. For the behavior problem scales, scores above 60 are considered problematic; for the adaptive scales, scores below 40 are considered problematic.
Measured: 7-16 weeks
Changes in child behavior problems on the Weekly Assessment of Child Behavior (WACB), a parent-report measure of child behavior.
WACB is a 9-item measure of child behavior plus one item regarding parenting stress. Frequency of behaviors (1=never to 7=almost always) and whether behaviors need to change (1=yes, 0=no) are recorded at pre-treatment, each weekly session, post-treatment, one month post-treatment, and six months post-treatment. The parenting stress severity score has a range of 1-7, with higher number indicating more stress. The parenting stress need to change score is either 0 or 1, with 1 indicating the stress level needs to change. The severity of behavior problems is a total score (sum of the 9 behavior problem frequency scales) with a range of 9-63. The behavior problem need to change score is a total score, with a range of 0-9. For both scales, higher scores indicate more problems.
Measured: 6-8 months
Changes in parenting stress on the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form, 4th Edition (PSI4-SF), a self-report measure of parenting stress.
PSI4-SF yields four scales: Parent-Child Dysfunctional Relationship, Difficult Child, Parental Distress, and Total Stress. T-scores are computed for each scale. T-scores are standardized scores, with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Scores above 60 are considered problematic. Parents complete PSI4-SF at pre-treatment and post-treatment.
Measured: 7-16 weeks
Change in children's heart rate variability (HRV) via respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)
Children are connected via sticky electrodes to an ECG100C amplifier to measure electrocardiogram activity (ECG) in response to difficult tasks. RSA, a measure of HRV, is computed from the ECG signal using computer software and the Biopac MP150. RSA is a frequency measure, with a unit of natural log of ms squared (ln ms^2). The RSA indexes variability in heart rate that occurs in a high frequency range, the range of respiration. This variability is attributed to parasympathetic influence on the heart. RSA will be measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment.
Measured: 7-16 weeks
Change in children's heart rate variability (HRV) via Root Mean Square of the Successive Difference (RMSSD)
Children are connected via sticky electrodes to an ECG100C amplifier to measure electrocardiogram activity (ECG) in response to difficult tasks. RMSSD, a measure of HRV, is computed from the ECG signal using computer software and the Biopac MP150. RMSSD looks at changes in the time between heartbeats. The RMSSD indexes variability in heart rate that occurs in a high frequency range, the range of respiration. This variability is attributed to parasympathetic influence on the heart. RMSSD will be measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment.
Measured: 7-16 weeks
Secondary outcomes (5)
Proportion of families who agree to treatment
The percentage of families who were referred by pediatricians who agreed to treatment.
Measured: 20 months
Treatment retention
Percentage of families who agree to and begin services who complete the 6th session of PC-CARE.
Measured: 20 months
Reductions in child trauma symptoms by the Early Childhood Traumatic Stress Screen (ECTSS), a parent-report measure of children's trauma exposure and trauma-related symptoms.
Parents of 2-6-year-olds will complete the ECTSS. Parents indicate whether or not children experienced any of 11 traumatic events, then indicate whether or not (1=yes, 0=no) children display 17 symptoms indicative of posttraumatic stress disorder. The ECTSS yields a total number of traumatic events (range = 0-11; higher scores indicate more traumatic experiences) and a total trauma score (range = 0-17, higher scores indicate more trauma symptoms). Measures will be completed at pre-treatment and post-treatment.
Measured: 7-16 weeks.
Changes in child trauma symptoms by Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS), a parent-report measure of trauma experiences and trauma-related symptoms
Parents of 7-10-year-olds will complete the CATS. Parents indicate whether or not children experienced any of 11 traumatic events, indicate how often (0=never to 3=almost always) children display 20 symptoms indicative of posttraumatic stress disorder, and indicate whether or not (yes=1, no=0) those problems interfere in 5 areas of functioning. The CATS yields a total number of traumatic events (range = 0-11; higher scores indicate more traumatic experiences), a total trauma score (range = 0-60, higher scores indicate more trauma symptoms), and a functional impairment score (range = 0-5, higher scores mean more impairment). Measures will be completed at pre-treatment and post-treatment.
Measured: 7-16 weeks.
Satisfaction with pediatrics clinic will change by Pediatrics Satisfaction Survey
Parents answer 8 questions about their satisfaction with their pediatrician and pediatrics clinic (1= strongly disagree to 6 = strongly agree). Measure will be completed at pre-treatment and post-treatment.
Measured: 7-16 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Sep 2018
- Study start18 Sep 2018
- Primary completion1 Oct 2020
- Study completion30 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Problem;Behaviour;ChildStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a randomized controlled trial with waitlist control. The waitlist control group will receive the study treatment after a two-month wait.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Davis
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Brandi N Hawk, Ph.D., Principal investigator, University of California, Davis
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03658122
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1301710
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 29 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 12 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Timmer SG, Hawk B, Forte LA, Boys DK, Urquiza AJ. An Open Trial of Parent-Child Care (PC-CARE)-A 6-Week Dyadic Parenting Intervention for Children with Externalizing Behavior Problems. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2019 Feb;50(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10578-018-0814-8.
PubMed 29855819Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Integrating Behavioral Treatment in Primary Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03658122
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1301710
- Conditions
- Problem;Behaviour;Child, Parent-Child Relations
- Keywords
- Parent-Child Care, Parent-Child Relationship, Disruptive Behavior, Brief Intervention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, DavisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study seeks to assess the usefulness of Parent-Child Care (PC-CARE), a brief behavioral intervention for children with difficult behaviors. It will test whether PC-CARE can help families who talk to their pediatricians about behavior problems by improving parent-child relationships, decreasing disruptive behaviors, and improving parents' knowledge and use of effective parenting strategies. Pediatricians who observe or are told their 2-10-year-old patients have difficult behaviors, such as aggression, disobedience, tantrums, trouble focusing, and/or angry and irritable behaviors, will refer patients to this study.
At a first assessment, parents will complete questionnaires about the child's behaviors, parents and children will participate in a 12-minute play observation, and children will have their heart rate and blood flow measured during a 6-minute play observation. After this assessment, families will be randomly assigned either to begin PC-CARE right away or to wait about two months to begin PC-CARE.
Those who begin right away will attend weekly one-hour appointments for six weeks. During appointments, parents and children report on difficult behaviors from the week, learn new positive communication, regulation, and behavior management skills, are observed during a 4-minute play observation, are coached to use the skills (i.e., have the therapist tell the parent how to use skills while interacting with the child), and discuss how to incorporate these skills at home. Parents and children are also asked to play together for five minutes daily at home. At the end of the six weeks, parents and children will complete the same assessments they did at the beginning.
Those who wait to begin PC-CARE will be asked to complete the same questionnaires and observations again before beginning PC-CARE. They will then receive the same treatment as families who began PC-CARE right away. All families will be called one- and six- months after ending PC-CARE to complete a brief questionnaire about the child's behaviors.
Main study hypotheses include:
- Parents' positive communication with children will improve with PC-CARE
- Parents will report less parenting stress after PC-CARE
- Parents will report fewer child behavior problems after PC-CARE
- Children will show lower stress reactivity (heart rate and blood flow) after PC-CARE
- Parents will report similar levels of child behavior problems one- and six-months after completing PC-CARE
Detailed description
The current study proposes offering Parent-Child Care (PC-CARE; Timmer et al., 2018), a brief (6-session) behavioral intervention, to children from 2-10 years of age within the primary care building with the goal of improving parent-child relationships, decreasing child disruptive behaviors, and improving parents' knowledge and use of effective parenting strategies, as well as better integrating behavioral health treatments within the primary care setting. To assess the acceptability of integrating these services within primary care, the investigators will examine the proportion of families who participate in treatment out of the total number referred, and the proportion of families completing treatment. To determine the efficacy of PC-CARE in meeting treatment goals, this study uses a randomized control trial study design with a PC-CARE treatment group and a waitlist control group. To better understand the effects of the intervention and potential mechanisms related to improvements in children's disruptive behaviors, the study uses multiple assessment modalities, including parent-report questionnaires, behavioral observations, and physiological data during parent-child interactions. The investigators will additionally assess maintenance of treatment gains by conducting follow-up assessments at one- and six-months post-treatment.
The following hypotheses will be tested:
Hypothesis 1: Increase acceptability of integrative primary care.
- The proportion of families who agree to treatment with be at least 75% of those who are referred, and the retention rate for completing PC-CARE will be at least 90%.
- Caregiver-child dyads that receive PC-CARE when compared to the waitlist control group will report higher levels of satisfaction with their primary care provider and medical office (as measured by the Pediatrics Satisfaction Survey).
Hypothesis 2: Improve pediatricians' ability to detect child mental health service needs.
A: The total number of referrals per month will increase over the two-year grant period; demonstrating pediatricians' enhanced ability to recognize the need for behavioral services.
Hypothesis 3: Improve parenting skills
- Caregiver-child dyads that receive PC-CARE when compared to the waitlist control group will show significant increases in positive communication skills (as measured by PC-CARE observational coding) from pre to post treatment.
- Caregivers that receive PC-CARE will report higher levels of parenting competence (as measured by the Brief Parenting Stress Index [PSI4-SF]) compared to the waitlist control group
Hypothesis 4: Improve child behavioral problems and self-regulation
- PC-CARE trained parents, compared to the waitlist control group, will report significant decreases in levels of child behavior problems (as measured by the Weekly Assessment of Child Behavior [WACB] and Behavior Assessment Schedule for Children, 3rd Edition [BASC-3]) from pre to post treatment.
- For children with trauma histories, those who complete PC-CARE with their caregivers, compared to the waitlist control group, will show improvements in trauma symptoms from pre- to post-intervention (as measured by the Early Childhood Traumatic Stress Screen [ECTSS] or the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener [CATS]).
- After completing PC-CARE with their caregivers, children will show lower levels of autonomic stress reactivity compared to their pre-treatment levels and compared to the waitlist control group (as measured using the Biopac MP150 acquisition unit).
Hypothesis 5: Maintain positive treatment effects
- Caregivers will report similar levels of child behavior problems (as measured by the WACB) one and six months after treatment as they did at the post-treatment assessment, indicating the treatment gains were maintained.
Before starting recruitment, the investigators will meet with physicians at the pediatrics clinic to discuss the value of integrated primary care, explain the PC-CARE program, and discuss observed behaviors or parent concerns that would warrant referral to the program, and teach them how to make referrals. The investigators will provide the primary care physician (PCP) with information about our research study and intervention and will educate them on appropriate clients. When a PCP feels a child would meet criteria for this study, the PCP will provide the caregiver with the recruitment flier and ask for consent to provide the client's information to the research team.
Caregivers that consent to participate in this research study will complete the pre-treatment assessment with their children and then be placed in either the waitlist control group or in the treatment group. Those placed in the treatment group will actively participate in 6 weekly sessions of PC-CARE treatment and respond to a one-month and six month follow-up phone call to provide support and check up on the child's functioning. Caregivers placed in the waitlist control group will participate in the pre-treatment assessment and after approximately two months will be contacted to complete another pre-treatment assessment and to participate in 6 weekly sessions of PC-CARE treatment and afterward will respond to a one-month and six month follow up phone call to provide support and check up on the child's functioning.
For the pre-treatment assessment, parents will complete various questionnaires related to child behavior, parenting stress, and satisfaction with the pediatrics clinic. Parents and children will participate in a video-recorded 12-minute observational assessment of parent-child dyads as they play together in three semi-structured play situations that are analogs of typical parent-child interactions. Each of the 4-minute scenarios will be coded in the moment by the therapist, and later by a research assistant who is blind to the dyad's treatment group. While the therapist introduces PC-CARE to the caregiver, a trained researcher will work with the child to acquire cardiac physiological signals. Using a combination of age-appropriate explanations, books, and/or puppets, the researcher will explain how the device listens to the child's heart and how it is attached with stickers. Pediatric-grade adhesive electrodes will be applied to the child's torso and connected to an amplifier to record the signals using flexible wires. Physiological signals will be collected using a Biopac MP150 acquisition unit. The ECG100C amplifier will be used to collect electrocardiogram data. Children will then watch a 2-min neutral film clip in order to collect a resting measure of autonomic activity. Following this, they will complete two challenging tasks. First, children will have 3-minutes to work on a difficult puzzle on their own. Second, children will spend 3-minutes working on a difficult tangram puzzle with their caregivers. The difficulty of the materials will be age-adjusted. At the end of the assessment, the therapist will provide information about PC-CARE, identify treatment goals, and indicate whether the family has been assigned to waitlist control group or the treatment group.
During the treatment phase of this study, parents and children will attend weekly one-hour PC-CARE sessions for six weeks. At the beginning of these sessions, parents will complete a brief measure of child behaviors for the week. Then parents, children, and therapist will discuss behaviors from the week and identify behavioral goals for the session. The therapist will then teach new positive communication, self-regulation, and/or behavior management strategies to the parent and child together. The parent-child dyad will then be observed from behind a two-way mirror while they play for four minutes. The therapist will then coach the parent to use the newly learned skills by speaking to the parent via an ear-piece from behind the mirror. The session ends with the therapist reviewing progress with the parent and child and identifying a plan for incorporating new skills into the home environment. Parents and children are also assigned 'Daily CARE' to spend five minutes playing together daily and to use the new skills throughout the day.
A power analysis showed that in order to detect a large-sized effect (i.e., f=0.40, eta-squared = .138) with a power of 80, which is appropriate for a wait-list control design, this study would need a sample size of at least 25 families per group (Cohen, 1988). With an estimated attrition rate of 10%, the investigators plan to recruit 28 dyads for each group, comparison and control (Total N = 56) over the two-year study period. Information will be entered and stored in a Microsoft Access database, designed to score standardized measures and store all information relevant for data analysis. Standardized measures will be double-entered to ensure accuracy of scoring; reliability estimates will be assessed for all information that is "judged" or "coded." Each dyad (parent and child) will be identified by a unique ID composed of the child/participant's assigned subject identification (ID), the time in treatment (should the child receive PC-CARE more than once), and an indicator of which caregiver at any particular time in treatment is the participant in question (e.g., primary participant is mother, secondary participant is father). Data are stored on a secure University of California Davis Children's Hospital server, which is password-protected and backed up daily. Physiological data will be acquired using a University of California Davis issued laptop computer and identified only with the unique ID. Raw data files will be uploaded to a secure University of California Davis Children's Hospital server.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a randomized controlled trial with waitlist control. The waitlist control group will receive the study treatment after a two-month wait.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Parent-Child Care Treatment | Experimental | Behavioral: Parent-Child CareParticipants receive PC-CARE treatment immediately following the pre-treatment assessment. |
| Waitlist Control then Parent-Child Care | Other | Behavioral: Parent-Child CareParticipants wait approximately 2 months with no intervention before completing another pre-treatment assessment (post-waitlist assessment) and receiving PC-CARE treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 10 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Caregiver-child dyads in which the child has been in the custody or care of the caregiver for at least one month.
- Children at least 2 years old and no older than 11 years.
- Caregivers participating in this study must complete all measures assessing the child's functioning pre-intervention and the behavioral observation.
- Caregiver-child dyads participating in this study must agree to be video-taped.
- The caregiver must be able to read at a 4th grade reading level.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Caregiver-child dyads will be excluded from the study if the child has been in the custody or care of the caregiver less than a month.
- Caregiver-child dyads will be excluded from the study if there were any missing pre-treatment assessment measures.
- Caregiver-child dyads will be excluded from the study if the dyad did not consent to be video-taped.
- Caregiver-child dyads will be excluded from the study if the caregiver is unable to receive treatment in English.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Parent-Child CareParent-Child Care (PC-CARE) is a 6-week parenting intervention for children aged 1-10 years and their caregivers. This behavioral intervention involves weekly behavioral assessments, teaching of new skills, in-the-moment practice using the new skills, and discussion of how to incorporate skills at home. | Behavioural | Parent-Child Care Treatment, Waitlist Control then Parent-Child Care |
Primary outcome
Change in positive communication skills parents use during observations with children.
Time frame: 7-16 weeks
Parents' use of positive communication (PRIDE) skills and statements to avoid (Avoid), as coded with the PC-CARE Observational Coding, will be coded during observations with the child at pre-treatment, each weekly session, and post-treatment.
Changes in child behavior problems and improved adaptive functioning on the Behavior Assessment Schedule for Children, 3rd Edition (BASC-3), a parent-reported measure of child behavior.
Time frame: 7-16 weeks
BASC-3 composite scales = Externalizing, Internalizing, Behavioral Symptoms, Adaptive Skills. Subscales = Hyperactivity, Aggression, Conduct Problems, Anxiety, Depression, Somatization, Atypicality, Withdrawal, Attention Problems, Adaptability, Social Skills, Leadership, Activities of Daily Living, Functional Communication. Scores are converted to T-scores. T-scores are standardized, with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. For the behavior problem scales, scores above 60 are considered problematic; for the adaptive scales, scores below 40 are considered problematic.
Changes in child behavior problems on the Weekly Assessment of Child Behavior (WACB), a parent-report measure of child behavior.
Time frame: 6-8 months
WACB is a 9-item measure of child behavior plus one item regarding parenting stress. Frequency of behaviors (1=never to 7=almost always) and whether behaviors need to change (1=yes, 0=no) are recorded at pre-treatment, each weekly session, post-treatment, one month post-treatment, and six months post-treatment. The parenting stress severity score has a range of 1-7, with higher number indicating more stress. The parenting stress need to change score is either 0 or 1, with 1 indicating the stress level needs to change. The severity of behavior problems is a total score (sum of the 9 behavior problem frequency scales) with a range of 9-63. The behavior problem need to change score is a total score, with a range of 0-9. For both scales, higher scores indicate more problems.
Changes in parenting stress on the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form, 4th Edition (PSI4-SF), a self-report measure of parenting stress.
Time frame: 7-16 weeks
PSI4-SF yields four scales: Parent-Child Dysfunctional Relationship, Difficult Child, Parental Distress, and Total Stress. T-scores are computed for each scale. T-scores are standardized scores, with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Scores above 60 are considered problematic. Parents complete PSI4-SF at pre-treatment and post-treatment.
Change in children's heart rate variability (HRV) via respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)
Time frame: 7-16 weeks
Children are connected via sticky electrodes to an ECG100C amplifier to measure electrocardiogram activity (ECG) in response to difficult tasks. RSA, a measure of HRV, is computed from the ECG signal using computer software and the Biopac MP150. RSA is a frequency measure, with a unit of natural log of ms squared (ln ms^2). The RSA indexes variability in heart rate that occurs in a high frequency range, the range of respiration. This variability is attributed to parasympathetic influence on the heart. RSA will be measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment.
Change in children's heart rate variability (HRV) via Root Mean Square of the Successive Difference (RMSSD)
Time frame: 7-16 weeks
Children are connected via sticky electrodes to an ECG100C amplifier to measure electrocardiogram activity (ECG) in response to difficult tasks. RMSSD, a measure of HRV, is computed from the ECG signal using computer software and the Biopac MP150. RMSSD looks at changes in the time between heartbeats. The RMSSD indexes variability in heart rate that occurs in a high frequency range, the range of respiration. This variability is attributed to parasympathetic influence on the heart. RMSSD will be measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment.
5 secondary outcomes
Proportion of families who agree to treatment
Time frame: 20 months
Treatment retention
Time frame: 20 months
Reductions in child trauma symptoms by the Early Childhood Traumatic Stress Screen (ECTSS), a parent-report measure of children's trauma exposure and trauma-related symptoms.
Time frame: 7-16 weeks.
Changes in child trauma symptoms by Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS), a parent-report measure of trauma experiences and trauma-related symptoms
Time frame: 7-16 weeks.
Satisfaction with pediatrics clinic will change by Pediatrics Satisfaction Survey
Time frame: 7-16 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Apr 2021.
- Background: PubMed 29855819Timmer SG, Hawk B, Forte LA, Boys DK, Urquiza AJ. An Open Trial of Parent-Child Care (PC-CARE)-A 6-Week Dyadic Parenting Intervention for Children with Externalizing Behavior Problems. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2019 Feb;50(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10578-018-0814-8.
- BackgroundCohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Problem;Behaviour;Child
Active, not recruiting
Chicago Parent Program for Foster and Kinship Caregivers
Behavior Problem, Parenting
Active, not recruiting
Tailoring CPP for the Foster Care Setting
Behavior Problem
Active, not recruiting
Improving Student Mental Health Through a Universal Trauma-Informed Intervention
Anxiety Symptoms, Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms
Recruiting
Online Feeding Education for Fathers of Children With Feeding Problems
Feeding Problems, Parent Training
Active, not recruiting
A Mobile App to Improve 24-Hour Movement Guideline Adherence in Preschoolers
Healthy, 24-Hour Movement Guidelines
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Brandi N Hawk, Ph.D. principal investigator
University of California, Davis
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Parent-Child Care in people with Problem;Behaviour;Child and Parent-Child Relations, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in positive communication skills parents use during observations with children. (time frame: 7-16 weeks). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03658122, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2021.