AzTrials
AzTrials

Clinical Decision SupportEMBEDNCT03658642

Clinical Decision Support to Implement ED-initiated Buprenorphine for OUD

A study testing Clinical Decision Support (CDS) in people with Clinical Decision Support and Buprenorphine, run by Yale University at 22 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Emergency Departments (EDs) frequently care for individuals with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD). Buprenorphine (BUP) is an effective treatment option for patients with OUD that can safely be initiated in the ED. At present, BUP is rarely initiated as a part of routine ED care. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Clinical Decision Support (CDS)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
5,047 participants
Where
22 sitesUnited States
Study dates
15 Nov 2019to 15 Sep 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinicians
  • All clinicians working in Emergency Departments in the selected sites
  • Patients
  • 18 years or older
  • Will meet an EHR-derived phenotype suggesting possible OUD will be included in the analysis
  • Will be discharged from the ED
  • Not pregnant
  • Not currently taking any medication for Opioid Use Disorder

Who cannot join

  • Patients
  • Have a medical or psychiatric condition that requires hospitalization during the ED visit
  • Have prior enrollment in the current study
  • Currently in addiction treatment
  • Be a prisoner or in police custody at the time of ED visit
  • Note: The CDS will also be available for physicians to use when patients do not meet the EHR phenotype. These patients will be excluded from the primary analyses

Trial locations and contacts

22 sites in 1 country.

22 sites in 1 country

United States22 sites
  • UCHealth Anschutz Medical Campus (AMC)

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • UAB Medicine Highlands - Highlands ED, (HED)

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35205

  • UAB - University Hospital ED (UED)

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • Bridgeport Hospital ED (BPT), YNHHS

    Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06610

  • UNC Hospitals Emergency Department, UNCHS

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514

  • UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central

    Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909

  • UCHealth Memorial Hospital North (MHN)

    Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80920

  • UCHealth Poudre Valley Hospital (PVH)

    Fort Collins, Colorado, 80524

  • UAB Freestanding Emergency Department of Gardendale (GED)

    Gardendale, Alabama, 35071

  • Baystate Franklin

    Greenfield, Massachusetts, 01301

  • Greenwich Hospital ED (GH), YNHHS

    Greenwich, Connecticut, 06830

  • UCHealth Medical Center of the Rockies

    Loveland, Colorado, 80538

  • St Raphael's Campus (SRC), YNHHS

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06410

  • Lawrence + Memorial Hospital ED (L&M), YNHHS

    New London, Connecticut, 06320

  • Baystate Wing Hospital ED

    Palmer, Massachusetts, 01069

  • REX Healthcare Emergency Department, UNCHS

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607

  • Emergency Care Center at Nash General Hospital, UNCHS

    Rocky Mount, North Carolina, 27804

  • Chatham Hospital ED, UNCHS

    Siler City, North Carolina, 27344

  • Johnston Health ED, UNCHS

    Smithfield, North Carolina, 27577

  • Baystate Springfield Hospital ED

    Springfield, Massachusetts, 01199

  • Baystate Mary Lane Hospital ED

    Ware, Massachusetts, 01082

  • Baystate Noble

    Westfield, Massachusetts, 01085

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Pragmatic Trial of User-centered Clinical Decision Support to Implement EMergency Department-initiated BuprenorphinE for Opioid Use Disorder

Emergency Departments (EDs) frequently care for individuals with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD). Buprenorphine (BUP) is an effective treatment option for patients with OUD that can safely be initiated in the ED. At present, BUP is rarely initiated as a part of routine ED care. Clinical decision support (CDS) represents a potential approach to accelerate adoption of this best practice into routine emergency care. The goal of this trial is to determine whether implementation of a user-centered clinical decision support (CDS) system can increase adoption of initiation of BUP into the routine emergency care of individuals with OUD.

Read the detailed description

The study design is an 18-month pragmatic, parallel, cluster randomized, superiority trial using constrained randomization of clusters to arms. The unit of randomization (i.e. cluster) is the ED. EDs will be randomly allocated with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Adequate lead time will be allotted to install the intervention in the electronic health records (EHR) at all intervention sites--including a three month implementation and washout phase. The intervention will then begin at the same time across all sites with the CDS intervention fully implemented in the intervention sites' EHRs at the start of the trial. Clinicians at control sites will retain all control of their practice and practice as usual without the CDS intervention installed in their EHR.

Pragmatic trials study an intervention under the usual conditions in which it will be applied; as opposed to an explanatory trial which would test an intervention under ideal conditions. In cluster randomized trials, treatment intervention is allocated to clusters (i.e. groups of individuals) rather than individuals. This is done to manipulate the physical or social environment of the intervention when an individual intervention would likely result in contamination between intervention and control participants at the group level. The parallel cluster randomized design was chosen over a stepped wedge design due to the high likelihood of confounding by temporal trends from ongoing efforts to mitigate the opioid epidemic. A major challenge of the cluster randomized design is from potential confounding due to a limited number of heterogeneous groups. Constrained randomization offers a solution to this source of confounding by balancing key cluster-level prognostic factors across the study to avoid distorting estimates of treatment effect due to the confounding factors. This allocation technique more evenly distributes potential confounders between intervention arms by specifying the confounding factors, characterizing each cluster in terms of these factors, identifying a subset of randomization combinations of clusters that adequately balance confounding factors between intervention arms and randomly selecting one of these combinations as the allocation scheme. Potential confounders that will be used for this trial are: EHR vendor, ED annual volume, ED type (e.g., academic, community, urban, rural, etc), ratio of ED clinicians who have a waiver to prescribe BUP, current rate of ED BUP prescribing, resources in ED to facilitate management of patients with OUD, and willingness of staff to adopt the practice of ED-initiation of BUP.

Intervention:

The intervention for this study includes the user-centered CDS as well as education of ED clinicians practicing at all study sites.

The need for flexibility in the graphical user interface of the intervention resulted in the decision to develop the CDS as a web application. This provides the ability to access the tool both embedded within the EHR or directly over the Internet. The web application was developed as a single-page application (SPA) based on React JavaScript library. The CDS is a user-initiated, Substitutable Medical Applications and Reusable Technologies (SMART) on Fast Health Interoperability Resources (FHIR) application that streamlines a flow diagram of the clinical protocol for ED-initiated BUP.

The intervention's graphical user interface is an intuitive, simple layout presenting four care pathways in columns based on the patient's diagnosis of OUD, the severity of withdrawal, and readiness to start treatment. There is additional, optional decision support available for guidance to: 1) evaluate OUD severity based on diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM)-5 criteria, 2) assess withdrawal severity using the clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) score, and 3) motivate patient willingness and readiness to initiate medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment with a brief motivational interview. These materials are also available to share with other members of the care team via a web address, text messaging, or Quick Response (QR) code. The interface also includes a toggle switch for the user based on whether or not they have a waiver to prescribe BUP. Clinicians without a waiver cannot prescribe BUP but can administer a one-time dose of BUP in the ED for up to 72-hours. When integrated into the local EHR system, launching a care pathway enables the user to: place orders, refer for ongoing MOUD treatment, and update clinical notes.

The educational plan will be site-specific and tailored to the usual care at that institution. It will be administered within three months of the study start date. The details of the plan will be developed in partnership with local champions who self-identify an interest in helping to implement an ED-initiated BUP protocol at their site. Specifically, the education plan will be required to include:

  1. A didactic on opioid use disorder, its diagnosis, assessment of withdrawal severity, and local resources for referral for ongoing MOUD treatment, 2)Circulation and posting in each study site ED of the flow diagram of the study's clinical protocol for ED-initiated BUP. Since this protocol is considered best practice, clinicians at control sites will retain all control of their practice and be encouraged to follow this protocol even though the CDS will not be available to them. 3) Intervention sites will include strategies to increase use of the intervention by training clinicians on how to launch and use the CDS. Use of the intervention will be tracked with site-specific audit and feedback that is consistent with typical quality improvement initiatives at that site.

Given the ongoing and escalating opioid epidemic and wide scope of this trial, the investigators anticipate that there may be concomitant interventions to stem OUD at study sites during the trial. The investigators plan to permit these interventions as long as they are: (1) implemented before randomization so that they can be tracked and accounted for in the constrained randomization process, and (2) they are not a health IT intervention targeted at clinicians to initiate BUP in the ED.

Being tested
Clinical Decision Support (CDS)
Keywords
Opioid Use Disorder, Buprenorphine, Opioid-use Disorder, Health IT
Medical subject headings
Opioid-Related Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Clinical Decision Support (CDS)Behavioural

    This clinical decision support tool will improve the clinician's ability to identify those with OUD, initiate BUP and refer the patient to ongoing Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT)

Study groups in NCT03658642
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Clinical Decision Support for BUPExperimentalThe Clinical Decision Support (CDS) will be available for clinician use for Emergency Department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) with referral for ongoing medication assisted treatment (MAT) if: ED chief complaint or urine drug screen indicate opioid use. The clinician will then be prompted to complete DSM-5 checklist for OUD. If DSM-5 OUD Score>5 and urine drug screen is positive for opioids, then the clinician is prompted to complete COWS scale. If COWS score >12, then the clinician is prompted to order BUP. Regardless of COWS score, the clinician will be prompted to schedule an MAT appointment with BUP provider. The CDS will interface with outside MAT facilities so that making an appointment is easy and to capture data on whether an appointment has been scheduled.
Receives: Behavioral: Clinical Decision Support (CDS)
Usual CareNo interventionThe CDS will not be activated and patients will receive care as usual.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Count of Initiating BUP in the ED With Referral for Ongoing MOUD With User-centered CDS Compared With Usual Care

    The primary outcome will be Buprenorphine (BUP) initiation in the Emergency Department (ED), defined as whether or not an eligible patient is administered BUP in the ED and/or prescribed BUP upon discharge from the ED. Although this is not a patient-centered outcome, it is a pragmatic and meaningful surrogate that will serve as a lead indicator of the CDS intervention's effect on engaging more OUD patients in treatment. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD)

    Measured: Upon discharge (Up to 1 day)

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Count of Those With Referral to Follow-up for Ongoing MOUD Treatment (Patient Level)

    The count of enrolled patients who receive an Medication Assisted Therapy (MAT) appointment. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD)

    Measured: Upon discharge (Up to 1 day)

  2. Rates Receiving a MAT Appointment Who go to the Appointment

    Data will be collected in the aggregate for the percentage of patients that attended the referral MAT appointment

    Measured: 18 months

  3. Number of Clinicians Providing ED-initiated BUP

    Number of clinicians providing ED-initiated BUP regardless of CDS

    Measured: 18 months

  4. Number of Clinicians Providing Referral of Any Ongoing MOUD Treatment

    Number of clinicians that refer patients with OUD regardless of CDS

    Measured: 18 months

  5. Number of Clinicians Who Have Received Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA) of 2000 Training

    Number of clinicians that obtained DATA waiver

    Measured: 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Sep 2018
  2. Study start15 Nov 2019
  3. Primary completion14 May 2021
  4. Study completion15 Sep 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Parallel cluster randomized
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
5,047 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03658642
Sponsor's protocol ID
HIC 2000023783
Other IDs
UG3DA047003
Acronym
EMBED
Status last verified
Jun 2022
First submitted
28 Aug 2018
Last updated
28 Jun 2022
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cowan E, D'Onofrio G, Perrone J, Anderson E, Dziura J, Hawk K, Herring A, McCormack R, Phadke M, Samuels EA, Fiellin DA. Drug Use After Emergency Department-Initiated Injectable Buprenorphine: A Secondary Analysis of the ED-INNOVATION Ancillary Safety and Feasibility Trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2026 Mar;33(3):e70191. doi: 10.1111/acem.70191. Epub 2025 Nov 24.

    PubMed 41287157
  • Gao E, Melnick ER, Paek H, Nath B, Taylor RA, Loza AJ. Adoption of Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder: Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2342786. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42786.

    PubMed 37948075
  • Melnick ER, Nath B, Dziura JD, Casey MF, Jeffery MM, Paek H, Soares WE 3rd, Hoppe JA, Rajeevan H, Li F, Skains RM, Walter LA, Patel MD, Chari SV, Platts-Mills TF, Hess EP, D'Onofrio G. User centered clinical decision support to implement initiation of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder in the emergency department: EMBED pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2022 Jun 27;377:e069271. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069271.

    PubMed 35760423
  • Melnick ER, Nath B, Ahmed OM, Brandt C, Chartash D, Dziura JD, Hess EP, Holland WC, Hoppe JA, Jeffery MM, Katsovich L, Li F, Lu CC, Maciejewski K, Maleska M, Mao JA, Martel S, Michael S, Paek H, Patel MD, Platts-Mills TF, Rajeevan H, Ray JM, Skains RM, Soares WE 3rd, Deutsch A, Solad Y, D'Onofrio G. Progress Report on EMBED: A Pragmatic Trial of User-Centered Clinical Decision Support to Implement EMergency Department-Initiated BuprenorphinE for Opioid Use Disorder. J Psychiatr Brain Sci. 2020;5:e200003. doi: 10.20900/jpbs.20200003. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

    PubMed 32309637
  • Melnick ER, Jeffery MM, Dziura JD, Mao JA, Hess EP, Platts-Mills TF, Solad Y, Paek H, Martel S, Patel MD, Bankowski L, Lu C, Brandt C, D'Onofrio G. User-centred clinical decision support to implement emergency department-initiated buprenorphine for opioid use disorder: protocol for the pragmatic group randomised EMBED trial. BMJ Open. 2019 May 30;9(5):e028488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028488.

    PubMed 31152039

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Clinical Decision Support (CDS) in people with Clinical Decision Support and Buprenorphine, run by Yale University at 22 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 22 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Jun 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Count of Initiating BUP in the ED With Referral for Ongoing MOUD With User-centered CDS Compared With Usual Care (time frame: Upon discharge (Up to 1 day)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03658642, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in