AzTrials
AzTrials

Giant Cell ArteritisARTEMISNCT03658889

Assessment of Giant Cell Arteritis Medical Practices in France

An observational study of Giant Cell Arteritis, run by Chugai Pharma France at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to describe medical practices in patients with GCA in terms of patient journey, diagnostic methods and specific GCA treatments since diagnosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Giant Cell Arteritis
How many people
306 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
2 Aug 2018to 9 Nov 2018
How long will I take part?
1 Day
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: 300 patients aged at least 50 years old, suffering from GCA, starting or under treatment for GCA recruited by 150 internists and rheumatologists practicing in hospitals or private clinics in Metropolitan France will be included in the study.

Who may be able to join

  • At least 50 years old.
  • Suffering from GCA as per investigator judgement, newly diagnosed or not.
  • Starting or under treatment for GCA.
  • Informed verbally and in writing about this study and not objecting to their data being electronically processed or subjected to data quality control.
  • Non-inclusion Criteria:
  • Unable to consent
  • Participation to a randomised controlled clinical trial

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hospital of the Archet

    Nice, Alpes-Maritimes, 06202

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Cross-sectional, Multicentre, Non-interventional Study to Assess Giant Cell Arteritis Medical Practices in France

The purpose of this study is to describe medical practices in patients with GCA in terms of patient journey, diagnostic methods and specific GCA treatments since diagnosis.

Read the detailed description

This is a cross-sectional, non-interventional, national (France), multicentre study, conducted on a population of 300 patients with GCA, to describe GCA management and patient characteristics.

The study will be conducted in accordance with the professional code of ethics and the good epidemiological practice guidelines developed by the Association of French-Speaking Epidemiologists.

The information will be collected during a single visit to the internist or rheumatologist as part of the usual management of the patient with GCA. The physician will not perform any additional examinations specific to the study. The physician will inform the patient about the study before inclusion and seek her/his non-opposition. A patient information form will be given to each patient by the physician. Patients who are eligible to participate in the study and who verbally accept automatic processing of their personal data, will be included in the study.

Data will be collected from the medical file and from patient questionnaires on health status (SF-36 [36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument], EQ5D [EuroQol-5 Dimensions]) and fatigue (FACIT-fatigue). In addition, GCA activity will be evaluated using a global arteritis activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to be completed by the patient and the physician.

Medical subject headings
Giant Cell Arteritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03658889
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients under treatment(s) for GCAPatients at least 50 years old with Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) and under treatment(s) for GCA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient Journey : Physicians Who Referred the Patient

    Proportion of patients for each physician specialty that referred the patient

    Measured: Baseline only

  2. Patient Journey : Physician Encountered by the Patient at Least One Time Since the First Events Related to GCA

    Physician encountered by the patient at least one time since the first events related to GCA (Multiple answers possible, If a patient encountered a medical speciality more than one time, this speciality will be counted only once)

    Measured: Baseline only

  3. Patient Journey : Time to GCA Diagnosis

    Time between GCA signs/symptoms and diagnosis

    Measured: Baseline only

  4. GCA Diagnostic Method

    Proportions of each diagnostic method used

    Measured: Baseline only

  5. GCA Treatments Since Diagnosis : Glucocorticoids Since Diagnosis

    GCs treatment since diagnosis : Current GC dose at inclusion and total cumulative GC dose according to investigator (excl. IV bolus) since diagnosis.

    Measured: Baseline only

  6. GCA Treatments Since Diagnosis: Glucocorticoids at Inclusion

    Number of patients with at least one GC kinetic ongoing at inclusion

    Measured: baseline only

  7. GCA Treatments Since Diagnosis: Immunosuppressants Stopped Before Inclusion

    Immunosuppressants for GCA taken since diagnosis and stopped before inclusion

    Measured: Baseline only

  8. GCA Treatments Since Diagnosis: Immunosuppressants Ongoing at Inclusion

    Number of patients with at least one immunosuppressant ongoing at inclusion

    Measured: Baseline only

  9. GCA Treatments Since Diagnosis: Targeted Biologic Therapies Stopped Before Inclusion

    Number of patients who have taken at least one targeted biologic therapy since diagnosis and stopped before inclusion

    Measured: Baseline only

  10. GCA Treatments Since Diagnosis: Targeted Biologic Therapies Ongoing at Inclusion

    Number of patients with at least one targeted biologic therapy ongoing at inclusion

    Measured: Baseline only

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Comorbidities Related to GCs

    Comorbidities related/ aggravated by the use of GCs according to the investigator's judgment in at least 2 patients (by SOC)

    Measured: Baseline only

  2. Treatments in Patients With Comorbidities Related to GCs

    Number of patients with at least one ongoing treatment for comorbidities related to the use of GCs

    Measured: Baseline only

  3. Proportion of Incident Patients

    Proportion of incident patients: patients with a diagnosis of GCA ≤ 6 weeks from inclusion

    Measured: Baseline only

  4. Proportion of Prevalent Patients

    Proportion of prevalent patients: patients with a diagnosis of GCA > 6 weeks from inclusion

    Measured: Baseline only

  5. GCA Duration

    Time since GCA diagnosis for overall population, prevalent and incident patients

    Measured: Baseline only

  6. GCA Initial Presentation

    Proportions of patients with cranial GCA, Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR), extracranial GCA, elevated ESR/CRP and general signs at diagnosis

    Measured: Baseline only

  7. GCA Clinical Form

    Proportion of patients with at least one relapse and number of relapses

    Measured: Baseline only

  8. Patients With GCA Complications

    Proportions of patients with GCA complications

    Measured: Baseline only

  9. Global Arteritis Activity

    Score of the physician and patient global arteritis activity on a 100 mm-visual analog scale (100mm-VAS) (Patients with physician's VAS score less than or equal to 10mm will be considered with "non-active GCA", while patients with physician's VAS score greater than 10 mm will be considered with "active GCA")

    Measured: Baseline only

  10. Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores: Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire

    Total and detailed scores of the self reported SF-36 questionnaire (36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument): 36 item survey measuring health-related quality-of-life.

    For each domains: score ranging from 0 (worst health status) to 100 (best health status)

    Measured: Baseline only

  11. PRO Scores: EQ5D-3L Questionnaire

    Total score of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L) questionnaire and perceived current health state (100mm-EQ_VAS score, 0 = 'Worst imaginable health state' and 100 = 'Best imaginable health state)

    Measured: Baseline only

  12. PRO Scores: FACIT-Fatigue Questionnaire

    Total score of the 13-items Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) questionnaire.

    FACIT-Fatigue is an instrument that measures overall fatigue and its effects on the general functioning and daily activities through 13 questions. Each question has 5 levels: not at all, a little bit, somewhat, quite a bit, very much. Lower scores indicate greater fatigue. The total score of FACIT-Fatigue varies from 0 to 52 (score <30 = severe fatigue).

    Measured: Baseline only

  13. Physician Medical Specialty

    Physician characteristics: medical specialty

    Measured: Baseline only

  14. Physician Number of Years of Practice

    Number of years since medical school graduation

    Measured: Baseline only

  15. Physician Type of Practice

    Physician main activity (University Hospital or General Services Hospital)

    Measured: Baseline only

  16. Physician Characteristics: Number of GCA Diagnosis

    Number of GCA cases (Horton) personally treated within the last year prior to the date of inclusion of first patient

    Measured: Baseline only

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Sep 2018
  2. Study start2 Aug 2018
  3. Primary completion9 Nov 2018
  4. Study completion9 Nov 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
306 participants (actual)
Target duration
1 Day
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03658889
Sponsor's protocol ID
CPF_ARTEMIS2018
Acronym
ARTEMIS
Status last verified
Jul 2022
First submitted
11 Jul 2018
Last updated
22 Jul 2022
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Giant Cell Arteritis, run by Chugai Pharma France at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 May 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient Journey : Physicians Who Referred the Patient (time frame: Baseline only). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in