Sub-fertilityPIPNCT03660735
The PIP Study - Pre- IVF Immune Profiling Study
An observational study of Sub-fertility and Recurrent Implantation Failure, run by University of Oxford at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Many IVF clinics offer testing for immune cells in the blood and endometrium as it has been suggested that abnormal levels of these cells can affect fertility or the chance of an IVF cycle working. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 39 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Sub-fertility, Recurrent Implantation Failure
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 26 Sep 2018to 1 Aug 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 39 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Study population: Participants will be women attending an IVI Midlands, IVI Oxford clinic or the Wolfson Fertility Centre age <40 years who are undertaking an IVF cycle.
Who may be able to join
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- Female, aged 18 years to 39 years at the time of egg collection.
- Participant has an ovulatory cycle of 25-35 days.
- Participant is undergoing:
- A first or second cycle of IVF and ICSI for male factor subfertility, or
- An IVF cycle to treat subfertility with a history of RIF, or
- An IVF cycle to treat at least 1 year of subfertility
- We do not plan to target specific numbers in each group. Rather, the numbers that recruit in each group will be assessed at the end of the study and may well influence the design of the main study.
Who cannot join
- The participant may not enter the study if ANY of the following apply:
- Donor egg cycle.
- Age 40 or above at the time of egg collection.
- Ovulatory cycle of <25 or >35 days or evidence of anovulation
- Involved in a interventional research study of any medication that may have an effect on the immune system
- Patient taking oral steroids or other immunomodulatory medication
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Wolfson Fertility Centre
London
Rehan Salim
- Not yet recruiting
IVI Oxford
Oxford
Ingrid Granne
About this study
Official title: The PIP Study- Pre- IVF Immune Profiling Study
Many IVF clinics offer testing for immune cells in the blood and endometrium as it has been suggested that abnormal levels of these cells can affect fertility or the chance of an IVF cycle working. However, routinely offering these tests remains highly controversial as the scientific evidence behind the tests is not of a high quality. The PIP Study aims to find out how a woman's blood and endometrial immune cells affect the likelihood of an IVF cycle working and whether or not they are different in women with subfertility and implantation failure. This feasibility study aims to find out if it is possible to enrol enough women into the research study. If this is successful, the investigators will then go on to recruit a larger group of women into the main PIP study to enable them to investigate the impact of immune profiling on IVF success in more detail.
Read the detailed description
Although there are examples of autoimmune associated pregnancy pathology, notably the anti-phospholipid syndrome (1), robust evidence of immune mediated pregnancy failure is limited. However for many years there have been persistent reports of a possible association between 'abnormal' levels of peripheral or endometrial immune cell populations (predominantly NK cells), altered cell function or cytokine production (by NK and T cells) and subfertility, recurrent failed implantation or recurrent miscarriage (2-5). Many fertility clinics offer testing for a variety of peripheral blood immune cell parameters (NK cell numbers, cytotoxicity assays, Tregs, cytokine assays, etc) or endometrial parameters (most commonly NK cell numbers). Furthermore, treatments including corticosteroids, immunoglobulin, intralipids, biologic agents (e.g.: anti-TNFα therapy) are commonly offered to treat 'abnormal' results. The testing and treatment of immune mediated subfertility and implantation failure remains highly controversial for a number of reasons:
- To date there is little evidence that blood or endometrial immune cell numbers, activation status or function, are associated with either implantation failure or successful IVF treatment (6).
- There is little evidence in the literature as to normal parameters of endometrial or blood immune cell populations in fertile women. Of note, a recent meta-analysis (6) of blood NK cells describes a total of 106 fertile controls and compares them to 249 women who were either subfertile or had recurrent implantation failure. This is the largest dataset of controls however the 6 included studies vary in how the cells were measured and therefore pooling these data is of limited value. Studies assessing endometrial NK cells comprised only 20 fertile women and 40 subfertile women.
- The majority of studies compare a pathology (e.g.: Recurrent Implantation Failure (RIF)) with controls but do not have outcome data of the subsequent IVF cycles.
- It is often argued that blood testing can be of no value as the immune cell populations in the endometrium are phenotypically and functionally different to those in the periphery (7). However the majority of clinical testing is done in blood. There are only a few small studies that compare endometrial and blood parameters in the same patients with no evidence to date that blood NK cells reflect the endometrial NK population.
The evidence above describes the limited data on which routine clinical testing is performed. Added to which, there are no high quality Randomised Controlled Trials showing evidence of benefit for the treatments that are used. In this study the investigators propose to describe in detail normal endometrial and blood immune cell parameters as this has not previously been done in a large population In order to achieve this, women who are undergoing a first cycle or second cycle of IVF for male factor subfertility requiring Intracytoplasmic Sperm injection (ICSI) will be recruited. Those women who go on to have a live birth will be considered to be fertile controls (as their reason for IVF was a male factor and pregnancy was achieved at the first attempt). A sub-group of such participants will be used to describe the normal population (with standard deviations) and to use as a control group to compare to pathologies (RIF and subfertility).
The investigators wish to recruit broadly to the study-250 women overall but they have not defined a recruitment target for each group so that they can, at the end of the feasibility study identify the proportions of the 250 women who fall into each subgroup. Depending on the findings the investigators may need to target specific groups in the main study.
The purpose of the feasibility study is to determine the recruitment rate in the screened population for a larger fully powered study. The investigators will recruit all women under the age of 40 (at time of egg collection) from IVI clinics in the UK and the Wolfson Fertility Centre who are eligible and wish to recruit to the study. Within this population of recruits there will be three specific groups:
- Women in a first or second cycle of IVF for male factor subfertility requiring ICSI.
- Women with a history of RIF (using the definition described in (8))
- Any women with a history of at least 1 year of subfertility.
Inclusion in the study will require women to undertake a single visit to have a blood sample and an endometrial biopsy during the mid-luteal phase of the cycle before IVF treatment. There are minimal risks (besides the small risk of bruising and discomfort) from blood tests. Endometrial biopsy (known clinically as an endometrial 'scratch') is a procedure that is commonly undertaken prior to IVF treatment, as there is evidence that a scratch increases the pregnancy rate in the subsequent IVF cycle (9). Endometrial biopsy causes some discomfort at the time of the procedure but has no significant risks to participants.
- Conditions
- Sub-fertility, Recurrent Implantation Failure
- Keywords
- Immune Profiling, Pre-IVF
- Medical subject headings
- Infertility
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Male Factor Subfertility | Participant is undergoing first or second cycle of IVF and ICSI for male factor subfertility | |
| Recurrent Implantation Failure | Participant is undergoing an IVF cycle to treat subfertility with a history of Recurrent Implantation Failure (RIF). | |
| Female Subfertility | Participant is undergoing an IVF cycle to treat at least 1 year of subfertility |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recruitment of 250 participants to subgroups relevant to a future larger study
Recruitment rate of participants screened eligible for the study
- of recruits who are undoing a first or second IVF cycle with ICSI for male factor subfertility
- of recruits with a history of recurrent implantation failure
Measured: At study completion, this is anticipated to be 3 years.
Secondary outcomes (4)
To describe the normal variation in blood and endometrial immune cell populations in the mid-luteal phase of the menstrual cycle of women in undergoing IVF for a severe male factor subfertility who go on to have a live birth
Descriptive data to define the populations of blood and endometrial cells, this will include NK and T cells as well as smaller immune cell populations.
Measured: Blood and endometrial biopsies will be analysed throughout the study (a period of 36 months) but comparison between groups will take place after 3 years, at study completion
To identify if there are significant differences in endometrial or blood immune cell populations in: Women with a history of Recurrent Implantation Failure Women with a history of subfertility
Significant differences in cellular parameters between control group and RIF / subfertility
Measured: Blood and endometrial biopsies will be analysed throughout the study (a period of 36 months) but comparison between groups will take place after 3 years, at study completion
To identify if there are differences in immune cell parameters between successful and failed cycles
Differences in immune cell parameters depending on pregnancy outcome
Measured: Blood and endometrial biopsies will be analysed throughout the study (a period of 36 months) but comparison between groups will take place after 3 years, at study completion
To identify if there is a relationship between endometrial and peripheral blood immune cell parameters
Correlation between endometrial and blood immune cell parameters
Measured: Blood and endometrial biopsies will be analysed throughout the study (a period of 36 months) but comparison between groups will take place after 3 years, at study completion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Sep 2018
- Study start26 Sep 2018
- Primary completion1 Aug 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Aug 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sub-fertilityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of OxfordThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oxford
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Finox Biotech
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ingrid Granne, DPhil MA MBBS MRCOG, Study director, University of Oxford
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03660735
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 13399
- Acronym
- PIP
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 9 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Rai R, Sacks G, Trew G. Natural killer cells and reproductive failure--theory, practice and prejudice. Hum Reprod. 2005 May;20(5):1123-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh804. Epub 2005 Mar 10.
PubMed 15760961Beer AE, Kwak JY, Ruiz JE. Immunophenotypic profiles of peripheral blood lymphocytes in women with recurrent pregnancy losses and in infertile women with multiple failed in vitro fertilization cycles. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1996 Apr;35(4):376-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1996.tb00497.x.
PubMed 8739457Kwak-Kim JY, Chung-Bang HS, Ng SC, Ntrivalas EI, Mangubat CP, Beaman KD, Beer AE, Gilman-Sachs A. Increased T helper 1 cytokine responses by circulating T cells are present in women with recurrent pregnancy losses and in infertile women with multiple implantation failures after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2003 Apr;18(4):767-73. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg156.
PubMed 12660269Ng SC, Gilman-Sachs A, Thaker P, Beaman KD, Beer AE, Kwak-Kim J. Expression of intracellular Th1 and Th2 cytokines in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion, implantation failures after IVF/ET or normal pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2002 Aug;48(2):77-86. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0897.2002.01105.x.
PubMed 12389596McGrath E, Ryan EJ, Lynch L, Golden-Mason L, Mooney E, Eogan M, O'Herlihy C, O'Farrelly C. Changes in endometrial natural killer cell expression of CD94, CD158a and CD158b are associated with infertility. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2009 Apr;61(4):265-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2009.00688.x.
PubMed 19260857Seshadri S, Sunkara SK. Natural killer cells in female infertility and recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):429-38. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt056. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
PubMed 24285824Moffett A, Regan L, Braude P. Natural killer cells, miscarriage, and infertility. BMJ. 2004 Nov 27;329(7477):1283-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7477.1283.
PubMed 15564263Polanski LT, Baumgarten MN, Quenby S, Brosens J, Campbell BK, Raine-Fenning NJ. What exactly do we mean by 'recurrent implantation failure'? A systematic review and opinion. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Apr;28(4):409-23. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
PubMed 24581986Nastri CO, Lensen SF, Gibreel A, Raine-Fenning N, Ferriani RA, Bhattacharya S, Martins WP. Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 22;(3):CD009517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009517.pub3.
PubMed 25803542
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The PIP Study- Pre- IVF Immune Profiling Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03660735
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PIP / 13399
- Conditions
- Sub-fertility, Recurrent Implantation Failure
- Keywords
- Immune Profiling, Pre-IVF
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OxfordUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Finox Biotech
- Study start
- 26 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Many IVF clinics offer testing for immune cells in the blood and endometrium as it has been suggested that abnormal levels of these cells can affect fertility or the chance of an IVF cycle working. However, routinely offering these tests remains highly controversial as the scientific evidence behind the tests is not of a high quality. The PIP Study aims to find out how a woman's blood and endometrial immune cells affect the likelihood of an IVF cycle working and whether or not they are different in women with subfertility and implantation failure. This feasibility study aims to find out if it is possible to enrol enough women into the research study. If this is successful, the investigators will then go on to recruit a larger group of women into the main PIP study to enable them to investigate the impact of immune profiling on IVF success in more detail.
Detailed description
Although there are examples of autoimmune associated pregnancy pathology, notably the anti-phospholipid syndrome (1), robust evidence of immune mediated pregnancy failure is limited. However for many years there have been persistent reports of a possible association between 'abnormal' levels of peripheral or endometrial immune cell populations (predominantly NK cells), altered cell function or cytokine production (by NK and T cells) and subfertility, recurrent failed implantation or recurrent miscarriage (2-5). Many fertility clinics offer testing for a variety of peripheral blood immune cell parameters (NK cell numbers, cytotoxicity assays, Tregs, cytokine assays, etc) or endometrial parameters (most commonly NK cell numbers). Furthermore, treatments including corticosteroids, immunoglobulin, intralipids, biologic agents (e.g.: anti-TNFα therapy) are commonly offered to treat 'abnormal' results. The testing and treatment of immune mediated subfertility and implantation failure remains highly controversial for a number of reasons:
- To date there is little evidence that blood or endometrial immune cell numbers, activation status or function, are associated with either implantation failure or successful IVF treatment (6).
- There is little evidence in the literature as to normal parameters of endometrial or blood immune cell populations in fertile women. Of note, a recent meta-analysis (6) of blood NK cells describes a total of 106 fertile controls and compares them to 249 women who were either subfertile or had recurrent implantation failure. This is the largest dataset of controls however the 6 included studies vary in how the cells were measured and therefore pooling these data is of limited value. Studies assessing endometrial NK cells comprised only 20 fertile women and 40 subfertile women.
- The majority of studies compare a pathology (e.g.: Recurrent Implantation Failure (RIF)) with controls but do not have outcome data of the subsequent IVF cycles.
- It is often argued that blood testing can be of no value as the immune cell populations in the endometrium are phenotypically and functionally different to those in the periphery (7). However the majority of clinical testing is done in blood. There are only a few small studies that compare endometrial and blood parameters in the same patients with no evidence to date that blood NK cells reflect the endometrial NK population.
The evidence above describes the limited data on which routine clinical testing is performed. Added to which, there are no high quality Randomised Controlled Trials showing evidence of benefit for the treatments that are used. In this study the investigators propose to describe in detail normal endometrial and blood immune cell parameters as this has not previously been done in a large population In order to achieve this, women who are undergoing a first cycle or second cycle of IVF for male factor subfertility requiring Intracytoplasmic Sperm injection (ICSI) will be recruited. Those women who go on to have a live birth will be considered to be fertile controls (as their reason for IVF was a male factor and pregnancy was achieved at the first attempt). A sub-group of such participants will be used to describe the normal population (with standard deviations) and to use as a control group to compare to pathologies (RIF and subfertility).
The investigators wish to recruit broadly to the study-250 women overall but they have not defined a recruitment target for each group so that they can, at the end of the feasibility study identify the proportions of the 250 women who fall into each subgroup. Depending on the findings the investigators may need to target specific groups in the main study.
The purpose of the feasibility study is to determine the recruitment rate in the screened population for a larger fully powered study. The investigators will recruit all women under the age of 40 (at time of egg collection) from IVI clinics in the UK and the Wolfson Fertility Centre who are eligible and wish to recruit to the study. Within this population of recruits there will be three specific groups:
- Women in a first or second cycle of IVF for male factor subfertility requiring ICSI.
- Women with a history of RIF (using the definition described in (8))
- Any women with a history of at least 1 year of subfertility.
Inclusion in the study will require women to undertake a single visit to have a blood sample and an endometrial biopsy during the mid-luteal phase of the cycle before IVF treatment. There are minimal risks (besides the small risk of bruising and discomfort) from blood tests. Endometrial biopsy (known clinically as an endometrial 'scratch') is a procedure that is commonly undertaken prior to IVF treatment, as there is evidence that a scratch increases the pregnancy rate in the subsequent IVF cycle (9). Endometrial biopsy causes some discomfort at the time of the procedure but has no significant risks to participants.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Male Factor Subfertility | – | –Participant is undergoing first or second cycle of IVF and ICSI for male factor subfertility |
| Recurrent Implantation Failure | – | –Participant is undergoing an IVF cycle to treat subfertility with a history of Recurrent Implantation Failure (RIF). |
| Female Subfertility | – | –Participant is undergoing an IVF cycle to treat at least 1 year of subfertility |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 39 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Participants will be women attending an IVI Midlands, IVI Oxford clinic or the Wolfson Fertility Centre age <40 years who are undertaking an IVF cycle.
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- Female, aged 18 years to 39 years at the time of egg collection.
- Participant has an ovulatory cycle of 25-35 days.
- Participant is undergoing:
- We do not plan to target specific numbers in each group. Rather, the numbers that recruit in each group will be assessed at the end of the study and may well influence the design of the main study.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Donor egg cycle.
- Age 40 or above at the time of egg collection.
- Ovulatory cycle of <25 or >35 days or evidence of anovulation
- Involved in a interventional research study of any medication that may have an effect on the immune system
- Patient taking oral steroids or other immunomodulatory medication
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Recruitment of 250 participants to subgroups relevant to a future larger study
Time frame: At study completion, this is anticipated to be 3 years.
Recruitment rate of participants screened eligible for the study * of recruits who are undoing a first or second IVF cycle with ICSI for male factor subfertility * of recruits with a history of recurrent implantation failure
4 secondary outcomes
To describe the normal variation in blood and endometrial immune cell populations in the mid-luteal phase of the menstrual cycle of women in undergoing IVF for a severe male factor subfertility who go on to have a live birth
Time frame: Blood and endometrial biopsies will be analysed throughout the study (a period of 36 months) but comparison between groups will take place after 3 years, at study completion
To identify if there are significant differences in endometrial or blood immune cell populations in: Women with a history of Recurrent Implantation Failure Women with a history of subfertility
Time frame: Blood and endometrial biopsies will be analysed throughout the study (a period of 36 months) but comparison between groups will take place after 3 years, at study completion
To identify if there are differences in immune cell parameters between successful and failed cycles
Time frame: Blood and endometrial biopsies will be analysed throughout the study (a period of 36 months) but comparison between groups will take place after 3 years, at study completion
To identify if there is a relationship between endometrial and peripheral blood immune cell parameters
Time frame: Blood and endometrial biopsies will be analysed throughout the study (a period of 36 months) but comparison between groups will take place after 3 years, at study completion
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2018.
- Background: PubMed 15760961Rai R, Sacks G, Trew G. Natural killer cells and reproductive failure--theory, practice and prejudice. Hum Reprod. 2005 May;20(5):1123-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh804. Epub 2005 Mar 10.
- Background: PubMed 8739457Beer AE, Kwak JY, Ruiz JE. Immunophenotypic profiles of peripheral blood lymphocytes in women with recurrent pregnancy losses and in infertile women with multiple failed in vitro fertilization cycles. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1996 Apr;35(4):376-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1996.tb00497.x.
- Background: PubMed 12660269Kwak-Kim JY, Chung-Bang HS, Ng SC, Ntrivalas EI, Mangubat CP, Beaman KD, Beer AE, Gilman-Sachs A. Increased T helper 1 cytokine responses by circulating T cells are present in women with recurrent pregnancy losses and in infertile women with multiple implantation failures after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2003 Apr;18(4):767-73. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg156.
- Background: PubMed 12389596Ng SC, Gilman-Sachs A, Thaker P, Beaman KD, Beer AE, Kwak-Kim J. Expression of intracellular Th1 and Th2 cytokines in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion, implantation failures after IVF/ET or normal pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2002 Aug;48(2):77-86. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0897.2002.01105.x.
- Background: PubMed 19260857McGrath E, Ryan EJ, Lynch L, Golden-Mason L, Mooney E, Eogan M, O'Herlihy C, O'Farrelly C. Changes in endometrial natural killer cell expression of CD94, CD158a and CD158b are associated with infertility. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2009 Apr;61(4):265-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2009.00688.x.
- Background: PubMed 24285824Seshadri S, Sunkara SK. Natural killer cells in female infertility and recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):429-38. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt056. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
- Background: PubMed 15564263Moffett A, Regan L, Braude P. Natural killer cells, miscarriage, and infertility. BMJ. 2004 Nov 27;329(7477):1283-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7477.1283.
- Background: PubMed 24581986Polanski LT, Baumgarten MN, Quenby S, Brosens J, Campbell BK, Raine-Fenning NJ. What exactly do we mean by 'recurrent implantation failure'? A systematic review and opinion. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Apr;28(4):409-23. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
- Background: PubMed 25803542Nastri CO, Lensen SF, Gibreel A, Raine-Fenning N, Ferriani RA, Bhattacharya S, Martins WP. Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 22;(3):CD009517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009517.pub3.
Related trials for Sub-fertility
RecruitingObservational study
Association of Ultrasound Features of the Myometrium Suggestive of Adenomyosis and Clinical Symptoms
Adenomyosis of Uterus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Progesterone Luteal Support in Unexplained Infertility Management
Infertility, Female Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
Assessing the Correlation Between Phospholipase C Zeta Measurements and Semen Parameters
Male Infertility, Male Subfertility
RecruitingObservational study
The FLORA-project: in Search for the Microbial Cause of Chronic Endometritis and the Most Appropriate Treatment to Obtain a Successful Pregnancy IVF/ICSI
Endometritis; Chronic, Subfertility
RecruitingPhase 3
GnRH Agonist for Dual Trigger in IVF and for Luteal Phase Support in FET
Subfertility
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ingrid Granne, DPhil MA MBBS MRCOG study director
University of Oxford
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Sub-fertility and Recurrent Implantation Failure, run by University of Oxford at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ingrid Granne, DPhil MA MBBS MRCOG (01865 740887, ingrid.granne@wrh.ox.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recruitment of 250 participants to subgroups relevant to a future larger study (time frame: At study completion, this is anticipated to be 3 years.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03660735, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2018.