StrokePhase 4ARAMISNCT03661411
Antiplatelet vs R-tPA for Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke
A Phase 4 study testing Aspirin, Clopidogrel 75mg and Alteplase in people with Stroke, run by General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is one of common diseases with significant morbidity, mortality and disability. A wide array of studies confirms that intravenous thrombolytic therapy with alteplase can effectively improve the functional prognosis in acute ischemic stroke. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Aspirin, Clopidogrel 75mg and Alteplase
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 760 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 17 Oct 2018to 18 Jul 2022
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient age ≥18 years;
- Study treatment can be started within 4.5h;
- Ischemic stroke confirmed by head CT or MRI;
- NIHSS score ≤ 5, and ≤ 1 NIHSS score in single item scores such as vision, language, neglect and single limb and no score in consciousness item;
- Premorbid mRS ≤ 1;
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Serious neurological deficits before onset ( mRS ≥ 2);
- Obvious head injuries or strokes within 3 months;
- Subarachnoid hemorrhage;
- History of intracranial hemorrhage;
- Intracranial tumor, arteriovenous malformation or aneurysm;
- Intracranial or spinal cord surgery within 3 months;
Show all 24Show fewer
- Arterial puncture at a noncompressible site within the previous seven days;
- Gastrointestinal or urinary tract hemorrhage within the previous 21 days;
- Major surgery within 1 month;
- Systolic pressure ≥180 mmHg or diastolic pressure ≥110 mmHg;
- Blood glucose < 50 mg/dl (2.7mmol/L);
- Heparin therapy or oral anticoagulation therapy within 48 hours;
- Platelet count of <100,000/mm3 (This does not need to be verified prior to randomization if clinical abnormality is not suspected);
- Oral warfarin is being taken and INR>1.6;
- Abnormal APTT;
- Pregnancy;
- Neurological deficit after epileptic seizures;
- Myocardial infarction within 3 months;
- Cerebral infarction with definite anticoagulation indications, such as cerebral infarction caused by cardiogenic embolism;
- Oral administration is not allowed due to dysphagia;
- allergy to study drugs;
- Other serious illness that would confound the clinical outcome at 90 days;
- Participating in other clinical trials within 3 months;
- patients not suitable for this clinical studies considered by researcher;
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Antiplatelet vs R-tPA for Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke: a Prospective, Random, Blinded Assessment of Outcome and Open Label Multi-center Study
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is one of common diseases with significant morbidity, mortality and disability. A wide array of studies confirms that intravenous thrombolytic therapy with alteplase can effectively improve the functional prognosis in acute ischemic stroke. Thus all guidelines recommended the intravenous thrombolytic therapy with alteplase for acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours from stroke onset.
Minor stroke is usually defined as NIHSS score ≤ 3 or 5,although it accounts for 1/2-2/3 of AIS, the evidence of thrombolysis is insufficient. A study from Canada shows that 28.5% of patients with minor stroke who have not receive rt-pa thrombolytic therapy are unable to walk independently when discharged. Based on such a consideration,the PRISMS study further compares the efficacy and safety of thrombolytic therapy with antithrombotic therapy in patients with minor stroke. Unfortunately, the study has been early terminated due to the sponsorship reason in 2018, with only 313 cases enrolled. The preliminary results shows that there is no significant difference of the 90-day neurological function between the two groups, while the safety of the treatment group with alteplase has a higher rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. The patient receiving thrombolysis can not be given antithrombolytic therapy within 24 hours even if the patient's condition has worsened, is clinically more puzzling.
Read more
The CHANCE study in 2013 shows that the efficacy of aspirin with clopidogrel is superior to aspirin alone with minor stroke (NIHSS < 3) or TIA(ABCD2 < 4). The POINT study in 2018 further confirmed the efficacy and safety of intensive antithrombotic therapy within 12 hours of onset with minor stroke.
Based on the above discussion, this study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of aspirin with clopidogrel vs alteplase in the treatment of acute minor stroke.
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AspirinDrug
100mg qd
Clopidogrel 75mgDrug
75mg(after first dose of 300mg)qd
AlteplaseDrug
Iv at 0.9 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Aspirin+ clopidogrel | Experimental | aspirin 100mg qd and clopidogrel 75mg(300mg in the first day)qd with a total of 10-14 days, then oral aspirin 100mg or clopidogrel 75mg qd lasting for 90 days. Receives: Drug: Aspirin; Drug: Clopidogrel 75mg |
| Alteplase | Active comparator | intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg and maximal dose of 90 mg) was given, and followed by antithrombotic protocol 24 hours after thrombolysis based on clinical guideline. Receives: Drug: Alteplase |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of mRS (0-1)
Measured: 90±7 days
Secondary outcomes (8)
Proportion of mRS (0-2)
Measured: 90±7 days
change in NIH Stroke Scale score compared with baseline
Measured: 24 hours
incidence of early neurological improvement
more than 2 NIH Stroke Scale score decrease compared with baseline
Measured: 24 hours
Incidence of early neurological deterioration
more than 2 NIH Stroke Scale score increase (not result of cerebral hemorrhage) compared with baseline
Measured: 7 days
occurrence of stroke or other vascular events
Measured: 90±7 days
proportion of death of any cause
Measured: 90±7 days
occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
more than 4 NIHSS score increase caused by intracranial hemorrhage
Measured: 90±7 days
proportion of any bleeding events
Measured: 90±7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Sep 2018
- Study start17 Oct 2018
- Primary completion18 Jul 2022
- Study completion18 Jul 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 760 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hui-Sheng Chen, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region
- Investigators
- Huisheng Chen, Doctor, Study chair, Neurology Department
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03661411
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- k(2018)22-1
- Acronym
- ARAMIS
- Status last verified
- Aug 2022
- First submitted
- 5 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 3 Aug 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Yao ZG, Pei YF, Chen HS. Onset to Treatment Time and Early Neurological Deterioration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Alteplase in Minor Stroke. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Nov 4;14(21):e043980. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.125.043980. Epub 2025 Oct 23.
PubMed 41128284Fei ZX, Yin Y, Cui Y, Nguyen TN, Chen HS. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Alteplase for Mild Stroke with Admission NIHSS Score 0-3 Versus 4-5: A Secondary Analysis of the ARAMIS Randomized Trial. CNS Drugs. 2025 Oct;39(10):1037-1046. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01211-6. Epub 2025 Aug 4.
PubMed 40760234He XY, He C, Chen HS. Renal function and efficacy of dual antiplatelet vs. alteplase in minor stroke: a post hoc analysis of ARAMIS study. Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 30;16:1568711. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1568711. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 40371069Cui Y, Chen HS. Dual antiplatelet versus alteplase in anterior and posterior circulation minor stroke. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2025 Aug 26;10(4):491-498. doi: 10.1136/svn-2024-003705.
PubMed 39663175Cui Y, He C, Li ZA, Wang Y, Chen HS. Dual Antiplatelet Versus Alteplase for Early Neurologic Deterioration in Minor Stroke With Versus Without Large Vessel Occlusion: Prespecified Post Hoc Analysis of the ARAMIS Trial. Stroke. 2024 Nov;55(11):2590-2598. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048248. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
PubMed 39387110Cui Y, Zhao ZA, Wang JQ, Qiu SQ, Shen XY, Li ZY, Hu HZ, Chen HS. Systolic blood pressure and early neurological deterioration in minor stroke: A post hoc analysis of ARAMIS trial. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024 Jul;30(7):e14868. doi: 10.1111/cns.14868.
PubMed 39014552Chen HS, Cui Y, Zhou ZH, Zhang H, Wang LX, Wang WZ, Shen LY, Guo LY, Wang EQ, Wang RX, Han J, Dong YL, Li J, Lin YZ, Yang QC, Zhang L, Li JY, Wang J, Xia L, Ma GB, Lu J, Jiang CH, Huang SM, Wan LS, Piao XY, Li Z, Li YS, Yang KH, Wang DL, Nguyen TN; ARAMIS Investigators. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase for Patients With Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ARAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 Jun 27;329(24):2135-2144. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7827.
PubMed 37367978
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Aug 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Antiplatelet vs R-tPA for Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke: a Prospective, Random, Blinded Assessment of Outcome and Open Label Multi-center Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03661411
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ARAMIS / k(2018)22-1
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 760 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- General Hospital of Shenyang Military RegionUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Jul 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is one of common diseases with significant morbidity, mortality and disability. A wide array of studies confirms that intravenous thrombolytic therapy with alteplase can effectively improve the functional prognosis in acute ischemic stroke. Thus all guidelines recommended the intravenous thrombolytic therapy with alteplase for acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours from stroke onset.
Minor stroke is usually defined as NIHSS score ≤ 3 or 5,although it accounts for 1/2-2/3 of AIS, the evidence of thrombolysis is insufficient. A study from Canada shows that 28.5% of patients with minor stroke who have not receive rt-pa thrombolytic therapy are unable to walk independently when discharged. Based on such a consideration,the PRISMS study further compares the efficacy and safety of thrombolytic therapy with antithrombotic therapy in patients with minor stroke. Unfortunately, the study has been early terminated due to the sponsorship reason in 2018, with only 313 cases enrolled. The preliminary results shows that there is no significant difference of the 90-day neurological function between the two groups, while the safety of the treatment group with alteplase has a higher rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. The patient receiving thrombolysis can not be given antithrombolytic therapy within 24 hours even if the patient's condition has worsened, is clinically more puzzling.
The CHANCE study in 2013 shows that the efficacy of aspirin with clopidogrel is superior to aspirin alone with minor stroke (NIHSS < 3) or TIA(ABCD2 < 4). The POINT study in 2018 further confirmed the efficacy and safety of intensive antithrombotic therapy within 12 hours of onset with minor stroke.
Based on the above discussion, this study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of aspirin with clopidogrel vs alteplase in the treatment of acute minor stroke.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Aspirin+ clopidogrel | Experimental | Drug: Aspirin, Drug: Clopidogrel 75mgaspirin 100mg qd and clopidogrel 75mg(300mg in the first day)qd with a total of 10-14 days, then oral aspirin 100mg or clopidogrel 75mg qd lasting for 90 days. |
| Alteplase | Active comparator | Drug: Alteplaseintravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg and maximal dose of 90 mg) was given, and followed by antithrombotic protocol 24 hours after thrombolysis based on clinical guideline. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patient age ≥18 years;
- Study treatment can be started within 4.5h;
- Ischemic stroke confirmed by head CT or MRI;
- NIHSS score ≤ 5, and ≤ 1 NIHSS score in single item scores such as vision, language, neglect and single limb and no score in consciousness item;
- Premorbid mRS ≤ 1;
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Serious neurological deficits before onset ( mRS ≥ 2);
- Obvious head injuries or strokes within 3 months;
- Subarachnoid hemorrhage;
- History of intracranial hemorrhage;
- Intracranial tumor, arteriovenous malformation or aneurysm;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Aspirin100mg qd | Drug | Aspirin+ clopidogrel |
| Clopidogrel 75mg75mg(after first dose of 300mg)qd | Drug | Aspirin+ clopidogrel |
| AlteplaseIv at 0.9 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) | Drug | Alteplase |
Primary outcome
Proportion of mRS (0-1)
Time frame: 90±7 days
8 secondary outcomes
Proportion of mRS (0-2)
Time frame: 90±7 days
change in NIH Stroke Scale score compared with baseline
Time frame: 24 hours
incidence of early neurological improvement
Time frame: 24 hours
Incidence of early neurological deterioration
Time frame: 7 days
occurrence of stroke or other vascular events
Time frame: 90±7 days
proportion of death of any cause
Time frame: 90±7 days
occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
Time frame: 90±7 days
proportion of any bleeding events
Time frame: 90±7 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Aug 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41128284Yao ZG, Pei YF, Chen HS. Onset to Treatment Time and Early Neurological Deterioration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Alteplase in Minor Stroke. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Nov 4;14(21):e043980. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.125.043980. Epub 2025 Oct 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40760234Fei ZX, Yin Y, Cui Y, Nguyen TN, Chen HS. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Alteplase for Mild Stroke with Admission NIHSS Score 0-3 Versus 4-5: A Secondary Analysis of the ARAMIS Randomized Trial. CNS Drugs. 2025 Oct;39(10):1037-1046. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01211-6. Epub 2025 Aug 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40371069He XY, He C, Chen HS. Renal function and efficacy of dual antiplatelet vs. alteplase in minor stroke: a post hoc analysis of ARAMIS study. Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 30;16:1568711. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1568711. eCollection 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39663175Cui Y, Chen HS. Dual antiplatelet versus alteplase in anterior and posterior circulation minor stroke. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2025 Aug 26;10(4):491-498. doi: 10.1136/svn-2024-003705.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39387110Cui Y, He C, Li ZA, Wang Y, Chen HS. Dual Antiplatelet Versus Alteplase for Early Neurologic Deterioration in Minor Stroke With Versus Without Large Vessel Occlusion: Prespecified Post Hoc Analysis of the ARAMIS Trial. Stroke. 2024 Nov;55(11):2590-2598. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048248. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39014552Cui Y, Zhao ZA, Wang JQ, Qiu SQ, Shen XY, Li ZY, Hu HZ, Chen HS. Systolic blood pressure and early neurological deterioration in minor stroke: A post hoc analysis of ARAMIS trial. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024 Jul;30(7):e14868. doi: 10.1111/cns.14868.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37367978Chen HS, Cui Y, Zhou ZH, Zhang H, Wang LX, Wang WZ, Shen LY, Guo LY, Wang EQ, Wang RX, Han J, Dong YL, Li J, Lin YZ, Yang QC, Zhang L, Li JY, Wang J, Xia L, Ma GB, Lu J, Jiang CH, Huang SM, Wan LS, Piao XY, Li Z, Li YS, Yang KH, Wang DL, Nguyen TN; ARAMIS Investigators. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase for Patients With Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ARAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 Jun 27;329(24):2135-2144. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7827.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Huisheng Chen, Doctor study chair
Neurology Department
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Aspirin, Clopidogrel 75mg and Alteplase in people with Stroke, run by General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of mRS (0-1) (time frame: 90±7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03661411, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2022.