AzTrials
AzTrials

Focal Hand DystoniaNCT03664375

Impact Of Physiotherapy And Botox In Improving Functional Outcomes Among Post Stroke Focal Dystonia Patients

A study testing Botulinum toxin type A and Task Specific Training in people with Focal Hand Dystonia, run by Isra University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study was conducted to assess the combine role of Physiotherapy by providing task specific trainings and Botulinum Toxin Type A in improving the functional outcomes of upper limb in post stroke patients with focal hand dystonia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Focal Hand Dystonia
What is being tested?
Botulinum toxin type A and Task Specific Training
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
39 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 2015to Dec 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients having first episode of unilateral stroke
  • At least 6 months of post stroke duration presenting with post stroke focal dystonia of the upper limb.
  • No previous exposure of the affected hand of Botox.
  • Reduced upper limb functions
  • Both genders will be included equally.

Who cannot join

  • Significant speech or cognitive impairment which impedes the ability to perform the assessment.
  • Other significant upper limb impairment e.g. fracture or frozen shoulder within 6 months.
  • Severe arthritis, amputation, evidence of fixed contracture, pregnancy or lactating womens.
  • Other diagnosis likely to interfere with rehabilitation or outcome assessments, e.g. blind, malignancy,
  • Other conditions which may contribute to upper limb spasticity, e.g. multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy.
  • Use of botulinum toxin to the upper limb in the previous 4 months.
  • Contraindications to intramuscular injection.
  • Contraindications /allergy to botulinum toxin type A, which include bleeding disorders, myasthenia gravis and concurrent use of aminoglycosides.

About this study

Official title: Impact Of Physiotherapy And Botulinum Toxin Type-A In Improving Functional Outcomes In Upper Limb Focal Dystonia Among Post Stroke Patients

This study was conducted to assess the combine role of Physiotherapy by providing task specific trainings and Botulinum Toxin Type A in improving the functional outcomes of upper limb in post stroke patients with focal hand dystonia.

Read the detailed description

Post-stroke hemiparesis, with dystonia, is a major cause of disability. Dystonia can hinder the functional activities making patient dependent on others for performance of daily living activities. Dystonia not only limits the physical activity of the patient but also affects their quality of life significantly. Various treatment protocols have been used in the literature for treatment of focal hand dystonia in the past including deep brain stimulation, kinesio taping, sensory oriented training, splinting, extracorporeal shock wave therapy and botox. Out of these Botox has gained much importance but it results only in improving the passive range of motion and has no consensus in improving the active range of motion and functional independence of the patient. The current study was planned to determine the effects of botulinum toxin type A combined with task-specific therapy, for post-stroke focal dystonia of upper limb.

Being tested
Botulinum toxin type A, Task Specific Training
Keywords
Dystonia Task-specific training Botulinum toxin type A
Medical subject headings
Dystonia, Focal, Task-Specific

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Botulinum toxin type AOther

    All patients in the experimental group received a BoNT-A injection. The injected total dose for individual patient in the experimental group was 100 units which is equivalent to approximately 300-500 Units of Dysport (the other type of BoNT-A available). The Botox was injected by the neurophysician intramuscularly using insulin U100 syringe and determination of muscles for injection was assessed clinically.

  • Task Specific TrainingOther

    Task specific training is the repetition of a specific task until expertise is reached. More challenging tasks are added as a means of progression

Study groups in NCT03664375
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental GroupExperimentalThe experimental group received botulinum toxin type A. After one week of Botox administration, a specially made task specific training program was started for these patients. It was provided for a duration of one hour and for three times per week for a total of 12 weeks by a trained physiotherapist.
Receives: Other: Botulinum toxin type A; Other: Task Specific Training
Control GroupPlacebo comparatorThe control group received only task specific training program with the same protocol as for the experimental group; for a duration of one hour and for three times per week up to a total of 12 weeks by a trained physiotherapist
Receives: Other: Task Specific Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT):

    It assessed specific changes in limb function by 19 items grouped in four subscales. The total score ranged from 0 to 57. The lower score indicated no movement and upper score indicated normal performance of the patient.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. MOTOR ASSESSMENT SCALE (MAS)

    It was a performance-based scale, based on a task-oriented approach to evaluate and assesses performance of functional tasks rather than isolated patterns of movement. All items were assessed using a 7-point scale from 0 - 6. A score of 6 indicated optimal motor behavior.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. WOLF MOTOR FUNCTION TEST (WMFT)

    It quantified motor ability through timed functional tasks. It used a 6-point ordinal scale with "0" = "does not attempt with the involved arm" to "5" = movement appears to be normal."

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. FUGL- MEYER ASSESSMENT TEST

    It was a performance-based impairment index to measure motor functioning. The total score possible was from 0 - 66, with higher function showing the improved level of independence

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Severity Of Dystonia

    The Arm Dystonia Disability Scale: The severity of dystonia was assessed using 0 (None) to 3 (Marked Difficulty in performing activity

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. Stroke Specific Quality Of Life

    The stroke specific Quality Of Life was administered to patients which rated their Quality of life

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Sep 2018
  2. Study startNov 2015
  3. Primary completionAug 2016
  4. Study completionDec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A total of 46 patients were recruited in the study using non-probability purposive sampling and were divided randomly into two equal groups; control and experimental group, by sealed envelope method. The experimental group received botulinum toxin A followed by task specific training, while the control group received only task-specific training for 12 weeks. Data was collected at baseline, after 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks by using upper extremity items of Motor Assessment Scale and Fugl Meyer Assessment scale of upper limb, Stroke specific quality of Life, Arm dystonia Disability scale and WOLF Motor function test.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
39 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03664375
Sponsor's protocol ID
IIRS-IUISB/PHD/008
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
5 Sep 2018
Last updated
10 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Botulinum toxin type A and Task Specific Training in people with Focal Hand Dystonia, run by Isra University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Action Research Arm Test (ARAT): (time frame: 12 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in