AzTrials
AzTrials

Whiplash InjuriesNCT03664934

Pathophysiological Mechanism Behind Prolonged Whiplash Associated Disorders

A study testing Exercises in people with Whiplash Injuries, run by Linkoeping University at 1 site in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms behind prolonged Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) is insufficient and whether changes can be restored by rehabilitation or not is unknown. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 63 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Whiplash Injuries
What is being tested?
Exercises
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
4 Oct 2018to 16 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 63 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age and gender matched healthy individuals without neck pain and disability (VAS <10mm, NDI <5%) that feel overall healthy without known diseases.

Who cannot join

  • Individuals with any of the following signs of head injury at the time of whiplash injury will be excluded: loss of consciousness, amnesia before or after the injury, altered mental status (e.g., confusion, disorientation), focal neurological changes (changes in smell and taste).
  • Previous fractures or dislocation of the cervical spine
  • Known or suspected serious physical pathology included myelopathy,
  • Spinal tumours
  • Spinal infection
  • Ongoing malignancy
Show all 21Show fewer
  • Previous severe neck problems that resulted in sick leave for more than a month in the year before the current whiplash injury
  • surgery in the cervical spine
  • Generalized or more dominant pain elsewhere in the body
  • Other illness/injury that may prevent full participation
  • Inability to understand and write in Swedish
  • Additional criteria in the present sub group:
  • Increased risk of bleeding,
  • BMI >35
  • Contraindications of MRI such as metal, severe obesity, pacemaker and pregnancy.
  • Earlier neck injury,
  • Recurrent neck pain,
  • Earlier treatment for neck pain.
  • Increased risk of bleeding,
  • BMI >35
  • Contraindications of MRI such as metal, severe obesity, pacemaker and pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Linköping University

    Linköping, Östergötland County, 58183

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

The knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms behind prolonged Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) is insufficient and whether changes can be restored by rehabilitation or not is unknown. The aim of these studies are to investigate different parameters to further learn about pathophysiological mechanisms (neck muscle fatty infiltration, cross-sectional area, volume, inflammation and function, brain structure and activity, biomarkers for stress and inflammation, cervical kinaesthesia and balance before and after intervention) and the association for clinical outcomes in individuals with chronic WAD (n=30) compared with age and gender matched healthy individuals (n=30). Measurements will be made at baseline (patients and healthy) and at 3 months (patients only, at the end of treatment). However, for the blood and saliva samples, they will be re-investigated in the healthy group as well. The study results may contribute to the development of improved understanding and diagnostics in chronic WAD that may improve future rehabilitation.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND There is no consensus regarding the injury mechanism in complex prolonged Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) cases. Often, tissue damage and physiological alterations is not detectable. In order to improve future rehabilitation, a greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying whiplash injury and their importance for treatment success is required. It is also important to investigate if pathophysiological changes can be restored by rehabilitation.

AIM The projects aims to investigate neck muscle structure and function, biomarkers and the association with pain, disability and other outcomes before and after neck-specific exercises.

METHODS Design These are sub-group trials, each one independent of the others, in a prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel treatment arms conducted according to a protocol established before recruitment started (ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol ID: NCT03022812). Physiotherapist-led neck-specific exercise previously shown to be effective for the current population constitutes the control treatment for the new Internet-based neck-specific exercise treatment. In the RCT, a total of 140 patients will be included (70 from each group), whereof 30 (both randomization arms equally) consecutively will be asked to participate in the present sub-group study. The sub-group studies aims to start September 2019. Independent physiotherapists in primary health care will distribute the treatment.

In sub-group of individuals, additional measurements will be performed before and after interventions end (3 months follow-up). The physical measurements will be performed by independent specially trained test-leaders blinded to randomization.

Additionally, 30 neck healthy individuals without serious diseases matched for age and gender will consecutively be investigated.

Study population

The inclusion criteria for patients are:

  • Chronic neck problems corresponding to WAD grades 2-3 verified by clinical examination
  • Average estimated pain in the last week at least 20 mm on the visual analogue scale (VAS)
  • Neck disability of more than 20% on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) [10]
  • Working age (18 - 63 years)
  • Daily access to a computer/tablet/smart phone and Internet
  • Neck symptoms within the first week after the injury (i.e., neck pain, neck stiffness, or cervical radiculopathy).

For the present sub group study additional criteria were:

  • Right handed
  • Dominant right sided or equal sided pain

Inclusion criteria for healthy controls:

  • Age and gender matched healthy individuals without neck pain and disability (VAS <10mm, NDI <5%) that feel overall healthy without known diseases.

Exclusion criteria for patients:

  • Individuals with any of the following signs of head injury at the time of whiplash injury will be excluded: loss of consciousness, amnesia before or after the injury, altered mental status (e.g., confusion, disorientation), focal neurological changes (changes in smell and taste).
  • Previous fractures or dislocation of the cervical spine
  • Known or suspected serious physical pathology included myelopathy,
  • Spinal tumours
  • Spinal infection
  • Ongoing malignancy
  • Previous severe neck problems that resulted in sick leave for more than a month in the year before the current whiplash injury
  • surgery in the cervical spine
  • Generalized or more dominant pain elsewhere in the body
  • Other illness/injury that may prevent full participation
  • Inability to understand and write in Swedish

Additional criteria in the present sub group:

  • Increased risk of bleeding,
  • BMI >35
  • Contraindications of MRI such as metal, severe obesity, pacemaker and pregnancy.

Exclusion criteria for healthy controls:

  • Earlier neck injury,
  • Recurrent neck pain,
  • Earlier treatment for neck pain.
  • Increased risk of bleeding,
  • BMI >35
  • Contraindications of MRI

Recruitment and randomization Information about the study will be provided by healthcare providers, reports in newspapers, social media, and the university's website. Interested patients will contact the research team through the project website. After completing a small survey on the website, a project team member (physiotherapist) will perform a telephone interview and ask about the patient's medical history. An appointment for a physical examination and additional interview for the present sub-group study is made as a last step to ensure that the criteria for study participation are met. If the study criteria are met, written and oral informed consent are obtained, and the patient will fill out a questionnaire and undergo physical measurements of neck-related function. Baseline measurements must be completed for inclusion.

Healthy individuals will consecutively be recruited among friends, family and staff at the university or the university hospital to suit the age and gender of a patient.

Intervention for the patient group The intervention consists of neck-specific exercises distributed in two different ways, twice a week at the physiotherapist clinic for 3 months (NSE group) or with 4 physiotherapy visits only combined with a web-based system (NSEIT group).

  1. In the NSE group, patients will get an explanation and justification for the exercise consisting of basic information about the musculoskeletal anatomy of the neck relevant to the exercises given by the physiotherapist in order to motivate the patient and help make them feel safe and reassured. The patients undergo a 12-week training programme with a physiotherapist 2 days/week (total 24 times). Exercises are chosen from a clear and written frame of exercises. The training includes exercises for the deep neck muscles, continuing with the endurance training of neck and shoulder muscles. The exercises are individually adjusted according to the individual's physical conditions and progressively increased in severity and dose. Exercise-related pain provocation is not accepted. The patient may also perform exercises at home. At the end of the treatment period, the participants are encouraged to continue practising on their own. The exercises have been used with good results in previous RCTs.
  2. In the NSEIT group, patients will receive the same information and training programmes as the NSE group, but with 4 visits to the physiotherapist instead of 24. Exercises are introduced, progressed, and followed up to ensure correct performance. The exercises are performed and most of the information is given with the help of Internet support outside the healthcare system. Photos and videos of the exercises (a clear stepwise progression) and information are available on the Web-based system. A SMS reminder is automatically available if the exercise diary is not completed. The time required for training is the same as in group A, but without the patient having to go to the physiotherapy clinic. The Internet programme was developed by experienced physiotherapists/ researchers together with technicians and clinicians. Technicians are available to assist the participants if any technical difficulties arise. The patients will be introduced to the exercises and get information and support at the physiotherapy visits.

Variables and measurements Background data and data in the RCT include personal details, questionnaires and test results regarding pain, physical and psychological functioning, health and cost-effectiveness described elsewhere (ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol ID: NCT03022812).

Measurements will be done at baseline for both groups and at 3 months follow-up for the patient when treatment ends. Except for blood and saliva samples that will be collected twice (baseline and repeated after 3 months), the measurements will be performed at baseline only for the healthy individuals.

Being tested
Exercises
Keywords
Neck pain, Rehabilitation, Muscles, Clinical Trial,, Diagnostics
Medical subject headings
Whiplash Injuries, Neck Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ExercisesOther

    Also called No treatment, controls only

    Neck-specific exercises for chronic whiplash associated disorders

Study groups in NCT03664934
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients, Neck-specific exercisesExperimentalPatients before and after neck-specific exercises, subgroup to NCT01528579 with additional measures
Receives: Other: Exercises
Healthy controlsNo interventionHealthy controls, no treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Speckle tracking analyses of neck and shoulder muscle function

    Measured with medical ultrasonography during neck and arm exercises

    Measured: Baseline and at 3 months follow-up when intervention ended. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.

  2. Cross-sectional area, volume, fatty infiltration and inflammation of neck muscles

    Neck and some whole body imaging measured with 3.0 T MRI scanner

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.

  3. Brain function in cortical networks related to pain

    Measured with a resting-state fMRI protocol with an echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.

  4. Biomarkers for inflammation and stress

    Measured with blood samples and saliva

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.

  5. Cervikal kinaesthesia

    Neck-eye coordination

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.

  6. Balance test

    Postural sway during single and double leg stance

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.

Secondary outcomes (32)
  1. Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    Self-reported neck-specific function. Score 0 to 50 (or in percentages 0% to 100%); 0p/0%=no disability, 50p/100%=complete activity limitation

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  2. Whiplash Disability Questionnaire

    Disability associated with whiplash, in patients. Score 0 to 130; 0=no disability, 130=maximum disability.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  3. Patient-specific functional scale (PSFS)

    Individual ratings of function to quantify activity limitations, in patients. Score 0-10 score; 0= Unable to perform activity, 10= Able to perform activity at the same level as before injury or problem. Total score=sum of the activity scores/ number of activities.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  4. Pain intensity in neck, head, and arm and dizziness by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0-100 mm; where 0=no pain, 100= worst imaginable pain )

    Pain intensity. Score 0 to 100 mm; 0=no pain, 100=worst imaginable pain

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  5. Distribution of pain by a pain drawing assessed with images

    Distribution of pain, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  6. Frequency of pain

    Frequency of pain, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  7. Use of pain medications

    Use of pain medications, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  8. Dizziness/balance by the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI)

    Dizziness questionnaire, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  9. Headache Questions by VAS and the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6)

    Impact of headache, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  10. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), total scores range from 0 - 52; 0=no catastrophizing, 52= maximum catastrophizing

    Self-reported pain catastrophizing, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  11. EuroQuol five dimensions

    Self-reported health, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  12. Effort Reward Imbalance questionnaire

    Work related balance between effort and reward, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  13. Symptoms Satisfaction scale

    Satisfaction with present symptoms, in patients. 1 to 7 scale; 1=delighted, 7=terrible.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  14. Physical activity score, a combination score of the 2 questions (everyday physical activity and exercise/sport/open-air activity) to a combined 4-point score

    Physical activity. Score 0 to 4; 0=inactivity, 4=high activity.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  15. Health care consumption, number of visits

    Health care consumption, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  16. Self-Efficacy Scale (SES)

    Self-reported self-efficacy, in patients. Score 0-200; 0=no self-efficacy, 200=strong self-efficacy

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  17. Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)

    Fear Avoidance Beliefs, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  18. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD)

    Depression and anxiety. Each subscale (depression and anxiety) range from 0 to 21; 0=normal, 21=severe

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  19. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder checklist (PCL-S)

    Post Traumatic Stress, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  20. Range of neck motion

    Range of motion, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  21. Ergonomics questions and how work is perceived

    Work ergonomics, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  22. Sickness presence by the Stanford presenteeism scale (SPS-6)

    Sickness presence at work, impact of health problems on individual work performance and overall perceived productivity , in patients. Scores 6-30, with lower scores indicting lower Presenteeism, and higher scores indicating higher Presenteeism.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  23. Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) questionnaire

    Patient enablement, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  24. Consumption of analgesic drugs prescribed through the drug registry

    Consumption of analgesic drugs, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  25. Sick-leave registration, number of days and episodes

    Sick-leave, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  26. Cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ)

    Cognitive function, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  27. Sensorimotor control of the neck muscles, mm Hg

    Sensorimotor control, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  28. Neck muscle endurance of ventral and dorsal neck muscles in seconds

    Neck muscle endurance, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  29. Balance measured in seconds, standing on one leg with eyes closed

    Balance, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  30. Neurology

    Clinical examination of neurology, in patients, such as reflexes, sensibility, muscle weakness, Spurling´s test, neural tension test.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  31. Work Ability Index (WAI)

    Self-reported work ability, in patients

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

  32. Global rating of change scale

    Overall change because of the treatment, in patients. Score -5 (very much worse to +5 completely recovered and importance of change 0=not at all important, 100= very important.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Sep 2018
  2. Study start4 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion16 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion16 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03664934
Sponsor's protocol ID
Linköping University
Status last verified
Oct 2023
First submitted
28 Aug 2018
Last updated
3 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Unidentified data may be available upon resonable request (may need approval from the ethics comittee as it contains data about health).

Publications

  • Peterson G, Andersson E, Jonsson M, Peolsson A. Effect of neck-specific exercises on trapezius muscle function in chronic whiplash-associated disorders: a longitudinal case-control study using ultrasound and speckle-tracking analyses. Sci Rep. 2026 Feb 25;16(1):7725. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-35963-y.

    PubMed 41741477
  • Ragnarsdottir H, Peterson G, Gislason MK, Oddsdottir GL, Peolsson A. The effect of a neck-specific exercise program on cervical kinesthesia for patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorders: a case-control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 2;25(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07427-9.

    PubMed 38693515
  • Peolsson A, Karlsson A, Ghafouri B, Ebbers T, Engstrom M, Jonsson M, Wahlen K, Romu T, Borga M, Kristjansson E, Bahat HS, German D, Zsigmond P, Peterson G. Pathophysiology behind prolonged whiplash associated disorders: study protocol for an experimental study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Feb 2;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2433-3.

    PubMed 30711003

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Exercises in people with Whiplash Injuries, run by Linkoeping University at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Speckle tracking analyses of neck and shoulder muscle function (time frame: Baseline and at 3 months follow-up when intervention ended. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03664934, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in