Whiplash InjuriesNCT03664934
Pathophysiological Mechanism Behind Prolonged Whiplash Associated Disorders
A study testing Exercises in people with Whiplash Injuries, run by Linkoeping University at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms behind prolonged Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) is insufficient and whether changes can be restored by rehabilitation or not is unknown. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 63 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Whiplash Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Exercises
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 4 Oct 2018to 16 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 63 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age and gender matched healthy individuals without neck pain and disability (VAS <10mm, NDI <5%) that feel overall healthy without known diseases.
Who cannot join
- Individuals with any of the following signs of head injury at the time of whiplash injury will be excluded: loss of consciousness, amnesia before or after the injury, altered mental status (e.g., confusion, disorientation), focal neurological changes (changes in smell and taste).
- Previous fractures or dislocation of the cervical spine
- Known or suspected serious physical pathology included myelopathy,
- Spinal tumours
- Spinal infection
- Ongoing malignancy
Show all 21Show fewer
- Previous severe neck problems that resulted in sick leave for more than a month in the year before the current whiplash injury
- surgery in the cervical spine
- Generalized or more dominant pain elsewhere in the body
- Other illness/injury that may prevent full participation
- Inability to understand and write in Swedish
- Additional criteria in the present sub group:
- Increased risk of bleeding,
- BMI >35
- Contraindications of MRI such as metal, severe obesity, pacemaker and pregnancy.
- Earlier neck injury,
- Recurrent neck pain,
- Earlier treatment for neck pain.
- Increased risk of bleeding,
- BMI >35
- Contraindications of MRI such as metal, severe obesity, pacemaker and pregnancy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms behind prolonged Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) is insufficient and whether changes can be restored by rehabilitation or not is unknown. The aim of these studies are to investigate different parameters to further learn about pathophysiological mechanisms (neck muscle fatty infiltration, cross-sectional area, volume, inflammation and function, brain structure and activity, biomarkers for stress and inflammation, cervical kinaesthesia and balance before and after intervention) and the association for clinical outcomes in individuals with chronic WAD (n=30) compared with age and gender matched healthy individuals (n=30). Measurements will be made at baseline (patients and healthy) and at 3 months (patients only, at the end of treatment). However, for the blood and saliva samples, they will be re-investigated in the healthy group as well. The study results may contribute to the development of improved understanding and diagnostics in chronic WAD that may improve future rehabilitation.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND There is no consensus regarding the injury mechanism in complex prolonged Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) cases. Often, tissue damage and physiological alterations is not detectable. In order to improve future rehabilitation, a greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying whiplash injury and their importance for treatment success is required. It is also important to investigate if pathophysiological changes can be restored by rehabilitation.
AIM The projects aims to investigate neck muscle structure and function, biomarkers and the association with pain, disability and other outcomes before and after neck-specific exercises.
METHODS Design These are sub-group trials, each one independent of the others, in a prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel treatment arms conducted according to a protocol established before recruitment started (ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol ID: NCT03022812). Physiotherapist-led neck-specific exercise previously shown to be effective for the current population constitutes the control treatment for the new Internet-based neck-specific exercise treatment. In the RCT, a total of 140 patients will be included (70 from each group), whereof 30 (both randomization arms equally) consecutively will be asked to participate in the present sub-group study. The sub-group studies aims to start September 2019. Independent physiotherapists in primary health care will distribute the treatment.
In sub-group of individuals, additional measurements will be performed before and after interventions end (3 months follow-up). The physical measurements will be performed by independent specially trained test-leaders blinded to randomization.
Additionally, 30 neck healthy individuals without serious diseases matched for age and gender will consecutively be investigated.
Study population
The inclusion criteria for patients are:
- Chronic neck problems corresponding to WAD grades 2-3 verified by clinical examination
- Average estimated pain in the last week at least 20 mm on the visual analogue scale (VAS)
- Neck disability of more than 20% on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) [10]
- Working age (18 - 63 years)
- Daily access to a computer/tablet/smart phone and Internet
- Neck symptoms within the first week after the injury (i.e., neck pain, neck stiffness, or cervical radiculopathy).
For the present sub group study additional criteria were:
- Right handed
- Dominant right sided or equal sided pain
Inclusion criteria for healthy controls:
- Age and gender matched healthy individuals without neck pain and disability (VAS <10mm, NDI <5%) that feel overall healthy without known diseases.
Exclusion criteria for patients:
- Individuals with any of the following signs of head injury at the time of whiplash injury will be excluded: loss of consciousness, amnesia before or after the injury, altered mental status (e.g., confusion, disorientation), focal neurological changes (changes in smell and taste).
- Previous fractures or dislocation of the cervical spine
- Known or suspected serious physical pathology included myelopathy,
- Spinal tumours
- Spinal infection
- Ongoing malignancy
- Previous severe neck problems that resulted in sick leave for more than a month in the year before the current whiplash injury
- surgery in the cervical spine
- Generalized or more dominant pain elsewhere in the body
- Other illness/injury that may prevent full participation
- Inability to understand and write in Swedish
Additional criteria in the present sub group:
- Increased risk of bleeding,
- BMI >35
- Contraindications of MRI such as metal, severe obesity, pacemaker and pregnancy.
Exclusion criteria for healthy controls:
- Earlier neck injury,
- Recurrent neck pain,
- Earlier treatment for neck pain.
- Increased risk of bleeding,
- BMI >35
- Contraindications of MRI
Recruitment and randomization Information about the study will be provided by healthcare providers, reports in newspapers, social media, and the university's website. Interested patients will contact the research team through the project website. After completing a small survey on the website, a project team member (physiotherapist) will perform a telephone interview and ask about the patient's medical history. An appointment for a physical examination and additional interview for the present sub-group study is made as a last step to ensure that the criteria for study participation are met. If the study criteria are met, written and oral informed consent are obtained, and the patient will fill out a questionnaire and undergo physical measurements of neck-related function. Baseline measurements must be completed for inclusion.
Healthy individuals will consecutively be recruited among friends, family and staff at the university or the university hospital to suit the age and gender of a patient.
Intervention for the patient group The intervention consists of neck-specific exercises distributed in two different ways, twice a week at the physiotherapist clinic for 3 months (NSE group) or with 4 physiotherapy visits only combined with a web-based system (NSEIT group).
- In the NSE group, patients will get an explanation and justification for the exercise consisting of basic information about the musculoskeletal anatomy of the neck relevant to the exercises given by the physiotherapist in order to motivate the patient and help make them feel safe and reassured. The patients undergo a 12-week training programme with a physiotherapist 2 days/week (total 24 times). Exercises are chosen from a clear and written frame of exercises. The training includes exercises for the deep neck muscles, continuing with the endurance training of neck and shoulder muscles. The exercises are individually adjusted according to the individual's physical conditions and progressively increased in severity and dose. Exercise-related pain provocation is not accepted. The patient may also perform exercises at home. At the end of the treatment period, the participants are encouraged to continue practising on their own. The exercises have been used with good results in previous RCTs.
- In the NSEIT group, patients will receive the same information and training programmes as the NSE group, but with 4 visits to the physiotherapist instead of 24. Exercises are introduced, progressed, and followed up to ensure correct performance. The exercises are performed and most of the information is given with the help of Internet support outside the healthcare system. Photos and videos of the exercises (a clear stepwise progression) and information are available on the Web-based system. A SMS reminder is automatically available if the exercise diary is not completed. The time required for training is the same as in group A, but without the patient having to go to the physiotherapy clinic. The Internet programme was developed by experienced physiotherapists/ researchers together with technicians and clinicians. Technicians are available to assist the participants if any technical difficulties arise. The patients will be introduced to the exercises and get information and support at the physiotherapy visits.
Variables and measurements Background data and data in the RCT include personal details, questionnaires and test results regarding pain, physical and psychological functioning, health and cost-effectiveness described elsewhere (ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol ID: NCT03022812).
Measurements will be done at baseline for both groups and at 3 months follow-up for the patient when treatment ends. Except for blood and saliva samples that will be collected twice (baseline and repeated after 3 months), the measurements will be performed at baseline only for the healthy individuals.
- Conditions
- Whiplash Injuries
- Being tested
- Exercises
- Keywords
- Neck pain, Rehabilitation, Muscles, Clinical Trial,, Diagnostics
- Medical subject headings
- Whiplash Injuries, Neck Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ExercisesOther
Also called No treatment, controls only
Neck-specific exercises for chronic whiplash associated disorders
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients, Neck-specific exercises | Experimental | Patients before and after neck-specific exercises, subgroup to NCT01528579 with additional measures Receives: Other: Exercises |
| Healthy controls | No intervention | Healthy controls, no treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Speckle tracking analyses of neck and shoulder muscle function
Measured with medical ultrasonography during neck and arm exercises
Measured: Baseline and at 3 months follow-up when intervention ended. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Cross-sectional area, volume, fatty infiltration and inflammation of neck muscles
Neck and some whole body imaging measured with 3.0 T MRI scanner
Measured: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Brain function in cortical networks related to pain
Measured with a resting-state fMRI protocol with an echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence
Measured: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Biomarkers for inflammation and stress
Measured with blood samples and saliva
Measured: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Cervikal kinaesthesia
Neck-eye coordination
Measured: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Balance test
Postural sway during single and double leg stance
Measured: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Secondary outcomes (32)
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Self-reported neck-specific function. Score 0 to 50 (or in percentages 0% to 100%); 0p/0%=no disability, 50p/100%=complete activity limitation
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Whiplash Disability Questionnaire
Disability associated with whiplash, in patients. Score 0 to 130; 0=no disability, 130=maximum disability.
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Patient-specific functional scale (PSFS)
Individual ratings of function to quantify activity limitations, in patients. Score 0-10 score; 0= Unable to perform activity, 10= Able to perform activity at the same level as before injury or problem. Total score=sum of the activity scores/ number of activities.
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Pain intensity in neck, head, and arm and dizziness by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0-100 mm; where 0=no pain, 100= worst imaginable pain )
Pain intensity. Score 0 to 100 mm; 0=no pain, 100=worst imaginable pain
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Distribution of pain by a pain drawing assessed with images
Distribution of pain, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Frequency of pain
Frequency of pain, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Use of pain medications
Use of pain medications, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Dizziness/balance by the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI)
Dizziness questionnaire, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Headache Questions by VAS and the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6)
Impact of headache, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), total scores range from 0 - 52; 0=no catastrophizing, 52= maximum catastrophizing
Self-reported pain catastrophizing, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
EuroQuol five dimensions
Self-reported health, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Effort Reward Imbalance questionnaire
Work related balance between effort and reward, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Symptoms Satisfaction scale
Satisfaction with present symptoms, in patients. 1 to 7 scale; 1=delighted, 7=terrible.
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Physical activity score, a combination score of the 2 questions (everyday physical activity and exercise/sport/open-air activity) to a combined 4-point score
Physical activity. Score 0 to 4; 0=inactivity, 4=high activity.
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Health care consumption, number of visits
Health care consumption, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Self-Efficacy Scale (SES)
Self-reported self-efficacy, in patients. Score 0-200; 0=no self-efficacy, 200=strong self-efficacy
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)
Fear Avoidance Beliefs, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD)
Depression and anxiety. Each subscale (depression and anxiety) range from 0 to 21; 0=normal, 21=severe
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder checklist (PCL-S)
Post Traumatic Stress, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Range of neck motion
Range of motion, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Ergonomics questions and how work is perceived
Work ergonomics, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Sickness presence by the Stanford presenteeism scale (SPS-6)
Sickness presence at work, impact of health problems on individual work performance and overall perceived productivity , in patients. Scores 6-30, with lower scores indicting lower Presenteeism, and higher scores indicating higher Presenteeism.
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) questionnaire
Patient enablement, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Consumption of analgesic drugs prescribed through the drug registry
Consumption of analgesic drugs, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Sick-leave registration, number of days and episodes
Sick-leave, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ)
Cognitive function, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Sensorimotor control of the neck muscles, mm Hg
Sensorimotor control, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Neck muscle endurance of ventral and dorsal neck muscles in seconds
Neck muscle endurance, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Balance measured in seconds, standing on one leg with eyes closed
Balance, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Neurology
Clinical examination of neurology, in patients, such as reflexes, sensibility, muscle weakness, Spurling´s test, neural tension test.
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Work Ability Index (WAI)
Self-reported work ability, in patients
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Global rating of change scale
Overall change because of the treatment, in patients. Score -5 (very much worse to +5 completely recovered and importance of change 0=not at all important, 100= very important.
Measured: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Sep 2018
- Study start4 Oct 2018
- Primary completion16 Dec 2021
- Study completion16 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Whiplash InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Linkoeping University
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anneli Peolsson, Linkoeping University
- Investigators
- Anneli Peolsson, Professor, Principal investigator, Linkoeping University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03664934
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Linköping University
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 28 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 3 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Unidentified data may be available upon resonable request (may need approval from the ethics comittee as it contains data about health).
Publications
Peterson G, Andersson E, Jonsson M, Peolsson A. Effect of neck-specific exercises on trapezius muscle function in chronic whiplash-associated disorders: a longitudinal case-control study using ultrasound and speckle-tracking analyses. Sci Rep. 2026 Feb 25;16(1):7725. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-35963-y.
PubMed 41741477Ragnarsdottir H, Peterson G, Gislason MK, Oddsdottir GL, Peolsson A. The effect of a neck-specific exercise program on cervical kinesthesia for patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorders: a case-control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 2;25(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07427-9.
PubMed 38693515Peolsson A, Karlsson A, Ghafouri B, Ebbers T, Engstrom M, Jonsson M, Wahlen K, Romu T, Borga M, Kristjansson E, Bahat HS, German D, Zsigmond P, Peterson G. Pathophysiology behind prolonged whiplash associated disorders: study protocol for an experimental study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Feb 2;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2433-3.
PubMed 30711003
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pathophysiological Mechanism Behind Prolonged Whiplash Associated Disorders
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03664934
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Linköping University
- Conditions
- Whiplash Injuries
- Keywords
- Neck pain, Rehabilitation, Muscles, Clinical Trial,, Diagnostics
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Linkoeping UniversityOther government
- Study start
- 4 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms behind prolonged Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) is insufficient and whether changes can be restored by rehabilitation or not is unknown. The aim of these studies are to investigate different parameters to further learn about pathophysiological mechanisms (neck muscle fatty infiltration, cross-sectional area, volume, inflammation and function, brain structure and activity, biomarkers for stress and inflammation, cervical kinaesthesia and balance before and after intervention) and the association for clinical outcomes in individuals with chronic WAD (n=30) compared with age and gender matched healthy individuals (n=30). Measurements will be made at baseline (patients and healthy) and at 3 months (patients only, at the end of treatment). However, for the blood and saliva samples, they will be re-investigated in the healthy group as well. The study results may contribute to the development of improved understanding and diagnostics in chronic WAD that may improve future rehabilitation.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND There is no consensus regarding the injury mechanism in complex prolonged Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) cases. Often, tissue damage and physiological alterations is not detectable. In order to improve future rehabilitation, a greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying whiplash injury and their importance for treatment success is required. It is also important to investigate if pathophysiological changes can be restored by rehabilitation.
AIM The projects aims to investigate neck muscle structure and function, biomarkers and the association with pain, disability and other outcomes before and after neck-specific exercises.
METHODS Design These are sub-group trials, each one independent of the others, in a prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel treatment arms conducted according to a protocol established before recruitment started (ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol ID: NCT03022812). Physiotherapist-led neck-specific exercise previously shown to be effective for the current population constitutes the control treatment for the new Internet-based neck-specific exercise treatment. In the RCT, a total of 140 patients will be included (70 from each group), whereof 30 (both randomization arms equally) consecutively will be asked to participate in the present sub-group study. The sub-group studies aims to start September 2019. Independent physiotherapists in primary health care will distribute the treatment.
In sub-group of individuals, additional measurements will be performed before and after interventions end (3 months follow-up). The physical measurements will be performed by independent specially trained test-leaders blinded to randomization.
Additionally, 30 neck healthy individuals without serious diseases matched for age and gender will consecutively be investigated.
Study population
The inclusion criteria for patients are:
- Chronic neck problems corresponding to WAD grades 2-3 verified by clinical examination
- Average estimated pain in the last week at least 20 mm on the visual analogue scale (VAS)
- Neck disability of more than 20% on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) [10]
- Working age (18 - 63 years)
- Daily access to a computer/tablet/smart phone and Internet
- Neck symptoms within the first week after the injury (i.e., neck pain, neck stiffness, or cervical radiculopathy).
For the present sub group study additional criteria were:
- Right handed
- Dominant right sided or equal sided pain
Inclusion criteria for healthy controls:
- Age and gender matched healthy individuals without neck pain and disability (VAS <10mm, NDI <5%) that feel overall healthy without known diseases.
Exclusion criteria for patients:
- Individuals with any of the following signs of head injury at the time of whiplash injury will be excluded: loss of consciousness, amnesia before or after the injury, altered mental status (e.g., confusion, disorientation), focal neurological changes (changes in smell and taste).
- Previous fractures or dislocation of the cervical spine
- Known or suspected serious physical pathology included myelopathy,
- Spinal tumours
- Spinal infection
- Ongoing malignancy
- Previous severe neck problems that resulted in sick leave for more than a month in the year before the current whiplash injury
- surgery in the cervical spine
- Generalized or more dominant pain elsewhere in the body
- Other illness/injury that may prevent full participation
- Inability to understand and write in Swedish
Additional criteria in the present sub group:
- Increased risk of bleeding,
- BMI >35
- Contraindications of MRI such as metal, severe obesity, pacemaker and pregnancy.
Exclusion criteria for healthy controls:
- Earlier neck injury,
- Recurrent neck pain,
- Earlier treatment for neck pain.
- Increased risk of bleeding,
- BMI >35
- Contraindications of MRI
Recruitment and randomization Information about the study will be provided by healthcare providers, reports in newspapers, social media, and the university's website. Interested patients will contact the research team through the project website. After completing a small survey on the website, a project team member (physiotherapist) will perform a telephone interview and ask about the patient's medical history. An appointment for a physical examination and additional interview for the present sub-group study is made as a last step to ensure that the criteria for study participation are met. If the study criteria are met, written and oral informed consent are obtained, and the patient will fill out a questionnaire and undergo physical measurements of neck-related function. Baseline measurements must be completed for inclusion.
Healthy individuals will consecutively be recruited among friends, family and staff at the university or the university hospital to suit the age and gender of a patient.
Intervention for the patient group The intervention consists of neck-specific exercises distributed in two different ways, twice a week at the physiotherapist clinic for 3 months (NSE group) or with 4 physiotherapy visits only combined with a web-based system (NSEIT group).
- In the NSE group, patients will get an explanation and justification for the exercise consisting of basic information about the musculoskeletal anatomy of the neck relevant to the exercises given by the physiotherapist in order to motivate the patient and help make them feel safe and reassured. The patients undergo a 12-week training programme with a physiotherapist 2 days/week (total 24 times). Exercises are chosen from a clear and written frame of exercises. The training includes exercises for the deep neck muscles, continuing with the endurance training of neck and shoulder muscles. The exercises are individually adjusted according to the individual's physical conditions and progressively increased in severity and dose. Exercise-related pain provocation is not accepted. The patient may also perform exercises at home. At the end of the treatment period, the participants are encouraged to continue practising on their own. The exercises have been used with good results in previous RCTs.
- In the NSEIT group, patients will receive the same information and training programmes as the NSE group, but with 4 visits to the physiotherapist instead of 24. Exercises are introduced, progressed, and followed up to ensure correct performance. The exercises are performed and most of the information is given with the help of Internet support outside the healthcare system. Photos and videos of the exercises (a clear stepwise progression) and information are available on the Web-based system. A SMS reminder is automatically available if the exercise diary is not completed. The time required for training is the same as in group A, but without the patient having to go to the physiotherapy clinic. The Internet programme was developed by experienced physiotherapists/ researchers together with technicians and clinicians. Technicians are available to assist the participants if any technical difficulties arise. The patients will be introduced to the exercises and get information and support at the physiotherapy visits.
Variables and measurements Background data and data in the RCT include personal details, questionnaires and test results regarding pain, physical and psychological functioning, health and cost-effectiveness described elsewhere (ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol ID: NCT03022812).
Measurements will be done at baseline for both groups and at 3 months follow-up for the patient when treatment ends. Except for blood and saliva samples that will be collected twice (baseline and repeated after 3 months), the measurements will be performed at baseline only for the healthy individuals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients, Neck-specific exercises | Experimental | Other: ExercisesPatients before and after neck-specific exercises, subgroup to NCT01528579 with additional measures |
| Healthy controls | No intervention | –Healthy controls, no treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 63 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Age and gender matched healthy individuals without neck pain and disability (VAS <10mm, NDI <5%) that feel overall healthy without known diseases.
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Individuals with any of the following signs of head injury at the time of whiplash injury will be excluded: loss of consciousness, amnesia before or after the injury, altered mental status (e.g., confusion, disorientation), focal neurological changes (changes in smell and taste).
- Previous fractures or dislocation of the cervical spine
- Known or suspected serious physical pathology included myelopathy,
- Spinal tumours
- Spinal infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ExercisesAlso: No treatment, controls onlyNeck-specific exercises for chronic whiplash associated disorders | Other | Patients, Neck-specific exercises |
Primary outcome
Speckle tracking analyses of neck and shoulder muscle function
Time frame: Baseline and at 3 months follow-up when intervention ended. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Measured with medical ultrasonography during neck and arm exercises
Cross-sectional area, volume, fatty infiltration and inflammation of neck muscles
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Neck and some whole body imaging measured with 3.0 T MRI scanner
Brain function in cortical networks related to pain
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Measured with a resting-state fMRI protocol with an echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence
Biomarkers for inflammation and stress
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Measured with blood samples and saliva
Cervikal kinaesthesia
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Neck-eye coordination
Balance test
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Postural sway during single and double leg stance
32 secondary outcomes
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Whiplash Disability Questionnaire
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Patient-specific functional scale (PSFS)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Pain intensity in neck, head, and arm and dizziness by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0-100 mm; where 0=no pain, 100= worst imaginable pain )
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Distribution of pain by a pain drawing assessed with images
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Frequency of pain
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Use of pain medications
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Dizziness/balance by the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Headache Questions by VAS and the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), total scores range from 0 - 52; 0=no catastrophizing, 52= maximum catastrophizing
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
EuroQuol five dimensions
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Effort Reward Imbalance questionnaire
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Symptoms Satisfaction scale
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Physical activity score, a combination score of the 2 questions (everyday physical activity and exercise/sport/open-air activity) to a combined 4-point score
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Health care consumption, number of visits
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Self-Efficacy Scale (SES)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder checklist (PCL-S)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Range of neck motion
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Ergonomics questions and how work is perceived
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Sickness presence by the Stanford presenteeism scale (SPS-6)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) questionnaire
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Consumption of analgesic drugs prescribed through the drug registry
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Sick-leave registration, number of days and episodes
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Sensorimotor control of the neck muscles, mm Hg
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Neck muscle endurance of ventral and dorsal neck muscles in seconds
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Balance measured in seconds, standing on one leg with eyes closed
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Neurology
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Work Ability Index (WAI)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Global rating of change scale
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Oct 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41741477Peterson G, Andersson E, Jonsson M, Peolsson A. Effect of neck-specific exercises on trapezius muscle function in chronic whiplash-associated disorders: a longitudinal case-control study using ultrasound and speckle-tracking analyses. Sci Rep. 2026 Feb 25;16(1):7725. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-35963-y.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38693515Ragnarsdottir H, Peterson G, Gislason MK, Oddsdottir GL, Peolsson A. The effect of a neck-specific exercise program on cervical kinesthesia for patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorders: a case-control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 2;25(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07427-9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30711003Peolsson A, Karlsson A, Ghafouri B, Ebbers T, Engstrom M, Jonsson M, Wahlen K, Romu T, Borga M, Kristjansson E, Bahat HS, German D, Zsigmond P, Peterson G. Pathophysiology behind prolonged whiplash associated disorders: study protocol for an experimental study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Feb 2;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2433-3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Unidentified data may be available upon resonable request (may need approval from the ethics comittee as it contains data about health).
Related trials for Whiplash Injuries
Active, not recruiting
Neck-specific Exercises Effectively Improves Whiplash-associated Disorders.
Whiplash-associated Disorders
Not yet recruiting
StressModex for Post-Traumatic Neck Pain
Post-Traumatic Neck Pain, Whiplash-associated Disorders
Recruiting
Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Whiplash Associated Disorders
Whiplash Associated Disorder (WAD)
Recruiting
Virtual Reality Rehabilitation in Neck Pain Subjects
Neck Pain, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Percutaneous Electrolysis and Dry Needling vs. Standard Therapy for Whiplash Syndrome
Whiplash Injuries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anneli Peolsson, Professor principal investigator
Linkoeping University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Exercises in people with Whiplash Injuries, run by Linkoeping University at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Speckle tracking analyses of neck and shoulder muscle function (time frame: Baseline and at 3 months follow-up when intervention ended. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03664934, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2023.