Iron Deficiency (Without Anemia)NCT03670537
Iron Parameters in Non-anemic First Trimester Gravidas
An observational study of Iron Deficiency (Without Anemia) and Pregnancy, run by Auerbach Hematology Oncology Associates P C at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to see the percentage of non-anemic, first trimester gravidas presenting to their obstetricians, who are iron deficient. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Iron Deficiency (Without Anemia), Pregnancy
- What is being tested?
- Iron parameters
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Feb 2018to 24 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Pregnant women presenting to their obstetricians
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant in first trimester
- Non-anemic
Who cannot join
- anemia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Auerbach Hematology and Oncology
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237
About this study
The purpose of the study is to see the percentage of non-anemic, first trimester gravidas presenting to their obstetricians, who are iron deficient.
Read the detailed description
The 2015 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) stated "there is insufficient evidence to recommend the routine screening for iron deficiency in non-anemic gravidas". The basis for this recommendation is the lack maternal or fetal outcome data in this population. To date, there are no guidelines for the treatment of non-anemic, iron deficiency pregnancy women with or without anemia. Obstetricians and gynecologists often do not screen for iron deficiency unless the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) is reduced even in the presence of a reduced hemoglobin. Iron deficiency occurs prior to a decrement in hemoglobin concentration, followed by a decrease in the MCV which occurs after. Subsequently, if these recommendation are followed up to 50% of iron deficient pregnant women remain undiagnosed.
While prospective studies may be absent proving that routine screening and supplementation is beneficial, there is ample evidence that iron deficiency in mothers and infants results in significant morbidity, even in the absence of anemia. Fetal, neonatal and childhood brain growth and development require iron, with deficiencies resulting with adverse effects on myelination, neurotransmitter synthesis and brain programming. There is a two-fold incidence of preterm birth, three-fold increase in low birth weight and small for gestational age infants. In addition to negative effects on the fetus, maternal iron deficiency is associated with an increased risk for caesarean delivery, transfusion, perinatal bleeding, pre-eclampsia, placental abruption, poor wound healing, cardiac failure and even death. Of note, using existing guidelines infants are not screened for iron deficiency even if they are at high risk (preterm, infants of diabetic mothers, smokers or those with intrauterine growth restriction.
Published evidence suggests that when iron deficiency is present later in pregnancy in the mother, adequate iron delivery to the fetus does not occur. In a prospective study of 2400 urban women with iron deficiency in the second and third trimesters, while supplementation resulted in a significant improvement in maternal hemoglobin concentrations and iron parameters, over 45% of infants were iron deficient at birth.
Subsequently, while prospective studies are lacking supporting routine screening and iron supplementation, high quality published evidence imputing a litany of morbid events associated with iron deficiency, calls into question the recommendations of the USPSTF. Until such evidence is available based on the preponderance of evidence supporting absence of harm with either screening or supplementation we believe all gravidas presenting to their obstetricians should be screened for iron deficiency.
We propose a prospective observation study of one hundred consecutive, non-selected, non-anemic, first trimester pregnant women to have iron parameters added to their routine laboratory tests. While we realize this is not standard, many practices already have adopted this screening process. We intend to redact all demographic patient information and expect to incur no uncovered costs. As a result we believe neither investigational review board or informed consent is necessary. In hundreds of patients so screened we have encountered no insurance pushback. The additional tests will include only serum iron, total iron binding capacity (TIBC), percent transferrin saturation (Fe/TIBC) and serum ferritin. The data will be stratified by parity.
We anticipate to find an incidence of iron deficiency of 30-40% based on either a low TSAT or low serum ferritin. Such a finding should motivate properly powered, prospective outcome analyses supporting a new paradigm that incorporating the low cost screening for iron deficiency accompany standard screening tests at the beginning of pregnancy irrespective of the presence or absence of anemia.
- Conditions
- Iron Deficiency (Without Anemia), Pregnancy
- Being tested
- Iron parameters
- Keywords
- Iron deficiency, Non-anemic, Pregnancy
- Medical subject headings
- Iron Deficiencies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Iron parametersDiagnostic test
Serum iron, total iron binding capacity, TSAT (Fe/TIBC), serum ferritin
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| First trimester pregnant women | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Iron parameters |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent of Non-anemic Patients With Iron Deficiency Stratified by Gravidity
Either low serum ferritin or low percent transferrin saturation (TSAT)
Measured: Day 1 presentation to obstetrician
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Sep 2018
- Study start7 Feb 2018
- Primary completion24 Aug 2018
- Study completion24 Aug 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Iron Deficiency (Without Anemia)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Auerbach Hematology Oncology Associates P C
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- MedStar Women's Care at Honeygo
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael Auerbach MD, Auerbach Hematology Oncology Associates P C
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03670537
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Protocol 3
- Status last verified
- Jun 2019
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Auerbach M, Abernathy J, Juul S, Short V, Derman R. Prevalence of iron deficiency in first trimester, nonanemic pregnant women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Mar;34(6):1002-1005. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1619690. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
PubMed 31154873
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Iron Parameters in Non-anemic First Trimester Gravidas
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03670537
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Protocol 3
- Conditions
- Iron Deficiency (Without Anemia), Pregnancy
- Keywords
- Iron deficiency, Non-anemic, Pregnancy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Auerbach Hematology Oncology Associates P CUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- MedStar Women's Care at Honeygo
- Study start
- 7 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 15 Oct 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to see the percentage of non-anemic, first trimester gravidas presenting to their obstetricians, who are iron deficient.
Detailed description
The 2015 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) stated "there is insufficient evidence to recommend the routine screening for iron deficiency in non-anemic gravidas". The basis for this recommendation is the lack maternal or fetal outcome data in this population. To date, there are no guidelines for the treatment of non-anemic, iron deficiency pregnancy women with or without anemia. Obstetricians and gynecologists often do not screen for iron deficiency unless the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) is reduced even in the presence of a reduced hemoglobin. Iron deficiency occurs prior to a decrement in hemoglobin concentration, followed by a decrease in the MCV which occurs after. Subsequently, if these recommendation are followed up to 50% of iron deficient pregnant women remain undiagnosed.
While prospective studies may be absent proving that routine screening and supplementation is beneficial, there is ample evidence that iron deficiency in mothers and infants results in significant morbidity, even in the absence of anemia. Fetal, neonatal and childhood brain growth and development require iron, with deficiencies resulting with adverse effects on myelination, neurotransmitter synthesis and brain programming. There is a two-fold incidence of preterm birth, three-fold increase in low birth weight and small for gestational age infants. In addition to negative effects on the fetus, maternal iron deficiency is associated with an increased risk for caesarean delivery, transfusion, perinatal bleeding, pre-eclampsia, placental abruption, poor wound healing, cardiac failure and even death. Of note, using existing guidelines infants are not screened for iron deficiency even if they are at high risk (preterm, infants of diabetic mothers, smokers or those with intrauterine growth restriction.
Published evidence suggests that when iron deficiency is present later in pregnancy in the mother, adequate iron delivery to the fetus does not occur. In a prospective study of 2400 urban women with iron deficiency in the second and third trimesters, while supplementation resulted in a significant improvement in maternal hemoglobin concentrations and iron parameters, over 45% of infants were iron deficient at birth.
Subsequently, while prospective studies are lacking supporting routine screening and iron supplementation, high quality published evidence imputing a litany of morbid events associated with iron deficiency, calls into question the recommendations of the USPSTF. Until such evidence is available based on the preponderance of evidence supporting absence of harm with either screening or supplementation we believe all gravidas presenting to their obstetricians should be screened for iron deficiency.
We propose a prospective observation study of one hundred consecutive, non-selected, non-anemic, first trimester pregnant women to have iron parameters added to their routine laboratory tests. While we realize this is not standard, many practices already have adopted this screening process. We intend to redact all demographic patient information and expect to incur no uncovered costs. As a result we believe neither investigational review board or informed consent is necessary. In hundreds of patients so screened we have encountered no insurance pushback. The additional tests will include only serum iron, total iron binding capacity (TIBC), percent transferrin saturation (Fe/TIBC) and serum ferritin. The data will be stratified by parity.
We anticipate to find an incidence of iron deficiency of 30-40% based on either a low TSAT or low serum ferritin. Such a finding should motivate properly powered, prospective outcome analyses supporting a new paradigm that incorporating the low cost screening for iron deficiency accompany standard screening tests at the beginning of pregnancy irrespective of the presence or absence of anemia.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| First trimester pregnant women | – | Diagnostic Test: Iron parameters |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Pregnant women presenting to their obstetricians
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnant in first trimester
- Non-anemic
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- anemia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Iron parametersSerum iron, total iron binding capacity, TSAT (Fe/TIBC), serum ferritin | Diagnostic test | First trimester pregnant women |
Primary outcome
Percent of Non-anemic Patients With Iron Deficiency Stratified by Gravidity
Time frame: Day 1 presentation to obstetrician
Either low serum ferritin or low percent transferrin saturation (TSAT)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 31154873Auerbach M, Abernathy J, Juul S, Short V, Derman R. Prevalence of iron deficiency in first trimester, nonanemic pregnant women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Mar;34(6):1002-1005. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1619690. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Iron Deficiency (Without Anemia)
Recruiting
Absorption of Iron From Stabilized Lactoferrin: A Study in Women With Iron Deficiency
Iron Deficiency (Without Anemia)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Impact of Iron Deficiency on Arrhythmic Events and Resting ECG Abnormalities in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
Risk of Anemia and Effects of Oral Iron Therapy in Non-Anemic Iron-Deficient Women (18-55 Years)
Non-Anemic Iron Deficiency
Active, not recruiting
The Immediate and Long-term Effects of a Novel Marine-based Iron Supplement in Adult Females
Anemia, Iron Deficiency (Without Anemia)
RecruitingObservational study
Non-invasive Detection of Iron Deficiency in Obstetrics
Iron Deficiency Anemia of Pregnancy, Iron-deficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Iron Deficiency (Without Anemia) and Pregnancy, run by Auerbach Hematology Oncology Associates P C at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Oct 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent of Non-anemic Patients With Iron Deficiency Stratified by Gravidity (time frame: Day 1 presentation to obstetrician). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03670537, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2019.