AzTrials
AzTrials

Infection, FungalBDG-REANCT03674359

Dosage of Plasma 1, 3-β-D-glucan for the Diagnosis of Candidemia.

An observational study of Infection, Fungal, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 2 sites in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Systematic and repeated dosing (3 times weekly) of 1,3-β-D-glucan (BDG), associated with blood cultures and fungal mapping (twice a week) for the patients hospitalized in intensive care. The diagnosis of candidemia is defined as the 1st positive blood culture for Candida spp. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Infection, Fungal
What is being tested?
BDG analysis
How many people
2,000 participants
Where
2 sitesFrance
Study dates
12 Dec 2018to Mar 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients aged over 18, hospitalized in intensive care unit, under mechanical ventilation, antibiotics and with a central venous catheter, excluding pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients ≥ 18 years
  • Patients Under mechanical ventilation (MV), antibiotic (AB) And with a central venous catheter (CVK)
  • inclusion at day 4 of hospitalization or from establishing of antifungal treatment between admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and day 4
  • Affiliation to the social security system.
  • Signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Antifungal therapy at the admission in intensive care unit
  • Patient whose inclusion life expectancy is less than 72 h
  • Patient being treated for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Neutropenia: < 500 nuclear neutrophil / mm3
  • Patients under ECMO

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Philippe KAROUBI, MD contact

+33 1 48 95 21 96

philippe.karoubi@aphp.fr

Mohammed RAHAOUI, PM contact

+33 1 48 95 74 71

mohammed.rahaoui@aphp.fr

France2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Hopital Avicenne

    Bobigny, 93000

    Philippe KAROUBI, Dr

    Recruiting
  • Hôpital Louis Mourier

    Colombes, 92701

    Damien ROUX, Pr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Performance of the Dosage of Plasma 1, 3-β-D-glucan (BDG) for the Diagnosis of Candidemia in Intensive Care Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter Study

Systematic and repeated dosing (3 times weekly) of 1,3-β-D-glucan (BDG), associated with blood cultures and fungal mapping (twice a week) for the patients hospitalized in intensive care. The diagnosis of candidemia is defined as the 1st positive blood culture for Candida spp.

The dosage of BDG will be considered positive if the value is at least or equal to 80 pg/ml.

Read the detailed description

The candidemia is the 3rd cause of sepsis in intensive care unit and a serious problem because the high mortality remains (> 50%) despite the new treatments by echinocandins.

A single positive blood culture is sufficient for diagnosis, but the sensitivity of blood cultures is only 50 to 70 percent. Clinical signs are unspecific and do not guide the diagnosis. If treatment started early, 12 hours after the 1st positive blood culture collection the mortality is 10%. Recently, the incidence of candidemia in intensive care unit has increased in France as in other countries as. From these different elements (frequency, mortality, early diagnosis, little specific clinical signs), it is easy to understand the approach that has prevailed for many years, which is to define the profile of the patients at risk of candidemia in intensive care unit. Currently, there are several predictive factors of occurrence of a candidemia in intensive care unit. They are represented by the index of colonization, very high risk factors (FTHR) and Candida score (CS).

Predictive factors of occurrence of candidemia have led to the concept of preemptive or empirical treatment, the aim is to being avoid the occurrence of candidemia.

However, the ability of these factors to predict the occurrence of a candidemia is not satisfactory, explaining in part the mortality rate.

In the light of current knowledge, including the predictive factors of occurrence of candidemia in intensive care patients, a better selection of patients likely to develop candidemia remains to this day, a crucial issue. Several teams have been interested in the evaluation of various bio-markers, including the (1,3) - β - D-glucan (BDG), to optimize decision-making in intensive care patients at risk of candidemia in front of:

  • the increased frequency of candidemia,
  • poorly discriminating predictive factors,
  • no specific clinical signs,
  • the low sensitivity of blood culture,
  • and the impact of early treatment.

To clarify the role of BDG as a predictive factor of candidemia, all patients hospitalized in intensive care unit, meeting the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, will be followed, from day 4 of hospitalization or from the beginning of antifungal treatment between the admission in intensive care unit and day 4, until the exit of intensive care unit or until day30 of hospitalization in intensive care unit.

The dosage of BDG and blood cultures will be performed on day 4 of hospitalization or before the beginning of antifungal treatment between the admission in intensive care unit and the 4th day, then 3 times a week, until day 30.

A before the beginning of antifungal treatment between the admission to intensive care unit and the 4th day of hospitalization, then twice a week, maximum until day30.

Being tested
BDG analysis
Keywords
1, 3-β-D-glucan, Candidemia, Intensive Care Unit
Medical subject headings
Mycoses, Candidemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BDG analysisDiagnostic test

    BDG analysis

Study groups in NCT03674359
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CohortPatients hospitalized in intensive care, meeting the inclusion criteria. BDG analysis
Receives: Diagnostic Test: BDG analysis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Determine the sensitivity and specificity of the BDG for the diagnosis of candidemia in intensive care unit patients.

    Systematic and repeated dosing , for the diagnosis of candidemia (1st positive blood culture for Candida spp).

    Dosage of BDG will be considered positive if a dosage is at least equal to 80 pg/ml or greater.

    Measured: 30 day after inclusion

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Sep 2018
  2. Study start12 Dec 2018
  3. Primary completionSep 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
2,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03674359
Sponsor's protocol ID
P170926J
Acronym
BDG-REA
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
10 Sep 2018
Last updated
26 Jan 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Lortholary O, Renaudat C, Sitbon K, Madec Y, Denoeud-Ndam L, Wolff M, Fontanet A, Bretagne S, Dromer F; French Mycosis Study Group. Worrisome trends in incidence and mortality of candidemia in intensive care units (Paris area, 2002-2010). Intensive Care Med. 2014 Sep;40(9):1303-12. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3408-3. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

    PubMed 25097069
  • Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Finding the "missing 50%" of invasive candidiasis: how nonculture diagnostics will improve understanding of disease spectrum and transform patient care. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 May;56(9):1284-92. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit006. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

    PubMed 23315320
  • Morrell M, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH. Delaying the empiric treatment of candida bloodstream infection until positive blood culture results are obtained: a potential risk factor for hospital mortality. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Sep;49(9):3640-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.9.3640-3645.2005.

    PubMed 16127033
  • Posteraro B, De Pascale G, Tumbarello M, Torelli R, Pennisi MA, Bello G, Maviglia R, Fadda G, Sanguinetti M, Antonelli M. Early diagnosis of candidemia in intensive care unit patients with sepsis: a prospective comparison of (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan assay, Candida score, and colonization index. Crit Care. 2011;15(5):R249. doi: 10.1186/cc10507. Epub 2011 Oct 22.

    PubMed 22018278

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Infection, Fungal, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 2 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Philippe KAROUBI, MD (+33 1 48 95 21 96, philippe.karoubi@aphp.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Determine the sensitivity and specificity of the BDG for the diagnosis of candidemia in intensive care unit patients. (time frame: 30 day after inclusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03674359, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in