Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 1NCT03674827
Vaccine-Based Immunotherapy Regimen For NSCLC and TNBC
A Phase 1 study testing PF-06936308 in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Triple-negative Breast Cancer, run by Pfizer at 34 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Part 1of the study will evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and immunogenicity of increasing doses of a vaccine-based immunotherapy regimen (VBIR-2) for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Triple-negative Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- PF-06936308
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 34 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 27 Nov 2018to 27 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Part 1:Histological or cytological diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer or triple-negative breast cancer. Adequate bone marrow, renal and liver function.
- Part 2: Histological or cytological diagnosis of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with 1 or 2 regimens in metastatic setting including a CPI and platinum-based chemotherapy. Adequate bone marrow, renal and liver function.
Who cannot join
- Known symptomatic brain metastases
- ECOG performance status greater than or equal to 2
- Concurrent immunotherapy
- History of or active autoimmune disorders (including but not limited to: myasthenia gravis, thyroiditis, pneumonitis, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus, erythematosus, scleroderma) and other conditions that disorganize or alter the immune system.
- History of inflammatory bowel disease.
- Current use of any implanted electronic stimulation device, such as cardiac demand pacemakers, automatic implantable cardiac defibrillator, nerve stimulators, or deep brain stimulators.
- Presence of any surgical or traumatic metal implants at the site of administration
Trial locations and contacts
34 sites in 1 country.
34 sites in 1 country
United States34 sites
The University of Chicago Medical Center, CCD - Investigational Drug Service Pharmacy
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Siteman Cancer Center - St. Peters
City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376
Siteman Cancer Center - West County
Creve Coeur, Missouri, 63141
UCSD Medical Center - Encinitas
Encinitas, California, 92024
The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Investigational Drug Services
Fairway, Kansas, 66205
The University of Kansas Clinical Research Center
Fairway, Kansas, 66205
UC San Diego Medical Center - La Jolla (Jacobs Medical Center / Thornton Hospital)
La Jolla, California, 92037
UC San Diego Perlman Medical Offices
La Jolla, California, 92037
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92093
Horizon Oncology Research, LLC
Lafayette, Indiana, 47905
InnerVision Advanced Medical Imaging
Lafayette, Indiana, 47905
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
UCLA Hematology/Oncology
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Norton Cancer Institute Downtown
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Norton Cancer Institute Pharmacy, Downtown Pharmacy
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Norton Hospital
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
The Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center at Silver Cross Hospital
New Lenox, Illinois, 60451
Orland Park - University of Chicago Center for Advanced Care
Orland Park, Illinois, 60462
University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
UC San Diego Medical Center - Hillcrest
San Diego, California, 92103
UCLA Hematology/Oncology - Parkside
Santa Monica, California, 90404
UCLA Hematology/Oncology - Santa Monica
Santa Monica, California, 90404
University of Washington Medical Center - Translational Research Unit (TRU)
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Barnes-Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Washington University Infusion Center Pharmacy
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Siteman Cancer Center - South County
St Louis, Missouri, 63129
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute Inc
Tampa, Florida, 33612
UCSD Medical Center - Vista
Vista, California, 92081
The University of Kansas Cancer Center
Westwood, Kansas, 66205
About this study
Official title: A PHASE 1 STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF ESCALATING DOSES AND TREATMENT INTENSIFICATION OF A VACCINE-BASED IMMUNOTHERAPY REGIMEN-2 (VBIR-2) (PF-06936308) FOR ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER AND METASTATIC TRIPLE-NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER
Part 1of the study will evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and immunogenicity of increasing doses of a vaccine-based immunotherapy regimen (VBIR-2) for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
Part 2 will evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity and preliminary evidence of efficacy of the Expansion dose of VBIR-2 in participants with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Read the detailed description
The study is divided into two parts, Dose Escalation (Part 1) in participants with NSCLC and TNBC without acceptable alternative treatment options, followed by Dose Expansion (Part 2) in participants with NSCLC who have progressed on or after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and treatment with 1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, given concurrently or sequentially with chemotherapy.
Part 1 has been completed.
- Being tested
- PF-06936308
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PF-06936308Biological
Also called Vaccine-based immunotherapy regimen-2 (VBIR-2)
PF-06936308 components will be administered 4 times per cycle. A cycle is 4 months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dose escalation (Part 1) | Experimental | Participants with NSCLC or TNBC were enrolled at escalating dose levels s of the VBIR-2 regimen. Receives: Biological: PF-06936308 |
| Dose Expansion (Part 2) | Experimental | Participants with metastatic NSCLC will be enrolled at the expansion dose level identified during Part 1 of the study. Receives: Biological: PF-06936308 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or considered to be an important medical event. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs.
Measured: Baseline up to 6 months after End of Treatment (EOT; 22 months in maximum)
Number of Participants With AEs as Graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0 (NCI CTCAE v5.0) (Grade ≥3)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE v5.0. Grade 1 = asymptomatic/mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2 = minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); Grade 3 = severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4 = events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5 = death related to AE.
Measured: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (22 months in maximum)
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation or Dose Reduction
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment.
Measured: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (22 months in maximum)
Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
AEs in the first 28 d (days) following the first AdC68 vaccination that were considered possibly related to study treatment and not to disease/progression were DLTs: Grade≥3 neutropenia lasting>7 d, febrile neutropenia, Grade≥3 neutropenic infection, Grade≥3 thrombocytopenia with Grade≥2 clinically significant bleeding, Grade≥3 anemia lasting >7 d, Grade≥3 lymphopenia lasting>14 d; Grade≥3 lab abnormalities associated with symptoms or worsening of an existing condition or that suggested a new disease process or that required additional active management, Grade≥3 AEs considered non-hematologic, non-hepatic major organ toxicity, Grade 3 flu-like symptoms lasting>3 d, fever of >40.0 degree Celsius lasting>3 d, concurrent aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase >3x upper limit of normal (ULN) and total bilirubin >2x ULN (potential Hy's law case). Other clinically important or persistent toxicities at discretion of investigator and Pfizer.
Measured: The first 28 days following the first AdC68 vaccination (Cycle 1 Day 1)
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation (Grade 3 or 4)
Laboratory abnormalities (graded per NCI CTCAE v5.0: Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated) in at least 1 participant with data in the categories are presented here. Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, platelets, white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils and lymphocytes. Coagulation should include prothrombin time (PT) or international normalized ratio (INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT).
Measured: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (22 months in maximum)
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Chemistry (Grade 3 or 4)
Chemistry abnormalities (graded per NCI CTCAE v5.0: Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated) in at least 1 participant with data in the categories are presented here. Chemistry parameters included aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, sodium, potassium, magnesium, total chloride, total calcium, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen (or urea), creatinine, uric acid, glucose (nonfasted), albumin, phosphorous or phosphate, lactate dehydrogenase, lipase, amylase, bicarbonate or carbon dioxide, total protein, TSH (reflex free T4 and free T3).
Measured: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (22 months in maximum)
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Urinalysis (Grade 3 or 4)
Urinalysis abnormalities (graded per NCI CTCAE v5.0: Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated) in at least 1 participant with data in the categories are presented here. Urine parameters included urine protein and urine blood.
Measured: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (22 months in maximum)
Proportion of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response, Partial Response or Stable Disease for More Than 6 Months Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 Criteria (Part 2)
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) is defined as the proportion of participants who achieved anti-tumor responses of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) for >6 months. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10 mm). All target lesions must be assessed. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease and no new lesions. All target lesions must be assessed. SD: Does not qualify for CR, PR or Progression. SD can follow PR only in the rare case that the sum increases by <20% from the nadir, but enough that a previously documented 30% decrease no longer holds.
Measured: Performed every 8 weeks from baseline up to Week 32
Secondary outcomes (17)
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Sasanlimab
Cmax was defined as the maximum observed serum concentration.
Measured: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; EOT; Months 2, 4, and 6 after EOT visit
Cmax of Tremelimumab
Cmax was defined as the maximum observed serum concentration.
Measured: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; EOT; Months 2, 4 and 6 after EOT visit
Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Sasanlimab
Tmax was defined as the time to reach maximum observed serum concentration.
Measured: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; EOT; Months 2, 4 and 6 after EOT visit
Tmax of Tremelimumab
Tmax was defined as the time to reach maximum observed serum concentration.
Measured: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; EOT; Months 2, 4 and 6 after EOT visit
Area Under the Curve From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUCinf) of Sasanlimab
AUCinf was defined as area under the concentration time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity. AUCinf of sasanlimab was not reported due to the limited data points during elimination phase, and the lack of a well-characterized terminal phase. A well-characterized terminal phase was defined as one with at least 3 data points, r^2 ≥0.9, and percent of AUCextrap% ≤20%.
Measured: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; EOT; Months 2, 4 and 6 after EOT visit
AUCinf of Tremelimumab
AUCinf was defined as area under the concentration time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity. AUCinf of tremelimumab was not reported due to the limited data points during elimination phase, and the lack of a well-characterized terminal phase. A well-characterized terminal phase was defined as one with at least 3 data points, r^2 ≥0.9, and percent of AUCextrap% ≤20%.
Measured: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; EOT; Months 2, 4 and 6 after EOT visit
Trough Concentrations After Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) of Sasanlimab
Ctrough was defined as the drug concentration observed at the last planned timepoint prior to dosing. Ctrough was not calculated for sasanlimab because trough concentration prior to the fifth dose (on Cycle 2 Day 1) were not collected for any participants in Cohorts 4A or 5A.
Measured: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; Months 2, 4, 6 after EOT visit
Ctrough of Tremelimumab
Ctrough was defined as the drug concentration observed at the last planned timepoint prior to dosing.
Measured: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Using RECIST v1.1
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response based assessment of CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1. Per RECIST v1.1: CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10 mm). All target lesions must be assessed. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease and no new lesions. All target lesions must be assessed.
Measured: Performed every 8 weeks from baseline up to Week 32
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Using RECIST v1.1 With NSCLC
PFS was defined as the time from start date to date of first documentation of progression, or death due to any cause. Progression was defined as the appearance of local, regional or distant disease of the same type after complete response or progression of pre-existing lesions.
Measured: Performed every 3 weeks after treatment discontinuation until death, participant refusal, or lost to follow-up (telephone contact acceptable).
PFS Using RECIST v1.1 With TNBC
PFS was defined as the time from start date to date of first documentation of progression, or death due to any cause. Progression was defined as the appearance of local, regional or distant disease of the same type after complete response or progression of pre existing lesions.
Measured: Performed every 3 weeks after treatment discontinuation until death, participant refusal, or lost to follow-up (telephone contact acceptable).
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Against Sasanlimab
Participants were considered ADA-positive if (1) baseline titer was missing or negative and participant had ≥1 post-treatment positive titer (treatment-induced), or (2) positive titer at baseline and had a ratio of ≥4 in titer (dilution) to baseline in ≥1 post-treatment sample (treatment-boosted).
Measured: Cycle 1: on Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: on Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples to be collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to sasanlimab dosing.
Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) Against Sasanlimab
A participant was NAb positive if (1) baseline titer was missing or negative and participant had ≥1 post-treatment positive titer (treatment-induced), or (2) positive titer at baseline and had a ratio of ≥4 in titer (dilution) to baseline in ≥1 post-treatment sample (treatment-boosted). Participants who were either (1) an ADA-negative participant or (2) an ADA-positive participant without treatment-induced or treatment-boosted NAb response were considered as NAb negative.
Measured: Cycle 1: on Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: on Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples to be collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to sasanlimab dosing.
Number of Participants With ADA Against Tremelimumab
Participants were considered ADA-positive if (1) baseline titer was missing or negative and participant had ≥1 post-treatment positive titer (treatment-induced), or (2) positive titer at baseline and had a ratio of ≥4 in titer (dilution) to baseline in ≥1 post-treatment sample (treatment-boosted).
Measured: Cycle 1: on Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: on Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to tremelimumab dosing.
Number of Participants With NAb Against Tremelimumab
A participant was NAb positive if (1) baseline titer was missing or negative and participant had ≥1 post-treatment positive titer (treatment-induced), or (2) positive titer at baseline and had a ratio of ≥4 in titer (dilution) to baseline in ≥1 post-treatment sample (treatment-boosted). Participants who were either (1) an ADA-negative participant or (2) an ADA-positive participant without treatment-induced or treatment-boosted NAb response were considered as NAb negative. NAb evaluation was not considered as meaningful taken that treatment-induced ADA was found in only 1 participant. Thus, NAb to tremelimumab was not examined.
Measured: Cycle 1: on Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: on Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples to be collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to tremelimumab dosing.
Titers of Treatment-Induced ADA and NAb Against Sasanlimab
Titers were measured in terms of 1/dilution. Only the samples tested positive for ADA were to be further tested for Nab. Treatment-induced ADA: baseline titer is missing or negative and participant has >= 1 post-treatment positive titer. Treatment-induced NAb: baseline titer was missing or negative and participant had ≥1 post-treatment positive titer.
Measured: Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples to be collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to sasanlimab dosing.
Titers of Treatment-Induced ADA and NAb Against Tremelimumab
Titers were measured in terms of 1/dilution. Only the samples tested positive for ADA were to be further tested for Nab. Treatment-induced ADA: baseline titer is missing or negative and participant has >= 1 post-treatment positive titer. Treatment-induced NAb: baseline titer was missing or negative and participant had ≥1 post-treatment positive titer. NAb was not examined as the evaluation was not meaningful considering only 1 participant had treatment-induced ADA.
Measured: Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples to be collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to tremelimumab dosing.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Sep 2018
- Study start27 Nov 2018
- Primary completion27 Sep 2021
- Study completion27 Sep 2021
Why it stopped: The study was terminated due to the review of the asset (VBIR-2) within the Sponsor's oncology portfolio; the study was not terminated because of safety concerns.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Non-Small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03674827
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C3621001
- Other IDs
- VBIR-2
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 23 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE 1 STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF ESCALATING DOSES AND TREATMENT INTENSIFICATION OF A VACCINE-BASED IMMUNOTHERAPY REGIMEN-2 (VBIR-2) (PF-06936308) FOR ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER AND METASTATIC TRIPLE-NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03674827
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C3621001
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The study was terminated due to the review of the asset (VBIR-2) within the Sponsor's oncology portfolio; the study was not terminated because of safety concerns.
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 27 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Sep 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 23 Aug 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Part 1of the study will evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and immunogenicity of increasing doses of a vaccine-based immunotherapy regimen (VBIR-2) for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
Part 2 will evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity and preliminary evidence of efficacy of the Expansion dose of VBIR-2 in participants with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Detailed description
The study is divided into two parts, Dose Escalation (Part 1) in participants with NSCLC and TNBC without acceptable alternative treatment options, followed by Dose Expansion (Part 2) in participants with NSCLC who have progressed on or after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and treatment with 1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, given concurrently or sequentially with chemotherapy.
Part 1 has been completed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dose escalation (Part 1) | Experimental | Biological: PF-06936308Participants with NSCLC or TNBC were enrolled at escalating dose levels s of the VBIR-2 regimen. |
| Dose Expansion (Part 2) | Experimental | Biological: PF-06936308Participants with metastatic NSCLC will be enrolled at the expansion dose level identified during Part 1 of the study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Part 1:Histological or cytological diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer or triple-negative breast cancer. Adequate bone marrow, renal and liver function.
- Part 2: Histological or cytological diagnosis of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with 1 or 2 regimens in metastatic setting including a CPI and platinum-based chemotherapy. Adequate bone marrow, renal and liver function.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Known symptomatic brain metastases
- ECOG performance status greater than or equal to 2
- Concurrent immunotherapy
- History of or active autoimmune disorders (including but not limited to: myasthenia gravis, thyroiditis, pneumonitis, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus, erythematosus, scleroderma) and other conditions that disorganize or alter the immune system.
- History of inflammatory bowel disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PF-06936308Also: Vaccine-based immunotherapy regimen-2 (VBIR-2)PF-06936308 components will be administered 4 times per cycle. A cycle is 4 months. | Biological | Dose Expansion (Part 2), Dose escalation (Part 1) |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months after End of Treatment (EOT; 22 months in maximum)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or considered to be an important medical event. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs.
Number of Participants With AEs as Graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0 (NCI CTCAE v5.0) (Grade ≥3)
Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (22 months in maximum)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE v5.0. Grade 1 = asymptomatic/mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2 = minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); Grade 3 = severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4 = events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5 = death related to AE.
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation or Dose Reduction
Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (22 months in maximum)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment.
Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Time frame: The first 28 days following the first AdC68 vaccination (Cycle 1 Day 1)
AEs in the first 28 d (days) following the first AdC68 vaccination that were considered possibly related to study treatment and not to disease/progression were DLTs: Grade≥3 neutropenia lasting>7 d, febrile neutropenia, Grade≥3 neutropenic infection, Grade≥3 thrombocytopenia with Grade≥2 clinically significant bleeding, Grade≥3 anemia lasting >7 d, Grade≥3 lymphopenia lasting>14 d; Grade≥3 lab abnormalities associated with symptoms or worsening of an existing condition or that suggested a new disease process or that required additional active management, Grade≥3 AEs considered non-hematologic, non-hepatic major organ toxicity, Grade 3 flu-like symptoms lasting>3 d, fever of >40.0 degree Celsius lasting>3 d, concurrent aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase >3x upper limit of normal (ULN) and total bilirubin >2x ULN (potential Hy's law case). Other clinically important or persistent toxicities at discretion of investigator and Pfizer.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation (Grade 3 or 4)
Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (22 months in maximum)
Laboratory abnormalities (graded per NCI CTCAE v5.0: Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated) in at least 1 participant with data in the categories are presented here. Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, platelets, white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils and lymphocytes. Coagulation should include prothrombin time (PT) or international normalized ratio (INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT).
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Chemistry (Grade 3 or 4)
Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (22 months in maximum)
Chemistry abnormalities (graded per NCI CTCAE v5.0: Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated) in at least 1 participant with data in the categories are presented here. Chemistry parameters included aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, sodium, potassium, magnesium, total chloride, total calcium, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen (or urea), creatinine, uric acid, glucose (nonfasted), albumin, phosphorous or phosphate, lactate dehydrogenase, lipase, amylase, bicarbonate or carbon dioxide, total protein, TSH (reflex free T4 and free T3).
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Urinalysis (Grade 3 or 4)
Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (22 months in maximum)
Urinalysis abnormalities (graded per NCI CTCAE v5.0: Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated) in at least 1 participant with data in the categories are presented here. Urine parameters included urine protein and urine blood.
Proportion of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response, Partial Response or Stable Disease for More Than 6 Months Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 Criteria (Part 2)
Time frame: Performed every 8 weeks from baseline up to Week 32
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) is defined as the proportion of participants who achieved anti-tumor responses of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) for >6 months. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10 mm). All target lesions must be assessed. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease and no new lesions. All target lesions must be assessed. SD: Does not qualify for CR, PR or Progression. SD can follow PR only in the rare case that the sum increases by <20% from the nadir, but enough that a previously documented 30% decrease no longer holds.
17 secondary outcomes
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Sasanlimab
Time frame: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; EOT; Months 2, 4, and 6 after EOT visit
Cmax of Tremelimumab
Time frame: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; EOT; Months 2, 4 and 6 after EOT visit
Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Sasanlimab
Time frame: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; EOT; Months 2, 4 and 6 after EOT visit
Tmax of Tremelimumab
Time frame: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; EOT; Months 2, 4 and 6 after EOT visit
Area Under the Curve From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUCinf) of Sasanlimab
Time frame: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; EOT; Months 2, 4 and 6 after EOT visit
AUCinf of Tremelimumab
Time frame: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; EOT; Months 2, 4 and 6 after EOT visit
Trough Concentrations After Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) of Sasanlimab
Time frame: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; Months 2, 4, 6 after EOT visit
Ctrough of Tremelimumab
Time frame: Cycle 1: at pre-dose on Days 1, 3-6, 8, 15, 22, 29, 57, 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Using RECIST v1.1
Time frame: Performed every 8 weeks from baseline up to Week 32
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Using RECIST v1.1 With NSCLC
Time frame: Performed every 3 weeks after treatment discontinuation until death, participant refusal, or lost to follow-up (telephone contact acceptable).
PFS Using RECIST v1.1 With TNBC
Time frame: Performed every 3 weeks after treatment discontinuation until death, participant refusal, or lost to follow-up (telephone contact acceptable).
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Against Sasanlimab
Time frame: Cycle 1: on Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: on Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples to be collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to sasanlimab dosing.
Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) Against Sasanlimab
Time frame: Cycle 1: on Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: on Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples to be collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to sasanlimab dosing.
Number of Participants With ADA Against Tremelimumab
Time frame: Cycle 1: on Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: on Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to tremelimumab dosing.
Number of Participants With NAb Against Tremelimumab
Time frame: Cycle 1: on Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: on Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples to be collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to tremelimumab dosing.
Titers of Treatment-Induced ADA and NAb Against Sasanlimab
Time frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples to be collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to sasanlimab dosing.
Titers of Treatment-Induced ADA and NAb Against Tremelimumab
Time frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples to be collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to tremelimumab dosing.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Aug 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Amivantamab in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Including Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Carcinoma, Non-small-Cell Lung
RecruitingPhase 1/2
FiH Study to Investigate Safety, PK and Efficacy of the NaPi2b ADC TUB-040 in Patients With PROC or r/r Adenocarcinoma NSCLC
Ovarian Cancer, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Lazertinib With Subcutaneous Amivantamab Compared With Intravenous Amivantamab in Participants With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutated Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase 1 and 2 Study of VMD-102 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Other Solid Tumors
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
REZILIENT3 (REsearching ZIpaLertinib In Egfr Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors)
Advanced or Metastatic NSCLS With Exon 20 Insertion Mutation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
34 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing PF-06936308 in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Triple-negative Breast Cancer, run by Pfizer at 34 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 34 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Aug 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (time frame: Baseline up to 6 months after End of Treatment (EOT; 22 months in maximum)). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Aug 2024.