Adenocarcinoma of LungPhase 3NCT03676192
To Compare Efficacy and Safety of CT-P16 and European Union-Approved Avastin as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic or Recurrent Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing CT-P16 and Avastin in people with Adenocarcinoma of Lung, run by Celltrion at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
To demonstrate that CT-P16 is similar to EU-Approved Avastin in terms of efficacy as determined by objective response rate (ORR) during the Induction Study Period Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Adenocarcinoma of Lung
- What is being tested?
- CT-P16 and Avastin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 689 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2019to 19 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- diagnosed as recurrent disease or stage IV
- has at least 1 measurable lesion by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) Version 1.1
Who cannot join
- has predominantly squamous cell histology non-small cell lung cancer
- had surgery for metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Phase 3 Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of CT-P16 and EU-Approved Avastin as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic or Recurrent Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
To demonstrate that CT-P16 is similar to EU-Approved Avastin in terms of efficacy as determined by objective response rate (ORR) during the Induction Study Period
- Conditions
- Adenocarcinoma of Lung
- Being tested
- CT-P16, Avastin
- Medical subject headings
- Adenocarcinoma of Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CT-P16Drug
15mg/kg IV of CT-P16 every 3 weeks up to 6 cycles in the induction study period and every 3 weeks until PD occurs in the maintenance study period.
AvastinDrug
15mg/kg IV of Avastin every 3 weeks up to 6 cycles in the induction study period and every 3 weeks until PD occurs in the maintenance study period.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CT-P16 | Experimental | Drug: Bevacizumab 15mg/kg IV of CT-P16 will be administered every 3 weeks up to 6 cycles during the Induction Study Period and every 3 weeks until Progressive Disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity during the Maintenance Period. Receives: Drug: CT-P16 |
| Avastin | Active comparator | Drug: Bevacizumab 15mg/kg IV of EU-approved Avastin will be administered every 3 weeks up to 6 cycles during the Induction Study Period and every 3 weeks until PD or intolerable toxicity during the Maintenance Period. Receives: Drug: Avastin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) During the Induction Study Period From Central Review
The ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) of CR or PR (the 'responder'). All other patients except responders were considered as non-responders, including patients without post-baseline tumor assessment.
Measured: Induction Study Period (around 18 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Response Duration From Central Review
Response duration was defined as time between initial response (CR or PR) that is confirmed by the subsequent assessment after study treatment administration and PD/recurrence or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Measured: Tumor assessments were assessed every 2 cycles during the Induction Study Period, every 3 cycles during the Maintenance Study Period, and at the EOT visit. The median follow-up time from randomization was 12.86 months.
Time to Progression From Central Review
Time to progression was defined as time from randomization to determined PD/recurrence.
Measured: Tumor assessments were assessed every 2 cycles during the Induction Study Period, every 3 cycles during the Maintenance Study Period, and at the EOT visit. The median follow-up time from randomization was 12.86 months.
Progression Free Survival From Central Review
Progression-free survival was defined as time from randomization to determined PD/recurrence or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Measured: Tumor assessments were assessed every 2 cycles during the Induction Study Period, every 3 cycles during the Maintenance Study Period, and at the EOT visit. The median follow-up time from randomization was 12.86 months.
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as time from randomization to death from any cause.
Measured: Tumor assessments were assessed every 2 cycles during the Induction Study Period, every 3 cycles during the Maintenance Study Period, and at the EOT visit. The median follow-up time from randomization was 12.86 months.
Trough Serum Concentrations During the Induction Study Period
Pharmacokinetic samples were collected on Day 1 of each cycle (prior to the beginning of the study drug administration) in the Induction Study Period.
Measured: Induction Study Period. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected on Day 1 of each cycle in Induction Study Period.
Patients With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb) at Anytime During the Whole Study Period
Immunogenicity was assessed on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (pre-dose), every 2 cycles during the Induction Study Period, and every 3 cycles during the Maintenance Study Period and End of Treatment (EOT) visit. In the Follow-Up Period, immunogenicity was assessed once at the first visit of the Follow-Up Period (ninth week).
Measured: Immunogenicity was assessed Day 1 of Cycle 1 (predose), every 2 cycles during the Induction Study Period, every 3 cycles during the Maintenance Study Period, EOT visit, and at the first visit of Follow-up period.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Sep 2018
- Study start1 Feb 2019
- Primary completion22 Apr 2021
- Study completion19 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Adenocarcinoma of LungStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 689 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Celltrion
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03676192
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CT-P16 3.1
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 6 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 17 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Kim T, Kim H, Lee H, Ahn K, Park T, Baek H, Chang MJ. Population Pharmacokinetic Comparability of CT-P16 Versus EU-Avastin(R) and US-Avastin(R) in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. BioDrugs. 2026 Aug 2. doi: 10.1007/s40259-026-00800-1. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42542998Andric Z, Moiseenko F, Makharadze T, Oleksiienko A, Yanez Ruiz E, Kim S, Ahn K, Park T, Ju H, Baek EH, Kwon S, Chang I, Kim S, Kim H, Lee E, Verschraegen C. Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial of biosimilar CT-P16 and reference bevacizumab in patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2025;44:100970. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100970. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
PubMed 40795416Verschraegen C, Andric Z, Moiseenko F, Makharadze T, Shevnya S, Oleksiienko A, Yanez Ruiz E, Kim S, Ahn K, Park T, Park S, Ju H, Ohe Y. Candidate Bevacizumab Biosimilar CT-P16 versus European Union Reference Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. BioDrugs. 2022 Nov;36(6):749-760. doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00552-8. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
PubMed 36169807
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-Blind, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Phase 3 Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of CT-P16 and EU-Approved Avastin as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic or Recurrent Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03676192
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CT-P16 3.1
- Conditions
- Adenocarcinoma of Lung
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 689 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CelltrionIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 17 Mar 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To demonstrate that CT-P16 is similar to EU-Approved Avastin in terms of efficacy as determined by objective response rate (ORR) during the Induction Study Period
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CT-P16 | Experimental | Drug: CT-P16Drug: Bevacizumab 15mg/kg IV of CT-P16 will be administered every 3 weeks up to 6 cycles during the Induction Study Period and every 3 weeks until Progressive Disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity during the Maintenance Period. |
| Avastin | Active comparator | Drug: AvastinDrug: Bevacizumab 15mg/kg IV of EU-approved Avastin will be administered every 3 weeks up to 6 cycles during the Induction Study Period and every 3 weeks until PD or intolerable toxicity during the Maintenance Period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- diagnosed as recurrent disease or stage IV
- has at least 1 measurable lesion by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) Version 1.1
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- has predominantly squamous cell histology non-small cell lung cancer
- had surgery for metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CT-P1615mg/kg IV of CT-P16 every 3 weeks up to 6 cycles in the induction study period and every 3 weeks until PD occurs in the maintenance study period. | Drug | CT-P16 |
| Avastin15mg/kg IV of Avastin every 3 weeks up to 6 cycles in the induction study period and every 3 weeks until PD occurs in the maintenance study period. | Drug | Avastin |
Primary outcome
Objective Response Rate (ORR) During the Induction Study Period From Central Review
Time frame: Induction Study Period (around 18 weeks)
The ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) of CR or PR (the 'responder'). All other patients except responders were considered as non-responders, including patients without post-baseline tumor assessment.
6 secondary outcomes
Response Duration From Central Review
Time frame: Tumor assessments were assessed every 2 cycles during the Induction Study Period, every 3 cycles during the Maintenance Study Period, and at the EOT visit. The median follow-up time from randomization was 12.86 months.
Time to Progression From Central Review
Time frame: Tumor assessments were assessed every 2 cycles during the Induction Study Period, every 3 cycles during the Maintenance Study Period, and at the EOT visit. The median follow-up time from randomization was 12.86 months.
Progression Free Survival From Central Review
Time frame: Tumor assessments were assessed every 2 cycles during the Induction Study Period, every 3 cycles during the Maintenance Study Period, and at the EOT visit. The median follow-up time from randomization was 12.86 months.
Overall Survival
Time frame: Tumor assessments were assessed every 2 cycles during the Induction Study Period, every 3 cycles during the Maintenance Study Period, and at the EOT visit. The median follow-up time from randomization was 12.86 months.
Trough Serum Concentrations During the Induction Study Period
Time frame: Induction Study Period. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected on Day 1 of each cycle in Induction Study Period.
Patients With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb) at Anytime During the Whole Study Period
Time frame: Immunogenicity was assessed Day 1 of Cycle 1 (predose), every 2 cycles during the Induction Study Period, every 3 cycles during the Maintenance Study Period, EOT visit, and at the first visit of Follow-up period.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42542998Kim T, Kim H, Lee H, Ahn K, Park T, Baek H, Chang MJ. Population Pharmacokinetic Comparability of CT-P16 Versus EU-Avastin(R) and US-Avastin(R) in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. BioDrugs. 2026 Aug 2. doi: 10.1007/s40259-026-00800-1. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40795416Andric Z, Moiseenko F, Makharadze T, Oleksiienko A, Yanez Ruiz E, Kim S, Ahn K, Park T, Ju H, Baek EH, Kwon S, Chang I, Kim S, Kim H, Lee E, Verschraegen C. Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial of biosimilar CT-P16 and reference bevacizumab in patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2025;44:100970. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100970. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36169807Verschraegen C, Andric Z, Moiseenko F, Makharadze T, Shevnya S, Oleksiienko A, Yanez Ruiz E, Kim S, Ahn K, Park T, Park S, Ju H, Ohe Y. Candidate Bevacizumab Biosimilar CT-P16 versus European Union Reference Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. BioDrugs. 2022 Nov;36(6):749-760. doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00552-8. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
Related trials for Adenocarcinoma of Lung
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of ERAS-0015 in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Metastatic Solid Tumors
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing CT-P16 and Avastin in people with Adenocarcinoma of Lung, run by Celltrion at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Objective Response Rate (ORR) During the Induction Study Period From Central Review (time frame: Induction Study Period (around 18 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03676192, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2025.