Metastatic Breast CancerNCT03676257
Survival Endpoints in Women Treated for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Contribution of Real-life Databases
An observational study of Metastatic Breast Cancer, run by Institut Bergonié at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Overall survival (OS) is considered the most reliable cancer endpoint and used by the Health Rregulatory authorities (HRA). OS presents multiple advantages in cancer randomized controlled trials (RCT): it is universally accepted as a measure of clinical benefit for the patient; it is objectively defined, both in terms… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Metastatic Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Chemotherapy (exclusive), Endocrine therapy (exclusive) and Combination of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy
- How many people
- 20,033 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2008to 1 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Data source : We extracted data from the ESME mBC database (NCT03275311) which gathers deidentified data from consecutive patients managed in 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Adult women diagnosed with mBC between 2008 and 2017 were included. The Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economic (ESME) Research Program is a French academic initiative supporting the centralization of structured and non- structured data documented in the electronic health records (EHR) (clinical notes, pathology reports and radiology reports) of patients treated for malignant conditions in a unique secured web-based data platform available for researchers. The ESME mBC data platform is an EHR-derived database that gathers exhaustive data on consecutive patients who initiated a L1 treatment for mBC between 01 January 2008 and 31 December 2017 in one of 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers.
ELIGIBILITY
- female patients older than 18 years
- diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer (de novo disease or first metastatic recurrence) between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017
- received a fist-line systemic treatment such as chemotherapy, endocrine therapy or targeted therapy, whatever the sequence (monotherapy or combination of therapies using distinct mechanisms of actions, i.e., polytherapy).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Survival Endpoints for Treatment Evaluation in Subjects Treated for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Contribution of Real-life Databases
Overall survival (OS) is considered the most reliable cancer endpoint and used by the Health Rregulatory authorities (HRA). OS presents multiple advantages in cancer randomized controlled trials (RCT): it is universally accepted as a measure of clinical benefit for the patient; it is objectively defined, both in terms of events and date of incidence; it is easily and precisely measured and thus reproducible; it can be exhaustively collected. As such, OS has been validated by HRAs. On the other hand, OS presents some limitations. Observing a benefit on OS may require a large number of patients and/or considerable time for patient follow-up. Costs for trials may be increased, and there might be delays in the introduction of possible beneficial treatments for patients. The development of alternative endpoints that could capture treatment benefit appropriately and be measurable earlier, is central for the evolution of clinical research in oncology.
Real world data (RWD) are defined as other sources than clinical trials such as: electronic medical records, registries, insurance claims, pharmacy records, death certificates and other patient-generated data.
Read more
This research is aimed at (i) describing the existing endpoints of survival in real-life setting, (ii) comparing the correlation at individual level with data to clinical trials for related to anti-HER2 targeted therapies and endocrine therapies in MBC. We will investigate the individual correlation between candidate surrogate endpoints and overall survival in a population-based record-computerized database centralizing data on about 20,000 patients from 2008 to 2017 in France.
This work should lead to the estimation of various time-to event endpoints (e.g. OS, PFS, etc), in the real-life setting, for mBC patients. In addition, we will estimate their individual correlation with OS, which should help us highlight potential surrogate endpoints in this setting. We will focuss on three distinct population, accounting for a large population of mBS patients: : patients treated with anti-HER2 targeted agents, patients treated with endocrine therapies and elderly population.
- Conditions
- Metastatic Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Chemotherapy (exclusive), Endocrine therapy (exclusive), Combination of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, Chemotherapy and targeted treatment, Combination of endocrine therapy and targeted treatment
- Keywords
- Metastatic breast cancer, Real world data, Surrogate
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Chemotherapy (exclusive)Drug
Administration of any chemotherapeutic agent(s)
Endocrine therapy (exclusive)Drug
Administration of any type of endocrine therapy
Combination of endocrine therapy and chemotherapyDrug
Any combination of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy
Chemotherapy and targeted treatmentDrug
Any combination of chemotherapy and targeted treatment(s)
Combination of endocrine therapy and targeted treatmentDrug
Any combination of endocrine therapy and targeted treatment
Combination of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and targeted treatmentDrug
Any combination of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and targeted treatment(s)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) | Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) Receives: Drug: Chemotherapy (exclusive); Drug: Endocrine therapy (exclusive); Drug: Combination of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy; Drug: Chemotherapy and targeted treatment; Drug: Combination of endocrine therapy and targeted treatment; Drug: Combination of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and targeted treatment | |
| Women with a diagnosis of HR- /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) | Women with a diagnosis of HR- /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) Receives: Drug: Chemotherapy (exclusive); Drug: Chemotherapy and targeted treatment | |
| Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) | Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) Receives: Drug: Chemotherapy (exclusive); Drug: Endocrine therapy (exclusive); Drug: Combination of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy; Drug: Chemotherapy and targeted treatment; Drug: Combination of endocrine therapy and targeted treatment; Drug: Combination of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and targeted treatment | |
| Women with a diagnosis of HR- /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) | Women with a diagnosis of HR- /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) Receives: Drug: Chemotherapy (exclusive); Drug: Chemotherapy and targeted treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival (OS) for Commonly Prescribed First-line Treatment Strategies
OS was defined as the time from diagnosis of mBC to the date of death from any cause.
Measured: 10 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Real-world Progression-free Survival (rwPFS) for Commonly Prescribed First-line Treatment Strategies
rwPFS was defined as the delay between time from initial diagnosis of mBC to the date of disease progression (regional recurrence, progression, appearance/occurrence of metastases and distant recurrence) or death (any cause), whichever came first.
Disease progression was assessed by the treating physician based on observed clinical events, as per routine practice (regional recurrence, progression, appearance/occurrence of metastases and distant recurrence). These events were recorded in the patient medical record. As this study relates to real-world data, no specific procedure was imposed to assess these events.
Measured: 10 years
Association Between Overall Survival and Real-world Progression-free Survival for Commonly Prescribed First-line Treatment Strategies
Individual-level association between rwPFS and OS estimated using a Spearman rank correlation coefficient.
Measured: 10 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Sep 2018
- Study start1 Jan 2008
- Primary completion1 Dec 2023
- Study completion1 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Metastatic Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 20,033 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institut Bergonié
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- UNICANCER, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03676257
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IB-2017DATECAN-ESME
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 17 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 10 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Availability of data and materials : The data that support the findings of this study are available from UNICANCER but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of UNICANCER.
Publications
Courtinard C, Gourgou S, Jacot W, Carton M, Guerin O, Vacher L, Bertaut A, Le Deley MC, Perol D, Marino P, Levy C, Uwer L, Perrocheau G, Schiappa R, Bachelot F, Parent D, Breton M, Petit T, Filleron T, Loeb A, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Robain M, Delaloge S, Bellera C. Association between progression-free survival and overall survival in women receiving first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer: evidence from the ESME real-world database. BMC Med. 2023 Mar 8;21(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02754-5.
PubMed 36882736
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Survival Endpoints for Treatment Evaluation in Subjects Treated for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Contribution of Real-life Databases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03676257
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IB-2017DATECAN-ESME
- Conditions
- Metastatic Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Metastatic breast cancer, Real world data, Surrogate
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20,033 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut BergoniéUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- UNICANCER, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 10 Dec 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Overall survival (OS) is considered the most reliable cancer endpoint and used by the Health Rregulatory authorities (HRA). OS presents multiple advantages in cancer randomized controlled trials (RCT): it is universally accepted as a measure of clinical benefit for the patient; it is objectively defined, both in terms of events and date of incidence; it is easily and precisely measured and thus reproducible; it can be exhaustively collected. As such, OS has been validated by HRAs. On the other hand, OS presents some limitations. Observing a benefit on OS may require a large number of patients and/or considerable time for patient follow-up. Costs for trials may be increased, and there might be delays in the introduction of possible beneficial treatments for patients. The development of alternative endpoints that could capture treatment benefit appropriately and be measurable earlier, is central for the evolution of clinical research in oncology.
Real world data (RWD) are defined as other sources than clinical trials such as: electronic medical records, registries, insurance claims, pharmacy records, death certificates and other patient-generated data.
This research is aimed at (i) describing the existing endpoints of survival in real-life setting, (ii) comparing the correlation at individual level with data to clinical trials for related to anti-HER2 targeted therapies and endocrine therapies in MBC. We will investigate the individual correlation between candidate surrogate endpoints and overall survival in a population-based record-computerized database centralizing data on about 20,000 patients from 2008 to 2017 in France.
This work should lead to the estimation of various time-to event endpoints (e.g. OS, PFS, etc), in the real-life setting, for mBC patients. In addition, we will estimate their individual correlation with OS, which should help us highlight potential surrogate endpoints in this setting. We will focuss on three distinct population, accounting for a large population of mBS patients: : patients treated with anti-HER2 targeted agents, patients treated with endocrine therapies and elderly population.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) | – | Drug: Chemotherapy (exclusive), Drug: Endocrine therapy (exclusive), Drug: Combination of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, Drug: Chemotherapy and targeted treatment, Drug: Combination of endocrine therapy and targeted treatment, Drug: Combination of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and targeted treatmentWomen with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) |
| Women with a diagnosis of HR- /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) | – | Drug: Chemotherapy (exclusive), Drug: Chemotherapy and targeted treatmentWomen with a diagnosis of HR- /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) |
| Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) | – | Drug: Chemotherapy (exclusive), Drug: Endocrine therapy (exclusive), Drug: Combination of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, Drug: Chemotherapy and targeted treatment, Drug: Combination of endocrine therapy and targeted treatment, Drug: Combination of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and targeted treatmentWomen with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) |
| Women with a diagnosis of HR- /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) | – | Drug: Chemotherapy (exclusive), Drug: Chemotherapy and targeted treatmentWomen with a diagnosis of HR- /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Data source : We extracted data from the ESME mBC database (NCT03275311) which gathers deidentified data from consecutive patients managed in 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Adult women diagnosed with mBC between 2008 and 2017 were included. The Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economic (ESME) Research Program is a French academic initiative supporting the centralization of structured and non- structured data documented in the electronic health records (EHR) (clinical notes, pathology reports and radiology reports) of patients treated for malignant conditions in a unique secured web-based data platform available for researchers. The ESME mBC data platform is an EHR-derived database that gathers exhaustive data on consecutive patients who initiated a L1 treatment for mBC between 01 January 2008 and 31 December 2017 in one of 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Chemotherapy (exclusive)Administration of any chemotherapeutic agent(s) | Drug | Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC), Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC), Women with a diagnosis of HR- /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC), Women with a diagnosis of HR- /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) |
| Endocrine therapy (exclusive)Administration of any type of endocrine therapy | Drug | Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC), Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) |
| Combination of endocrine therapy and chemotherapyAny combination of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy | Drug | Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC), Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) |
| Chemotherapy and targeted treatmentAny combination of chemotherapy and targeted treatment(s) | Drug | Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC), Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC), Women with a diagnosis of HR- /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC), Women with a diagnosis of HR- /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) |
| Combination of endocrine therapy and targeted treatmentAny combination of endocrine therapy and targeted treatment | Drug | Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC), Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) |
| Combination of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and targeted treatmentAny combination of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and targeted treatment(s) | Drug | Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC), Women with a diagnosis of HR+ /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival (OS) for Commonly Prescribed First-line Treatment Strategies
Time frame: 10 years
OS was defined as the time from diagnosis of mBC to the date of death from any cause.
2 secondary outcomes
Real-world Progression-free Survival (rwPFS) for Commonly Prescribed First-line Treatment Strategies
Time frame: 10 years
Association Between Overall Survival and Real-world Progression-free Survival for Commonly Prescribed First-line Treatment Strategies
Time frame: 10 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Dec 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 36882736Courtinard C, Gourgou S, Jacot W, Carton M, Guerin O, Vacher L, Bertaut A, Le Deley MC, Perol D, Marino P, Levy C, Uwer L, Perrocheau G, Schiappa R, Bachelot F, Parent D, Breton M, Petit T, Filleron T, Loeb A, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Robain M, Delaloge S, Bellera C. Association between progression-free survival and overall survival in women receiving first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer: evidence from the ESME real-world database. BMC Med. 2023 Mar 8;21(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02754-5.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Availability of data and materials : The data that support the findings of this study are available from UNICANCER but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of UNICANCER.
Related trials for Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Augmented-Reality ICG Fluorescence Second-Look for Residual Nodal Disease After Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer, Breast Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
BrAin Metastasis in tripLe Negateive Breast Cancer: IvoneScimab and Trop2 ADC
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), Brain Metastases
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Treatment Combinations in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of CSF Samples From Participants With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) and HER2+ Breast Cancer With no Prior History Nor Active Radiographically Detectable Brain Metastases
Breast Cancer, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Metastatic Breast Cancer, run by Institut Bergonié at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (OS) for Commonly Prescribed First-line Treatment Strategies (time frame: 10 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03676257, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2025.