AzTrials
AzTrials

Hemostasis MonitoringNCT03679286

Comparative Analysis of PCM With ROTEM in the Measurement of Viscoelastic Coagulation Parameters

An observational study of Hemostasis Monitoring, run by Entegrion, Inc. at 3 sites in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To determine if PMC viscoelastic coagulation parameters correlate with those generated by a marketed device in adult patients who require hemostasis monitoring or who are at risk of bleeding or thrombotic indications Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hemostasis Monitoring
What is being tested?
PCM and ROTEM
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
120 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
20 Aug 2018to 31 Mar 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Male and female patients who have a medical management need that requires measurement of their hemostasis status or are at risk of being hypocoagulable or hypercoagulable

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years or older
  • In opinion of investigator, absence of anything that precludes subject from being good study candidate
  • Informed consent
  • Order for measurement of hemostasis status of patients who are at risk for being hyper-coagulable or hypo-coagulable due to clinical diagnosis or medical need

Who cannot join

  • Previous enrollment in study
  • Incarcerated
  • Heparin infusion in prior 24 hours

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Ohio State University

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

    Completed
  • Thomas Jefferson University

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107

    Clinical Research Nurse

    Recruiting
  • Washington University in St. Louis

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

    Clinical Research Nurse

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Comparative Analysis of the Entegrion Point of Care Coagulation Monitor (PCM) With ROTEM in the Measurement of Viscoelastic Coagulation Parameters

To determine if PMC viscoelastic coagulation parameters correlate with those generated by a marketed device in adult patients who require hemostasis monitoring or who are at risk of bleeding or thrombotic indications

Read the detailed description

The primary aim of this study is a performance evaluation of the PCM coagulation monitor in comparison to the ROTEM thromboelastometry system.

To include a measurement of the entire range of the test system, subjects with a medical management need that requires the measurement of their hemostasis status (such as PT/PTT, INR) or are at risk for being hypo-coagulable or hyper-coagulable will be included in this study.

Being tested
PCM and ROTEM
Keywords
Coagulation
Medical subject headings
Thrombosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PCM and ROTEMDevice

    Test of blood sample by both PCM and ROTEM

Study groups in NCT03679286
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
All subjectsNo intervention
Receives: Device: PCM and ROTEM

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Method comparison: Deming regression analysis (PCM and ROTEM NATEM)

    Deming regression will be used to compare the PCM and the ROTEM NATEM assay (which reports clotting time, speed of clot formation, maximal clot firmness and clot lysis)

    Measured: Parameter differences assessed at time of blood sampling

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Method comparison: Deming regression analysis (PCM and ROTEM INTEM, EXTEM)

    Deming regression will be used to compare the PCM and the ROTEM INTEM and EXTEM assays (which both report clotting time, speed of clot formation, maximal clot firmness and clot lysis)

    Measured: Parameter differences assessed at time of blood sampling

  2. Correlation between abnormalities

    Correlation between abnormalities as assessed by conventional coagulation assays (such as fibrinogen concentration, CBC, PT, PTT, INR), vital signs, demographics or trauma (if any)

    Measured: Parameter differences assessed at time of blood sampling

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Sep 2018
  2. Study start20 Aug 2018
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03679286
Sponsor's protocol ID
PCM-002
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
30 Aug 2018
Last updated
16 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hemostasis Monitoring, run by Entegrion, Inc. at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Chris Lindsell, PhD (919.536.1500, chris.lindsell@vumc.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Method comparison: Deming regression analysis (PCM and ROTEM NATEM) (time frame: Parameter differences assessed at time of blood sampling). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in