Type 1 Diabetes MellitusNCT03680079
High Risk Youth With Poorly-controlled Diabetes
A study testing Group education sessions in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study aims to implement a group education curriculum integrated with social media participation to provide peer support and interactive education sessions with the goal of improving glycemic control in disadvantaged youth with poorly-controlled type 1 diabetes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Group education sessions
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 9 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2018to 30 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Between ages 13-18 (at the time of consent) with diagnosis of T1DM
- HbA1c >9% and/or episode of DKA within the past year (other than at diagnosis)
- Residence in a zip code associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES)
- Possession of a device capable of accessing online social media platforms
Who cannot join
- Non-English speaking
- Diagnosed with a developmental or psychological condition that would prevent assumption of self-care responsibilities
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
St. Louis Children's Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
About this study
Official title: Group Education Program for High-risk Youth With Poorly-controlled Type 1 Diabetes
This study aims to implement a group education curriculum integrated with social media participation to provide peer support and interactive education sessions with the goal of improving glycemic control in disadvantaged youth with poorly-controlled type 1 diabetes.
Read the detailed description
It has been well established through The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and its follow-up Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) studies that achieving lower hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are associated with the delay and prevention of long-term complications of T1DM (1, 2). Management of T1DM involves adherence to a complex, labor-intensive regimen of subcutaneous insulin treatment, close glucose monitoring, accurate calculation of carbohydrate intake, and adjustment of dosing and dietary regimen to account for physical activity.
Recent technological advances including insulin pumps with auto-insulin-adjusting features along with continuous glucose monitoring systems have allowed for individuals with T1DM to achieve tighter diabetes control. However, despite these advances in glucose monitoring and insulin delivery systems, the majority of children and adolescents fail to optimize their diabetes control and are unable to achieve these targets.
Several studies have shown that adolescents in poor diabetes control are more likely to come from a racial minority background, have lower annual household income, and be publicly insured. In addition, these patients are also more likely to have missed medical appointments and have less stable home environments. Thus, increased efforts and innovative programs are needed to overcome additional barriers faced by youth with T1DM from disadvantaged backgrounds with the goal of improving the delivery of diabetes care for our most vulnerable, at-risk youth population.
The objective of this pilot and feasibility project is to implement a clinic-based group education program targeting teens with poorly controlled diabetes, focusing on peer group interaction and education combined with social media support to increase engagement and promote behavioral change to improve glycemic control.
This study utilizes 1) group education sessions (6 total sessions over the course of 9 months), 2) online social media group forums, 3) questionnaires to assess self-care habits in diabetes management and quality of life, and 4) surveys to assess this program.
Patients will be included in closed, private Facebook, Snapchat, and Instagram groups where members can communicate with each other and where biweekly updates, reminders, and messages of encouragement relevant to the previous topic covered at group sessions can be sent to the group. Online group forums will be moderated by a staff member to ensure that message content is appropriate and to avoid misinformation or questionable patient-to-patient medical advice.
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Group education sessions
- Keywords
- social media, noncompliance, youth, group education
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Patient Compliance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Group education sessionsOther
Also called Social media peer support
Peer support and interaction both in-person during group education sessions and online via social media platforms
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Youth with type 1 diabetes | Other | A group of 16 teens (ages 13-18) with poorly -controlled type 1 diabetes will be recruited to participate in this study. Receives: Other: Group education sessions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
HbA1c
Measure of glycemic control
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Diabetes self-management skills
Questionnaire (Self-Care Inventory--Revised Edition) to assess self-management skills prior to and after participation in this study.
The questionnaire is a validated measure of perceptions of adherence to recommended diabetes self-care behaviors. There are a total of 15 questions, each with a number answer from a scale of "1" to "5". The lowest possible total score is 15, representing poor compliance with diabetes self-management skills, and the highest possible total score would be 75.
Measured: 9 months
Improved quality of life
Peds QL Diabetes Module Version 3.0, Teen Report. This is a validated questionnaire to assess quality of life related to diabetes, this will be filled out at the start and after participation in this study. The questionnaire consists of 28 questions with answers from a scale of "0" to "4" with higher scores representing lower quality of life.
Measured: 9 months
Number of hospital admissions for DKA
Measure of severe diabetes episodes
Measured: 12 months
Depression screening
The PHQ-2 depression questionnaire is a validated 2 question screen for depression.
Each question has an answer scale from "0" to "3". A score of 3 or more (highest score would be 6) is a positive screen for depression.
This questionnaire will be given to participants at the start and after participation in this study.
Measured: 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Sep 2018
- Study start1 Sep 2018
- Primary completion30 Jun 2019
- Study completion30 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 1 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Washington University School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- The intervention being studied is a group education program
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ellen Kim, MD, Principal investigator, Washington University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03680079
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201807091
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 10 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 23 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
DCCT/EDIC research group. Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on albuminuria in type 1 diabetes: long-term follow-up of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Oct;2(10):793-800. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70155-X. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
PubMed 25043685Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study Research Group. Intensive Diabetes Treatment and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 1 Diabetes: The DCCT/EDIC Study 30-Year Follow-up. Diabetes Care. 2016 May;39(5):686-93. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1990. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
PubMed 26861924Campbell MS, Schatz DA, Chen V, Wong JC, Steck A, Tamborlane WV, Smith J, Beck RW, Cengiz E, Laffel LM, Miller KM, Haller MJ; T1D Exchange Clinic Network. A contrast between children and adolescents with excellent and poor control: the T1D Exchange clinic registry experience. Pediatr Diabetes. 2014 Mar;15(2):110-7. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12067. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
PubMed 23957219Khanolkar AR, Amin R, Taylor-Robinson D, Viner RM, Warner JT, Stephenson T. Young people with Type 1 diabetes of non-white ethnicity and lower socio-economic status have poorer glycaemic control in England and Wales. Diabet Med. 2016 Nov;33(11):1508-1515. doi: 10.1111/dme.13079. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
PubMed 26802317Fortin K, Pries E, Kwon S. Missed Medical Appointments and Disease Control in Children With Type 1 Diabetes. J Pediatr Health Care. 2016 Jul-Aug;30(4):381-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
PubMed 26559135
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Group Education Program for High-risk Youth With Poorly-controlled Type 1 Diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03680079
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201807091
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- social media, noncompliance, youth, group education
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to implement a group education curriculum integrated with social media participation to provide peer support and interactive education sessions with the goal of improving glycemic control in disadvantaged youth with poorly-controlled type 1 diabetes.
Detailed description
It has been well established through The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and its follow-up Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) studies that achieving lower hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are associated with the delay and prevention of long-term complications of T1DM (1, 2). Management of T1DM involves adherence to a complex, labor-intensive regimen of subcutaneous insulin treatment, close glucose monitoring, accurate calculation of carbohydrate intake, and adjustment of dosing and dietary regimen to account for physical activity.
Recent technological advances including insulin pumps with auto-insulin-adjusting features along with continuous glucose monitoring systems have allowed for individuals with T1DM to achieve tighter diabetes control. However, despite these advances in glucose monitoring and insulin delivery systems, the majority of children and adolescents fail to optimize their diabetes control and are unable to achieve these targets.
Several studies have shown that adolescents in poor diabetes control are more likely to come from a racial minority background, have lower annual household income, and be publicly insured. In addition, these patients are also more likely to have missed medical appointments and have less stable home environments. Thus, increased efforts and innovative programs are needed to overcome additional barriers faced by youth with T1DM from disadvantaged backgrounds with the goal of improving the delivery of diabetes care for our most vulnerable, at-risk youth population.
The objective of this pilot and feasibility project is to implement a clinic-based group education program targeting teens with poorly controlled diabetes, focusing on peer group interaction and education combined with social media support to increase engagement and promote behavioral change to improve glycemic control.
This study utilizes 1) group education sessions (6 total sessions over the course of 9 months), 2) online social media group forums, 3) questionnaires to assess self-care habits in diabetes management and quality of life, and 4) surveys to assess this program.
Patients will be included in closed, private Facebook, Snapchat, and Instagram groups where members can communicate with each other and where biweekly updates, reminders, and messages of encouragement relevant to the previous topic covered at group sessions can be sent to the group. Online group forums will be moderated by a staff member to ensure that message content is appropriate and to avoid misinformation or questionable patient-to-patient medical advice.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- The intervention being studied is a group education program
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Youth with type 1 diabetes | Other | Other: Group education sessionsA group of 16 teens (ages 13-18) with poorly -controlled type 1 diabetes will be recruited to participate in this study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Between ages 13-18 (at the time of consent) with diagnosis of T1DM
- HbA1c >9% and/or episode of DKA within the past year (other than at diagnosis)
- Residence in a zip code associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES)
- Possession of a device capable of accessing online social media platforms
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Non-English speaking
- Diagnosed with a developmental or psychological condition that would prevent assumption of self-care responsibilities
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Group education sessionsAlso: Social media peer supportPeer support and interaction both in-person during group education sessions and online via social media platforms | Other | Youth with type 1 diabetes |
Primary outcome
HbA1c
Time frame: 12 months
Measure of glycemic control
4 secondary outcomes
Diabetes self-management skills
Time frame: 9 months
Improved quality of life
Time frame: 9 months
Number of hospital admissions for DKA
Time frame: 12 months
Depression screening
Time frame: 9 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Sep 2019.
- Background: PubMed 25043685DCCT/EDIC research group. Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on albuminuria in type 1 diabetes: long-term follow-up of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Oct;2(10):793-800. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70155-X. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
- Background: PubMed 26861924Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study Research Group. Intensive Diabetes Treatment and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 1 Diabetes: The DCCT/EDIC Study 30-Year Follow-up. Diabetes Care. 2016 May;39(5):686-93. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1990. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
- Background: PubMed 23957219Campbell MS, Schatz DA, Chen V, Wong JC, Steck A, Tamborlane WV, Smith J, Beck RW, Cengiz E, Laffel LM, Miller KM, Haller MJ; T1D Exchange Clinic Network. A contrast between children and adolescents with excellent and poor control: the T1D Exchange clinic registry experience. Pediatr Diabetes. 2014 Mar;15(2):110-7. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12067. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
- Background: PubMed 26802317Khanolkar AR, Amin R, Taylor-Robinson D, Viner RM, Warner JT, Stephenson T. Young people with Type 1 diabetes of non-white ethnicity and lower socio-economic status have poorer glycaemic control in England and Wales. Diabet Med. 2016 Nov;33(11):1508-1515. doi: 10.1111/dme.13079. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
- Background: PubMed 26559135Fortin K, Pries E, Kwon S. Missed Medical Appointments and Disease Control in Children With Type 1 Diabetes. J Pediatr Health Care. 2016 Jul-Aug;30(4):381-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Recruiting
C-Carbs: A CGM-guided Approach to Teaching Carb Awareness
Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Baricitinib (LY3009104) for the Delay of Stage 3 Type 1 Diabetes in At-Risk Children and Adults
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
CKM For Safe Use of SGLT2i in Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Islet Transplantation Alone (ITA) in Patients With Difficult to Control Type I Diabetes Mellitus Using a Glucocorticoid-free Immunosuppressive Regimen
Diabetes Mellitus
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Baricitinib (LY3009104) to Preserve Beta Cell Function in Children and Adults Newly Diagnosed With Type 1 Diabetes (BARICADE-PRESERVE)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ellen Kim, MD principal investigator
Washington University School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Group education sessions in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
HbA1c (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03680079, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Sep 2019.