AzTrials
AzTrials

Birth InjuriesNCT03683264

Forceps vs Vacuum. Rate of Levator Ani Muscle Avulsion: Clinical Trial.

A study testing Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscle in people with Birth Injuries and Pelvic Floor Disorders, run by Hospital Universitario de Valme at 1 site in Spain.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main target is to determine levator ani muscle avulsion rate in vacuum delivery, comparing it to forceps delivery. As secondary goals, The aim to evaluate the difference in levator hiatus area among our study groups. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscle
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
146 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
1 Sep 2018to 1 Jun 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Delivery with forceps or vacuum
  • Cephalic presentation
  • Primiparity
  • At term gestation (37-42 weeks)
  • No prior pelvic floor corrective surgery
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancies with severe maternal or fetal pathology

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

José Antonio García Mejido contact

+34955015383

jagmejido@hotmail.com

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hospital Nuestra Señora de Valme

    Seville, 41014

    José Antonio García Mejido, 9055015385, jagmejido@hotmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

The main target is to determine levator ani muscle avulsion rate in vacuum delivery, comparing it to forceps delivery. As secondary goals, The aim to evaluate the difference in levator hiatus area among our study groups.

Read the detailed description

Nulliparous women who were recruited for an initial evaluation from our maternity unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme. Participants were recruited prior to instrumentation at delivery and those meeting the inclusion criteria, being randomized into the two study groups (vacuum delivery or forceps delivery).

Deliveries completed using vacuum instrumentation were performed by obstetricians with a minimum of five years' experience in obstetric practice. In terms of analgesia, epidural analgesia was used for intrapartum analgesia. The forceps used for the instrumentation was the forceps of Kielland and the vacuum was a metal vacuum (Bird's cup 50 mm, 80 kPa) was used to perform fetal extraction. A suction cup was carefully placed over the flexion point, avoiding caput succedaneum, and rapid negative pressure was applied (over 2 min, until 0.6-0.8 kg/cm2 ). Traction was carried out during contraction, along with maternal push, at a rate of 2-3 tractions per contraction, and without associating Kristeller maneuver. The procedure was abandoned if, after three cup slides or 15 min, fetal extraction had not been successful. Selective episiotomy was carried out in VD following Valme's University Hospital clinical practice guideline for instrumental deliveries.

Obstetric parameters evaluated were: gestational age, labor induction, epidural analgesia, type of instrumentation, duration of second stage of labor, episiotomy and perineal tears. Fetal parameters studied after birth were: fetal sex, weight, head circumference, umbilical artery pH at birth, Apgar test result (at 1 and 5 min), presence of neonatal morbidity (cephalohaematoma, brachial plexus palsy, etc.), admission to neonatology department and neonatal mortality.

The sonographic evaluation was performed six months after delivery and was carried out by a single examiner, with more than five years experience exclusively in obstetric ultrasound, with specific training in 3/4D imaging and blinded to obstetric data relating to the delivery. A 500_ Toshiba Aplio (Toshiba Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan) ultrasound with an abdominal probe PVT-675MV 3D was used for the assessments. Images were acquired with patients in dorsal lithotomy position, placed on the gynecological examination table and under empty bladder conditions. The transducer was carefully placed on each patient's perineum, applying the minimal possible pressure. Three volume measurements were taken for each patient: at rest, with Valsalva maneuver and with maximum contraction. Then, offline analysis of ultrasound volumes was carried out. Analysis of ultrasound volumes was performed offline.

In the multi-view ultrasound images, complete avulsion was defined as an abnormal insertion of LAM in the lower pubic branch identified in all three central slices, i.e. in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions (PMD) and the 2.5 and 5.0mm slices cranial to this one. Levator hiatus measurements, transverse diameters, anteroposterior diameters and area were also determined in the same plane (PMD).

Being tested
Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscle
Medical subject headings
Birth Injuries, Pelvic Floor Disorders, Wounds and Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscleOther

    In the multi-view ultrasound images, complete avulsion was defined as an abnormal insertion of LAM in the lower pubic branch identified in all three central slices, i.e. in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions (PMD) and the 2.5 and 5.0mm slices cranial to this one. Levator hiatus measurements, transverse diameters, anteroposterior diameters and area were also determined in the same plane (PMD).

Study groups in NCT03683264
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Vacuum deliveryOtherDeliveries completed using vacuum instrumentation were performed by obstetricians with a minimum of five years' experience in obstetric practice. In terms of analgesia, epidural analgesia was used for intrapartum analgesia. The vacuum was a metal vacuum (Bird's cup 50 mm, 80 kPa) was used to perform fetal extraction. Traction was carried out during contraction, along with maternal push, at a rate of 2-3 tractions per contraction, and without associating Kristeller maneuver. The procedure was abandoned if, after three cup slides or 15 min, fetal extraction had not been successful. Selective episiotomy was carried out in vacuum delivery following Valme's University Hospital clinical practice guideline for instrumental deliveries.
Receives: Other: Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscle
Forceps deliveryOtherDeliveries completed using forceps instrumentation were performed by obstetricians with a minimum of five years' experience in obstetric practice. In terms of analgesia, epidural analgesia was used for intrapartum analgesia. The forceps used for the instrumentation was the forceps of Kielland. Traction was carried out during contraction, along with maternal push, at a rate of 2-3 tractions per contraction, and without associating Kristeller maneuver. The procedure was abandoned if, after three cup slides or 15 min, fetal extraction had not been successful. Selective episiotomy was carried out in VD following Valme's University Hospital clinical practice guideline for instrumental deliveries.
Receives: Other: Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscle

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Compare the rate of levator ani muscle avulsion

    To compare the rate of levator ani muscle avulsion in vacuum delivery versus the rate of the ate of levator ani muscle avulsion in forceps delivery.

    The avulsion is studied by 3D transperineal ultrasound, through the multiplanar study, including images at 2.5 mm from the plane of minimal dmensions. Avulsion was defined as the discontinuity of levator ani muscle fibres at their pubic insertion, which were identified in the three central slices of the multiplanar assessment.

    Measured: at 6 months after randomisation

  2. Compare the levator ani muscle hiatus area (cm2)

    To compare the levator ani muscle hiatus area (cm2) in vacuum delivery versus the levator ani muscle hiatus area (cm2) in forceps delivery.

    Levator hiatal dimensions can be determined on 3D ultrasound by identifying the plane of minimal dimensions, i.e., the plane which contains the minimal distance between the posterior symphyseal margin and the anterior margin of the levator ani loop immediately posterior to the anorectal angle.

    Measured: at 6 months after randomisation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Sep 2018
  2. Study start1 Sep 2018
  3. Primary completion1 May 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
146 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03683264
Sponsor's protocol ID
Forceps vs vacuum
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
21 Sep 2018
Last updated
15 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscle in people with Birth Injuries and Pelvic Floor Disorders, run by Hospital Universitario de Valme at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact José Antonio García Mejido (+34955015383, jagmejido@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Compare the rate of levator ani muscle avulsion (time frame: at 6 months after randomisation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in