Birth InjuriesNCT03683264
Forceps vs Vacuum. Rate of Levator Ani Muscle Avulsion: Clinical Trial.
A study testing Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscle in people with Birth Injuries and Pelvic Floor Disorders, run by Hospital Universitario de Valme at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The main target is to determine levator ani muscle avulsion rate in vacuum delivery, comparing it to forceps delivery. As secondary goals, The aim to evaluate the difference in levator hiatus area among our study groups. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Birth Injuries, Pelvic Floor Disorders, Instrumental; Injury, Obstetric
- What is being tested?
- Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscle
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 146 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2018to 1 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Delivery with forceps or vacuum
- Cephalic presentation
- Primiparity
- At term gestation (37-42 weeks)
- No prior pelvic floor corrective surgery
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Pregnancies with severe maternal or fetal pathology
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Nuestra Señora de Valme
Seville, 41014
José Antonio García Mejido, 9055015385, jagmejido@hotmail.com
About this study
The main target is to determine levator ani muscle avulsion rate in vacuum delivery, comparing it to forceps delivery. As secondary goals, The aim to evaluate the difference in levator hiatus area among our study groups.
Read the detailed description
Nulliparous women who were recruited for an initial evaluation from our maternity unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme. Participants were recruited prior to instrumentation at delivery and those meeting the inclusion criteria, being randomized into the two study groups (vacuum delivery or forceps delivery).
Deliveries completed using vacuum instrumentation were performed by obstetricians with a minimum of five years' experience in obstetric practice. In terms of analgesia, epidural analgesia was used for intrapartum analgesia. The forceps used for the instrumentation was the forceps of Kielland and the vacuum was a metal vacuum (Bird's cup 50 mm, 80 kPa) was used to perform fetal extraction. A suction cup was carefully placed over the flexion point, avoiding caput succedaneum, and rapid negative pressure was applied (over 2 min, until 0.6-0.8 kg/cm2 ). Traction was carried out during contraction, along with maternal push, at a rate of 2-3 tractions per contraction, and without associating Kristeller maneuver. The procedure was abandoned if, after three cup slides or 15 min, fetal extraction had not been successful. Selective episiotomy was carried out in VD following Valme's University Hospital clinical practice guideline for instrumental deliveries.
Obstetric parameters evaluated were: gestational age, labor induction, epidural analgesia, type of instrumentation, duration of second stage of labor, episiotomy and perineal tears. Fetal parameters studied after birth were: fetal sex, weight, head circumference, umbilical artery pH at birth, Apgar test result (at 1 and 5 min), presence of neonatal morbidity (cephalohaematoma, brachial plexus palsy, etc.), admission to neonatology department and neonatal mortality.
The sonographic evaluation was performed six months after delivery and was carried out by a single examiner, with more than five years experience exclusively in obstetric ultrasound, with specific training in 3/4D imaging and blinded to obstetric data relating to the delivery. A 500_ Toshiba Aplio (Toshiba Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan) ultrasound with an abdominal probe PVT-675MV 3D was used for the assessments. Images were acquired with patients in dorsal lithotomy position, placed on the gynecological examination table and under empty bladder conditions. The transducer was carefully placed on each patient's perineum, applying the minimal possible pressure. Three volume measurements were taken for each patient: at rest, with Valsalva maneuver and with maximum contraction. Then, offline analysis of ultrasound volumes was carried out. Analysis of ultrasound volumes was performed offline.
In the multi-view ultrasound images, complete avulsion was defined as an abnormal insertion of LAM in the lower pubic branch identified in all three central slices, i.e. in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions (PMD) and the 2.5 and 5.0mm slices cranial to this one. Levator hiatus measurements, transverse diameters, anteroposterior diameters and area were also determined in the same plane (PMD).
- Being tested
- Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscle
- Medical subject headings
- Birth Injuries, Pelvic Floor Disorders, Wounds and Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscleOther
In the multi-view ultrasound images, complete avulsion was defined as an abnormal insertion of LAM in the lower pubic branch identified in all three central slices, i.e. in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions (PMD) and the 2.5 and 5.0mm slices cranial to this one. Levator hiatus measurements, transverse diameters, anteroposterior diameters and area were also determined in the same plane (PMD).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vacuum delivery | Other | Deliveries completed using vacuum instrumentation were performed by obstetricians with a minimum of five years' experience in obstetric practice. In terms of analgesia, epidural analgesia was used for intrapartum analgesia. The vacuum was a metal vacuum (Bird's cup 50 mm, 80 kPa) was used to perform fetal extraction. Traction was carried out during contraction, along with maternal push, at a rate of 2-3 tractions per contraction, and without associating Kristeller maneuver. The procedure was abandoned if, after three cup slides or 15 min, fetal extraction had not been successful. Selective episiotomy was carried out in vacuum delivery following Valme's University Hospital clinical practice guideline for instrumental deliveries. Receives: Other: Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscle |
| Forceps delivery | Other | Deliveries completed using forceps instrumentation were performed by obstetricians with a minimum of five years' experience in obstetric practice. In terms of analgesia, epidural analgesia was used for intrapartum analgesia. The forceps used for the instrumentation was the forceps of Kielland. Traction was carried out during contraction, along with maternal push, at a rate of 2-3 tractions per contraction, and without associating Kristeller maneuver. The procedure was abandoned if, after three cup slides or 15 min, fetal extraction had not been successful. Selective episiotomy was carried out in VD following Valme's University Hospital clinical practice guideline for instrumental deliveries. Receives: Other: Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscle |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Compare the rate of levator ani muscle avulsion
To compare the rate of levator ani muscle avulsion in vacuum delivery versus the rate of the ate of levator ani muscle avulsion in forceps delivery.
The avulsion is studied by 3D transperineal ultrasound, through the multiplanar study, including images at 2.5 mm from the plane of minimal dmensions. Avulsion was defined as the discontinuity of levator ani muscle fibres at their pubic insertion, which were identified in the three central slices of the multiplanar assessment.
Measured: at 6 months after randomisation
Compare the levator ani muscle hiatus area (cm2)
To compare the levator ani muscle hiatus area (cm2) in vacuum delivery versus the levator ani muscle hiatus area (cm2) in forceps delivery.
Levator hiatal dimensions can be determined on 3D ultrasound by identifying the plane of minimal dimensions, i.e., the plane which contains the minimal distance between the posterior symphyseal margin and the anterior margin of the levator ani loop immediately posterior to the anorectal angle.
Measured: at 6 months after randomisation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2018
- Study start1 Sep 2018
- Primary completion1 May 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Birth InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 146 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario de Valme
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, José Antonio García Mejido, Hospital Universitario de Valme
- Investigators
- José Antonio García Mejido, Principal investigator, Hospital Universitario de Valme
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03683264
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Forceps vs vacuum
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 21 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 15 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Forceps vs Vacuum. Rate of Levator Ani Muscle Avulsion: Clinical Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03683264
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Forceps vs vacuum
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 146 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario de ValmeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main target is to determine levator ani muscle avulsion rate in vacuum delivery, comparing it to forceps delivery. As secondary goals, The aim to evaluate the difference in levator hiatus area among our study groups.
Detailed description
Nulliparous women who were recruited for an initial evaluation from our maternity unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme. Participants were recruited prior to instrumentation at delivery and those meeting the inclusion criteria, being randomized into the two study groups (vacuum delivery or forceps delivery).
Deliveries completed using vacuum instrumentation were performed by obstetricians with a minimum of five years' experience in obstetric practice. In terms of analgesia, epidural analgesia was used for intrapartum analgesia. The forceps used for the instrumentation was the forceps of Kielland and the vacuum was a metal vacuum (Bird's cup 50 mm, 80 kPa) was used to perform fetal extraction. A suction cup was carefully placed over the flexion point, avoiding caput succedaneum, and rapid negative pressure was applied (over 2 min, until 0.6-0.8 kg/cm2 ). Traction was carried out during contraction, along with maternal push, at a rate of 2-3 tractions per contraction, and without associating Kristeller maneuver. The procedure was abandoned if, after three cup slides or 15 min, fetal extraction had not been successful. Selective episiotomy was carried out in VD following Valme's University Hospital clinical practice guideline for instrumental deliveries.
Obstetric parameters evaluated were: gestational age, labor induction, epidural analgesia, type of instrumentation, duration of second stage of labor, episiotomy and perineal tears. Fetal parameters studied after birth were: fetal sex, weight, head circumference, umbilical artery pH at birth, Apgar test result (at 1 and 5 min), presence of neonatal morbidity (cephalohaematoma, brachial plexus palsy, etc.), admission to neonatology department and neonatal mortality.
The sonographic evaluation was performed six months after delivery and was carried out by a single examiner, with more than five years experience exclusively in obstetric ultrasound, with specific training in 3/4D imaging and blinded to obstetric data relating to the delivery. A 500_ Toshiba Aplio (Toshiba Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan) ultrasound with an abdominal probe PVT-675MV 3D was used for the assessments. Images were acquired with patients in dorsal lithotomy position, placed on the gynecological examination table and under empty bladder conditions. The transducer was carefully placed on each patient's perineum, applying the minimal possible pressure. Three volume measurements were taken for each patient: at rest, with Valsalva maneuver and with maximum contraction. Then, offline analysis of ultrasound volumes was carried out. Analysis of ultrasound volumes was performed offline.
In the multi-view ultrasound images, complete avulsion was defined as an abnormal insertion of LAM in the lower pubic branch identified in all three central slices, i.e. in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions (PMD) and the 2.5 and 5.0mm slices cranial to this one. Levator hiatus measurements, transverse diameters, anteroposterior diameters and area were also determined in the same plane (PMD).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vacuum delivery | Other | Other: Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscleDeliveries completed using vacuum instrumentation were performed by obstetricians with a minimum of five years' experience in obstetric practice. In terms of analgesia, epidural analgesia was used for intrapartum analgesia. The vacuum was a metal vacuum (Bird's cup 50 mm, 80 kPa) was used to perform fetal extraction. Traction was carried out during contraction, along with maternal push, at a rate of 2-3 tractions per contraction, and without associating Kristeller maneuver. The procedure was abandoned if, after three cup slides or 15 min, fetal extraction had not been successful. Selective episiotomy was carried out in vacuum delivery following Valme's University Hospital clinical practice guideline for instrumental deliveries. |
| Forceps delivery | Other | Other: Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscleDeliveries completed using forceps instrumentation were performed by obstetricians with a minimum of five years' experience in obstetric practice. In terms of analgesia, epidural analgesia was used for intrapartum analgesia. The forceps used for the instrumentation was the forceps of Kielland. Traction was carried out during contraction, along with maternal push, at a rate of 2-3 tractions per contraction, and without associating Kristeller maneuver. The procedure was abandoned if, after three cup slides or 15 min, fetal extraction had not been successful. Selective episiotomy was carried out in VD following Valme's University Hospital clinical practice guideline for instrumental deliveries. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Delivery with forceps or vacuum
- Cephalic presentation
- Primiparity
- At term gestation (37-42 weeks)
- No prior pelvic floor corrective surgery
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pregnancies with severe maternal or fetal pathology
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscleIn the multi-view ultrasound images, complete avulsion was defined as an abnormal insertion of LAM in the lower pubic branch identified in all three central slices, i.e. in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions (PMD) and the 2.5 and 5.0mm slices cranial to this one. Levator hiatus measurements, transverse diameters, anteroposterior diameters and area were also determined in the same plane (PMD). | Other | Forceps delivery, Vacuum delivery |
Primary outcome
Compare the rate of levator ani muscle avulsion
Time frame: at 6 months after randomisation
To compare the rate of levator ani muscle avulsion in vacuum delivery versus the rate of the ate of levator ani muscle avulsion in forceps delivery. The avulsion is studied by 3D transperineal ultrasound, through the multiplanar study, including images at 2.5 mm from the plane of minimal dmensions. Avulsion was defined as the discontinuity of levator ani muscle fibres at their pubic insertion, which were identified in the three central slices of the multiplanar assessment.
Compare the levator ani muscle hiatus area (cm2)
Time frame: at 6 months after randomisation
To compare the levator ani muscle hiatus area (cm2) in vacuum delivery versus the levator ani muscle hiatus area (cm2) in forceps delivery. Levator hiatal dimensions can be determined on 3D ultrasound by identifying the plane of minimal dimensions, i.e., the plane which contains the minimal distance between the posterior symphyseal margin and the anterior margin of the levator ani loop immediately posterior to the anorectal angle.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Feb 2019.
Related trials for Birth Injuries
Recruiting
Optimization of Saturation Targets And Resuscitation Trial (OptiSTART)
Premature Infants, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Novosyn® Quick in Patients Undergoing Episiotomy Closure
Episiotomy Wound
RecruitingObservational study
Midwest Birth Outcomes and Indigenous American Pregnancy
Pregnancy
RecruitingPhase 2/3
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of RLS-0071 in Newborns With Moderate or Severe Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy Undergoing Therapeutic Hypothermia
Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy
Not yet recruiting
The Mepilex Cesarean Delivery Trial / MEPIDEL
Surgical Site Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
José Antonio García Mejido principal investigator
Hospital Universitario de Valme
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ultrasound diagnosis of avulsion of the levator ani muscle in people with Birth Injuries and Pelvic Floor Disorders, run by Hospital Universitario de Valme at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact José Antonio García Mejido (+34955015383, jagmejido@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Compare the rate of levator ani muscle avulsion (time frame: at 6 months after randomisation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2019.