AzTrials
AzTrials

Knee OsteoarthritisNCT03683992

Cemented vs Cementless TKA

An observational study of Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare cemented and cementless versions of the Triathlon total knee arthroplasty/replacement (TKA) in terms of clinical outcomes, perioperative course, and outcome scores including function and patient satisfaction. Patients who present to the clinical practices of Dr. Ryan Nunley, Dr. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Knee Osteoarthritis
What is being tested?
Triathlon total knee system
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
147 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Jan 2013to 1 Dec 2023
How long will I take part?
5 Years
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patient between the ages of 18-75 getting a total knee surgery.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who qualify for a cementless primary total knee arthroplasty*
  • 18 years of age but no more than 75 years of age
  • Willing to be randomized
  • Willing to sign informed consent
  • Willing to return for all follow-up visits

Who cannot join

  • Patients with inflammatory arthritis
  • BMI equal to 40 or less.
  • Patient with an active infection or suspected infection in the operative joint
  • The absolute and relative contraindications stated in the FDA cleared labeling for the device
  • Patients who have undergone osteotomy
  • Patients who have had previous patella fracture or surgery
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patients who have had previous healed tibia or femur fractures
  • Patients who have had previous knee or hip replacement surgery on the ipsilateral side
  • Patients who require patellar resurfacing
  • Patients with major medical/muscular/orthopedic deformities

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Washington University Medical School

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Early Outcomes of Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Triathlon Knee

The purpose of this study is to compare cemented and cementless versions of the Triathlon total knee arthroplasty/replacement (TKA) in terms of clinical outcomes, perioperative course, and outcome scores including function and patient satisfaction.

Patients who present to the clinical practices of Dr. Ryan Nunley, Dr. Robert Barrack, or Dr. Denis Nam and are suitable candidates for primary TKA will be screened for eligibility and invited to participate. Once enrolled participants will be randomized (1:1) to either receive a cemented or cementless Triathlon TKA. Data collected for the study will include standard of care clinical and radiographic evaluations collected during office visits and surgery, as well as study-specific patient questionnaires. Clinical, radiographic and questionnaire data will be collected pre-operatively, at the time of surgery, and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and beyond, and 2 years and beyond post-operatively. Patients will complete the following outcomes questionnaires preoperatively: New Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, UCLA Activity Score, SF-12, and EQ-5D. The following questionnaires will be collected at four to six weeks, six months, one year and beyond, and two years and beyond postoperatively: New Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, Washington University Knee Satisfaction and Function Questionnaire, Oxford Knee Score, UCLA Activity Score, SF-12, and EQ-5D, and a Pain Drawing. In addition, a Pain Diary with a pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will be assessed once daily at home for 6 weeks after surgery.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to compare cemented and cementless versions of the Triathlon total knee arthroplasty/replacement (TKA) in terms of clinical outcomes, perioperative course, and outcome scores including function and patient satisfaction.

Patients who present to the clinical practices of Dr. Ryan Nunley, Dr. Robert Barrack, or Dr. Denis Nam and are suitable candidates for primary TKA will be screened for eligibility and invited to participate. Once enrolled participants will be randomized (1:1) to either receive a cemented or cementless Triathlon TKA. Data collected for the study will include standard of care clinical and radiographic evaluations collected during office visits and surgery, as well as study-specific patient questionnaires. Clinical, radiographic and questionnaire data will be collected pre-operatively, at the time of surgery, and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and beyond, and 2 years and beyond post-operatively. Patients will complete the following outcomes questionnaires preoperatively: New Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, UCLA Activity Score, SF-12, and EQ-5D. The following questionnaires will be collected at four to six weeks, six months, one year and beyond, and two years and beyond postoperatively: New Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, Washington University Knee Satisfaction and Function Questionnaire, Oxford Knee Score, UCLA Activity Score, SF-12, and EQ-5D, and a Pain Drawing. In addition, a Pain Diary with a pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will be assessed once daily at home for 6 weeks after surgery.

Being tested
Triathlon total knee system
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Knee

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Triathlon total knee systemDevice

    Implantable

Study groups in NCT03683992
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
cemented and cementless Triathlon groupcemented group are patients who get randomized to receive cemented knee implant and Patient randomized to receiving cement less knee implant.
Receives: Device: Triathlon total knee system

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference in tourniquet time

    Tourniquet time will be recorded for each patient during surgery to see if there is a difference between tourniquet time between patients who are receiving cemented vs cementless.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Difference in functional pain score

    Patients will fill out a visual analog scale at 6 weeks, 1 year, 2 year to determine if there is a difference between functional pain score between cemented vs. cementless.

    Measured: 2 years

  2. knee society score

    Knee society score questionnaire will be completed preoperatively, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 year. Subscales are summed together to compute total score.

    Measured: 2 years

  3. Forgotten joint score

    Forgotten join score questionnaire will be completed preoperatively, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 year. Subscales are summed together to compute total score.

    Measured: 2 year

  4. Oxford knee score

    Oxford knee score questionnaire will be completed preoperatively, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 year.Subscales are summed together to compute total score.

    Measured: 2 years

  5. UCLA Activity score

    UCLA questionnaire will be completed preoperatively, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 year. Scale from 1 to 10. Higher number represent better outcome. Lower numbers represent worst outcome.

    Measured: 2 year

  6. SF-12 questionnaire

    SF-12 questionnaire will be completed preoperatively, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 year. Subscales are summed together to compute total score.

    Measured: 2 year

  7. EQ-5D

    EQ-5D questionnaire will be completed preoperatively, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 year. Subscales are summed together to compute total score.

    Measured: 2 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Sep 2018
  2. Study start1 Jan 2013
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
147 participants (actual)
Target duration
5 Years
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03683992
Sponsor's protocol ID
201308057
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
19 Sep 2018
Last updated
24 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference in tourniquet time (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in