AzTrials
AzTrials

In-hospital FallsHEMO-CIHNCT03687541

In-hospital Falls and Hemorrhagic Complications : a Descriptive Analysis in Rennes University Hospital

An observational study of In-hospital Falls, run by Rennes University Hospital at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Anticoagulant and antiplatelet treatments have well defined indactions, with a clearly proved benefit, respectivly for prevention of arterial and venous emblism and for prevention of athermo-related arterial thrombosis. Bleeding risk represents the main adverse effect of these antithrombotic medications. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
In-hospital Falls
How many people
157 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
7 Sep 2018to 10 Oct 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Hospitalized patients in internal medicine unit for whom an in-hospital fall was reported

Who may be able to join

  • Hospitalized patients in internal medicine unit in Rennes University Hospital, from 1/01/2017 to 31/12/2017
  • Age over 18
  • In-hospital fall reported in unwanted event database
  • Separated inclusion for each fall in the same patient

Who cannot join

  • Adults on legal protection (safeguarding justice, trusteeship, guardianship) or deprived of liberty
  • Patient opposed to inculsion

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes

    Rennes, 35

Other trials in France

About this study

Anticoagulant and antiplatelet treatments have well defined indactions, with a clearly proved benefit, respectivly for prevention of arterial and venous emblism and for prevention of athermo-related arterial thrombosis.

Bleeding risk represents the main adverse effect of these antithrombotic medications. Then benefit-risk ratio is sometimes difficult to evaluate, especially for elderly patients prone to fall (incidence of falls estimated to 30% per year for patients over 65), exposed on the one hand to thromboembolic risk and on the other hand to bleeding risk.

Read more

Associations between falls and antithrombotic-related bleeding risk had already been evaluated in several studies :

  • Concerning anticoagulant treatments in patients at high risk of falls, retrospective studies shown a overrated risk of intracranial hemorrhage and mortality, but those results remain discordant wtih 3 major prospective studies on larger populations.
  • Concerning antiplatelet treatments in patients at high risk of falls, majority of retrospective studies reported an overrated risk of major bleeding, intracranial bleeding and mortality, but datas remain fewer than for anticoagulant and results are as well discordant with prospective studies.
  • No difference of morbi-mortality is clearly estalblished depending of antithrombotic treatment class (anticoagulant versus antiplatelet), however there is a cumulative risk in case of association of both anticoagulant and antiplatelet.
  • Main factors associated with fall-related bleeding for patients on anticoagulant include age, female sex, anemia, chronic kidney disease, dementia and polymedication.

Thus, the purpose of this study is to specify whether occurrence of falls justify to reconsider prescription of antithrombotic treatments in patients having an indication of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy.

Read the detailed description

Retrospective, descriptive and non-interventional study over a period of 12 months (from 01/01/2017 to 31/12/2017), from unwanted events database of Rennes University Hospital.

Patients meeting criterias receive an information mail. Without opposition over a period of 3 weeks, datas will be treated, focusing on the event and its consequencies until hospital outing.

Baseline characteristics :

  • Demographic datas : age, sex
  • Antithrombotic treatement, treatment class and molecule
  • Last INR dosage before the fall for patients of vitamin K antagonists
  • Antithrombotic treatment indication : supra-ventricular arythmia, heart valve mecanical prothesis, severe left ventricle hypokinesia, venous thromboembolism, anti-phospholipid syndrome, myeloproliferative disorder, atheroma (in primary or secondary prevention)
  • Comorbidities : history of bleeding (including hemorrhagic stroke), haemostasis disorder, thrombocytopenia, anemia, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, alcohol abuse, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic stroke, cognitive disoreder, active neoplasm, HAS-BLED score, HEMORRHAGE score
  • Other undergoing treatments : total number of medications, antihypertensive treatment, psychotropic treatment, non-steroid anti-inflamatory treatment

Description of fall-related bleeding events rate (until hospital outing) according to the severity :

  • Any severity bleedings
  • Major bleedings (hemorrhagic shock, deglobulisation, red blood cells transfusion required, vital or functional-threatening bleeding spot, uncontrolled hemorrhage requiring specialized haemostatic intervention)
  • Intracranial bleeding
  • Fatal bleeding

Modification of the antithrombotic prescription in the aftermath of the fall :

  • Discontinuation or suspension of antithrombotic treatment

Sub-group analysis for each previous item, according to undergoing antithrombotic treatment at the moment of the fall :

  • Curative-dose anticoagulant in monotherapy
  • Preventive-dose anticoagulant in monotherapy
  • Antiplatelet in monotherapy
  • Curative-dose anticoagulant and antiplatelet in association
  • Preventive-dose anticoagulant and antiplatelet in association
  • No antithrombotic treatement
Keywords
In-hospital falls, fall-related bleeding, anticoagulant-related bleeding, antiplatelet-related bleeding, antithrombotic-related bleeding

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Any-severity fall-related hemorrhagic events rate

    All reported hemorrhagic events after a fall

    Measured: The inclusion day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Sep 2018
  2. Study start7 Sep 2018
  3. Primary completion10 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion10 Oct 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
157 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03687541
Sponsor's protocol ID
35RC18_3089_HEMO-CIH
Acronym
HEMO-CIH
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
26 Sep 2018
Last updated
19 Dec 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of In-hospital Falls, run by Rennes University Hospital at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Any-severity fall-related hemorrhagic events rate (time frame: The inclusion day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in