AzTrials
AzTrials

InfertilityPhase 4NCT03687697

Comparison of Global, G-TL, & Cornell Media

A Phase 4 study testing Global vs. G-TL vs Cornell's C3 vs Cornell's C1/C2 media in people with Infertility, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective, randomized clinical trial to compare the Global commercial single step media to 1) G-TL (Vitrolife), 2) Weill Cornell's single step and sequential steps media, which all support human embryo development in the laboratory using the Vitrolife Time-Lapse system. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Infertility
What is being tested?
Global vs. G-TL vs Cornell's C3 vs Cornell's C1/C2 media
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Apr 2018to 1 May 2018
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 40 years of age or younger (maternal)
  • 65 years of age or younger (paternal)
  • 10 or more oocytes
  • Fresh or frozen oocytes (including donor)
  • Fresh or frozen (including donor) sperm can be used
  • ICSI only
  • Frozen embryos from this study can be included in the outcome portion of this study.
  • PGD and/or PGS patients included

Who cannot join

  • Patients with less than 10 oocytes
  • Co-culture patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Center for Reproductive Medicine

    New York, New York, 10065

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Global Medium With G-TL, Cornell Single and Sequential Steps Media by the Time-Lapse System.

This is a prospective, randomized clinical trial to compare the Global commercial single step media to 1) G-TL (Vitrolife), 2) Weill Cornell's single step and sequential steps media, which all support human embryo development in the laboratory using the Vitrolife Time-Lapse system. The main goal of the study is to identify the best culture medium for optimal embryo development.

Read the detailed description

Culture media are used to culture embryos in order to support their development in the laboratory. New media are being introduced to the market. Clinical studies have shown that the use of the single-step Global medium for culture of human embryos from the zygote stage to the blastocyst stage has resulted in better in-vitro development than a variety of sequential media system.

Global is a FDA approved commercial single-step medium for all embryo culture from Day 0 to the blastocyst stage.

G-TL (Time-Lapse) is a FDA approved commercial single-step medium from Vitrolife. It was developed to be used with time-lapse devices as a continuous embryo culture medium from Day 0 to Day 5/6.

C3 is Cornell's in house made single-step buffered medium for embryo culture from oocyte fertilization to blastocyst stage used as standard of care.

C1/C2 is Cornell's in house made buffered sequential medium otherwise known as multi step medium, use to culture embryos for development. It is formulated to meet the embryos requirements at two specific stages of development but require removal of the dish from the incubator to physically exchange the culture media surrounding the embryos. This medium will be the control.

Conditions
Infertility
Being tested
Global vs. G-TL vs Cornell's C3 vs Cornell's C1/C2 media
Keywords
IVF
Medical subject headings
Infertility

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Global vs. G-TL vs Cornell's C3 vs Cornell's C1/C2 mediaBiological

    A comparison between Global, G-TL, Cornell's C3, and Cornell's C1/C2 embryo culture media.

Study groups in NCT03687697
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Global vs. G-TL MediaExperimentalGlobal medium will be compared with G-TL (Time-Lapse) medium.
Receives: Biological: Global vs. G-TL vs Cornell's C3 vs Cornell's C1/C2 media
Global vs. Cornell's C3 MediaExperimentalGlobal medium will be compared with Cornell's C3 single step medium.
Receives: Biological: Global vs. G-TL vs Cornell's C3 vs Cornell's C1/C2 media
Global vs. Cornell's sequential MediaExperimentalGlobal medium will be compared with Cornell's C1/C2 sequential medium.
Receives: Biological: Global vs. G-TL vs Cornell's C3 vs Cornell's C1/C2 media

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Embryo development

    Comparison of embryo development using standard assessments of morphology, cell number, and embryo grading, between the different media groups.

    Measured: Day 5

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Implantation rate

    The ratio of embryo implantation measured through ultrasound

    Measured: 4 weeks

  2. Pregnancy rate

    The ratio of pregnancy measured through βHCG

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Sep 2018
  2. Study start1 Apr 2018
  3. Primary completion1 May 2018
  4. Study completion1 May 2018

Why it stopped: The study was halted prior to enrollment of first participant due to non funding and recourses.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03687697
Sponsor's protocol ID
1707018347
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
31 Jul 2018
Last updated
27 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Global vs. G-TL vs Cornell's C3 vs Cornell's C1/C2 media in people with Infertility, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Embryo development (time frame: Day 5). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in