Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingPhase 3NCT03689972
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of EID of Natalizumab (BG00002) in Participants With RRMS Switching From Treatment With Natalizumab SID in Relation to Continued SID Treatment- Followed by Extension Study Comprising SC and IV Natalizumab Administration
A Phase 3 study testing Natalizumab in people with Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, run by Biogen at 107 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
Part 1: The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of natalizumab extended interval dosing (EID) (every 6 weeks [Q6W]) in participants who have previously been treated with natalizumab standard interval dosing (SID) (every 4 weeks [Q4W]) for at least 12 months, in relation to continued Q4W treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
- What is being tested?
- Natalizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 585 participants
- Where
- 107 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- 27 Nov 2018to 24 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- For Part 1:
- Ability of the participant to understand the purpose and risks of the study and provide signed and dated informed consent and authorization to use confidential health information in accordance with national and local participant privacy regulations.
- Diagnosis of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) according to the McDonald criteria [Thompson 2018].
- Treatment with natalizumab as disease-modifying monotherapy for RRMS that is consistent with the approved dosing for a minimum of 12 months prior to randomization. The participant must have received at least 11 doses of natalizumab in the 12 months prior to randomization with no missed doses in the 3 months prior to randomization.
- Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score <=5.5 at screening.
- No relapses in the last 12 months prior to randomization, as determined by the enrolling Investigator.
Show all 9Show fewer
- For Part 2:
- Ability of the participants to understand the purpose and risks of the study and provide signed and dated informed consent for Part 2 and authorization to use confidential health information in accordance with national and local participant privacy regulations.
- Completed Part 1 Week 72 visit while remaining on their randomized treatment assignment of Q4W or Q6W.
Who cannot join
- For Part 1:
- Primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS).
- MRI positive for Gd-enhancing lesions at screening.
- Participants for whom MRI is contraindicated (e.g., have a contraindicated pacemaker or other contraindicated implanted metal device, have suffered, or are at risk for, side effects from Gd, or have claustrophobia that cannot be medically managed).
- History of any clinically significant (as determined by the Investigator) cardiac, endocrinologic, hematologic, hepatic, immunologic, metabolic (including diabetes), urologic, pulmonary, neurologic (except for RRMS), dermatologic, psychiatric, renal, or other major disease that would preclude participation in a clinical study, in the opinion of the Investigator.
- Presence of anti-natalizumab antibodies at screening.
Show all 15Show fewer
- For Part 2:
- Participants treated with natalizumab Q6W was reverted to natalizumab Q4W by choice or as rescue treatment in Part 1.
- Participant received treatment with any MS disease-modifying therapy other than natalizumab in Part 1 or in the period between Part 1 and Part 2.
- History of human immunodeficiency virus or history of other immunodeficient conditions.
- Current enrollment or a plan to enroll in any interventional clinical study in which an investigational treatment or approved therapy for investigational use is administered within 30 days (or 5 half-lives of the agent, whichever is longer) prior to the Baseline Visit or at any time during this study.
- Inability to comply with study requirements.
- Other unspecified reasons that, in the opinion of the Investigator or Biogen, make the participant unsuitable for enrollment.
- The inclusion and exclusion criteria for new participants who did not participate in Part 1 of the study are the same as those for participants who did participate in Part 1.
- NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply
Trial locations and contacts
107 sites in 11 countries.
107 sites in 11 countries
United States52 sites
Shepherd Center, Inc.
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
Atlanta Neuroscience Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, 30327
University of Colorado Hospital Anschutz Outpatient Pavillion
Aurora, Colorado, 80010-0510
Lahey Clinic Inc. - PARENT ACCOUNT
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805
University Of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
North Central Neurology Associates, P.C.
Cullman, Alabama, 35058
Dayton Center for Neurological Disorders
Dayton, Ohio, 45459
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Northwestern University
Evanston, Illinois, 60208
Yale University
Fairfield, Connecticut, 06824
Michigan Institute for Neurological Disorders
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48334
Advanced Neurosciences Research
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80528
Neurology Center of New England P.C.
Foxborough, Massachusetts, 02035
Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology
Golden Valley, Minnesota, 55422
Michigan State University
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49506
Alabama Neurology Associates
Homewood, Alabama, 35209
UCI MIND
Irvine, California, 92607
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Inc.
Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, 02130-2075
Sibyl Wray, MD Neurology, PC
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37922
UC San Diego Movement Disorder Center
La Jolla, California, 92037
MS Center of California
Laguna Hills, California, 92653
Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
Miami, Florida, 33125
Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53227
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37215
NYU Langone Clinical Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10016
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029
Columbia University Hervert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10032
RWJ Barnabas Health
Newark, New Jersey, 07102
College Park Family Care Center
Overland Park, Kansas, 66212
Memorial Healthcare
Owosso, Michigan, 48867
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Island Neurological Associates, P.C.
Plainview, New York, 11803
Providence Neurological Specialties
Portland, Oregon, 97225
Raleigh Neurology Associates
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607-6010
Central Texas Neurology Consultants
Round Rock, Texas, 78681
Rocky Mountain MS Research Group LLC
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84103
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98101
Washington University, School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Infinity Clinical Research, LLC
Sunrise, Florida, 33351
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Holy Name Medical Center
Teaneck, New Jersey, 07666
Multiple Sclerosis Center of Greater Washington
Vienna, Virginia, 22182
Georgetown University Hospital-Medstar
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007-2113
Dragonfly Research, LLC
Wellesley, Massachusetts, 02481
South Shore Neurology Associates
Weymouth, Massachusetts, 02190
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Germany10 sites
Neurologie im Alphamed
Bamberg, 96052
Charité - Campus Charité Mitte
Berlin, 10117
Katholisches Klinikum Bochum gGmbH
Bochum, 44791
Neuro Centrum Science GmbH
Erbach im Odenwald, 64711
Universitaetsklinikum Essen
Essen, 45147
Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Universitaetsklinikum Giessen und Marburg GmbH Standort Marburg
Marburg, 35043
Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU Muenchen
Munich, 81675
Universitaetsklinikum Muenster
Münster, 48149
Synconcept GmbH - Neuro MVZ
Stuttgart, 70182
United Kingdom10 sites
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Campus
Glasgow, Strathclyde, G51 4TF
Walton Centre for Neurology & Neurosurgery.
Liverpool, Merseyside, L9 7LJ
King's College Hospital
London, Greater London, SE5 9RS
The National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery
London, Greater London, WC1N 3BG
Charing Cross Hospital
London, W6 8RF
Newcastle University- Clinical Ageing Research Unit
Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, NE4 5PL
Nottingham University Hospital, Queen's Medical Centre
Nottingham, NG7 2UH
Salford Care Organisation
Salford, M6 8HD
Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Sheffield, S10 2JF
Morriston Hospital
Swansea, SA6 6NL
Australia6 sites
Box Hill Hospital
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Lyell McEwin Hospital
Elizabeth Vale, South Australia, 5112
The Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, 3004
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, 3050
Royal North Shore Hospital
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065
Brain and Mind Centre
Sydney, New South Wales, 2050
France6 sites
Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin - Hôpital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, 33076
CHU CAEN - Hôpital de la Côte de Nacre
Caen, 14033
Hopital Roger Salengro - CHU Lille
Lille, 59037
CHU Nice - Hôpital Pasteur
Nice, 6001
CHU Nantes - Hopital Nord Laënnec
Saint-Herblain, 44800
CHU Strasbourg - Nouvel Hôpital Civil
Strasbourg, 67091
Canada5 sites
Clinique Neuro-Outaouais
Gatineau, Quebec, J8Y 1W2
Recherche SEPMUS
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2J2
CHUM Centre de Recherche
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0A9
Montreal Neurological Institute Clinical Research Unit
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 3B4
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8
Italy5 sites
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico "Gaspare Rodolico - San Marco" (Presidio G. Rodolico)
Catania, 95123
Fondazione Istituto G.Giglio di Cefalù
Cefalù, 90015
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Milan, 20133
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria- Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Naples, 80131
I.R.C.C.S. Neuromed-Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo
Pozzilli, 86077
Spain5 sites
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca
El Palmar, Murcia, 30120
Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova
Lleida, Catalonia, 25198
Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
Madrid, 28034
Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga
Málaga, 29010
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
Seville, 41009
Belgium4 sites
Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles Hopital Erasme
Brussels, 1070
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Brussels, 1200
UZA
Edegem, 2650
CHU de Tivoli
La Louvière, 7100
Netherlands3 sites
Amphia Ziekenhuis, Molengracht
Breda, 4818 CK
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein, 3435 CM
Zuyderland Medisch Centrum - Sittard-Geleen
Sittard, 6162 BG
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Rater-Blinded, Phase 3b Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of 6-Week Extended Interval Dosing (EID) of Natalizumab (BG00002) in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Switching From Treatment With 4-Week Natalizumab Standard Interval Dosing (SID) in Relation to Continued SID Treatment - Followed by an Open-Label Crossover Extension Study Comprising Subcutaneous and Intravenous Natalizumab Administration
Part 1: The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of natalizumab extended interval dosing (EID) (every 6 weeks [Q6W]) in participants who have previously been treated with natalizumab standard interval dosing (SID) (every 4 weeks [Q4W]) for at least 12 months, in relation to continued Q4W treatment. The secondary objectives is to evaluate relapse-based clinical efficacy measures, disability worsening, additional Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-lesion efficacy measures and safety of Q6W in participants who have previously been treated with natalizumab Q4W for at least 12 months, in relation to continued Q4W treatment.
Part 2: The primary objective is to evaluate participant preference for subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV) route of natalizumab administration. The secondary objectives is to evaluate treatment satisfaction, drug preparation and administration time, safety and immunogenicity, efficacy and characterize pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) drug preparation and administration time of SC versus IV routes of natalizumab administration.
Read the detailed description
This study will be conducted in 2 parts. At the end of part 1, participants who provide consent and are eligible, and newly enrolled participants, will enter part 2, an Open Label Extension comprising a crossover analysis.
Those participants who completed part 1 and cannot participate, or elect not to participate, in Part 2 (Open label extension) will enter a 12-week follow-up.
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
- Being tested
- Natalizumab
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NatalizumabDrug
Also called BG00002
Natalizumab 300 mg IV infusion.
NatalizumabDrug
Also called BG00002
Natalizumab 300 mg SC injection or IV infusion.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1: IV Q4W | Experimental | Participants received natalizumab 300 mg intravenous (IV) infusion once Q4W up to Week 72. Receives: Drug: Natalizumab |
| Part 1: IV Q6W | Experimental | Participants received natalizumab 300 mg IV infusion once Q6W up to Week 72. Receives: Drug: Natalizumab |
| Part 2: Run-in Period: IV Q6W | Experimental | Participants who completed Part 1 or were newly enrolled in Part 2 received natalizumab 300 mg IV infusion Q6W from Week 72 through Week 102. Receives: Drug: Natalizumab |
| Part 2: Crossover Period: IV Q6W, then SC Q6W | Experimental | Participants who completed run-in period of Part 2 were randomized to receive natalizumab 300 mg IV infusion Q6W from Week 108 through Week 126 followed by natalizumab 300 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection Q6W from Week 132 through Week 150 along with a single dose of natalizumab 300 mg SC injection or IV infusion as per participant's choice at Week 156. Receives: Drug: Natalizumab |
| Part 2: Crossover Period: SC Q6W, then IV Q6W | Experimental | Participants who completed run-in period of Part 2 were randomized to receive natalizumab 300 mg SC injection Q6W from Week 108 through Week 126 followed by natalizumab 300 mg IV infusion Q6W from Week 132 through Week 150 along with a single dose of natalizumab 300 mg SC injection or IV infusion as per participant's choice at Week 156. Receives: Drug: Natalizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Part 1: Mean Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions at Week 72
T2 hyperintense lesions were analyzed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of brain. New MRI scans were compared with the prior MRI scans to analyze the number of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions at Week 72 relative to baseline.
Measured: Week 72
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Indicating a Preference for Natalizumab SC Administration at the End of Crossover Period of Part 2
Measured: Week 150
Secondary outcomes (21)
Part 1: Time to First Relapse as Adjudicated by an Independent Neurology Evaluation Committee (INEC)
Relapse is defined as the onset of new or recurrent neurological symptoms, not associated with fever, infection, severe stress, or drug toxicity, lasting at least 24 hours, accompanied by new objective abnormalities on a neurological examination. Only relapses confirmed by an INEC were included in the analysis. Time to First Relapse was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Up to Week 72
Part 1: Annualized Relapse Rate at Week 72
Annualized relapse rate is calculated as the total number of INEC-confirmed relapses that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years followed in the period.
Measured: Week 72
Part 1: Time to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Worsening
Confirmed EDSS worsening is defined as an increase of at least 1.0 point from a baseline EDSS score ≥ 1.0 or an increase of at least 1.5 points from a baseline EDSS score of 0 that is confirmed after at least 24 weeks. Time to EDSS worsening is estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Up to Week 72
Part 1: Mean Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Weeks 24, 48, and 72
T1 hypointense lesions on brain were analyzed by MRI scans of brain. New MRI scans were compared with the prior MRI scans to analyze the number of new T1 hypointense lesions at Weeks 24, 48, and 72 relative to baseline.
Measured: Weeks 24, 48, and 72
Part 1: Mean Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions at Weeks 24 and 48
T2 hyperintense lesions were analyzed by MRI scans of brain. New MRI scans were compared with the prior MRI scans to analyze the number of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions at Weeks 24 and 48 relative to baseline.
Measured: Weeks 24 and 48
Part 1: Mean Number of New Gadolinium (Gd) Enhancing Lesions at Weeks 24, 48, and 72
Gd enhancing lesions on brain were analyzed by MRI scans of brain. New MRI scans were compared with the prior MRI scans to analyze the number of new Gd enhancing lesions at Weeks 24, 48, and 72 relative to baseline.
Measured: Weeks 24, 48, and 72
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE is any event occurring on or after first dose after randomization up to 12 weeks (or 24 weeks for PML [progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy] events) following the last dose on the study.An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is a life-threatening event, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in a significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly, is a medically important event.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 84
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scores During the Crossover Period
The TSQM has 14 questions that assesses participants' global satisfaction level with their treatment in 4 domains: side effects (There are 5 questions in the side effects domain, however one of them is a Yes/No question and there are 4 sub-components, hence a maximum score of 20), effectiveness (3 questions), global satisfaction (3 questions), and convenience (3 questions). All questions are scored from 1 (least satisfied) to 5 or 7 (most satisfied). The total score is summed for each domain to obtain: side effects (1-20), effectiveness (1-21), global satisfaction (1-17), and convenience (1-21), using transformed scores between 0 and 100 for effectiveness. Lower total scores in each domain indicate dissatisfaction with the study medication and higher total scores indicate satisfaction.
Measured: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Mean Time for Drug Preparation and Drug Administration During the Crossover Period
Measured: Week 108 up to Week 156
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE is any event occurring on or after first dose after randomization up to and including 12 weeks (or 24 weeks for PML events) following the last dose on the study.
Measured: Part 2: Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 180
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Anti-Natalizumab Antibodies During the Crossover Period
Measured: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Mean Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions During the Crossover Period
T2 hyperintense lesions were analyzed by MRI scans of brain. New MRI scans were compared with the prior MRI scans to analyze the number of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions during the crossover period of Part 2 relative to baseline.
Measured: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Time to First Relapse During the Crossover Period
Relapse is defined as the onset of new or recurrent neurological symptoms, not associated with fever, infection, severe stress, or drug toxicity, lasting at least 24 hours. The time to first relapse is defined as the time from the first randomized dose in Part 2 up to the first relapse. Time to First Relapse is estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Annualized Relapse Rate During the Crossover Period
Annualized relapse rate is calculated as the total number of relapses that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years followed in the period.
Measured: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Change From Baseline in EDSS Score During the Crossover Period
The EDSS is a scale based on standardized neurological examination which comprised of optic, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory and cerebral functions, as well as walking ability. It measures the MS disability status on a scale ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), with higher scores indicating more disability.
Measured: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Mean Number of New Gd Enhancing Lesions During the Crossover Period
Gd enhancing lesions on brain were analyzed by MRI scans of brain. New MRI scans were compared with the prior MRI scans to analyze the number of new Gd enhancing lesions during the crossover period of Part 2 relative to baseline.
Measured: Week 108 up to Week 156
Part 2: Mean Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions During the Crossover Period
T1 hypointense lesions on brain were analyzed by MRI scans of brain. New MRI scans were compared with the prior MRI scans to analyze the number of new T1 hypointense lesions during the crossover period of Part 2 relative to baseline.
Measured: Week 108 up to Week 156
Part 2: Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Brain Volume During the Crossover Period
Measured: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Cortical and Thalamic Brain Region Volume During the Crossover Period
Measured: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Trough Serum Concentration of Natalizumab (Ctrough) During the Crossover Period
Measured: Pre-dose at Weeks 108, 114, 120, 126, 132, 138, 144, 150, and 156
Part 2: Mean Trough α4 Integrin Saturation During the Crossover Period
Measured: Pre-dose at Weeks 108, 114, 120, 126, 132, 138, 144, 150, and 156
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Oct 2018
- Study start27 Nov 2018
- Primary completion31 Jan 2023
- Study completion24 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by BiogenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 585 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biogen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Biogen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03689972
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 101MS329
- Other IDs
- 2018-002145-11, 2018
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 27 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Please refer data queries to DataSharing@biogen.com.
Publications
Foley JF, Defer G, Ryerson LZ, Cohen JA, Arnold DL, Butzkueven H, Cutter GR, Giovannoni G, Killestein J, Wiendl H, Li K, Dsilva L, Toukam M, Ferber K, Sohn J, Engelman H, Lasky T. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Natalizumab 6-Week Dosing vs Continued 4-Week Dosing for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2024 Dec;11(6):e200321. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200321. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
PubMed 39393045Wiendl H, Foley J, Defer G, Zhovtis Ryerson L, Cohen JA, Arnold DL, Butzkueven H, Cutter GR, Giovannoni G, Killestein J, Domingo-Horne R, Toukam M, Nunn A, Maghzi AH, Kuhelj R, Lasky T. Patient Preference for Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Administration with Every-6-Week Natalizumab (Tysabri(R)) Dosing: NOVA Phase IIIb Extension Study (Part 2). Neurol Ther. 2024 Oct;13(5):1385-1401. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00647-0. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
PubMed 39046635Foley JF, Defer G, Ryerson LZ, Cohen JA, Arnold DL, Butzkueven H, Cutter G, Giovannoni G, Killestein J, Wiendl H, Smirnakis K, Xiao S, Kong G, Kuhelj R, Campbell N; NOVA study investigators. Comparison of switching to 6-week dosing of natalizumab versus continuing with 4-week dosing in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (NOVA): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol. 2022 Jul;21(7):608-619. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00143-0. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
PubMed 35483387
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Rater-Blinded, Phase 3b Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of 6-Week Extended Interval Dosing (EID) of Natalizumab (BG00002) in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Switching From Treatment With 4-Week Natalizumab Standard Interval Dosing (SID) in Relation to Continued SID Treatment - Followed by an Open-Label Crossover Extension Study Comprising Subcutaneous and Intravenous Natalizumab Administration
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03689972
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 101MS329
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 585 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BiogenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 27 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 12 Jun 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Part 1: The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of natalizumab extended interval dosing (EID) (every 6 weeks [Q6W]) in participants who have previously been treated with natalizumab standard interval dosing (SID) (every 4 weeks [Q4W]) for at least 12 months, in relation to continued Q4W treatment. The secondary objectives is to evaluate relapse-based clinical efficacy measures, disability worsening, additional Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-lesion efficacy measures and safety of Q6W in participants who have previously been treated with natalizumab Q4W for at least 12 months, in relation to continued Q4W treatment.
Part 2: The primary objective is to evaluate participant preference for subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV) route of natalizumab administration. The secondary objectives is to evaluate treatment satisfaction, drug preparation and administration time, safety and immunogenicity, efficacy and characterize pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) drug preparation and administration time of SC versus IV routes of natalizumab administration.
Detailed description
This study will be conducted in 2 parts. At the end of part 1, participants who provide consent and are eligible, and newly enrolled participants, will enter part 2, an Open Label Extension comprising a crossover analysis.
Those participants who completed part 1 and cannot participate, or elect not to participate, in Part 2 (Open label extension) will enter a 12-week follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1: IV Q4W | Experimental | Drug: NatalizumabParticipants received natalizumab 300 mg intravenous (IV) infusion once Q4W up to Week 72. |
| Part 1: IV Q6W | Experimental | Drug: NatalizumabParticipants received natalizumab 300 mg IV infusion once Q6W up to Week 72. |
| Part 2: Run-in Period: IV Q6W | Experimental | Drug: NatalizumabParticipants who completed Part 1 or were newly enrolled in Part 2 received natalizumab 300 mg IV infusion Q6W from Week 72 through Week 102. |
| Part 2: Crossover Period: IV Q6W, then SC Q6W | Experimental | Drug: NatalizumabParticipants who completed run-in period of Part 2 were randomized to receive natalizumab 300 mg IV infusion Q6W from Week 108 through Week 126 followed by natalizumab 300 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection Q6W from Week 132 through Week 150 along with a single dose of natalizumab 300 mg SC injection or IV infusion as per participant's choice at Week 156. |
| Part 2: Crossover Period: SC Q6W, then IV Q6W | Experimental | Drug: NatalizumabParticipants who completed run-in period of Part 2 were randomized to receive natalizumab 300 mg SC injection Q6W from Week 108 through Week 126 followed by natalizumab 300 mg IV infusion Q6W from Week 132 through Week 150 along with a single dose of natalizumab 300 mg SC injection or IV infusion as per participant's choice at Week 156. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Ability of the participant to understand the purpose and risks of the study and provide signed and dated informed consent and authorization to use confidential health information in accordance with national and local participant privacy regulations.
- Diagnosis of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) according to the McDonald criteria [Thompson 2018].
- Treatment with natalizumab as disease-modifying monotherapy for RRMS that is consistent with the approved dosing for a minimum of 12 months prior to randomization. The participant must have received at least 11 doses of natalizumab in the 12 months prior to randomization with no missed doses in the 3 months prior to randomization.
- Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score <=5.5 at screening.
- No relapses in the last 12 months prior to randomization, as determined by the enrolling Investigator.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS).
- MRI positive for Gd-enhancing lesions at screening.
- Participants for whom MRI is contraindicated (e.g., have a contraindicated pacemaker or other contraindicated implanted metal device, have suffered, or are at risk for, side effects from Gd, or have claustrophobia that cannot be medically managed).
- History of any clinically significant (as determined by the Investigator) cardiac, endocrinologic, hematologic, hepatic, immunologic, metabolic (including diabetes), urologic, pulmonary, neurologic (except for RRMS), dermatologic, psychiatric, renal, or other major disease that would preclude participation in a clinical study, in the opinion of the Investigator.
- Presence of anti-natalizumab antibodies at screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NatalizumabAlso: BG00002Natalizumab 300 mg IV infusion. | Drug | Part 1: IV Q4W, Part 1: IV Q6W, Part 2: Run-in Period: IV Q6W |
| NatalizumabAlso: BG00002Natalizumab 300 mg SC injection or IV infusion. | Drug | Part 2: Crossover Period: IV Q6W, then SC Q6W, Part 2: Crossover Period: SC Q6W, then IV Q6W |
Primary outcome
Part 1: Mean Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions at Week 72
Time frame: Week 72
T2 hyperintense lesions were analyzed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of brain. New MRI scans were compared with the prior MRI scans to analyze the number of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions at Week 72 relative to baseline.
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Indicating a Preference for Natalizumab SC Administration at the End of Crossover Period of Part 2
Time frame: Week 150
21 secondary outcomes
Part 1: Time to First Relapse as Adjudicated by an Independent Neurology Evaluation Committee (INEC)
Time frame: Up to Week 72
Part 1: Annualized Relapse Rate at Week 72
Time frame: Week 72
Part 1: Time to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Worsening
Time frame: Up to Week 72
Part 1: Mean Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions at Weeks 24, 48, and 72
Time frame: Weeks 24, 48, and 72
Part 1: Mean Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions at Weeks 24 and 48
Time frame: Weeks 24 and 48
Part 1: Mean Number of New Gadolinium (Gd) Enhancing Lesions at Weeks 24, 48, and 72
Time frame: Weeks 24, 48, and 72
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 84
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Scores During the Crossover Period
Time frame: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Mean Time for Drug Preparation and Drug Administration During the Crossover Period
Time frame: Week 108 up to Week 156
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Part 2: Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 180
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Anti-Natalizumab Antibodies During the Crossover Period
Time frame: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Mean Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions During the Crossover Period
Time frame: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Time to First Relapse During the Crossover Period
Time frame: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Annualized Relapse Rate During the Crossover Period
Time frame: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Change From Baseline in EDSS Score During the Crossover Period
Time frame: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Mean Number of New Gd Enhancing Lesions During the Crossover Period
Time frame: Week 108 up to Week 156
Part 2: Mean Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions During the Crossover Period
Time frame: Week 108 up to Week 156
Part 2: Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Brain Volume During the Crossover Period
Time frame: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Cortical and Thalamic Brain Region Volume During the Crossover Period
Time frame: Part 2 Baseline (Week 108) up to Week 156
Part 2: Trough Serum Concentration of Natalizumab (Ctrough) During the Crossover Period
Time frame: Pre-dose at Weeks 108, 114, 120, 126, 132, 138, 144, 150, and 156
Part 2: Mean Trough α4 Integrin Saturation During the Crossover Period
Time frame: Pre-dose at Weeks 108, 114, 120, 126, 132, 138, 144, 150, and 156
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39393045Foley JF, Defer G, Ryerson LZ, Cohen JA, Arnold DL, Butzkueven H, Cutter GR, Giovannoni G, Killestein J, Wiendl H, Li K, Dsilva L, Toukam M, Ferber K, Sohn J, Engelman H, Lasky T. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Natalizumab 6-Week Dosing vs Continued 4-Week Dosing for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2024 Dec;11(6):e200321. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200321. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39046635Wiendl H, Foley J, Defer G, Zhovtis Ryerson L, Cohen JA, Arnold DL, Butzkueven H, Cutter GR, Giovannoni G, Killestein J, Domingo-Horne R, Toukam M, Nunn A, Maghzi AH, Kuhelj R, Lasky T. Patient Preference for Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Administration with Every-6-Week Natalizumab (Tysabri(R)) Dosing: NOVA Phase IIIb Extension Study (Part 2). Neurol Ther. 2024 Oct;13(5):1385-1401. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00647-0. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35483387Foley JF, Defer G, Ryerson LZ, Cohen JA, Arnold DL, Butzkueven H, Cutter G, Giovannoni G, Killestein J, Wiendl H, Smirnakis K, Xiao S, Kong G, Kuhelj R, Campbell N; NOVA study investigators. Comparison of switching to 6-week dosing of natalizumab versus continuing with 4-week dosing in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (NOVA): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol. 2022 Jul;21(7):608-619. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00143-0. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Please refer data queries to DataSharing@biogen.com.
Related trials for Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
RecruitingObservational study
Non-interventional Study of Subcutaneous Ocrelizumab in Persons With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Active, not recruiting
Tai Chi Training for Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) - Relapsing-remitting
RecruitingObservational study
REAL-MS: Observational Database Study of AHSCT and MS Therapies
Multiple Sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis (MS) - Relapsing-remitting
RecruitingPhase 2
The HIt HArd and hiT Early in Multiple Sclerosis Trial
Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 3
Best Available Therapy Versus Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Multiple Sclerosis (BEAT-MS)
Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Biogen
107 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Natalizumab in people with Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, run by Biogen at 107 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 107 sites in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Australia, France and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Jun 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Part 1: Mean Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions at Week 72 (time frame: Week 72). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03689972, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.