Metastatic Pancreatic CancerPhase 2FUNGEMAXNCT03693677
First Line Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer : 5FU/LV+Nal-IRI, Gemcitabine+Nab-paclitaxel or a Sequential Regimen of 2 Months 5FU/LV+Nal-IRI
A Phase 2 study testing Irinotecan Liposomal Injection, 5-FU/LV and Nab-Paclitaxel in people with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer, run by Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive at 36 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
In Europe, pancreatic cancer (PC) is the 7th most common cancer and the 5th leading cause of cancer death in Europe. Each year, the number of deaths due to prostate cancer is almost as high as the number of new cases diagnosed reflecting the poor prognosis associated with this disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Irinotecan Liposomal Injection, 5-FU/LV and Nab-Paclitaxel
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 288 participants
- Where
- 36 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 16 Nov 2018to 10 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histopathologically or cytologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma (on primitive or metastatic lesion)
- Metastatic disease at a distance
- At least one measurable lesion according RECIST v1.1 criteria
- 18 ≤ age ≤ 75 years
- Life expectancy >12 weeks
- Performance status WHO < 2
Show all 19Show fewer
- No prior chemotherapy : adjuvant chemotherapy by gemcitabine +/- capecitabine is allowed if ended at least 12 months before the inclusion and adjuvant or neo-adjuvant FOLRIFINOX chemotherapy is allowed if ended at least 12 months prior the inclusion
- Pain well controlled before the inclusion of the patient
- ANC ≥ 1,500 cells/μL (without the use of hematopoietic growth factors); platelet count ≥ 100,000 cells/μL, hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL (blood transfusions is permitted for patients with hemoglobin levels below 9 g/dL)
- Adequate hepatic function as evidenced by: Serum total bilirubin within normal range for the institution (Serum bilirubin ≤ 1,5 UNL) Biliary drainage allowed for biliary obstruction.
- Albumin levels ≥ 3.0 g/dL
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 x ULN (≤ 5 x ULN acceptable if liver metastases were present)
- Normal renal function test (creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min)
- Normal ECG or ECG without any clinically significant findings
- Patient able to understand and sign an informed consent
- Females of child-bearing potential are required to test negative for pregnancy at the time of enrollment based on a urine or serum pregnancy test.
- Both male and female patients of reproductive potential were required to agree to use a reliable method of birth control, during the study and for 3 months following the last dose of study drug.
- Patient affiliated to social security
- Regular follow-up possible
Who cannot join
- Uncontrolled brain or meningeal metastasis, or bone metastasis (no need of systematic CT scan)
- Prior radiation therapy (except if there is at least one measurable target outside irradiation area)
- Clinically significant gastrointestinal disorder including hepatic disorders, bleeding, inflammation, occlusion, or diarrhea > Grade 1
- History of chronic inflammatory bowel disease
- Other types of pancreatic tumours, in particular endocrine or acinar cell tumours
- Ampulloma
Show all 17Show fewer
- Gilbert's syndrome
- Presence of neuropathy > grade 1 according to NCI-CTC
- History of any second malignancy in the last 5 years; subjects with prior history of in-situ cancer or basal or squamous cell skin cancer are eligible. Subjects with other malignancies are eligible if they had been continuously disease free for at least 5 years.
- Severe arterial thromboembolic events (myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, stroke) less than 6 months before inclusion.
- NYHA Class III or IV congestive heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias or uncontrolled blood pressure.
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the drugs /constituents or non-liposomal irinotecan
- Any other medical or social condition deemed by the investigator to be likely to interfere with a patient's ability to sign informed consent, cooperate and participate in the study, or interferes with the interpretation of the results.
- Use of CYP3A4/UGT1A inducers/inhibitors
- Use of strong CYP2C8 inhibitors or inducers, or presence of any other contraindications for nab-paclitaxel or gemcitabine
- ILD presence
- Pregnant or breast feeding
Trial locations and contacts
36 sites in 2 countries.
36 sites in 2 countries
France35 sites
Clinique privée de l'Europe
Amiens, 80000
CHU Hôtel Dieu
Angers, 49000
Hôpital privé
Antony, 92160
CH
Auxerre, 89000
CH de la Côte Basque
Bayonne, 64100
CHU Avicenne
Bobigny, 93022
CH Duchenne
Boulogne-sur-Mer, 62200
Hôpital Privé Sainte Marie
Chalon-sur-Saône, 71100
CHU Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
Hopitaux civils de Colmar
Colmar, 68026
CH Sud Francilien
Corbeil-Essonnes, 91100
Centre GF Leclerc
Dijon, 21000
CHU
Dijon, 21000
Institut de cancérologie de Bourgogne
Dijon, 21000
Hôpital Emile Roux
Le Puy-en-Velay, 43000
CH Docteur Schaffner
Lens, 62218
CHU Dupuytren
Limoges, 87000
CH
Longjumeau, 91160
Clinique privée Jean Mermoz
Lyon, 69000
Hôpital Européen
Marseille, 13000
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, 13000
CH
Meaux, 77100
Centre médical Oncogard
Nîmes, 30000
CH
Niort, 79000
CH Privé Sainte Marie
Osny, 95520
Groupe Hospitalier La Pitié Salpêtrière
Paris, 75013
Hôpital Cochin
Paris, 75679
Hôpital Tenon
Paris, 75970
Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou
Paris
CH Saint Jean
Perpignan, 66000
Centre Cario HPCA
Plérin, 22190
CH Jacques Puel
Rodez, 12000
CHU Charles Nicolle
Rouen, 76000
CH Foch
Suresnes, 92150
CHRU de Nancy
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500
About this study
Official title: Randomized Phase II Study Comparing 5FU/LV+Nal-IRI, Gemcitabine+Nab-paclitaxel or a Sequential Regimen of 2 Months 5FU/LV+Nal-IRI Followed by Two Months of Gemcitabine+Nab-paclitaxel, in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
In Europe, pancreatic cancer (PC) is the 7th most common cancer and the 5th leading cause of cancer death in Europe. Each year, the number of deaths due to prostate cancer is almost as high as the number of new cases diagnosed reflecting the poor prognosis associated with this disease. PC is insidious and is often diagnosed late. Despite advances in the management of other more common gastrointestinal cancers, the treatment of PC has had few benefits inherent in recent advances in digestive oncology. Gemcitabine has thus remained the reference treatment for more than 10 years.
Recent studies have shown that gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel combination therapy is more effective in PC than gemcitabine-based therapy alone. In addition, multidrug therapy approaches (Irinotecan-5FU/LV) have also emerged to avoid the emergence of resistance to treatments while limiting toxicities. The recently developed Nal-IRI has also shown interesting efficacy in patients with metastatic PC previously treated with gemcitabine, with improved overall survival median and limited toxicity. Based on this information, the NAPOLI trial was conducted in patients with second line PC comparing the efficacy of Nal-IRI/5FU/LV or Nal-IRI and 5FU/LV alone; in this key study, the combination Nal-IRI/5FU/LV treatment was more effective than monotherapies (Nal-IRI or 5FU/LV alone).
Based on all these data, a Phase II trial testing the standard of care gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel vs Nal-IRI/5FU/LV vs Nal-IRI/5FU/LV 2-months sequential regimen followed by gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel will be performed. This will allow us to i) know the tolerance and efficacy of Nal-IRI/5FU/LV in the first line of treatment, ii) test a new sequential strategy with Nal-IRI but also iii) compare our results in the experimental arms with one of the two world standard therapeutic regimens: gemcitabine + nab-Paclitaxel. All this in order to improve the management of patients with PC from the first line of treatment.
Read the detailed description
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the seventh cause from cancer and the fifth cause from cancer-related death in Europe. Nearly as many deaths occur from PC than the number of new cases diagnosed each year, reflecting the poor prognosis typically associated with this disease. PC is insidious in onset and is often diagnosed late at the stage of metastatic spread. In spite of advances made in the management of other more common gastrointestinal cancers, the treatment of PC did take only a small advantage of recent progresses in gastrointestinal oncology and targeted therapies did not significantly modify its prognosis to date.
Thus, for more than 10 years, gemcitabine has been the standard of care to treat metastatic PC. Recently, two positive phase III trials in metastatic PC were reported.
First, the gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel combination therapy was compared to gemcitabine alone in 861 randomized patients with metastatic PC. Results showed a significant improvement in response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Second, the results of the PRODIGE 4/ACCORD 11 trial testing the FOLFIRINOX regimen in metastatic PC patients, finally gave a hope showing a major improvement in PFS and OS as compared to gemcitabine. However, though manageable, the safety profiles of FOLFIRINOX and of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel were less favourable than that of gemcitabine. These regimens were associated with a higher incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhoea, and grade 2-3 sensory neuropathy.
Irinotecan has a stronger growth-inhibiting effect than cisplatin, mitomycin C and fluorouracil on cultured pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. In most trials testing this molecule in PC patients, however, the response rates were low (<10%) and survivals were poor. Intensive regimens with irinotecan and 5-FU have been developed in colorectal cancer patients to increase the anti-tumor effects of this combination therapy. From those, the FOLFIRI.3, in which the irinotecan is administered before and after a 5-FU 46h continuous infusion gave promising results. The investigator has tested this regimen in a phase II trial in advanced PC patients, with an objective RR of 37.5%, a median OS time of 12 months and acceptable tolerability. Considering these encouraging results the investigator has proposed a new approach to improve outcomes for patients with metastatic PC, using FOLFIRI.3 and gemcitabine alone, sequentially, to increase patient survival with a preserved quality of life (QOL). Indeed, some authors have reported that the administration of different patterns of sequential polychemotherapy was independently associated with OS in patients with PC and other gastrointestinal tumors such as metastatic colorectal cancer. Such strategies using drugs without cross-resistance sequentially may increase anti-tumor effects and limit cumulative and non-cumulative toxicities.
The investigator thus performed a randomized multicentre phase II trial to assess this sequential treatment strategy using FOLFIRI.3 and gemcitabine alternately in one arm and gemcitabine alone in the other arm, in patients with metastatic non pre-treated pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In this study the FIRGEM strategy seems to be an effective first line treatment option in good condition patients with metastatic PC. The primary endpoint was reached with a rate of PFS at 6 months of 44.9% in the FIRGEM arm while gemcitabine alone failed (25.7%). This good PFS rate at 6 months was maintained at 12 and 18 months (26.2% and 18% respectively) though median PFS was 5.0 months. Moreover, an impressive objective response rate was observed in the FIRGEM arm (40%) as compared to the gemcitabine arm (11.4%). These results confirm those of the initial phase II trial evaluating the FOLFIRI.3 regimen (37.5% objective response rate)(15) in PC patients and compare favourably with the 31.6% and 23% reported in the two trials evaluating FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, respectively.
Median overall survival was 11 months with FIRGEM versus 8.2 months with gemcitabine (HR:0.710 95% CI: 0.457-1.103). Here again the experimental arm gave good results, with median OS in the range of those reported with FOLFIRINOX (11.1 months). The safety profile of the FIRGEM strategy showed that hematological and GI toxicities were more important than with gemcitabine alone. Interestingly no limiting sensory neuropathy was observed with our treatment schedule and a significant increase in the time to definitive deterioration of the QoL was observed in the FIRGEM group as compared with the gemcitabine group. This effect was observed for all domains.
Considering that nab-paclitaxel improves significantly patients outcome in metastatic PC when combined to gemcitabine, the addition of this drug to the FIRGEM strategy may be of particular interest. And the PRODIGE 37 trial tested this combination in a randomized phase II trial recently closed for inclusions. This trial allowed to fight the cancer with 4 different drugs, without any cross resistance described between them, given sequentially in the first 4 months of treatment. Moreover, the "resting period" without nab-paclitaxel may delay significantly the occurrence of the cumulative neuropathy induced by this molecule and optimised its used with such a "stop and go" like strategy. Results are awaited for early 2018.
More recently a liposomal irinotecan has been developed and tested in pancreatic cancer patients, it comprises irinotecan free base encapsulated in liposome nanoparticles, which keep irinotecan into the circulation sheltered from conversion to its active metabolite (SN-38) longer and use local macrophage-mediated activation, which would increase and prolong intratumoral levels of both irinotecan and SN-38. In a phase II study of 40 patients with MPA previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy, monotherapy with nal-IRI resulted in a median overall survival of 5.2 months, and a manageable toxicity profile. The NAPOLI-1 phase III trial was then conducted, comparing three arms of chemotherapy in patients previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy: liposomal irinotecan (MM-398 or nal-IRI) alone or combined with 5FU and folinic acid, and 5FU and folinic acid alone. Combination of nal-IRI and 5FU/LV was more effective than 5FU alone or Nal-IRI alone (median OS of 6.1 vs. 4.2 and 4.9 months respectively (HR: 0.67; p=0.012). Increased hematologic and GI toxicities were also seen in the Nal-IRI arms but were manageable. Nal-IRI plus 5FU and folinic acid extends survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who previously received gemcitabine-based therapy. In a setting where there is a paucity of second line treatment option, this combination is an important emerging treatment option for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.
Considering all these data, the investigator proposes to run a randomized phase II trial testing the standard continuous Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel schedule vs Nal-IRI+5FU/LV vs Nal-IRI+5FU/LV for two months followed by Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel for two months before starting again Nal-IRI. This will allow i) to generate efficacy and tolerability data on the Nal-IRI/5FU combination in the first line setting, ii) to test a new sequential strategy with Nal-IRI , in regards of the interesting results obtained in second and third line pancreatic cancer treatment, iii) to control our results in the experimental arms with one of the two first line worldwide standard regimen: Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel.
- Conditions
- Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
- Being tested
- Irinotecan Liposomal Injection, 5-FU/LV, Nab-Paclitaxel, Gemcitabine
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Irinotecan Liposomal InjectionDrug
Also called Nal-IRI
Nal-IRI at 80 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes
5-FU/LVDrug
5-FU 2400 mg/m2 IV over 46-hours, every 2 weeks.
Nab-PaclitaxelDrug
Nab-Paclitaxel: 125 mg/m2 This treatment is administered at D1, D8, D15 and at D29, D36, D43.
GemcitabineDrug
1000 mg/m² in 500 ml normal saline infusion at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m²/min (i.e. 100 min). This treatment is administered at D1, D8, D15 and at D29, D36, D43.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Nal-IRI/5-FU/LV + Nab-paclitaxel/Gemcitabine alternatively | Experimental | Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV and Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine alternately every two months
* Nal-IRI at 80 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes followed by folinic acid (leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV, or Elvorin 200 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes) then by 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 IV over 46-hours, every 2 weeks.
* Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine (6 injections, one injection three weeks out of four; so ≈ 2 months per cycle)
Day 1 (D1): Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine at the dose of :
* Gemcitabine: 1000 mg/m² in 500 ml normal saline infusion at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m²/min (i.e. 100 min).
* Nab-Paclitaxel: 125 mg/m2 This treatment is administered at D1, D8, D15 and at D29, D36, D43. Receives: Drug: Irinotecan Liposomal Injection; Drug: 5-FU/LV; Drug: Nab-Paclitaxel; Drug: Gemcitabine |
| Nal-IRI/5-FU/LV | Experimental | Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV Nal-IRI at 80 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes followed by folinic acid (leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV, or Elvorin 200 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes) then by 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 IV over 46-hours, every 2 weeks. Receives: Drug: Irinotecan Liposomal Injection; Drug: 5-FU/LV |
| Nab-paclitaxel/Gemcitabine | Active comparator | Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine (6 courses, one course three weeks out of four; so ≈ 2 months per cycle)
Day 1 (D1): Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine at the dose of :
* Gemcitabine: 1000 mg/m² in 500 ml normal saline infusion at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m²/min (i.e. 100 min).
* Nab-Paclitaxel: 125 mg/m2 This treatment is administered at D1, D8, D15 and at D29, D36, D43. Receives: Drug: Nab-Paclitaxel; Drug: Gemcitabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The progression free survival at 6 months according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria
PFS is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of the first radiological and/or clinical progression or the date of death (for whatever reason). Patients living without progression will be censured at date of last news. Progression is assessed by investigator and central review according to RECIST v1.1 criteria.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Progression free survival at 6 months (according to central review)
PFS is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of the first radiological and/or clinical progression or the date of death (for whatever reason). Patients living without progression will be censured at date of last news. Progression is assessed by investigator and central review according to RECIST v1.1 criteria.
Measured: 6 months
Best objective response rate
BOR is defined as complete or partial response rate according to scans and RECIST v1.1 criteria over the entire treatment period.
Measured: An average of 1 year
Overall survival
OS is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death (whatever the cause). Alive patients will be censured at date of last news.
Measured: 2 years
Time to treatment failure
Time to treatment failure is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of discontinuation of all protocol treatments (regardless of cause) or date last news for patients alive under treatment.
Measured: An average of 1 year
Treatment safety
Toxicities are evaluated according to NCI-CTC v4.0.
Measured: An average of 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Oct 2018
- Study start16 Nov 2018
- Primary completion10 Jan 2025
- Study completion10 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Metastatic Pancreatic CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 288 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Julien Taieb, Pr, Principal investigator, HEGP - Paris - France
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03693677
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PRODIGE 61 - FUNGEMAX
- Other IDs
- FFCD 1702, 2017-004309-41, 2017
- Acronym
- FUNGEMAX
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 1 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 1 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Taieb J, Pernot S, Thuillier F, Delattre A, Vo-Quang E, Petorin C, Bourgeois V, Tougeron D, Audemar F, Vitellius C, Mosser L, Desrame J, Di Fiore F, Rinaldi Y, Pellat A, Bolliet M, Watelle F, Perrier H, Dubreuil O, Lepage C, Bachet JB. Sequential alternation of nal-IRI/5-FU and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus nal-IRI/5-FU versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of the randomized phase II PRODIGE 61-FUNGEMAX trial (France). EClinicalMedicine. 2026 May 29;96:103998. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103998. eCollection 2026 Jun.
PubMed 42256682
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Phase II Study Comparing 5FU/LV+Nal-IRI, Gemcitabine+Nab-paclitaxel or a Sequential Regimen of 2 Months 5FU/LV+Nal-IRI Followed by Two Months of Gemcitabine+Nab-paclitaxel, in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03693677
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FUNGEMAX / PRODIGE 61 - FUNGEMAX
- Conditions
- Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 288 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Federation Francophone de Cancerologie DigestiveUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In Europe, pancreatic cancer (PC) is the 7th most common cancer and the 5th leading cause of cancer death in Europe. Each year, the number of deaths due to prostate cancer is almost as high as the number of new cases diagnosed reflecting the poor prognosis associated with this disease. PC is insidious and is often diagnosed late. Despite advances in the management of other more common gastrointestinal cancers, the treatment of PC has had few benefits inherent in recent advances in digestive oncology. Gemcitabine has thus remained the reference treatment for more than 10 years.
Recent studies have shown that gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel combination therapy is more effective in PC than gemcitabine-based therapy alone. In addition, multidrug therapy approaches (Irinotecan-5FU/LV) have also emerged to avoid the emergence of resistance to treatments while limiting toxicities. The recently developed Nal-IRI has also shown interesting efficacy in patients with metastatic PC previously treated with gemcitabine, with improved overall survival median and limited toxicity. Based on this information, the NAPOLI trial was conducted in patients with second line PC comparing the efficacy of Nal-IRI/5FU/LV or Nal-IRI and 5FU/LV alone; in this key study, the combination Nal-IRI/5FU/LV treatment was more effective than monotherapies (Nal-IRI or 5FU/LV alone).
Based on all these data, a Phase II trial testing the standard of care gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel vs Nal-IRI/5FU/LV vs Nal-IRI/5FU/LV 2-months sequential regimen followed by gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel will be performed. This will allow us to i) know the tolerance and efficacy of Nal-IRI/5FU/LV in the first line of treatment, ii) test a new sequential strategy with Nal-IRI but also iii) compare our results in the experimental arms with one of the two world standard therapeutic regimens: gemcitabine + nab-Paclitaxel. All this in order to improve the management of patients with PC from the first line of treatment.
Detailed description
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the seventh cause from cancer and the fifth cause from cancer-related death in Europe. Nearly as many deaths occur from PC than the number of new cases diagnosed each year, reflecting the poor prognosis typically associated with this disease. PC is insidious in onset and is often diagnosed late at the stage of metastatic spread. In spite of advances made in the management of other more common gastrointestinal cancers, the treatment of PC did take only a small advantage of recent progresses in gastrointestinal oncology and targeted therapies did not significantly modify its prognosis to date.
Thus, for more than 10 years, gemcitabine has been the standard of care to treat metastatic PC. Recently, two positive phase III trials in metastatic PC were reported.
First, the gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel combination therapy was compared to gemcitabine alone in 861 randomized patients with metastatic PC. Results showed a significant improvement in response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Second, the results of the PRODIGE 4/ACCORD 11 trial testing the FOLFIRINOX regimen in metastatic PC patients, finally gave a hope showing a major improvement in PFS and OS as compared to gemcitabine. However, though manageable, the safety profiles of FOLFIRINOX and of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel were less favourable than that of gemcitabine. These regimens were associated with a higher incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhoea, and grade 2-3 sensory neuropathy.
Irinotecan has a stronger growth-inhibiting effect than cisplatin, mitomycin C and fluorouracil on cultured pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. In most trials testing this molecule in PC patients, however, the response rates were low (<10%) and survivals were poor. Intensive regimens with irinotecan and 5-FU have been developed in colorectal cancer patients to increase the anti-tumor effects of this combination therapy. From those, the FOLFIRI.3, in which the irinotecan is administered before and after a 5-FU 46h continuous infusion gave promising results. The investigator has tested this regimen in a phase II trial in advanced PC patients, with an objective RR of 37.5%, a median OS time of 12 months and acceptable tolerability. Considering these encouraging results the investigator has proposed a new approach to improve outcomes for patients with metastatic PC, using FOLFIRI.3 and gemcitabine alone, sequentially, to increase patient survival with a preserved quality of life (QOL). Indeed, some authors have reported that the administration of different patterns of sequential polychemotherapy was independently associated with OS in patients with PC and other gastrointestinal tumors such as metastatic colorectal cancer. Such strategies using drugs without cross-resistance sequentially may increase anti-tumor effects and limit cumulative and non-cumulative toxicities.
The investigator thus performed a randomized multicentre phase II trial to assess this sequential treatment strategy using FOLFIRI.3 and gemcitabine alternately in one arm and gemcitabine alone in the other arm, in patients with metastatic non pre-treated pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In this study the FIRGEM strategy seems to be an effective first line treatment option in good condition patients with metastatic PC. The primary endpoint was reached with a rate of PFS at 6 months of 44.9% in the FIRGEM arm while gemcitabine alone failed (25.7%). This good PFS rate at 6 months was maintained at 12 and 18 months (26.2% and 18% respectively) though median PFS was 5.0 months. Moreover, an impressive objective response rate was observed in the FIRGEM arm (40%) as compared to the gemcitabine arm (11.4%). These results confirm those of the initial phase II trial evaluating the FOLFIRI.3 regimen (37.5% objective response rate)(15) in PC patients and compare favourably with the 31.6% and 23% reported in the two trials evaluating FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, respectively.
Median overall survival was 11 months with FIRGEM versus 8.2 months with gemcitabine (HR:0.710 95% CI: 0.457-1.103). Here again the experimental arm gave good results, with median OS in the range of those reported with FOLFIRINOX (11.1 months). The safety profile of the FIRGEM strategy showed that hematological and GI toxicities were more important than with gemcitabine alone. Interestingly no limiting sensory neuropathy was observed with our treatment schedule and a significant increase in the time to definitive deterioration of the QoL was observed in the FIRGEM group as compared with the gemcitabine group. This effect was observed for all domains.
Considering that nab-paclitaxel improves significantly patients outcome in metastatic PC when combined to gemcitabine, the addition of this drug to the FIRGEM strategy may be of particular interest. And the PRODIGE 37 trial tested this combination in a randomized phase II trial recently closed for inclusions. This trial allowed to fight the cancer with 4 different drugs, without any cross resistance described between them, given sequentially in the first 4 months of treatment. Moreover, the "resting period" without nab-paclitaxel may delay significantly the occurrence of the cumulative neuropathy induced by this molecule and optimised its used with such a "stop and go" like strategy. Results are awaited for early 2018.
More recently a liposomal irinotecan has been developed and tested in pancreatic cancer patients, it comprises irinotecan free base encapsulated in liposome nanoparticles, which keep irinotecan into the circulation sheltered from conversion to its active metabolite (SN-38) longer and use local macrophage-mediated activation, which would increase and prolong intratumoral levels of both irinotecan and SN-38. In a phase II study of 40 patients with MPA previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy, monotherapy with nal-IRI resulted in a median overall survival of 5.2 months, and a manageable toxicity profile. The NAPOLI-1 phase III trial was then conducted, comparing three arms of chemotherapy in patients previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy: liposomal irinotecan (MM-398 or nal-IRI) alone or combined with 5FU and folinic acid, and 5FU and folinic acid alone. Combination of nal-IRI and 5FU/LV was more effective than 5FU alone or Nal-IRI alone (median OS of 6.1 vs. 4.2 and 4.9 months respectively (HR: 0.67; p=0.012). Increased hematologic and GI toxicities were also seen in the Nal-IRI arms but were manageable. Nal-IRI plus 5FU and folinic acid extends survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who previously received gemcitabine-based therapy. In a setting where there is a paucity of second line treatment option, this combination is an important emerging treatment option for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.
Considering all these data, the investigator proposes to run a randomized phase II trial testing the standard continuous Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel schedule vs Nal-IRI+5FU/LV vs Nal-IRI+5FU/LV for two months followed by Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel for two months before starting again Nal-IRI. This will allow i) to generate efficacy and tolerability data on the Nal-IRI/5FU combination in the first line setting, ii) to test a new sequential strategy with Nal-IRI , in regards of the interesting results obtained in second and third line pancreatic cancer treatment, iii) to control our results in the experimental arms with one of the two first line worldwide standard regimen: Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Nal-IRI/5-FU/LV + Nab-paclitaxel/Gemcitabine alternatively | Experimental | Drug: Irinotecan Liposomal Injection, Drug: 5-FU/LV, Drug: Nab-Paclitaxel, Drug: GemcitabineNal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV and Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine alternately every two months * Nal-IRI at 80 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes followed by folinic acid (leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV, or Elvorin 200 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes) then by 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 IV over 46-hours, every 2 weeks. * Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine (6 injections, one injection three weeks out of four; so ≈ 2 months per cycle) Day 1 (D1): Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine at the dose of : * Gemcitabine: 1000 mg/m² in 500 ml normal saline infusion at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m²/min (i.e. 100 min). * Nab-Paclitaxel: 125 mg/m2 This treatment is administered at D1, D8, D15 and at D29, D36, D43. |
| Nal-IRI/5-FU/LV | Experimental | Drug: Irinotecan Liposomal Injection, Drug: 5-FU/LVNal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV Nal-IRI at 80 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes followed by folinic acid (leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV, or Elvorin 200 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes) then by 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 IV over 46-hours, every 2 weeks. |
| Nab-paclitaxel/Gemcitabine | Active comparator | Drug: Nab-Paclitaxel, Drug: GemcitabineNab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine (6 courses, one course three weeks out of four; so ≈ 2 months per cycle) Day 1 (D1): Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine at the dose of : * Gemcitabine: 1000 mg/m² in 500 ml normal saline infusion at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m²/min (i.e. 100 min). * Nab-Paclitaxel: 125 mg/m2 This treatment is administered at D1, D8, D15 and at D29, D36, D43. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Histopathologically or cytologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma (on primitive or metastatic lesion)
- Metastatic disease at a distance
- At least one measurable lesion according RECIST v1.1 criteria
- 18 ≤ age ≤ 75 years
- Life expectancy >12 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Uncontrolled brain or meningeal metastasis, or bone metastasis (no need of systematic CT scan)
- Prior radiation therapy (except if there is at least one measurable target outside irradiation area)
- Clinically significant gastrointestinal disorder including hepatic disorders, bleeding, inflammation, occlusion, or diarrhea > Grade 1
- History of chronic inflammatory bowel disease
- Other types of pancreatic tumours, in particular endocrine or acinar cell tumours
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Irinotecan Liposomal InjectionAlso: Nal-IRINal-IRI at 80 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes | Drug | Nal-IRI/5-FU/LV, Nal-IRI/5-FU/LV + Nab-paclitaxel/Gemcitabine alternatively |
| 5-FU/LV5-FU 2400 mg/m2 IV over 46-hours, every 2 weeks. | Drug | Nal-IRI/5-FU/LV, Nal-IRI/5-FU/LV + Nab-paclitaxel/Gemcitabine alternatively |
| Nab-PaclitaxelNab-Paclitaxel: 125 mg/m2 This treatment is administered at D1, D8, D15 and at D29, D36, D43. | Drug | Nab-paclitaxel/Gemcitabine, Nal-IRI/5-FU/LV + Nab-paclitaxel/Gemcitabine alternatively |
| Gemcitabine1000 mg/m² in 500 ml normal saline infusion at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m²/min (i.e. 100 min). This treatment is administered at D1, D8, D15 and at D29, D36, D43. | Drug | Nab-paclitaxel/Gemcitabine, Nal-IRI/5-FU/LV + Nab-paclitaxel/Gemcitabine alternatively |
Primary outcome
The progression free survival at 6 months according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria
Time frame: 6 months
PFS is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of the first radiological and/or clinical progression or the date of death (for whatever reason). Patients living without progression will be censured at date of last news. Progression is assessed by investigator and central review according to RECIST v1.1 criteria.
5 secondary outcomes
Progression free survival at 6 months (according to central review)
Time frame: 6 months
Best objective response rate
Time frame: An average of 1 year
Overall survival
Time frame: 2 years
Time to treatment failure
Time frame: An average of 1 year
Treatment safety
Time frame: An average of 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jul 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42256682Taieb J, Pernot S, Thuillier F, Delattre A, Vo-Quang E, Petorin C, Bourgeois V, Tougeron D, Audemar F, Vitellius C, Mosser L, Desrame J, Di Fiore F, Rinaldi Y, Pellat A, Bolliet M, Watelle F, Perrier H, Dubreuil O, Lepage C, Bachet JB. Sequential alternation of nal-IRI/5-FU and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus nal-IRI/5-FU versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of the randomized phase II PRODIGE 61-FUNGEMAX trial (France). EClinicalMedicine. 2026 May 29;96:103998. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103998. eCollection 2026 Jun.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Zoldonrasib + Chemo of Investigator's Choice vs Placebo + Chemo of Investigator's Choice as First-line Treatment in Metastatic KRAS G12D-mutated Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ( RASolute 305 )
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
CREO - Microwave Ablation Feasibility Study
Pancreatic Cancer, Liver Cancer (Locally Advanced or Metastatic)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Julien Taieb, Pr principal investigator
HEGP - Paris - France
36 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Irinotecan Liposomal Injection, 5-FU/LV and Nab-Paclitaxel in people with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer, run by Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive at 36 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 36 sites in France, Martinique. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The progression free survival at 6 months according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03693677, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2025.