External Ventricular DrainNCT03696043
External Ventricular Drain Placement Stealth Study
A study testing Axium Steatlh Image Guidance and EVD placement in people with External Ventricular Drain and Intracranial Pressure, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is performed very often in neurosurgical practices. EVD's are most commonly placed at the bedside using external anatomical landmarks to guide the catheter into the frontal horn of the ipsilateral lateral ventricle. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 88 years
- Conditions the study is for
- External Ventricular Drain, Intracranial Pressure
- What is being tested?
- Axium Steatlh Image Guidance and EVD placement
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Aug 2018to 12 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 88 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing bedside external ventricular drain placement determined by attending physician
- Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 88 years
- Male or Female
- Patients or consentable family member must sign a written informed consent prior to EVD placement
- Stealth compatible head CT or MRI
Who cannot join
- Patients ≤ 18 and ≥ 88 years of age
- Prisoner status
- Subjects who decline participation into the study
- Subjects determined to be medically or neurologically to high of a risk for the study, determined by attending physician
- Patients who undergo emergent EVD placement via emergency consent
- Subjects for whom self-consent or consent by a LAR cannot be obtained or cannot be obtained
- Pregnant women
- Non-English speaking patients
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
About this study
Official title: Application of Image Guidance Technology to Bedside External Ventricular Drain Placement
External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is performed very often in neurosurgical practices. EVD's are most commonly placed at the bedside using external anatomical landmarks to guide the catheter into the frontal horn of the ipsilateral lateral ventricle. EVDs are often placed due to acute neurological compromise and require timely insertion.
Accurate catheter placement is essential to achieving effective external CSF drainage without complications or occlusion/failure of the catheter. Catheter placement is most commonly performed via a freehand approach using external anatomical landmarks to help identify the location of the lateral ventricle within the brain without the aid of imaging. Proper identification of the ventricles on pre-procedure imaging, surgeon skill, and estimation of pathologic perturbations to the normal location of the ventricles all factor into the success of catheter placement. Multiple passes are often required. The accuracy rate from the freehand technique has been reported to range from 40 to 98 percent.
Read more
Current methods for EVD placement do not compensate for superficial brain vessels or pathology that may alter the intracranial anatomy such as trauma, hemorrhage, or mass lesions. Some studies have attempted to use CTA imaging to identify intracranial vessels in an attempt to avoid them during placement.
Image guidance is a tool used very commonly for placement of EVD's and shunts in the operating room. AxiEM Stealth is a noninvasive image localization modality that registers a CT or MRI to the individual patients facial and scalp anatomy.
This study will compare the current standard of care of freehand placement of bedside external ventricular catheters to the placement of EVD catheters with AxiEM Stealth image guidance.
Read the detailed description
External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is performed very often in neurosurgical practices. EVD's are used most commonly to monitor intracranial pressure and divert cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with increased intracranial pressures. Pathologies where EVDs are most frequently needed include hydrocephalus, malignancy, and/or trauma. EVD's are most commonly placed at the bedside using external anatomical landmarks to guide the catheter into the frontal horn of the ipsilateral lateral ventricle. EVDs are often placed due to acute neurological compromise and require timely insertion. This can increase the associated risk and result in complications.
Accurate catheter placement is essential to achieving effective external CSF drainage without complications or occlusion/failure of the catheter. Catheter placement is most commonly performed via a freehand approach using external anatomical landmarks to help identify the location of the lateral ventricle within the brain without the aid of imaging. Proper identification of the ventricles on pre-procedure imaging, surgeon skill, and estimation of pathologic perturbations to the normal location of the ventricles all factor into the success of catheter placement. Multiple passes are often required. The accuracy rate from the freehand technique has been reported to range from 40 to 98 percent. A very basic grading scale has been developed to assess placement but does not include items such as the number of passes until successful placement and presence of post placement hemorrhage or other neurological complications. An increased number of passes increases the risk of post placement hemorrhage and may damage the brain. Hemorrhage has been reported to occur after catheter placement at rates ranging from 0.2 to 41 percent.
Current methods for EVD placement do not compensate for superficial brain vessels or pathology that may alter the intracranial anatomy such as trauma, hemorrhage, or mass lesions. Some studies have attempted to use CTA imaging to identify intracranial vessels in an attempt to avoid them during placement.
Image guidance is a tool used very commonly for placement of EVD's and shunts in the operating room. AxiEM Stealth is a noninvasive image localization modality that registers a CT or MRI to the individual patients facial and scalp anatomy. A probe can then be used to identify, in real-time, the underlying anatomy and trajectories. This imaging guidance may improve the accuracy of EVD placement.
This study will compare the current standard of care of freehand placement of bedside external ventricular catheters to the placement of EVD catheters with AxiEM Stealth image guidance. Accuracy of the tip of the catheter, occurrence of post-placement hemorrhage, the number of passes required for CSF flow, ventricle diameter, catheter clogging/failure, time required for placement, patient demographics and other secondary outcome measures such as Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and Modified Rankin Score (MRS) will be collected. The hypothesis is that image guided EVD catheter placement will improve accuracy, decrease the number of brain transgressions, and decrease complications of EVD placement.
What makes up an external ventricular drain and how does it work? An external ventricular drain (EVD) is comprised of a catheter, drainage tubing, and a collection system. Once the catheter is in the ventricular system, it works by measuring the intracranial pressure via a transducer and drains excess CSF from the ventricular system to ensure pressures does not exceed a set threshold. Normal intracranial pressures range from about 5-20 mmHg and are usually around 10mmHg. The EVD system can be set at a certain level and when the intracranial pressures rise above that level, CSF drains out the catheter into the collecting system. The EVD system can be raised or lowered to create different intracranial pressure thresholds and keep intracranial pressures controlled in patients that have a pathology, such as cerebral swelling or ventricular obstruction, leading to increased pressures.
What is the current technique used to place an EVD? A sterile field is prepared about 10-12 centimeters posterior to the eye (either right or left as clinically indicated) and about 2-3 cm lateral to the midline of the skull. This point should be about 1 cm anterior to the coronal suture. An incision is made at this point and a burr hole is created using a hand drill. The EVD catheter is prepared using a stylet to help with movement through the brain parenchyma. The catheter is advanced in a trajectory perpendicular to the skull, which results in a direction that is towards the ipsilateral medial canthus and ipsilateral tragus which are other landmarks that can be used. The catheter is advanced to 5-6 cm and the stylet is removed to assess for CSF flow. If CSF flow is not appreciated, then the catheter is passed softly for about 1 more centimeter. If CSF flow is still not appreciated, the catheter is removed and the stylet replaced for another attempt. If unsuccessful after 3 attempts, the catheter can be left in place and a head CT can be done to assess the adjustments that need to be made. This can often take up to 10 passes or more if there is significant brain shift due to mass effect or aberrant anatomy. Once CSF flow is obtained, the catheter is tunneled posteriorly and anchored to the skin with a stitch. The incision is then closed and the catheter is connected to the drainage tubing of the collection system. The presence of CSF drainage is checked at multiple points during closure to ensure that the catheter remains in good position.
How does Axiem Stealth work as an image guidance system and how is it used for EVD placement? The first step for using the image guidance system is to upload the most recent (since admission or within 6 hours from bleeding) head CT or MRI into the Stealth station that has been obtained since admission. The Axiem Stealth imaging guidance system uses a probe (AxiEM Registration Probe) and a side mount emitter (AxiEM Side Mount Emitter) to register the patient's head in relation to the probe. A trajectory (entry point and target) is then planned. This registration process takes an estimated 5-15 minutes to perform. A separate stylet (StealthStation EM Stylet) is designed specifically for the catheter and slides down the center of the catheter. A burr-hole is created at the predefined precise location and the catheter is passed to the target under electromagnetic guidance.
Relevance of this research:
The novelty of this study is to investigate whether using image guidance technology can improve EVD catheter placement. Image guidance is used very commonly for EVD and shunt placement in the operating room with excellent accuracy and precision. The hypothesis is that using this same workflow at the bedside will improve accuracy; decrease the number of passes needed for a successful placement, decrease the number of post-placement hemorrhagic events, and help improve the effectiveness of the catheter as well as patient outcomes.
- Conditions
- External Ventricular Drain, Intracranial Pressure
- Being tested
- Axium Steatlh Image Guidance, EVD placement
- Keywords
- intracranial pressure, external ventricular drain, cerebrospinal fluid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Axium Steatlh Image GuidanceOther
The Axiem Stealth imaging guidance system uses a probe (AxiEM Registration Probe) and a side mount emitter (AxiEM Side Mount Emitter) to register the patient's head in relation to the probe. A trajectory (entry point and target) is then planned. This registration process takes an estimated 5-15 minutes to perform. A separate stylet (StealthStation EM Stylet) is designed specifically for the catheter and slides down the center of the catheter. A burr-hole is created at the predefined precise location and the catheter is passed to the target under electromagnetic guidance.
EVD placementOther
A sterile field is prepared about 10-12 centimeters posterior to the eye and about 2-3 cm lateral to the midline of the skull. An incision is made at this point and a burr hole is created using a hand drill. The catheter is advanced in a trajectory perpendicular to the skull, which results in a direction that is towards the ipsilateral medial canthus and ipsilateral tragus which are other landmarks that can be used.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EVD placement | Active comparator | Catheter placement is most commonly performed via a freehand approach using external anatomical landmarks to help identify the location of the lateral ventricle within the brain without the aid of imaging. Proper identification of the ventricles on pre-procedure imaging, surgeon skill, and estimation of pathologic perturbations to the normal location of the ventricles all factor into the success of catheter placement. Multiple passes are often required. The accuracy rate from the freehand technique has been reported to range from 40 to 98 percent. Receives: Other: EVD placement |
| Axium Stealth Image Guidance | Experimental | The novelty of this study is to investigate whether using image guidance technology can improve EVD catheter placement. Image guidance is used very commonly for EVD and shunt placement in the operating room with excellent accuracy and precision. We hypothesize that using this same workflow at the bedside will improve accuracy; decrease the number of passes needed for a successful placement, decrease the number of post-placement hemorrhagic events, and help improve the effectiveness of the catheter as well as patient outcomes. Receives: Other: Axium Steatlh Image Guidance; Other: EVD placement |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of catheter passes or attempts
Collection of number of passes needed for successful catheter placement
Measured: baseline
Accuracy of catheter tip compared to foramen of Monro
Measurement of accuracy for catheter tip compared to foramen of Monro with accuracy formula
Measured: baseline
Secondary outcomes (5)
Occurrence of post-placement hemorrhage
Anotation of occurrence of hemorrhage post-catheter placement by either freehand or image guided
Measured: baseline and 12 months
New neurological deficits
Utilization of the Glasgow Come Score and mRS scale to measure new neurological symptoms
Measured: baseline and 12 months
Durability of EVD
Presence of clogging/ failure
Measured: baseline and 12 months
Time required catheter insertion
Anotation of time allocation for catheter insertion - both methods
Measured: baseline
Infection rate
Occurrence of ventriculostomy infection (meningitis, ventriculitis, cerebritis)
Measured: baseline and 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Oct 2018
- Study start15 Aug 2018
- Primary completion12 Mar 2026
- Study completion12 Mar 2026
Why it stopped: slow accrual
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for External Ventricular DrainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Target of 100 participants - 50% freehand EVD placement and 50% image guided EVD placement. Randomization is every other patient will received image guided EVD placement
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Azam Ahmed, MD, Principal investigator, University of Wisconsin, Madison
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03696043
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017-1487
- Other IDs
- A535700, SMPH/NEURO SURG/NEURO SURG, Protocol Version 8/8/2024
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 24 May 2018
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Patil V, Lacson R, Vosburgh KG, Wong JM, Prevedello L, Andriole K, Mukundan S, Popp AJ, Khorasani R. Factors associated with external ventricular drain placement accuracy: data from an electronic health record repository. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 Sep;155(9):1773-9. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1769-y. Epub 2013 May 23.
PubMed 23700258Mahan M, Spetzler RF, Nakaji P. Electromagnetic stereotactic navigation for external ventricular drain placement in the intensive care unit. J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Dec;20(12):1718-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
PubMed 23993898Patil V, Gupta R, San Jose Estepar R, Lacson R, Cheung A, Wong JM, Popp AJ, Golby A, Ogilvy C, Vosburgh KG. Smart stylet: the development and use of a bedside external ventricular drain image-guidance system. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2015;93(1):50-8. doi: 10.1159/000368906. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
PubMed 25662506Sarrafzadeh A, Smoll N, Schaller K. Guided (VENTRI-GUIDE) versus freehand ventriculostomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Dec 5;15:478. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-478.
PubMed 25480528Robertson FC, Abd-El-Barr MM, Mukundan S Jr, Gormley WB. Ventriculostomy-associated hemorrhage: a risk assessment by radiographic simulation. J Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;127(3):532-536. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.JNS16538. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
PubMed 27911234Alan N, Lee P, Ozpinar A, Gross BA, Jankowitz BT. Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSA) Utilization for Minimally Invasive Placement of Intraparenchymal Hematoma and Intraventricular Catheters. World Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;108:996.e7-996.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.027. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
PubMed 28919568Wang A, Tenner MS, Tobias ME, Mohan A, Kim D, Tandon A. A Novel Approach Using Electromagnetic Neuronavigation and a Flexible Neuroendoscope for Placement of Ommaya Reservoirs. World Neurosurg. 2016 Dec;96:195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.127. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
PubMed 27609447
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Application of Image Guidance Technology to Bedside External Ventricular Drain Placement
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03696043
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2017-1487
- Conditions
- External Ventricular Drain, Intracranial Pressure
- Keywords
- intracranial pressure, external ventricular drain, cerebrospinal fluid
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: slow accrual
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, MadisonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Mar 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is performed very often in neurosurgical practices. EVD's are most commonly placed at the bedside using external anatomical landmarks to guide the catheter into the frontal horn of the ipsilateral lateral ventricle. EVDs are often placed due to acute neurological compromise and require timely insertion.
Accurate catheter placement is essential to achieving effective external CSF drainage without complications or occlusion/failure of the catheter. Catheter placement is most commonly performed via a freehand approach using external anatomical landmarks to help identify the location of the lateral ventricle within the brain without the aid of imaging. Proper identification of the ventricles on pre-procedure imaging, surgeon skill, and estimation of pathologic perturbations to the normal location of the ventricles all factor into the success of catheter placement. Multiple passes are often required. The accuracy rate from the freehand technique has been reported to range from 40 to 98 percent.
Current methods for EVD placement do not compensate for superficial brain vessels or pathology that may alter the intracranial anatomy such as trauma, hemorrhage, or mass lesions. Some studies have attempted to use CTA imaging to identify intracranial vessels in an attempt to avoid them during placement.
Image guidance is a tool used very commonly for placement of EVD's and shunts in the operating room. AxiEM Stealth is a noninvasive image localization modality that registers a CT or MRI to the individual patients facial and scalp anatomy.
This study will compare the current standard of care of freehand placement of bedside external ventricular catheters to the placement of EVD catheters with AxiEM Stealth image guidance.
Detailed description
External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is performed very often in neurosurgical practices. EVD's are used most commonly to monitor intracranial pressure and divert cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with increased intracranial pressures. Pathologies where EVDs are most frequently needed include hydrocephalus, malignancy, and/or trauma. EVD's are most commonly placed at the bedside using external anatomical landmarks to guide the catheter into the frontal horn of the ipsilateral lateral ventricle. EVDs are often placed due to acute neurological compromise and require timely insertion. This can increase the associated risk and result in complications.
Accurate catheter placement is essential to achieving effective external CSF drainage without complications or occlusion/failure of the catheter. Catheter placement is most commonly performed via a freehand approach using external anatomical landmarks to help identify the location of the lateral ventricle within the brain without the aid of imaging. Proper identification of the ventricles on pre-procedure imaging, surgeon skill, and estimation of pathologic perturbations to the normal location of the ventricles all factor into the success of catheter placement. Multiple passes are often required. The accuracy rate from the freehand technique has been reported to range from 40 to 98 percent. A very basic grading scale has been developed to assess placement but does not include items such as the number of passes until successful placement and presence of post placement hemorrhage or other neurological complications. An increased number of passes increases the risk of post placement hemorrhage and may damage the brain. Hemorrhage has been reported to occur after catheter placement at rates ranging from 0.2 to 41 percent.
Current methods for EVD placement do not compensate for superficial brain vessels or pathology that may alter the intracranial anatomy such as trauma, hemorrhage, or mass lesions. Some studies have attempted to use CTA imaging to identify intracranial vessels in an attempt to avoid them during placement.
Image guidance is a tool used very commonly for placement of EVD's and shunts in the operating room. AxiEM Stealth is a noninvasive image localization modality that registers a CT or MRI to the individual patients facial and scalp anatomy. A probe can then be used to identify, in real-time, the underlying anatomy and trajectories. This imaging guidance may improve the accuracy of EVD placement.
This study will compare the current standard of care of freehand placement of bedside external ventricular catheters to the placement of EVD catheters with AxiEM Stealth image guidance. Accuracy of the tip of the catheter, occurrence of post-placement hemorrhage, the number of passes required for CSF flow, ventricle diameter, catheter clogging/failure, time required for placement, patient demographics and other secondary outcome measures such as Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and Modified Rankin Score (MRS) will be collected. The hypothesis is that image guided EVD catheter placement will improve accuracy, decrease the number of brain transgressions, and decrease complications of EVD placement.
What makes up an external ventricular drain and how does it work? An external ventricular drain (EVD) is comprised of a catheter, drainage tubing, and a collection system. Once the catheter is in the ventricular system, it works by measuring the intracranial pressure via a transducer and drains excess CSF from the ventricular system to ensure pressures does not exceed a set threshold. Normal intracranial pressures range from about 5-20 mmHg and are usually around 10mmHg. The EVD system can be set at a certain level and when the intracranial pressures rise above that level, CSF drains out the catheter into the collecting system. The EVD system can be raised or lowered to create different intracranial pressure thresholds and keep intracranial pressures controlled in patients that have a pathology, such as cerebral swelling or ventricular obstruction, leading to increased pressures.
What is the current technique used to place an EVD? A sterile field is prepared about 10-12 centimeters posterior to the eye (either right or left as clinically indicated) and about 2-3 cm lateral to the midline of the skull. This point should be about 1 cm anterior to the coronal suture. An incision is made at this point and a burr hole is created using a hand drill. The EVD catheter is prepared using a stylet to help with movement through the brain parenchyma. The catheter is advanced in a trajectory perpendicular to the skull, which results in a direction that is towards the ipsilateral medial canthus and ipsilateral tragus which are other landmarks that can be used. The catheter is advanced to 5-6 cm and the stylet is removed to assess for CSF flow. If CSF flow is not appreciated, then the catheter is passed softly for about 1 more centimeter. If CSF flow is still not appreciated, the catheter is removed and the stylet replaced for another attempt. If unsuccessful after 3 attempts, the catheter can be left in place and a head CT can be done to assess the adjustments that need to be made. This can often take up to 10 passes or more if there is significant brain shift due to mass effect or aberrant anatomy. Once CSF flow is obtained, the catheter is tunneled posteriorly and anchored to the skin with a stitch. The incision is then closed and the catheter is connected to the drainage tubing of the collection system. The presence of CSF drainage is checked at multiple points during closure to ensure that the catheter remains in good position.
How does Axiem Stealth work as an image guidance system and how is it used for EVD placement? The first step for using the image guidance system is to upload the most recent (since admission or within 6 hours from bleeding) head CT or MRI into the Stealth station that has been obtained since admission. The Axiem Stealth imaging guidance system uses a probe (AxiEM Registration Probe) and a side mount emitter (AxiEM Side Mount Emitter) to register the patient's head in relation to the probe. A trajectory (entry point and target) is then planned. This registration process takes an estimated 5-15 minutes to perform. A separate stylet (StealthStation EM Stylet) is designed specifically for the catheter and slides down the center of the catheter. A burr-hole is created at the predefined precise location and the catheter is passed to the target under electromagnetic guidance.
Relevance of this research:
The novelty of this study is to investigate whether using image guidance technology can improve EVD catheter placement. Image guidance is used very commonly for EVD and shunt placement in the operating room with excellent accuracy and precision. The hypothesis is that using this same workflow at the bedside will improve accuracy; decrease the number of passes needed for a successful placement, decrease the number of post-placement hemorrhagic events, and help improve the effectiveness of the catheter as well as patient outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Target of 100 participants - 50% freehand EVD placement and 50% image guided EVD placement. Randomization is every other patient will received image guided EVD placement
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EVD placement | Active comparator | Other: EVD placementCatheter placement is most commonly performed via a freehand approach using external anatomical landmarks to help identify the location of the lateral ventricle within the brain without the aid of imaging. Proper identification of the ventricles on pre-procedure imaging, surgeon skill, and estimation of pathologic perturbations to the normal location of the ventricles all factor into the success of catheter placement. Multiple passes are often required. The accuracy rate from the freehand technique has been reported to range from 40 to 98 percent. |
| Axium Stealth Image Guidance | Experimental | Other: Axium Steatlh Image Guidance, Other: EVD placementThe novelty of this study is to investigate whether using image guidance technology can improve EVD catheter placement. Image guidance is used very commonly for EVD and shunt placement in the operating room with excellent accuracy and precision. We hypothesize that using this same workflow at the bedside will improve accuracy; decrease the number of passes needed for a successful placement, decrease the number of post-placement hemorrhagic events, and help improve the effectiveness of the catheter as well as patient outcomes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 88 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients undergoing bedside external ventricular drain placement determined by attending physician
- Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 88 years
- Male or Female
- Patients or consentable family member must sign a written informed consent prior to EVD placement
- Stealth compatible head CT or MRI
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients ≤ 18 and ≥ 88 years of age
- Prisoner status
- Subjects who decline participation into the study
- Subjects determined to be medically or neurologically to high of a risk for the study, determined by attending physician
- Patients who undergo emergent EVD placement via emergency consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Axium Steatlh Image GuidanceThe Axiem Stealth imaging guidance system uses a probe (AxiEM Registration Probe) and a side mount emitter (AxiEM Side Mount Emitter) to register the patient's head in relation to the probe. A trajectory (entry point and target) is then planned. This registration process takes an estimated 5-15 minutes to perform. A separate stylet (StealthStation EM Stylet) is designed specifically for the catheter and slides down the center of the catheter. A burr-hole is created at the predefined precise location and the catheter is passed to the target under electromagnetic guidance. | Other | Axium Stealth Image Guidance |
| EVD placementA sterile field is prepared about 10-12 centimeters posterior to the eye and about 2-3 cm lateral to the midline of the skull. An incision is made at this point and a burr hole is created using a hand drill. The catheter is advanced in a trajectory perpendicular to the skull, which results in a direction that is towards the ipsilateral medial canthus and ipsilateral tragus which are other landmarks that can be used. | Other | Axium Stealth Image Guidance, EVD placement |
Primary outcome
Number of catheter passes or attempts
Time frame: baseline
Collection of number of passes needed for successful catheter placement
Accuracy of catheter tip compared to foramen of Monro
Time frame: baseline
Measurement of accuracy for catheter tip compared to foramen of Monro with accuracy formula
5 secondary outcomes
Occurrence of post-placement hemorrhage
Time frame: baseline and 12 months
New neurological deficits
Time frame: baseline and 12 months
Durability of EVD
Time frame: baseline and 12 months
Time required catheter insertion
Time frame: baseline
Infection rate
Time frame: baseline and 12 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: slow accrual). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Mar 2026.
- Background: PubMed 23700258Patil V, Lacson R, Vosburgh KG, Wong JM, Prevedello L, Andriole K, Mukundan S, Popp AJ, Khorasani R. Factors associated with external ventricular drain placement accuracy: data from an electronic health record repository. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 Sep;155(9):1773-9. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1769-y. Epub 2013 May 23.
- Background: PubMed 23993898Mahan M, Spetzler RF, Nakaji P. Electromagnetic stereotactic navigation for external ventricular drain placement in the intensive care unit. J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Dec;20(12):1718-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
- Background: PubMed 25662506Patil V, Gupta R, San Jose Estepar R, Lacson R, Cheung A, Wong JM, Popp AJ, Golby A, Ogilvy C, Vosburgh KG. Smart stylet: the development and use of a bedside external ventricular drain image-guidance system. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2015;93(1):50-8. doi: 10.1159/000368906. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
- Background: PubMed 25480528Sarrafzadeh A, Smoll N, Schaller K. Guided (VENTRI-GUIDE) versus freehand ventriculostomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Dec 5;15:478. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-478.
- Background: PubMed 27911234Robertson FC, Abd-El-Barr MM, Mukundan S Jr, Gormley WB. Ventriculostomy-associated hemorrhage: a risk assessment by radiographic simulation. J Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;127(3):532-536. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.JNS16538. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
- Background: PubMed 28919568Alan N, Lee P, Ozpinar A, Gross BA, Jankowitz BT. Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSA) Utilization for Minimally Invasive Placement of Intraparenchymal Hematoma and Intraventricular Catheters. World Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;108:996.e7-996.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.027. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
- Background: PubMed 27609447Wang A, Tenner MS, Tobias ME, Mohan A, Kim D, Tandon A. A Novel Approach Using Electromagnetic Neuronavigation and a Flexible Neuroendoscope for Placement of Ommaya Reservoirs. World Neurosurg. 2016 Dec;96:195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.127. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for External Ventricular Drain
Not yet recruiting
Noninvasive CA Monitoring Validation and Autonomic Modulation in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal, Delayed Cerebral Ischemia
Not yet recruiting
Early Lumbar Drainage for Intraventricular Hemorrhage
Intraventricular Hemorrhage, Cerebral Hemorrhage
RecruitingPhase 1
Prophylactic Antibiotics Useful With Antibiotic Impregnated External Ventricular Drains (EVDs)?
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Implementing External Ventricular Drain Guidelines on Nurses' Practice and Traumatic Brain Injury Patients' Outcomes
Brain Injuries,Traumatic
Not yet recruiting
Strategies for Weaning From External Ventricular Drainage
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Hydrocephalus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Azam Ahmed, MD principal investigator
University of Wisconsin, Madison
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Axium Steatlh Image Guidance and EVD placement in people with External Ventricular Drain and Intracranial Pressure, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: slow accrual). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of catheter passes or attempts (time frame: baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03696043, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2026.