AzTrials
AzTrials

Social Determinants of HealthFamilyStressNCT03700697

A Clinical Process Support System for Primary Care to Address Family Stress

A study testing Family Stress Module Intervention in people with Social Determinants of Health and Child Abuse, run by Total Child Health, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This project is to create and test a "clinical process support system" that will improve the ability of primary child health care providers (PCPs) to screen for and address family stressors during routine child health visits that are associated with negative child outcomes in a manner that is feasible and acceptable… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 month to 2 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Social Determinants of Health, Child Abuse
What is being tested?
Family Stress Module Intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
16,630 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
9 Jul 2018to 31 Aug 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 month to 2 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Parents and their children 1 month to 4 months at enrollment.
  • Parents and their children 16-20 months for comparison group.
  • Primary Care Providers of any age.

Who cannot join

  • -Unable to speak and read English.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Barbara Howard, MD contact

443-618-9104

bhoward@chadis.com

Genevieve Vullo, MHS contact

508-517-5106

gvullo@chadis.com

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Total Child Health

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21210

    Genevieve Vullo, MHS, 508-517-5106, gvullo@chadis.com

    Lydia Stewart, MPH, 910-391-2563, lstewart@chadis.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

This project is to create and test a "clinical process support system" that will improve the ability of primary child health care providers (PCPs) to screen for and address family stressors during routine child health visits that are associated with negative child outcomes in a manner that is feasible and acceptable to both clinicians and parents.

Read the detailed description

This project is to create and test a "clinical process support system" that will improve the ability of primary child health care providers (PCPs) to screen for and address family stressors during routine child health visits that are associated with negative child outcomes in a manner that is feasible and acceptable to both clinicians and parents. The family stressors assessed include: intimate partner violence (IPV), parental depression, parental stress, food insecurity, parental substance use and harsh punishment of the child. The system is designed to overcome known obstacles to addressing these issues during routine well child visits. These obstacles include: lack of PCP training in an evidence-based approach to the interview (e.g., motivational interviewing); lack of time; low parental expectations for addressing sensitive family issues during routine child "physicals"; and the usual absence of co-located mental health providers. The new Family Stress module will build on two foundations: 1) previous studies of screening using the Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) tool, which showed reduced child maltreatment outcomes in two Randomized Control Trials; and 2) an existing online screening and decision support system (CHADIS). The goals are to support parents in reducing family risk and the exposure of the young child to their own Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE), including child maltreatment.

The innovations in this method of addressing family stressors and overcoming the above obstacles include:

  1. Time efficiencies. Time is saved through pre-visit online data collection, saving both interview and clinical documentation time and staff time saved for patient education and needed referrals.
  2. Creating the environment for psychosocial care. This is done through a combination of pre-visit questionnaires with agenda broadening questions (best and hardest parts of parenting), inclusion of parental background from Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) and Positive Childhood Experiences inquiries in clinical discussions; individualized text and resources for the family in the Care Portal; milestones to "celebrate" in each child's "MemoryBook"; and empathetic and reflective responses from the PCP.
  3. Efficient training. Training is done using innovative "moment of care" teleprompters created instantly in response to the individual parent issues from the pre-visit tools to support the difficult conversations and a motivational interview begun by the computer needed to move families towards services.
  4. Care communication. Practices will be able to share data with their own colocated services or be linked electronically with outside local resources using a unique online "consent to share information" functionality that also facilitates determining if the referral appointment was completed. Visit notes and documentation of attendance at a consultation will be shared with consent between the PCP and referral agency or professional to facilitate two-way communication for coordinated care.

Design: A cluster randomized quality improvement intervention using the clinical process support family stress module in routine care for children 0-3 years will be conducted in 30 primary care practices. The project will enroll as many 0-4 month olds as possible and follow them to age 24 months and a cohort of 18-24 month olds as controls using online consent (not requiring staff time). For this 2.5 year project the study staff will ask physicians and office staff to complete a one hour online training, offices to notify parents to complete CHADIS when scheduling well-child visits for children 0-3 years old with the questionnaire assignments for the project including Family Assessment of Safety and Stress (FASS), and primary care clinicians to use the CHADIS Family Stress module including the care coordination functionality during the visits when that site is randomized to the intervention period. At the end of the project the study requires clinicians to complete a survey and provide information from the medical records for participating children about immunization completion and missed visits. This information can be collected in a variety of ways depending on each electronic record.

Outcomes: The outcomes anticipated for the proposed study include improved parent connection to services and parent-child relationships, and reduced family stressors, child behavior problems, harsh punishment, and Child Protection referrals for abuse and neglect. Expected outcomes include that higher parent satisfaction with the enhanced clinical process will result in lower rates of missed visits and delayed immunizations. These results should provide evidence of the effectiveness of PCP screening and referral to reduce family stressors and the evidence needed for full United States Preventive Services Task Force endorsement of this clinical process support tool for reducing child maltreatment.

Being tested
Family Stress Module Intervention

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Family Stress Module InterventionBehavioural

    as above

Study groups in NCT03700697
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Family Stress Module InterventionExperimentalPrimary care clinicians will use the CHADIS Family Stress Module including the reviewing ACE, Positive Childhood Experiences, and FASS Plus questionnaires at designated child ages; address family stressors revealed using the motivational interviewing teleprompter and refer parents with stressors as indicated using the care coordination functionality.
Receives: Behavioral: Family Stress Module Intervention
ControlsNo interventionControl primary care providers will provide care as usual.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Compare intervention vs control percent parents for receiving help for Family Stressors

    Compare intervention vs control percent parents endorsing "getting help" with any of:

    • Intimate Partner Violence per Hurt, insulted, Threatened with Harm, Screamed score >=2 (0-40)
    • substance use per NIH measure of excess alcohol or drug use >2 (0-12)
    • depression per Patient Health Questionnaire-2 >=2 (0-4),
    • food insecurity per Hunger Vital Sign >=1 (0-2),
    • life stress per parent report of life stress (yes/no)
    • harsh punishment per by report of hitting or screaming >=1(0-2)

    Measured: first 2 years of life

  2. Compare intervention vs control percent parents in rates of child maltreatment

    Compare difference between groups in percent with allegations of child maltreatment per state Child Protective Services agency.

    Measured: first 2 years of life

  3. Compare intervention vs control percent parents in rates of harsh punishment

    Compare intervention vs control percent parents for difference between groups in percent with harsh punishment per Conflict Tactics Scale- Parent Child version >0 (0-2)

    Measured: first 2 years of life

  4. Compare intervention vs control parents in percent reporting child behavior problems

    Compare intervention vs control parents in percent reporting behavior problems per Early Childhood Screening Assessment-short form >=9 (0-44)

    Measured: first 2 years of life

  5. Compare intervention vs control percent parents for rate of atypical child development.

    Compare intervention vs control parents in rates of atypical child development as measured by Age \& Stages Questionnaire (monitoring zone or referral zone are atypical)

    Measured: first 2 years of life

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Compare parent rating of physician competence and confidence handling family stressors between intervention and control groups

    Compare rating total scores of self reported care and confidence on survey measure using vignettes called Patient View of Healthcare.

    Measured: 12 months of child's age (Parent)

  2. Change in physician competence and confidence handling family stressors

    Change in total score of ratings of self reported care and confidence on survey measure using vignettes at start and end of project, approximately 2.5 years.

    Measured: 2 years from first measure (PCP)

  3. Compare intervention vs control group rates of missed well child visits

    Difference between groups in percent of medical record reports of missed well child visits (0-6 visits)

    Measured: at 2 years of age

  4. Compare intervention vs control group rates of missed recommended immunizations

    Difference between groups in percent of medical record reports of missed recommended routine vaccinations (0-5 episodes)

    Measured: at 2 years of age

  5. Compare intervention vs control group parent-child relationship

    Difference between groups on total score on Protective Factors Survey of parent ratings of family relationships (0-140)

    Measured: 18 months of age

  6. Compare intervention vs control group parent-child relationship

    Difference between groups on total score on Protective Factors Survey of parent ratings of family relationships (0-140)

    Measured: 24 months of age

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Oct 2018
  2. Study start9 Jul 2018
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A cluster randomized quality improvement intervention trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
16,630 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03700697
Sponsor's protocol ID
R44HD089785
Other IDs
R44HD089785
Acronym
FamilyStress
Status last verified
Jul 2020
First submitted
14 Jul 2018
Last updated
17 Jul 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Only deidentified data will be available to share. All data will be available to researchers with appropriate interest by arrangement.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Family Stress Module Intervention in people with Social Determinants of Health and Child Abuse, run by Total Child Health, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Barbara Howard, MD (443-618-9104, bhoward@chadis.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Compare intervention vs control percent parents for receiving help for Family Stressors (time frame: first 2 years of life). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in