AzTrials
AzTrials

HemorrhageHD-ROTEMNCT03703323

Comparison of Mortality Impact of Coagulation Rotative Thromboelastometry Analysis Versus Standard Analysis

A study testing Rotative thromboelastometry analysis in people with Hemorrhage, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville at 1 site in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Digestive hemorrhage is a common cause of acute hemorrhage in France, and its mortality remains high despite improvement of endoscopy technique and therapeutics. Hemostasis disorders are an important issue in the patient care both in severity diagnostic and therapeutic plan. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hemorrhage
What is being tested?
Rotative thromboelastometry analysis
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
13 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
8 Oct 2018to 21 Aug 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Hospitalized patient in reanimation unit or continuous monitoring for digestive hemorrhage before or immediately after digestive endoscopy
  • Digestive hemorrhage diagnostic: melena and/or rectal bleeding and/or hematemesis
  • Affiliation to the social security
  • Have signed an informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or nursing woman
  • Without digestive fibroscopy
  • With an anticoagulant treatment
  • With a congenital coagulopathy
  • Decision of therapeutic limitation or moribund patient
  • With a digestive hemorrhage after an hospitalisation in reanimation unit for an other reason
  • Participation in an other study in previous 30 days
  • Under trusteeship, guardianship or judicial safeguards

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHR Metz Thionville

    Metz, 57085

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Mortality Impact of Coagulation Rotative Thromboelastometry Analysis Versus Standard Analysis (Prothrombin Ratio) for Patients With Digestive Hemorrage

Digestive hemorrhage is a common cause of acute hemorrhage in France, and its mortality remains high despite improvement of endoscopy technique and therapeutics. Hemostasis disorders are an important issue in the patient care both in severity diagnostic and therapeutic plan.

Read the detailed description

Standard technique of coagulation analysis (prothrombin ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen and platelet count) do not provide to guide practitioner in reanimation of hemostatic patients in particular when coagulation defect preexisting to the digestive hemorrhage.

In this respect, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the interest of rotative thromboelastometry in the care of patient with digestive hemorrhage and its mortality impact.

Conditions
Hemorrhage
Being tested
Rotative thromboelastometry analysis
Medical subject headings
Hemorrhage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Rotative thromboelastometry analysisOther

    Obtaining blood sample (one tube of blood)

Study groups in NCT03703323
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Rotative thromboelastometry analysisExperimentalEvaluation of diagnostic properties of coagulation by rotative thromboelastometry in patient with digestive hemorrhage in predictive value of mortality.
Receives: Other: Rotative thromboelastometry analysis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mortality

    28-day mortality rate

    Measured: day 28

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Fresh-frozen plasma

    Number of fresh-frozen plasma used within the first 48 hours of the care

    Measured: day 2

  2. Length of stay

    Lenght of stay in reanimation unit

    Measured: day 28

  3. Recurrent bleeding

    recurrent bleeding within the first 48 hours

    Measured: Day 2

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Oct 2018
  2. Study start8 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion8 Aug 2020
  4. Study completion21 Aug 2020

Why it stopped: pandemic situation

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
13 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03703323
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-03-CHRMT
Acronym
HD-ROTEM
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
9 Oct 2018
Last updated
30 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Rotative thromboelastometry analysis in people with Hemorrhage, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: pandemic situation). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mortality (time frame: day 28). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in