Visual AcuityNCT03707821
Design Validation of Senofilcon A With New UV-blocking Additive
A study testing senofilcon A TEST Lens in people with Visual Acuity, run by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. at 10 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a 2-visit, multi-site, partially subject-masked, 2-arm parallel, controlled, randomized and dispensing trial. Subjects will be randomized to one of two study lenses for the entire duration of the study. The study lenses will be worn for a period of 2 weeks each in a bilateral fashion. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 49 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Visual Acuity
- What is being tested?
- senofilcon A TEST Lens
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 253 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2018to 1 Nov 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 49 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:
- The subject must read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
- Appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
- Between 18 and 49 (inclusive) years of age at the time of informed consent.
- Eligible presbyopes will be those that wear full distance contact lenses in both eyes, then wear reading glasses over them when needed for near vision.
- The subject is a current spherical soft contact lens wearer in both eyes with a minimum of 6 hours/day and 5 days/week wear time over the last 30 days by self-report.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Subjects must be able and willing to wear the study lenses at least 6 hours a day, a minimum of 5 days per week.
- Subjects must own a wearable pair of distance spectacles.
- The subject's vertex-corrected spherical equivalent distance refraction must be in the range of -1.00 to -6.00 D (inclusive) in each eye.
- The subject's refractive cylinder must be 0.00 to -1.00 D (inclusive) in each eye.
- The subject must have a spherocylindrical best corrected distance Snellen visual acuity of 20/25+3 or better in each eye.
Who cannot join
- Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:
- Currently pregnant or lactating (subjects who become pregnant during the study will be discontinued).
- Any active or ongoing systemic disease (e.g., Sjögren's Syndrome), infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis), contagious immunosuppressive diseases (e.g., HIV), autoimmune disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis).
- Subjects taking suspect oral medications for less than one year.
- Any prescribed or over the counter (OTC) ocular medication.
- Any known hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to Optifree® PureMoist® multi-purpose care solution or Eye-Cept® rewetting drop solution.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Toric, extended wear, monovision or multi-focal contact lens correction.
- Any previous or planned (during the course of the study) ocular surgery (e.g., PRK, LASIK, etc.).
- Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 30 days prior to study enrollment.
- Participation in clinical trials involving the Test lens within 3 months prior to study enrollment.
- Employee or immediate family member of an employee of clinical site (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician).
- Binocular vision abnormality or strabismus by self-report or prior medical history.
- History of recurrent corneal erosions, herpetic keratitis, or pathological dry eye.
- Any active ocular allergies, infections or other ocular abnormalities (entropion, ectropion, extrusions, chalazia, recurrent styes, glaucoma) that the investigator determines may interfere with the outcomes of this study or otherwise contraindicate participation in the study.
- Any Grade 2 or greater slit lamp findings (e.g., edema, corneal neovascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection) on the FDA Slit Lamp Classification Scale.
- Any previous history or signs of a contact lens-related corneal inflammatory event (e.g., past peripheral ulcer or round peripheral scar) within the past 3 years of otherwise successful contact lens wear.
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country.
10 sites in 1 country
United States10 sites
Eyecare Associates LLP
Bloomington, Illinois, 61701
James T. Fujimoto, OD
Cupertino, California, 95014
ProCare Vision Centers
Granville, Ohio, 43023
Maitland Vision Center
Maitland, Florida, 32751
Bradley Hines, OD
Memphis, Tennessee, 38111
Ziegler Leffingwell Eyecare
New Berlin, Wisconsin, 53151
Kannarr Eye Care
Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762
Tallahassee Eye Center
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308
Frazier Vision, Inc
Tyler, Texas, 75703
Professional Vision Care, Inc
Westerville, Ohio, 43081
About this study
This is a 2-visit, multi-site, partially subject-masked, 2-arm parallel, controlled, randomized and dispensing trial. Subjects will be randomized to one of two study lenses for the entire duration of the study. The study lenses will be worn for a period of 2 weeks each in a bilateral fashion.
- Conditions
- Visual Acuity
- Being tested
- senofilcon A TEST Lens, senofilcon A CONTROL Lens
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
senofilcon A TEST LensDevice
JJVC Investigational Contact Lens
senofilcon A CONTROL LensDevice
Acuvue Oasys
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| senofilcon A TEST Lens | Experimental | Subjects between 18 to 49 years of age that are habitual wearers of spherical soft contact lenses will be randomized into the TEST Lens for the duration of the clinical study. Receives: Device: senofilcon A TEST Lens |
| senofilcon A CONTROL Lens | Active comparator | Subjects between 18 to 49 years of age that are habitual wearers of spherical soft contact lenses will be randomized into the CONTROL Lens for the duration of the clinical study. Receives: Device: senofilcon A CONTROL Lens |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Comfort Score
Overall comfort was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
Measured: 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation
Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting
Vision satisfaction in bright light was assessed using the individual item" I was satisfied with the quality of my vision in bright lighting" from the CLUE™ questionnaire. This item used the response scale, 1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3: Neither Agree nor Disagree, 4: Agree and 5: Strongly Agree. CLUE is the Contact Lens User Experience™ questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The Proportion of responses in each category were reported for each lens type.
Measured: 2-Week Follow-up Evaluation
Distance Visual Acuity
Distance visual acuity was assessed by eye using LogMAR visual acuity at 4 meters using an ETDRS chart under high illumination high contrast conditions (room illumination > 400 lux and chart luminance 120-200 cd/m2) at the 2-week follow-up for each subject eye. Lower values of logMAR indicate better vision, where a score of 0.0 equates to 20/20 snellen vision. The average visual acuity for each lens was reported.
Measured: 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation
Contact Lens Fitting Acceptance Rate
Acceptable lens fit will be assessed at all study visits (scheduled and unscheduled) for each subject eye. Fit acceptance rate will be based on the lens fit acceptance of eyes wearing the Test lens only. Fit acceptance is a binary response where Y=1 if lens fit is acceptable and Y=0 otherwise. Unacceptable is defined as unacceptable if any one of the following criteria:
- limbal exposure at primary gaze or with extreme eye movement;
- edge lift;
- excessive movement in primary up gaze;
- insufficient movement in all three of the following conditions: primary gaze, up gaze, and push up test.
Eyes with multiple unacceptable fitting events will be counted only once. Fit rates of the Control lens will also be collected but are not a primary endpoint.
Measured: Up to 2-Week Follow-up
Number of Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings
Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). Slit Lamp Findings will be assessed for each subject eye at all study visits (schedule and unscheduled). SLF is a binary response where Y=1 for at least one Grade 3 or 4 slit lamp finding. The percentage of eyes with Grade 3 or higher slit lamp findings will be analyzed and will include corneal infiltrates. Eyes with multiple events will be counted only once. The number of eyes with SLF with grade 3 or higher by lens was reported.
Measured: Up to 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation
Secondary outcomes (2)
Overall Handling Score
Overall handling was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
Measured: 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation
Overall Quality of Vision Score
Overall quality of vision was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
Measured: 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Oct 2018
- Study start1 Oct 2018
- Primary completion1 Nov 2018
- Study completion1 Nov 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Visual AcuityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 253 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03707821
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR-6305
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 12 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 5 Dec 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Dec 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Design Validation of Senofilcon A With New UV-blocking Additive
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03707821
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR-6305
- Conditions
- Visual Acuity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 253 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 5 Dec 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a 2-visit, multi-site, partially subject-masked, 2-arm parallel, controlled, randomized and dispensing trial. Subjects will be randomized to one of two study lenses for the entire duration of the study. The study lenses will be worn for a period of 2 weeks each in a bilateral fashion.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| senofilcon A TEST Lens | Experimental | Device: senofilcon A TEST LensSubjects between 18 to 49 years of age that are habitual wearers of spherical soft contact lenses will be randomized into the TEST Lens for the duration of the clinical study. |
| senofilcon A CONTROL Lens | Active comparator | Device: senofilcon A CONTROL LensSubjects between 18 to 49 years of age that are habitual wearers of spherical soft contact lenses will be randomized into the CONTROL Lens for the duration of the clinical study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 49 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| senofilcon A TEST LensJJVC Investigational Contact Lens | Device | senofilcon A TEST Lens |
| senofilcon A CONTROL LensAcuvue Oasys | Device | senofilcon A CONTROL Lens |
Primary outcome
Overall Comfort Score
Time frame: 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation
Overall comfort was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting
Time frame: 2-Week Follow-up Evaluation
Vision satisfaction in bright light was assessed using the individual item" I was satisfied with the quality of my vision in bright lighting" from the CLUE™ questionnaire. This item used the response scale, 1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3: Neither Agree nor Disagree, 4: Agree and 5: Strongly Agree. CLUE is the Contact Lens User Experience™ questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The Proportion of responses in each category were reported for each lens type.
Distance Visual Acuity
Time frame: 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation
Distance visual acuity was assessed by eye using LogMAR visual acuity at 4 meters using an ETDRS chart under high illumination high contrast conditions (room illumination > 400 lux and chart luminance 120-200 cd/m2) at the 2-week follow-up for each subject eye. Lower values of logMAR indicate better vision, where a score of 0.0 equates to 20/20 snellen vision. The average visual acuity for each lens was reported.
Contact Lens Fitting Acceptance Rate
Time frame: Up to 2-Week Follow-up
Acceptable lens fit will be assessed at all study visits (scheduled and unscheduled) for each subject eye. Fit acceptance rate will be based on the lens fit acceptance of eyes wearing the Test lens only. Fit acceptance is a binary response where Y=1 if lens fit is acceptable and Y=0 otherwise. Unacceptable is defined as unacceptable if any one of the following criteria: * limbal exposure at primary gaze or with extreme eye movement; * edge lift; * excessive movement in primary up gaze; * insufficient movement in all three of the following conditions: primary gaze, up gaze, and push up test. Eyes with multiple unacceptable fitting events will be counted only once. Fit rates of the Control lens will also be collected but are not a primary endpoint.
Number of Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings
Time frame: Up to 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation
Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). Slit Lamp Findings will be assessed for each subject eye at all study visits (schedule and unscheduled). SLF is a binary response where Y=1 for at least one Grade 3 or 4 slit lamp finding. The percentage of eyes with Grade 3 or higher slit lamp findings will be analyzed and will include corneal infiltrates. Eyes with multiple events will be counted only once. The number of eyes with SLF with grade 3 or higher by lens was reported.
2 secondary outcomes
Overall Handling Score
Time frame: 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation
Overall Quality of Vision Score
Time frame: 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Dec 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Visual Acuity
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Assess the Injection Burden, Adverse Events, Change in Disease Activity, and Long-Term Preservation of Visual Acuity of Surabgene Lomparvovec in Adult Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD)
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of ADVM-022 in Treatment-Experienced Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration [LUNA]
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 3
Intravitreal Faricimab Injections or Fluocinolone Acetonide (0.19 mg) Intravitreal Implants vs Observation for Prevention of VA Loss Due to Radiation Retinopathy
Radiation Retinopathy, Visual Impairment
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Study With Batten-1 (Miglustat Liquid Formulation) to Treat Ceroid Lipofuscinosis Neuronal 3 (CLN3) Disease
CLN3
Active, not recruiting
Mean Visual Acuity Changes Following Five Injections of Aflibercept
Diabetic Macular Edema
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing senofilcon A TEST Lens in people with Visual Acuity, run by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. at 10 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Dec 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Comfort Score (time frame: 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Dec 2019.