AzTrials
AzTrials

DiarrheaNCT03709368

Software Interventions for Improving Hand Washing and Sanitation in Rural Tanzania: an Impact Evaluation

A study testing Hardware, CLTS and PHAST in people with Diarrhea, run by Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgium at 1 site in Tanzania.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

BACKGROUND. Diarrhea is ubiquitous, particularly among people in low- and middle-income countries. Unsafe drinking water, poor sanitation, and insufficient hygiene are responsible for nearly 90% of diarrhea-related mortalities. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Diarrhea
What is being tested?
Hardware, CLTS and PHAST
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
1,500 participants
Where
1 siteTanzania
Study dates
23 Apr 2018to 31 May 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All people above 18 years of age.

Who cannot join

  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Tanzania1 site
  • Tanzania Red Cross Society

    Kigoma

Other trials in Tanzania

About this study

Official title: Effect of Two add-on Software Interventions for Improving Hand Washing and Sanitation in Rural Tanzania: an Impact Evaluation

BACKGROUND. Diarrhea is ubiquitous, particularly among people in low- and middle-income countries. Unsafe drinking water, poor sanitation, and insufficient hygiene are responsible for nearly 90% of diarrhea-related mortalities. Despite extensive knowledge that has been obtained in recent years, there is no consensus as to the most efficacious approach to improve Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene behavior and health. With this study, we want to determine whether multi-faceted contextualized and non-contextualized WASH interventions have a differential impact.

OBJECTIVES. The primary objective is to determine the effectiveness of a contextualized and non-contextualized add-on intervention for improving hand washing (HW) behavior. Secondary objectives include the impact on latrine use, health, coverage of HW and latrine infrastructure, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.

Conditions
Diarrhea
Being tested
Hardware, CLTS, PHAST, RANAS, mini-RANAS
Keywords
Hand washing, WASH, RANAS, Behavior change
Medical subject headings
Diarrhea

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HardwareOther

    Community sessions will be provided to each of the sub-villages (n=27) teaching participants how to build a tippy tap, how to build an improved latrine, and how to make liquid soap. In addition, an existing water gravity flow scheme will be rehabilitated and extended, 350 tippy taps and 350 pans for pour flush latrines will be distributed, and sanitation blocks will be built in four schools. Within these schools, SWASH school hygiene clubs will be organized.

  • CLTSBehavioural

    CLTS sanitation and HW sessions will be given. A first session will focus on sanitation, covering 7 exercises: 1) sanitation or social map, 2) transect walk, 3) shit calculation, 4) medical expenses, 5) shit flow diagram, and 6) water/shit demo, 7) community declaration. A second session will focus on HW, involving 10 exercises: 1) anal cleansing materials, 2) shit and shake, 3) cassava/egg demonstration, 4) charcoal smearing, 5) smelly hands, 6) feces on baby nappies, 7) scratch \& smell, 8) wall contamination, 9) food sharing, 10) dirt under fingernails. These sessions will take approximately 3-5 hours each. Follow-up community meetings and household visits will take place to monitor improvement.

  • PHASTBehavioural

    PHAST sessions are based on the 'PHAST step-by-step guide: A participatory approach for the control of diarrhoeal disease' of the World Health Organization. Considering the overlap with some CLTS activities, only a selection of the full guideline will be enrolled, namely: 1) Health problems in our community, 2) Good and bad hygiene behaviors, 3) Investigating community practices, 4) How diseases spread, 5) Blocking the spread of disease, 6) Selecting the barriers, 7) Choosing sanitation improvements, and 8) Choosing improved hygiene behaviors. These 8 activities will be enrolled in approximately 40 community groups. Each activity will take between 30 minutes - 2 hours to complete.

  • RANASBehavioural

    Nine household visits of 20-40 min each will be offered at a frequency of one visit every two months. The content of these add-on visits is based on the RANAS manual: 'Systematic Behavior Change in Water, Sanitation and Hygiene - A practical guide to using the RANAS approach' (www.ranasmosler.com). First, baseline data is gathered through a questionnaire to better understand the context that is at play. Next, this data is analyzed in a do'er non-do'er analysis. Only those behavioral factors that are significantly different between do'ers and non-do'ers will be included in the intervention, as these are, at least theoretically, considered to be decisive for HW and latrine use behavior in the current setting.

  • mini-RANASBehavioural

    Nine household visits of 20-40 min each will be offered at a frequency of one visit every two months. The content of the mini-RANAS add-on intervention is based on the 'Norm Behavior Change Techniques' from the RANAS manual 'Systematic Behavior Change in Water, Sanitation and Hygiene - A practical guide to using the RANAS approach' (www.ranasmosler.com). During the mini-RANAS household visits, emphasis will be put on norms and volunteers will encourage participants to become a role model by improving HW and sanitation infrastructure and behavior.

  • Placebo posterOther

    One household visit will be offered. During this visit, a placebo poster will be distributed focusing on first aid. The topics to be discussed are burns, cuts and grazes. The main goal of this household visit is to avoid jealousy among the control cohort.

Study groups in NCT03709368
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RANASExperimentalHardware CLTS+PHAST RANAS (contextualized)
Receives: Other: Hardware; Behavioral: CLTS; Behavioral: PHAST; Behavioral: RANAS
Mini-RANASExperimentalHardware CLTS+PHAST mini-RANAS (norms)
Receives: Other: Hardware; Behavioral: CLTS; Behavioral: PHAST; Behavioral: mini-RANAS
ControlActive comparatorHardware CLTS+PHAST Placebo
Receives: Other: Hardware; Behavioral: CLTS; Behavioral: PHAST; Other: Placebo poster

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in hand washing behavior

    The primary outcome is the percentage of households washing hands. The outcome measure will be obtained by means of a self-developed WASH questionnaire, which involves both multiple choice questions and spot checks.

    A household was defined to have correct HW behavior when they: 1) have a HW station available (spot check), 2) have water and soap available at the HW station (spot check), and 3) indicate to wash their hands with water and soap (questionnaire). The analysis will be repeated for each of the critical times. Critical times of interest include: after defecation or using the latrine, before cooking or handling food, before eating, and before feeding a child.

    Measured: The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change in latrine use behavior

    Latrine use is assessed by means of a self-developed WASH questionnaire, involving both multiple choice questions and spot checks.

    A household is defined to have correct latrine use behavior when: 1) they have a latrine available (spot check), 2) the latrine minimally includes walls, a roof, a door or curtain, and a slab or concrete floor (spot check), 3) the latrine is clean (spot check), 3) they indicate to normally use the latrine when defecating at home (questionnaire), and 4) they indicate to not defecate in the open when they are at home (questionnaire). A similar analysis will be performed for latrine use behavior when people are elsewhere.

    Measured: The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.

  2. Quality of the hand washing infrastructure

    Hand washing infrastructure is assessed using a self-developed questionnaire and spot checks. The quality of the HW infrastructure is scored based on the type of HW facility (i.e. running water vs. bucket) (spot check), the presence of water and/or soap (spot check), and whether or not the station is always operational (questionnaire).

    Measured: The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.

  3. Change in health

    Health is assessed using a self-developed health questionnaire. The questionnaire is used to probe the prevalence rates of diarrhea, vomiting, limitations of daily activities, and need for medical care due to diarrheal illness in the past two weeks. The questionnaire also probes about the prevalence rates of hospitalization due to diarrheal illness in the past twelve months. Prevalence is subdivided into people below 5 years of age and people above 5 years of age. In some questions, a distinction was also made between men and women.

    Measured: The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.

  4. Change in EQ-5D-3L

    The EQ-5D-3L is a validated questionnaire, examining 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. All items are scored on a 3-point Likert scale. Results of the EQ-5D-3L can be used to calculate the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), a generic measure of disease burden. The QALY will be used to determine the cost-effectiveness of each intervention arm.

    Measured: The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.

  5. Quality of the latrine infrastructure

    Latrine infrastructure is assessed using a self-developed questionnaire and spot checks. The quality of the latrine infrastructure is scored based on the type of facility (i.e. does it have a roof, a door, etc.) (spot check), the cleanliness (spot check), and the number of people who use the latrine (questionnaire). Information about whether or not the pit has ever been emptied, and how will also be gathered (questionnaire) as this will allow for the measurement of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6 according to the WHO/UNICEF JMP (https://washdata.org/) tools.

    Measured: The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Oct 2018
  2. Study start23 Apr 2018
  3. Primary completion31 May 2021
  4. Study completion31 May 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,500 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03709368
Sponsor's protocol ID
TAN-001
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
2 Oct 2018
Last updated
9 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Dockx K, Van Remoortel H, De Buck E, Schelstraete C, Vanderheyden A, Lievens T, Kinyagu JT, Mamuya S, Vandekerckhove P. Effect of Contextualized Versus Non-Contextualized Interventions for Improving Hand Washing, Sanitation, and Health in Rural Tanzania: Study Design of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 15;16(14):2529. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142529.

    PubMed 31311186

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hardware, CLTS and PHAST in people with Diarrhea, run by Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgium at 1 site in Tanzania.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Tanzania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in hand washing behavior (time frame: The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03709368, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in