AzTrials
AzTrials

Alveolar Ridge AugmentationNCT03712631

Ridge Augmentation in Posterior Mandible Using Tunneling Technique With Amix of Autogenous Bone and Xenograft With and Without Collagen Membrane

A study testing tunneling technique bone augmentation in people with Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, run by Cairo University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

aim Evaluation of the amount of bone gain following Ridge augmentation using tunneling technique in atrophic posterior mandibular ridges using anorganic bovine bone derived mineral mixed with particulated autogenous bone chips with collagen membrane Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 22 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
What is being tested?
tunneling technique bone augmentation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 2018to Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 22 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • medically free,age 22:50 years, atrophic posterior mandibleClinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease Must be able to swallow tablets

Who cannot join

  • smoking Insulin dependent diabetes Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease Must be able to swallow tablets

About this study

Official title: Ridge Augmentation in Atrophic Posterior Mandible Using Tunneling Technique With Anorganic Bovine Bone-Derived Mineral Mixed With Particulated Autogenous Bone Chips With and Without Collagen Membrane

aim Evaluation of the amount of bone gain following Ridge augmentation using tunneling technique in atrophic posterior mandibular ridges using anorganic bovine bone derived mineral mixed with particulated autogenous bone chips with collagen membrane

Read the detailed description

Bone grafting before implant placement has become a routine procedure over the last 20 years. A 5-year survival rate of up to98.3% for implants placed in grafted bone has been reported.

Autologous bone grafts are considered the gold standard.However, the success rate of the grafting procedure may beinfluenced by various risk factors.

A particular challenge isposed by an extensive graft of the alveolar ridge, with relativelyhigh complication rates of up to 20% being reported, mostcommonly dehiscence. More serious complications such asdehiscence or mobilization of the graft were observed in one third of smokers compared to a complication rate of only 7.7%for non-smokers. Complications such as flap necroses, dehiscenceand resorption are frequently soft-tissue complications.

A tension-free wound closure is a key factor in the successof bone grafts. Periosteal incisions are a common techniquefor flap extension. However, too many relief incisions in the periosteum may also result in an excessively thin or stretched wound flap.

This type of soft-tissue management may result in perforation or flap necrosis above the bone graft.

In 1987 Härle reported on a tunneling access in connectionwith a technique for preprosthetic jaw ridge grafting in the mandibular side-tooth region with bone replacement materials.

In the clinical experience of the authors the use of a tunneling technique for preparation without a crestal incision can present an alternative with autologous bone grafts to conventional surgical procedures with a trapezoid flap design.

Being tested
tunneling technique bone augmentation
Keywords
tunneling technique, collagen membrane, tunnel, augmentation, horizontal ridge augmentation, bone graft, ridge augmentation, posterior mandible

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tunneling technique bone augmentationProcedure or surgery

    horizontal ridge augmentation using mixture of xenograft,autogenous bone

Study groups in NCT03712631
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
bone without a collagen membraneActive comparatornot covering bone with collagen membrane
Receives: Procedure: tunneling technique bone augmentation
bone with collagen membraneExperimentalcovering bone with collagen membrane
Receives: Procedure: tunneling technique bone augmentation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Height and width of bone gained

    Measured: 4 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Bone area percentage

    Measured: 4 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Oct 2018
  2. Study startOct 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionMay 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03712631
Sponsor's protocol ID
augmentation tunneling tech
Status last verified
Oct 2018
First submitted
17 Oct 2018
Last updated
22 Oct 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Hasson O. Augmentation of deficient lateral alveolar ridge using the subperiosteal tunneling dissection approach. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Mar;103(3):e14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.10.019. Epub 2007 Jan 22.

    PubMed 17241798
  • Maestre-Ferrin L, Boronat-Lopez A, Penarrocha-Diago M, Penarrocha-Diago M. Augmentation procedures for deficient edentulous ridges, using onlay autologous grafts: an update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009 Aug 1;14(8):e402-7.

    PubMed 19415058
  • de Macedo LG, de Macedo NL, do Socorro Ferreira Monteiro A. Fresh-frozen human bone graft for repair of defect after adenomatoid odontogenic tumour removal. Cell Tissue Bank. 2009 Aug;10(3):221-6. doi: 10.1007/s10561-008-9120-1. Epub 2009 Jan 9.

    PubMed 19132551
  • Khan SN, Cammisa FP Jr, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM. The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;13(1):77-86.

    PubMed 15712985
  • 9. Fonseca RJ, Powers MP, Dexter H. Oral and max¬illofacial surgery: Reconstructive and implant surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co. 2007; 7.

  • Kent JN. Reconstruction of the alveolar ridge with hydroxyapatite. Dent Clin North Am. 1986 Apr;30(2):231-57.

    PubMed 3009242
  • Smiler D, Soltan M, Lee JW. A histomorphogenic analysis of bone grafts augmented with adult stem cells. Implant Dent. 2007 Mar;16(1):42-53. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3180335934.

    PubMed 17356371
  • Rothstein SS, Paris DA, Zacek MP. Use of hydroxylapatite for the augmentation of deficient alveolar ridges. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984 Apr;42(4):224-30. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(84)90453-1.

    PubMed 6323657
  • Mehlisch DR, Taylor TD, Leibold DG, Hiatt R, Waite DE, Waite PD, Laskin DM, Smith ST. Collagen/hydroxylapatite implant for augmenting deficient alveolar ridges: twelve-month clinical data. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988 Oct;46(10):839-43. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(88)90046-8.

    PubMed 2845038
  • Williams CW, Meyers JF, Robinson RR. Hydroxyapatite augmentation of the anterior portion of the maxilla with a modified transpositional flap technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991 Oct;72(4):395-9. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(91)90546-o.

    PubMed 1656356
  • Marshall SG. The combined use of endosseous dental implants and collagen/hydroxylapatite augmentation procedures for reconstruction/augmentation of the edentulous and atrophic mandible: a preliminary report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1989 Oct;68(4 Pt 2):517-25; discussion 525-6. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(89)90231-4.

    PubMed 2559388
  • Kfir E, Kfir V, Eliav E, Kaluski E. Minimally invasive guided bone regeneration. J Oral Implantol. 2007;33(4):205-10. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[205:MIGBR]2.0.CO;2.

    PubMed 17912961
  • Li J, Xuan F, Choi BH, Jeong SM. Minimally invasive ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone blocks in an atrophied posterior mandible: a clinical and histological study. Implant Dent. 2013 Apr;22(2):112-6. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182805bec.

    PubMed 23344366
  • Vanassche BJ, Stoelinga PJ, de Koomen HA, Blijdorp PA, Schoenaers JH. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed mandible with interposed bone grafts and hydroxylapatite. A 2-3 year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988 Jun;17(3):157-60. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(88)80021-3.

    PubMed 2840471
  • Block MS. Horizontal ridge augmentation using particulate bone. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2006 Mar;14(1):27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cxom.2005.11.004. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16522508

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing tunneling technique bone augmentation in people with Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, run by Cairo University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Height and width of bone gained (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03712631, which also lists 39 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in