AzTrials
AzTrials

Primary DysmenorrheaNCT03712800

Rhythmical Massage Compared With Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback in Women With Menstrual Pain (Dysmenorrhea)

A study testing Rhythmical massage and HRV biofeedback in people with Primary Dysmenorrhea, run by ARCIM Institute Academic Research in Complementary and Integrative Medicine at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A study to explore whether rhythmical massage and heart rate variability biofeedback can help to reduce pain in women suffering from menstrual pain (dysmenorrhea). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 46 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Primary Dysmenorrhea
What is being tested?
Rhythmical massage and HRV biofeedback
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Feb 2012to Mar 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 46 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • At least one year of primary dysmenorrhea (physician-confirmed).
  • Written informed consent (also from parents/legal guardians of underage girls).
  • Menarche at least one year ago.

Who cannot join

  • Secondary dysmenorrhea.
  • Participation in another study.
  • Mental retardation.
  • Addiction.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Die Filderklinik

    Filderstadt, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70794

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Rhythmical Massage in Comparison to Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback in Women With Primary Dysmenorrhea - a Randomized, Controlled Trial

A study to explore whether rhythmical massage and heart rate variability biofeedback can help to reduce pain in women suffering from menstrual pain (dysmenorrhea).

Read the detailed description

This is a three-arm randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of rhythmical massage and HRV biofeedback in women with primary dysmenorrhea compared to a control group. The main focus is on pain intensity during menstruation. Moreover, analgesics intake, SF-12 mental and physical scores and parameters of a 24h-HRV measurement are assessed before and after the three-month intervention.

Being tested
Rhythmical massage, HRV biofeedback
Keywords
Dysmenorrhea, Women Health, Rhythmical Massage, Anthroposophic Medicine, HRV Biofeedback
Medical subject headings
Dysmenorrhea

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Rhythmical massageOther

    Rhythmical Massage according to Dr Ita Wegman, derived from Swedish Massage in the 1920s. Applied for various indications in the context of Anthroposophic Medicine, aiming at a recovery of self-regulation and self-healing forces.

  • HRV biofeedbackBehavioural

    One of various biofeedback types, HRV biofeedback gives a visual feedback of the participant's heart rate variability as an indicator for general health, physical and cognitive performance, self-regulation and a decreased risk of illness.

Study groups in NCT03712800
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Rhythmical massageExperimentalParticipants who receive rhythmical massage for three months.
Receives: Other: Rhythmical massage
HRV biofeedbackExperimentalParticipants who perform HRV biofeedback for three months.
Receives: Behavioral: HRV biofeedback
Control groupNo interventionParticipants who do not receive an intervention during the three-month intervention period but are advised to stay with their usual care during menstrual pain. For ethical and compliance reasons, these participants receive a series of rhythmical massage treatments after the initial three-month intervention/control period.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean pain intensity during menstruation

    Mean pain intensity on the three days of maximal menstrual discomfort, as indicated by the participants on a numeric rating scale in a pain diary.

    Measured: Baseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Maximum pain intensity during menstruation

    Maximum pain intensity on the three days of maximal menstrual discomfort, as indicated by the participants on a numeric rating scale in a pain diary.

    Measured: Baseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).

  2. SF-12 sum-score

    Overall quality of life as assessed by the SF-12 questionnaire.

    Measured: Baseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).

  3. SF-12 mental

    Quality of life (subscore mental) as assessed by the SF-12 questionnaire.

    Measured: Baseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).

  4. SF-12 physical

    Quality of life (subscore physical) as assessed by the SF-12 questionnaire.

    Measured: Baseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).

  5. SDNN

    Standard deviation of normal to normal beats, derived from 24h ECGs.

    Measured: Baseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).

  6. RMSSD

    Root mean square of successive differences, derived from 24h ECGs.

    Measured: Baseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).

  7. LF/HF-Ratio

    LF/HF-Ratio = Ratio of two bands from frequency domain analysis: LF band (0.04-0.15 Hz), HF band (0.15-0.40 Hz), derived from 24h ECGs.

    Measured: Baseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).

  8. Analgesics intake during menstruation

    Percentage of participants taking analgesics.

    Measured: Baseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Oct 2018
  2. Study startFeb 2012
  3. Primary completionMar 2014
  4. Study completionMar 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants are randomized to one of the three groups (rhythmical massage, HRV biofeedback or control). After the three-month intervention period, the controls receive rhythmical massage for ethical and compliance reasons. Assessments are taken before and after the intervention phase. Pain intensity is once more queried three months after the end of the intervention period.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03712800
Sponsor's protocol ID
DYS_01
Status last verified
Oct 2018
First submitted
18 Oct 2018
Last updated
19 Oct 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Rhythmical massage and HRV biofeedback in people with Primary Dysmenorrhea, run by ARCIM Institute Academic Research in Complementary and Integrative Medicine at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean pain intensity during menstruation (time frame: Baseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in