PneumoniaCoughAssistNCT03714321
Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Compared With CPAP in Patients Admitted to an Intermediate Care Unit With Pneumonia
A study testing Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MIE) in people with Pneumonia, run by Odense University Hospital.
Trial summary
Pneumonia, an infection in the lower airways, is a common cause of hospital contacts and a leading cause of death from infections worldwide. Pneumonia is treated with antibiotics, and while waiting for the effect thereof patients may need supportive treatment to help their lungs work optimally. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pneumonia
- What is being tested?
- Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MIE)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2014to 9 Oct 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Community acquired or nosocomial pneumonia, diagnosed by new infiltrate on an x-ray chest and symptoms and/or objective findings acute lower airway infection
- 18 years or older
- able to participate in CPAP treatment 10 cm H2O for 5 minutes
- able to provide written consent
Who cannot join
- pneumothorax less than 4 weeks prior to admission
- current pleural tube
About this study
Official title: Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Compared With CPAP in Patients Admitted to an Intermediate Care Unit With Pneumonia: a Randomised Controlled Study.
Pneumonia, an infection in the lower airways, is a common cause of hospital contacts and a leading cause of death from infections worldwide. Pneumonia is treated with antibiotics, and while waiting for the effect thereof patients may need supportive treatment to help their lungs work optimally.
When patients suffering from pneumonia have problems breathing, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is widely used. CPAP works by forcing air down the patient's airway. In patients with pneumonia, though CPAP has proven to provide more oxygen to the lungs compared to a standard oxygen mask, it does not have any effect on the outcome.
Read more
Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MIE), examined in this study, is given through a machine connected to a mask. If provides a positive airway pressure like CPAP, but the inwards pressure is followed immediately by a negative pressure forcing air and mucus up from the lower airways. MIE is currently used successfully in patients suffering from neuromuscular diseases. In these patients, MIE has shown to prevent hospital admission, prolong survival and delay time until need of permanent ventilation. There exists no studies examining the effect of MIE on patients with pneumonia without neuromuscular disorders.
The investigators therefore wish to study patients with severe pneumonia, admitted to an intermediate care unit, and compare patients treated with MIE to patients treated with CPAP.
30 patients will be included and randomly selected to receive either CPAP or MIE. They will be monitored through registration of oxygen need (liters/min) and oxygen levels, respiratory rate and the daily number of suction due to mucus.
Data from each patient regarding their age, sex, other known diseases, the severity of pneumonia, chest X-ray findings, antibiotic treatment up to and during the admission, days admitted, hours admitted to the intermediate care unit, if they are transferred to the intensive care unit and put on a ventilator, 30-days mortality and re-admittance within 30 days of being discharged, will be registered. To enter the study, the patients have to be 18 years old, able to sign a written consent form, have no current chest tube, no recent collapsed lung and no chronic lung disease.
The hypothesizes is that patients receiving MIE will be helped with coughing up mucus in the lower airways, and therefore have less need of oxygen, and that the patients receiving MIE will have a reduced risk of being transferred to the intensive care unit to receive ventilator support and spend shorter time in the intermediate care unit compared with the other group.
Read the detailed description
Background
Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MIE) was invented to help mobilize secretion from the lower respiratory tract by simulating a cough [1]. It is widely used in patients who have neuromuscular disease and therefore reduced cough strength, both during hospital admissions, and in patients' homes. Delivered by a Cough Assistor device through a mask, MIE functions by delivering a positive inspiratory pressure followed immediately by a negative expiratory pressure [1].
In patients with neuromuscular disease, MIE prevents hospital admissions, improves survival rates and delay time to tracheostomy [1]. In this patient group, MIE has proven to be safe with few adverse effects, and generally well tolerated [1-3].
In patients with neuromuscular disease and an acute respiratory-tract infection, MIE in combination with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is superior to NIV alone in removing secretion from the airways in patients with respiratory tract infections [2]. In a study among patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and difficulties clearing airway secretions after acute respiratory failure, MIE had a significant effect on both oxygenation and dyspnea [3].
Pneumonia is, with a yearly incidence of 5-11 per 1.000 adult population, a leading cause of morbidity worldwide [4]. Around 22-42% of adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) require hospitalization [4]. Globally, pneumonia is the leading cause of death due to infections, and the mortality among hospitalized patients with pneumonia is 5.7-14% [4,5]. Pneumonia is seen with increased incidence in high risk patient groups such as the elderly, smokers, patients with immunodeficiencies and co-morbidities [6]. Early initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is the cornerstone in treatment of pneumonia and has been shown to shorten the course of disease and lessen the risk of complications and mortality [7].
In the acute phase of the disease, in addition to effective antimicrobial treatment, supportive treatment is important to optimize the respiratory care of the patients. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) delivered through a face mask is widely used as supportive treatment and improves oxygenation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure compared to oxygen delivered by mask [8]. CPAP also improves oxygenation in patients with pneumonia in a hospital setting compared to oxygen therapy, but the effect quickly resolves after discontinuation, and CPAP has failed to show effect on endotracheal intubation rate, hospital mortality and length of intensive care unit stay in patients with acute respiratory failure [8-10].
There are, to the investigators knowledge, no published studies who evaluate the effect of MIE on patients with acute respiratory-tract infections without neuromuscular disease.
The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and effect of MIE on patients hospitalized due to lower respiratory-tract infections and examine their outcome with the current standard treatment of CPAP.
Hypothesis Patients receiving MIE have better mobilization of secretions from the lower airways, and thereby faster oxygenation. Patients in the MIE group will have less need of ventilator support, and have a shorter admission to the intermediate care unit.
Methods
Study design This randomized clinical pilot study is conducted at the intermediate care unit at the Department of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. The intermediate care unit consists of 3 beds, all served by a nurse with special training in intermediate care. Continuous monitoring of blood pressure, pulse, oxygen saturation and respiratory rate is available. The assessment of the patient and admittance to the intermediate care unit is determined by the senior infectious disease doctor on call.
Randomization In total, 30 patients will be included and undergo 1:1 randomization to receive either CPAP or CPAP followed by MIE.
Interventions CPAP will be administered through MR 810 (Fisher \& Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) with standard settings of H2O and an oxygen flow of 15L/min [11]. CPAP is given by trained physiotherapists or nurses at the intermediate care unit.
MIE will be administered through the NIPPY Clearway (B\&D Electromedical, Stratford-Upon-Avon, Warwickshire, United Kingdom) with standard settings of insufflation 20 cm H2O and exsufflation 20 cm H2O, with possible individual changes from 10/-10 H2O up to 40/-40 H2O, and oxygen flow up to 15 l/min [12]. The standard settings will be set to five cycles of 2 seconds insufflation, 3 seconds exsufflation with a three second pause between each cycle. Every treatment session consists of five rounds of five cycles, in all 25 insufflation/exsufflation, with time between each cycle of 30 seconds, meant used for suction. The MIE is given by trained physiotherapists or nurses at the intermediate care unit.
Clinical data The following data will be registered for each patient: age, sex, comorbidities, the severity of pneumonia using the CURB-65 score [13], chest radiograph findings, antibiotic treatment up to and during the admission, days of admission, hours admitted to the semi-intensive unit, transfer to intensive care unit (ICU), intubation and mechanical ventilation, in-hospital and 30-days mortality and re-admittance within 30 days of discharge. During the admission in the intermediate care unit, number of CPAP and MIE treatments, oxygenation and oxygen need (liters/min) every 2 hours for the first 24 hours, hereafter every 4 hours, respiratory rate every 6 hours for the first 24 hours, hereafter every day, and the daily number of suction in pharynx or trachea in each patient will be registered.
Paraclinical data For each patient, microbial growth from blood and sputum cultures will be registered, as will Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) results from sputum samples and relevant bacterial serology during admission, C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC) and urea at time of admission, time of entering the intermediate care unit, time of discharge from the intermediate care unit and time of discharge from the hospital.
Statistical analysis Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum will be used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. A p-value of < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. The statistical analyses will be performed using STATA version 13.0.
- Conditions
- Pneumonia
- Being tested
- Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MIE)
- Keywords
- mechanical insufflation-exsufflation
- Medical subject headings
- Pneumonia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MIE)Device
Also called NIPPY Clearway
Randomization of 30 patients, 15 in each arm, to receive either CPAP or MIE.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation arm | Experimental | MIE will be given as prescribed by physician responsible at the intermediate care unit, typically every 4 hours. MIE will be administered with standard settings of insufflation 20 cm H2O and exsufflation 20 cm H2O, with possible individual changes from 10/-10 H2O up to 40/-40 H2O, and oxygen flow up to 15 l/min. The standard settings will be set to five cycles of 2 seconds insufflation, 3 seconds exsufflation with a three second pause between each cycle. Every treatment session consists of five rounds of five cycles, in all 25 insufflation/exsufflation, with time between each cycle of 30 seconds, meant used for suction. Receives: Device: Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MIE) |
| CPAP arm | No intervention | CPAP will be given as prescribed by the physician responsible at the intermediate care unit, typically every 4 hours. CPAP will be administered with standard settings of H2O and an oxygen flow of 15L/min. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Admission time in intermediate care unit
Time (in hours) of each patient spent admitted to the intermediate care unit
Measured: Admission to intermediate care unit (expected approx. 3-5 days)
Need of mechanical ventilation
For each patient; any need of mechanical ventilation (yes/no) during the entire hospital admission in which the patient is included in the study.
Measured: From admission to discharge/death, in the department responsible for the study, the mean duration of admittance is 7 days. Need of ventilation will be registered by investigator through review of patient chart after discharge from hospital.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Oxygenation therapy
Registration of oxygen therapy (L/min)
Measured: During the entire admission to the intermediate care unit (expected to be approx. 3-5 days) oxygen therapy will be registered every 2 hours for the first 24 hours of admittance, and every 4 hours thereafter until discharge.
Oxygenation saturation
Registration of oxygen saturation (%)
Measured: During the entire admission to the intermediate care unit (expected to be approx. 3-5 days) oxygen saturation will be registered every 2 hours for the first 24 hours of admittance, and every 4 hours thereafter until discharge.
Respiratory rate
Registration of respiratory rate (number/minute) every 6th hours
Measured: Registered at admission to the intermediate care unit, every 6th hour for the first 24 hours thereafter, and every 24 hours for the duration of admission to the intermediate care unit (approx.3-5 days).
Need of suction
Registration of every episode of suction (number/day) and from which part of the airway (mouth, pharynx, trachea)
Measured: During the entire admission to the intermediate care unit (approx.3-5 days), every episode of suction will be registered by the treating nurse, and total number of episodes will be registered every 24th hours until discharge.
Treatment related adverse events
Registration of discontinuation of MIE, change in settings in MIE due to discomfort, reported adverse events after treatment. Registered in patient charts and/or reported by treating nurses/physiotherapists to principal investigator during patient admissions. No structural form used.
Measured: Registered daily on patient chart forms during entire admission to the intermediate care unit, and orally reported to the principal investigator during the admissions (approx. 3-5 days per patient).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Oct 2018
- Study start1 Jan 2014
- Primary completion9 Oct 2015
- Study completion9 Oct 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PneumoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Odense University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized non-blinded controlled pilot study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fredrikke Christie Knudtzen, Odense University Hospital
- Investigators
- Isik Johansen, Prof., Principal investigator, Odense University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03714321
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- S-20130102/j.nr. 2008-58-0035
- Acronym
- CoughAssist
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 10 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 22 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: No current plan for IPD sharing, will be reconsidered when we have decided if the pilot project will be expanded.
Publications
Ellison RT III, Donowitz GR. Acute pneumonia. In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 8th Edn. Philadelphia, Elsevier Saunders, 2015; pp. 829-831.
Homnick DN. Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation for airway mucus clearance. Respir Care. 2007 Oct;52(10):1296-305; discussion 1306-7.
PubMed 17894900Chatwin M, Simonds AK. The addition of mechanical insufflation/exsufflation shortens airway-clearance sessions in neuromuscular patients with chest infection. Respir Care. 2009 Nov;54(11):1473-9.
PubMed 19863831Winck JC, Goncalves MR, Lourenco C, Viana P, Almeida J, Bach JR. Effects of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation on respiratory parameters for patients with chronic airway secretion encumbrance. Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3):774-80. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3.774.
PubMed 15364756Lim WS, Baudouin SV, George RC, Hill AT, Jamieson C, Le Jeune I, Macfarlane JT, Read RC, Roberts HJ, Levy ML, Wani M, Woodhead MA; Pneumonia Guidelines Committee of the BTS Standards of Care Committee. BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: update 2009. Thorax. 2009 Oct;64 Suppl 3:iii1-55. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.121434. No abstract available.
PubMed 19783532Welte T. Risk factors and severity scores in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: prediction of severity and mortality. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jan;31(1):33-47. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1272-4. Epub 2011 May 1.
PubMed 21533875Blasi F, Garau J, Medina J, Avila M, McBride K, Ostermann H; REACH study group. Current management of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia across Europe: outcomes from REACH. Respir Res. 2013 Apr 15;14(1):44. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-44.
PubMed 23586347Delclaux C, L'Her E, Alberti C, Mancebo J, Abroug F, Conti G, Guerin C, Schortgen F, Lefort Y, Antonelli M, Lepage E, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Treatment of acute hypoxemic nonhypercapnic respiratory insufficiency with continuous positive airway pressure delivered by a face mask: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000 Nov 8;284(18):2352-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.18.2352.
PubMed 11066186Cosentini R, Brambilla AM, Aliberti S, Bignamini A, Nava S, Maffei A, Martinotti R, Tarsia P, Monzani V, Pelosi P. Helmet continuous positive airway pressure vs oxygen therapy to improve oxygenation in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, controlled trial. Chest. 2010 Jul;138(1):114-20. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2290. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
PubMed 20154071Brambilla AM, Aliberti S, Prina E, Nicoli F, Del Forno M, Nava S, Ferrari G, Corradi F, Pelosi P, Bignamini A, Tarsia P, Cosentini R. Helmet CPAP vs. oxygen therapy in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure due to pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):942-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3325-5. Epub 2014 May 10.
PubMed 24817030MR810 technical manual. file:///C:/Users/lege4/Downloads/9e551a10-ef64-4514-a1bf-ce17cf08451e.pdf Date last accessed: July 12th 2017.
NIPPY Clearway user manual. http://nippyventilator.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2007v5-February2015-Clearway-IFU-English.pdf Date last updated: February 2015. Date last accessed: July 12th 2017.
Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, Boersma WG, Karalus N, Town GI, Lewis SA, Macfarlane JT. Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax. 2003 May;58(5):377-82. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.5.377.
PubMed 12728155
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Compared With CPAP in Patients Admitted to an Intermediate Care Unit With Pneumonia: a Randomised Controlled Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03714321
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CoughAssist / S-20130102/j.nr. 2008-58-0035
- Conditions
- Pneumonia
- Keywords
- mechanical insufflation-exsufflation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Oct 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Oct 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pneumonia, an infection in the lower airways, is a common cause of hospital contacts and a leading cause of death from infections worldwide. Pneumonia is treated with antibiotics, and while waiting for the effect thereof patients may need supportive treatment to help their lungs work optimally.
When patients suffering from pneumonia have problems breathing, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is widely used. CPAP works by forcing air down the patient's airway. In patients with pneumonia, though CPAP has proven to provide more oxygen to the lungs compared to a standard oxygen mask, it does not have any effect on the outcome.
Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MIE), examined in this study, is given through a machine connected to a mask. If provides a positive airway pressure like CPAP, but the inwards pressure is followed immediately by a negative pressure forcing air and mucus up from the lower airways. MIE is currently used successfully in patients suffering from neuromuscular diseases. In these patients, MIE has shown to prevent hospital admission, prolong survival and delay time until need of permanent ventilation. There exists no studies examining the effect of MIE on patients with pneumonia without neuromuscular disorders.
The investigators therefore wish to study patients with severe pneumonia, admitted to an intermediate care unit, and compare patients treated with MIE to patients treated with CPAP.
30 patients will be included and randomly selected to receive either CPAP or MIE. They will be monitored through registration of oxygen need (liters/min) and oxygen levels, respiratory rate and the daily number of suction due to mucus.
Data from each patient regarding their age, sex, other known diseases, the severity of pneumonia, chest X-ray findings, antibiotic treatment up to and during the admission, days admitted, hours admitted to the intermediate care unit, if they are transferred to the intensive care unit and put on a ventilator, 30-days mortality and re-admittance within 30 days of being discharged, will be registered. To enter the study, the patients have to be 18 years old, able to sign a written consent form, have no current chest tube, no recent collapsed lung and no chronic lung disease.
The hypothesizes is that patients receiving MIE will be helped with coughing up mucus in the lower airways, and therefore have less need of oxygen, and that the patients receiving MIE will have a reduced risk of being transferred to the intensive care unit to receive ventilator support and spend shorter time in the intermediate care unit compared with the other group.
Detailed description
Background
Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MIE) was invented to help mobilize secretion from the lower respiratory tract by simulating a cough [1]. It is widely used in patients who have neuromuscular disease and therefore reduced cough strength, both during hospital admissions, and in patients' homes. Delivered by a Cough Assistor device through a mask, MIE functions by delivering a positive inspiratory pressure followed immediately by a negative expiratory pressure [1].
In patients with neuromuscular disease, MIE prevents hospital admissions, improves survival rates and delay time to tracheostomy [1]. In this patient group, MIE has proven to be safe with few adverse effects, and generally well tolerated [1-3].
In patients with neuromuscular disease and an acute respiratory-tract infection, MIE in combination with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is superior to NIV alone in removing secretion from the airways in patients with respiratory tract infections [2]. In a study among patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and difficulties clearing airway secretions after acute respiratory failure, MIE had a significant effect on both oxygenation and dyspnea [3].
Pneumonia is, with a yearly incidence of 5-11 per 1.000 adult population, a leading cause of morbidity worldwide [4]. Around 22-42% of adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) require hospitalization [4]. Globally, pneumonia is the leading cause of death due to infections, and the mortality among hospitalized patients with pneumonia is 5.7-14% [4,5]. Pneumonia is seen with increased incidence in high risk patient groups such as the elderly, smokers, patients with immunodeficiencies and co-morbidities [6]. Early initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is the cornerstone in treatment of pneumonia and has been shown to shorten the course of disease and lessen the risk of complications and mortality [7].
In the acute phase of the disease, in addition to effective antimicrobial treatment, supportive treatment is important to optimize the respiratory care of the patients. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) delivered through a face mask is widely used as supportive treatment and improves oxygenation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure compared to oxygen delivered by mask [8]. CPAP also improves oxygenation in patients with pneumonia in a hospital setting compared to oxygen therapy, but the effect quickly resolves after discontinuation, and CPAP has failed to show effect on endotracheal intubation rate, hospital mortality and length of intensive care unit stay in patients with acute respiratory failure [8-10].
There are, to the investigators knowledge, no published studies who evaluate the effect of MIE on patients with acute respiratory-tract infections without neuromuscular disease.
The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and effect of MIE on patients hospitalized due to lower respiratory-tract infections and examine their outcome with the current standard treatment of CPAP.
Hypothesis Patients receiving MIE have better mobilization of secretions from the lower airways, and thereby faster oxygenation. Patients in the MIE group will have less need of ventilator support, and have a shorter admission to the intermediate care unit.
Methods
Study design This randomized clinical pilot study is conducted at the intermediate care unit at the Department of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. The intermediate care unit consists of 3 beds, all served by a nurse with special training in intermediate care. Continuous monitoring of blood pressure, pulse, oxygen saturation and respiratory rate is available. The assessment of the patient and admittance to the intermediate care unit is determined by the senior infectious disease doctor on call.
Randomization In total, 30 patients will be included and undergo 1:1 randomization to receive either CPAP or CPAP followed by MIE.
Interventions CPAP will be administered through MR 810 (Fisher \& Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) with standard settings of H2O and an oxygen flow of 15L/min [11]. CPAP is given by trained physiotherapists or nurses at the intermediate care unit.
MIE will be administered through the NIPPY Clearway (B\&D Electromedical, Stratford-Upon-Avon, Warwickshire, United Kingdom) with standard settings of insufflation 20 cm H2O and exsufflation 20 cm H2O, with possible individual changes from 10/-10 H2O up to 40/-40 H2O, and oxygen flow up to 15 l/min [12]. The standard settings will be set to five cycles of 2 seconds insufflation, 3 seconds exsufflation with a three second pause between each cycle. Every treatment session consists of five rounds of five cycles, in all 25 insufflation/exsufflation, with time between each cycle of 30 seconds, meant used for suction. The MIE is given by trained physiotherapists or nurses at the intermediate care unit.
Clinical data The following data will be registered for each patient: age, sex, comorbidities, the severity of pneumonia using the CURB-65 score [13], chest radiograph findings, antibiotic treatment up to and during the admission, days of admission, hours admitted to the semi-intensive unit, transfer to intensive care unit (ICU), intubation and mechanical ventilation, in-hospital and 30-days mortality and re-admittance within 30 days of discharge. During the admission in the intermediate care unit, number of CPAP and MIE treatments, oxygenation and oxygen need (liters/min) every 2 hours for the first 24 hours, hereafter every 4 hours, respiratory rate every 6 hours for the first 24 hours, hereafter every day, and the daily number of suction in pharynx or trachea in each patient will be registered.
Paraclinical data For each patient, microbial growth from blood and sputum cultures will be registered, as will Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) results from sputum samples and relevant bacterial serology during admission, C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC) and urea at time of admission, time of entering the intermediate care unit, time of discharge from the intermediate care unit and time of discharge from the hospital.
Statistical analysis Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum will be used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. A p-value of < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. The statistical analyses will be performed using STATA version 13.0.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized non-blinded controlled pilot study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation arm | Experimental | Device: Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MIE)MIE will be given as prescribed by physician responsible at the intermediate care unit, typically every 4 hours. MIE will be administered with standard settings of insufflation 20 cm H2O and exsufflation 20 cm H2O, with possible individual changes from 10/-10 H2O up to 40/-40 H2O, and oxygen flow up to 15 l/min. The standard settings will be set to five cycles of 2 seconds insufflation, 3 seconds exsufflation with a three second pause between each cycle. Every treatment session consists of five rounds of five cycles, in all 25 insufflation/exsufflation, with time between each cycle of 30 seconds, meant used for suction. |
| CPAP arm | No intervention | –CPAP will be given as prescribed by the physician responsible at the intermediate care unit, typically every 4 hours. CPAP will be administered with standard settings of H2O and an oxygen flow of 15L/min. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Community acquired or nosocomial pneumonia, diagnosed by new infiltrate on an x-ray chest and symptoms and/or objective findings acute lower airway infection
- 18 years or older
- able to participate in CPAP treatment 10 cm H2O for 5 minutes
- able to provide written consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- pneumothorax less than 4 weeks prior to admission
- current pleural tube
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MIE)Also: NIPPY ClearwayRandomization of 30 patients, 15 in each arm, to receive either CPAP or MIE. | Device | Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation arm |
Primary outcome
Admission time in intermediate care unit
Time frame: Admission to intermediate care unit (expected approx. 3-5 days)
Time (in hours) of each patient spent admitted to the intermediate care unit
Need of mechanical ventilation
Time frame: From admission to discharge/death, in the department responsible for the study, the mean duration of admittance is 7 days. Need of ventilation will be registered by investigator through review of patient chart after discharge from hospital.
For each patient; any need of mechanical ventilation (yes/no) during the entire hospital admission in which the patient is included in the study.
5 secondary outcomes
Oxygenation therapy
Time frame: During the entire admission to the intermediate care unit (expected to be approx. 3-5 days) oxygen therapy will be registered every 2 hours for the first 24 hours of admittance, and every 4 hours thereafter until discharge.
Oxygenation saturation
Time frame: During the entire admission to the intermediate care unit (expected to be approx. 3-5 days) oxygen saturation will be registered every 2 hours for the first 24 hours of admittance, and every 4 hours thereafter until discharge.
Respiratory rate
Time frame: Registered at admission to the intermediate care unit, every 6th hour for the first 24 hours thereafter, and every 24 hours for the duration of admission to the intermediate care unit (approx.3-5 days).
Need of suction
Time frame: During the entire admission to the intermediate care unit (approx.3-5 days), every episode of suction will be registered by the treating nurse, and total number of episodes will be registered every 24th hours until discharge.
Treatment related adverse events
Time frame: Registered daily on patient chart forms during entire admission to the intermediate care unit, and orally reported to the principal investigator during the admissions (approx. 3-5 days per patient).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Oct 2018.
- BackgroundEllison RT III, Donowitz GR. Acute pneumonia. In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 8th Edn. Philadelphia, Elsevier Saunders, 2015; pp. 829-831.
- Results publication: PubMed 17894900Homnick DN. Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation for airway mucus clearance. Respir Care. 2007 Oct;52(10):1296-305; discussion 1306-7.
- Results publication: PubMed 19863831Chatwin M, Simonds AK. The addition of mechanical insufflation/exsufflation shortens airway-clearance sessions in neuromuscular patients with chest infection. Respir Care. 2009 Nov;54(11):1473-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 15364756Winck JC, Goncalves MR, Lourenco C, Viana P, Almeida J, Bach JR. Effects of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation on respiratory parameters for patients with chronic airway secretion encumbrance. Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3):774-80. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3.774.
- Results publication: PubMed 19783532Lim WS, Baudouin SV, George RC, Hill AT, Jamieson C, Le Jeune I, Macfarlane JT, Read RC, Roberts HJ, Levy ML, Wani M, Woodhead MA; Pneumonia Guidelines Committee of the BTS Standards of Care Committee. BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: update 2009. Thorax. 2009 Oct;64 Suppl 3:iii1-55. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.121434. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 21533875Welte T. Risk factors and severity scores in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: prediction of severity and mortality. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jan;31(1):33-47. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1272-4. Epub 2011 May 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 23586347Blasi F, Garau J, Medina J, Avila M, McBride K, Ostermann H; REACH study group. Current management of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia across Europe: outcomes from REACH. Respir Res. 2013 Apr 15;14(1):44. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-44.
- Results publication: PubMed 11066186Delclaux C, L'Her E, Alberti C, Mancebo J, Abroug F, Conti G, Guerin C, Schortgen F, Lefort Y, Antonelli M, Lepage E, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Treatment of acute hypoxemic nonhypercapnic respiratory insufficiency with continuous positive airway pressure delivered by a face mask: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000 Nov 8;284(18):2352-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.18.2352.
- Results publication: PubMed 20154071Cosentini R, Brambilla AM, Aliberti S, Bignamini A, Nava S, Maffei A, Martinotti R, Tarsia P, Monzani V, Pelosi P. Helmet continuous positive airway pressure vs oxygen therapy to improve oxygenation in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, controlled trial. Chest. 2010 Jul;138(1):114-20. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2290. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 24817030Brambilla AM, Aliberti S, Prina E, Nicoli F, Del Forno M, Nava S, Ferrari G, Corradi F, Pelosi P, Bignamini A, Tarsia P, Cosentini R. Helmet CPAP vs. oxygen therapy in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure due to pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):942-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3325-5. Epub 2014 May 10.
- Results publicationMR810 technical manual. file:///C:/Users/lege4/Downloads/9e551a10-ef64-4514-a1bf-ce17cf08451e.pdf Date last accessed: July 12th 2017.
- Results publicationNIPPY Clearway user manual. http://nippyventilator.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2007v5-February2015-Clearway-IFU-English.pdf Date last updated: February 2015. Date last accessed: July 12th 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. No current plan for IPD sharing, will be reconsidered when we have decided if the pilot project will be expanded.
Related trials for Pneumonia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruiting
Expanded Diagnostic Strategy in Older Adults Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Acute Respiratory Infection
Acute Respiratory Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Isik Johansen, Prof. principal investigator
Odense University Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MIE) in people with Pneumonia, run by Odense University Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Admission time in intermediate care unit (time frame: Admission to intermediate care unit (expected approx. 3-5 days)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03714321, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2018.