AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseNCT03714802

Modified T-Stenting With Szabo Technique Versus T-Stenting for Bifurcation Lesions in Coronary Heart Diseases

A study testing Szabo T-Stenting Technique and T-Stenting Technique in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital at 2 sites in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study will compare clinical outcomes of modified T-stenting with Szabo technique with T-stenting for bifurcation lesions in coronary heart diseases. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
What is being tested?
Szabo T-Stenting Technique and T-Stenting Technique
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
100 participants
Where
2 sitesChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2019to 31 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient must be at least ≥18 years of age.
  • Lesions are eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
  • Patient has stable/unstable angina or myocardial infarction (MI).
  • Bifurcation lesions (Medina 1,1,1/0,1,1/1,0,1) without left main ostial lesions.
  • Downstream lesions could be covered by two stents.
  • Diameter of vessel ≥2.25mm
  • Diameter stenosis in main vessel and side branch ≥ 50% by visual estimation.

Who cannot join

  • Severe tortuosity or calcification affected procedural success.
  • Patient was allergic to the study stent or protocol-required concomitant medications.
  • Patient is intolerable to dual anti-platelet therapy.
  • Patient has any other serious medical illness that may reduce life expectancy to<12 months.
  • Patient is a woman who is pregnant or nursing.
  • Patient has a planned procedure that may cause non-compliance with the protocol or confound data interpretation.
  • Patient is participating in another clinical trial that has not reached its primary endpoint within 24 months after the index procedure.
  • Coronary restenosis.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

China2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Zhongshan Hospital

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200032

    Hongbo Yang, M.D., 13585890793, yang.hongbo@zs-hospital.sh.cn

    Zheyong Huang, M.D., 13512100180, huang.zheyong@zs-hospital.sh.cn

    Recruiting
  • Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

    Shanghai, 200032

    Junbo Ge, Professor

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Modified T-Stenting With Szabo Technique Versus T-Stenting for Bifurcation Lesions in Coronary Heart Diseases: SZABO Trial

The study will compare clinical outcomes of modified T-stenting with Szabo technique with T-stenting for bifurcation lesions in coronary heart diseases.

Read the detailed description

Accurate deployment of stents in ostial lesions is difficult with traditional angiographic guidance. Szabo technique, which used a second angioplasty guide wire to anchor the stent by passing the proximal end of the anchor wire through the last cell of the stent, demonstrated accurate placement of the stents in ostial locations. In bifurcation lesions, 2-stent strategy positioning with Szabo technique was not investigated. Modified T-stenting with Szabo technique may improve prognosis of bifurcation lesions through reducing stents overlap. There is no clinical trial focuses on the effect and outcome of Szabo technique for coronary artery bifurcation lesions in contrast with conventional strategy.

In this study, the authors choose the closest 2-stent strategy, T-stenting, as control. We hope to determine whether a planned Szabo 2-stent technique is superior to T-stenting for patients with bifurcation lesions.

Patients with bifurcation lesions will be randomly assigned to receive Szabo 2-stent technique or T-stenting strategy. Clinical outcomes and imaging assessment will be used to estimate their effects.

Being tested
Szabo T-Stenting Technique, T-Stenting Technique
Keywords
bifurcation lesion, percutaneous coronary intervention, Szabo, T-stenting
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Szabo T-Stenting TechniqueProcedure or surgery

    2-stent strategy was performed using modified T-stenting with Szabo technique in bifurcation lesions. First, stent was implanted in the side branch with Szabo technique. Then, stent was implanted in the main branch. Finally, kissing balloon inflation was performed.

  • T-Stenting TechniqueProcedure or surgery

    2-stent strategy was performed using traditional T-stenting technique in bifurcation lesions. First, stent was implanted in the side branch with angiographic guidance. Then, stent was implanted in the main branch. Finally, kissing balloon inflation was performed.

Study groups in NCT03714802
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Szabo T-Stenting TechniqueExperimentalPatients received 2-stents implantation guided with Szabo technique in bifurcation lesion.
Receives: Procedure: Szabo T-Stenting Technique; Procedure: T-Stenting Technique
T-Stenting TechniquePlacebo comparatorPatients received 2-stents implantation guided with T-stenting technique in bifurcation lesion.
Receives: Procedure: Szabo T-Stenting Technique; Procedure: T-Stenting Technique

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization

    record in follow-up

    Measured: 1 year after coronary angiography

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. rate of all cause death

    Recorded in follow-up

    Measured: 30 days and 12 months after primary angiography

  2. rate of cardiac death rate

    Recorded in follow-up

    Measured: 30 days and 12 months after primary angiography

  3. rate of recurrent myocardial infarction rate

    Recorded in follow-up

    Measured: 30 days and 12 months after primary angiography

  4. rate of target vessel revascularization rate

    Recorded in follow-up

    Measured: 30 days and 12 months after primary angiography

  5. rate of stent thrombosis

    Recorded in follow-up

    Measured: 30 days and 12 months after primary angiography

  6. residual stenosis degree

    Measured through intravenous ultrasound

    Measured: Immediately after stent implantation and 12 months after primary angiography

  7. residual stenosis of side branch

    Measured through angiography

    Measured: Immediately after stent implantation and 12 months after primary angiography

  8. late lumen loss

    Measured through intravenous ultrasound

    Measured: index procedure and 12 months follow up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Oct 2018
  2. Study start1 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03714802
Sponsor's protocol ID
SZABO Trial
Status last verified
Oct 2018
First submitted
21 Sep 2018
Last updated
5 Mar 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Szabo T-Stenting Technique and T-Stenting Technique in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital at 2 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Hongbo Yang, M.D. (008613585890793 ext. 00862164223006, yang.hongbo@zs-hospital.sh.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization (time frame: 1 year after coronary angiography). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in