AzTrials
AzTrials

SepsisPhase 3FAARVNCT03715556

Control Versus Liberal Cardiac Frequency in Patients in Sepse With Atrial Fibrillation of High Ventricular Response

A Phase 3 study testing Amiodarone and 0.9% physiological solution in people with Sepsis and Septic Shock, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Amiodarone is considered the medicine of choice in heart rate control in critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation with high ventricular response. However, a recent retrospective study showed a greater number of events in critical patients in whom there was an attempt to control versus in which there was no. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Sepsis, Septic Shock, Atrial Fibrillation
What is being tested?
Amiodarone and 0.9% physiological solution
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
126 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
1 Dec 2018to 1 Dec 2021
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Permanent FA presence with FC> 110 bpm
  • Presence of infection (any infectious outbreak)
  • Cardiovascular dysfunction - need for vasopressor drugs (noradrenaline, adrenaline or vasopressin) to maintain SBP> 90 mmHg
  • Signed consent form

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • Body mass index greater than 40 kg / m2
  • Contraindication to the use of oral or parenteral anticoagulants
  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <35%
  • Valvular Heart Disease
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Contraindication to the use of amiodarone
  • Child C cirrhosis
  • Dialytic chronic renal insufficiency
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Acute myocarditis
  • Pulmonary thromboembolism
  • Terminal neoplasia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Alexandre Soeiro, MD contact

+55112661-5299

alexandre.soeiro@bol.com.br

Brazil1 site
  • Instituto do Coração - HMFMUSP

    São Paulo, 05403000

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Prospective, Randomized and Blind Comparative Analysis Between Attraction of Restrict Control Versus Liberal Cardiac Frequency in Patients in Sepse With Atrial Fibrillation of High Ventricular Response

Amiodarone is considered the medicine of choice in heart rate control in critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation with high ventricular response. However, a recent retrospective study showed a greater number of events in critical patients in whom there was an attempt to control versus in which there was no. Therefore, the prospective and randomized comparative use of amiodarone in this group of patients has not yet been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the use of amiodarone (restricted group) versus placebo (liberal group) in heart rate control in atrial fibrillation with high ventricular response in patients with sepsis and vasopressor cardiovascular dysfunction. For this, a unicentric, randomized, blind and prospective study will be performed, in which the restrictive versus liberal strategy is performed in a comparative way. Hospital data (test results, medical evolutions complications) of patients will be analyzed to calculate safety and effectiveness. Expected results: The liberal strategy is superior to the restrictive strategy and causes fewer adverse events.

Being tested
Amiodarone, 0.9% physiological solution
Medical subject headings
Sepsis, Shock, Septic, Atrial Fibrillation, Ventricular Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AmiodaroneDrug

    Administration of the drug will be blinded within the first 48 hours for the principal investigator. Amiodarone (5 mg / kg EV in 30 minutes) will be the drug of choice in the Restricted group blinded to the principal investigator. If there is no reversal / control and there is no adverse event, a further dose of the same previously administered medicinal product will be performed within 30 minutes, amiodarone 3 mg / kg. After the second dose, continuous infusion of amiodarone at a dose of 900 mg in 24 hours will be initiated.

  • 0.9% physiological solutionDrug

    Administration of 0.9% physiological solution.

Study groups in NCT03715556
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AmiodaroneActive comparatorAmiodarone (5 mg / kg EV in 30 minutes) will be the drug of choice in the Restricted group blinded to the principal investigator. If there is no reversal / control and there is no adverse event, a further dose of the same previously administered medicinal product will be performed within 30 minutes, amiodarone 3 mg / kg. After the second dose, continuous infusion of amiodarone at a dose of 900 mg in 24 hours will be initiated. Administration of the drug will be blinded within the first hour to the principal investigator.
Receives: Drug: Amiodarone; Drug: 0.9% physiological solution
No interventionPlacebo comparatorThe Liberal group will receive only 0.9% physiological solution, also blinded to the principal investigator.
Receives: Drug: 0.9% physiological solution

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Complications of safety outcomes

    Need for orotracheal intubation, Bradycardia requiring specific treatment or transvenous pacemaker, Confirmed embolic event, Need for association of another vasoactive drug or dose increase of already used vasoactive drug> 50% of initial, Cardiorespiratory arrest, Death

    Measured: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Effectiveness in the control of the heart rate

    Comparison between the effectiveness in the control of the heart rate of AF among patients of the Restricted versus Liberal group. Effective control will be considered when the patient reaches heart rate <100 bpm

    Measured: 48 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Oct 2018
  2. Study start1 Dec 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
126 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03715556
Sponsor's protocol ID
PSInCor-FAARVSepsis
Acronym
FAARV
Status last verified
Oct 2018
First submitted
19 Oct 2018
Last updated
23 Oct 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Amiodarone and 0.9% physiological solution in people with Sepsis and Septic Shock, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Alexandre Soeiro, MD (+55112661-5299, alexandre.soeiro@bol.com.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Complications of safety outcomes (time frame: 48 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in