Active Non-segmental VitiligoPhase 2NCT03715829
A Phase 2b Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Profile Of PF-06651600 And PF-06700841 In Active Non-segmental Vitiligo Subjects
A Phase 2 study testing PF-06651600, PF06700841 and narrow-band UVB phototherapy in people with Active Non-segmental Vitiligo, run by Pfizer at 92 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
This is a Phase 2b, randomized, double blind, parallel group, multicenter study with an extension period. The study will have a maximum duration of approximately 60 weeks. This includes an up to 4 weeks Screening Period, a 24 week dose ranging period, an up to 24 week extension period and a 8 week Follow up Period. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Active Non-segmental Vitiligo
- What is being tested?
- PF-06651600, PF06700841 and narrow-band UVB phototherapy
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 366 participants
- Where
- 92 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- 26 Nov 2018to 5 Feb 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female subjects between 18-65 years of age, inclusive, at time of informed consent.
- Must have moderate to severe active non-segmental vitiligo.
Who cannot join
- History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or positive HIV serology at screening,
- Infected with hepatitis B or hepatitis C viruses.
- Have evidence of active or latent or inadequately treated infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB)
Trial locations and contacts
92 sites in 10 countries.
92 sites in 10 countries
United States40 sites
University Physicians Group
Austin, Texas, 78701
Tobias & Battite, Inc.
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Brookside Dermatology Associates
Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06606
New England Research Associates, LLC
Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06606
Chevy Chase Dermatology Center (TrialSpark, Inc.)
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815
TrialSpark - Samantha Toerge, MD
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815
Advanced Skin and MOHS Surgery Center, c/o TrialSpark, Inc.
Chicago, Illinois, 60657
Remington-Davis, Inc. Clinical Research
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
ForeFront Dermatology
Columbus, Ohio, 43220
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390-9191
Henry Ford Hospital Department of Dermatology
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Pickens Academic Tower
Houston, Texas, 77030
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Marvel Research, LLC
Huntington Beach, California, 92647
University of California, Irvine, Dermatology Clinical Research Center
Irvine, California, 92697
Vitiligo and Pigmentation Institute Of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90036
New Horizon Research Center
Miami, Florida, 33165
University of Minnesota Department of Dermatology
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Dermatology Specialist, Inc.
Murrieta, California, 92562
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10003
Upper West Side Dermatology c/o TrialSpark, Inc
New York, New York, 10023
MDCS: Medical Dermatology & Cosmetic Surgery (TrialSpark, Inc.)
New York, New York, 10065
Virginia Clinical Research, Inc
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Dermatology Specialists, Inc.
Oceanside, California, 92056
South Nassau Dermatology
Oceanside, New York, 11572
TrialSpark, Inc. - Russell W. Cohen, MD
Oceanside, New York, 11572
Park Avenue Dermatology
Orange Park, Florida, 32073
TrialSpark - Ronald Shore, MD
Rockville, Maryland, 20852
UC Davis Health
Sacramento, California, 95816
ForCare Clinical Research
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Vital Prospects Clinical Research Institute, PC
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
The Dermatology Group, P.C.
Verona, New Jersey, 07044
Tamjidi Skin Institute (TrialSpark, Inc.)
Vienna, Virginia, 22182
PMG Research of Wilmington, LLC
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28411
UMass Memorial Medical Center, Hahnemann Campus
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
Investigational Drug Service Pharmacy
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
UMass Memorial Medical Center Ear Nose and Throat
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
Canada17 sites
CCA Medical Research
Ajax, Ontario, L1S 7K8
Guenther Research Inc.
London, Ontario, N6A 3H7
Lynderm Research Inc.
Markham, Ontario, L3P 1X3
DermEdge Research
Mississauga, Ontario, L5H 1G9
Innovaderm Research Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1
North York Research Inc.
North York, Ontario, M2M 4J5
The Centre for Clinical Trials
Oakville, Ontario, L6J 7W5
Centre de Recherche Dermatologique du Quebec metropolitain (CRDQ)
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4X7
Centre de Recherche Saint-Louis
Québec, Quebec, G1W 4R4
Centre de Recherche Saint-Louis
Québec, Quebec, G1W1S2
The Centre for Dermatology
Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 1A5
Diex Research Sherbrooke Inc.
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1L 0H8
Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical Inc.
Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7
Enverus Medical Research
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 0C6
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E8
K.Papp Clinical Research
Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4
Wiseman Dermatology Research Inc.
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3Z4
Australia7 sites
Skin Health Institute
Carlton, Victoria, 3053
The Skin Hospital
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, 2010
Sinclair Dermatology
East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002
Premier Specialists Pty Ltd
Kogarah, New South Wales, 2217
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, 3050
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, 3052
Veracity Clinical Research Pty Ltd
Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102
Germany6 sites
Fachklinik Bad Bentheim, Fachbereich Dermatologie und Allergologie, Dermatologische Ambulanz
Bad Bentheim, 48455
Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen Hautklinik Studienambulanz
Erlangen, 91054
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie
Frankfurt am Main, 60590
Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck CCIM
Lübeck, 23538
Universitaetsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz
Mainz, 55131
Universitaetsklinikum Muenster
Münster, 48149
Japan5 sites
Nippon Medical School Hospital
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603
Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital
Kofu, Yamanashi, 400-8506
Nagoya City University Hospital - Dermatology
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 467-8602
Tohoku University Hospital
Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574
Tokyo Medical University Hospital
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023
South Korea5 sites
Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 10326
Inha University Hospital
Incheon, 22332
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, 03722
The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent's Hospital
Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16247
Ajou University Hospital
Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499
Spain5 sites
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08041
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
Córdoba, 14004
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
Madrid, 28034
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe
Valencia, 46026
Belgium3 sites
Hôpital Erasme Dermatology
Brussels, 1070
UZ Brussel - Dermatology
Brussels, 1090
UZ Gent - Dermatology
Ghent, 9000
Taiwan3 sites
Chang Gung Medical Foundation - Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 83301
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
Tainan, 70403
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 10002
Italy1 site
Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico,
Roma, RM, 00144
About this study
Official title: A PHASE 2B RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER, DOSE-RANGING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY PROFILE OF PF-06651600 WITH A PARTIALLY BLINDED EXTENSION PERIOD TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PF-06651600 AND PF-06700841 IN SUBJECTS WITH ACTIVE NON-SEGMENTAL VITILIGO
This is a Phase 2b, randomized, double blind, parallel group, multicenter study with an extension period. The study will have a maximum duration of approximately 60 weeks. This includes an up to 4 weeks Screening Period, a 24 week dose ranging period, an up to 24 week extension period and a 8 week Follow up Period.
- Conditions
- Active Non-segmental Vitiligo
- Being tested
- PF-06651600, placebo, PF06700841, narrow-band UVB phototherapy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PF-06651600Drug
Induction dose 1. Oral tablet taken QD
PF-06651600Drug
Induction dose 2. Oral tablet taken QD
PF-06651600Drug
Maintenance dose A. Oral tablet taken QD
PF-06651600Drug
Maintenance Dose B. Oral tablet taken QD
PF-06651600Drug
Maintenance Dose C. Oral tablet taken QD
placeboDrug
placebo
PF06700841Drug
Oral tablet taken QD
narrow-band UVB phototherapyDevice
Phototherapy will be combined with PF-06651600
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 | Experimental | Induction dose 1 given once a day(QD) for 4 weeks followed by maintenance dose A given QD for 20 weeks Receives: Drug: PF-06651600 |
| Cohort 2 | Experimental | Induction dose 2 given QD for 4 weeks followed by maintenance dose A given QD for 20 weeks Receives: Drug: PF-06651600 |
| Cohort 3 | Experimental | Maintenance dose A given QD for 24 weeks Receives: Drug: PF-06651600 |
| Cohort 4 | Experimental | Maintenance dose B given QD for 24 weeks Receives: Drug: PF-06651600 |
| Cohort 5 | Experimental | Maintenance dose C given QD for 24 weeks Receives: Drug: PF-06651600 |
| Cohort 6 | Placebo comparator | Placebo given QD for 24 weeks Receives: Drug: placebo |
| Extension Cohort 1 | Experimental | 4 week drug holiday (no drug given) followed by PF-06700841 oral tablet QD for 20 weeks Receives: Drug: PF06700841 |
| Extension Cohort 2 | Experimental | Induction dose 1 given QD for 4 weeks followed by maintenance dose A given QD for 20 weeks in conjunction with narrow band UVB phototherapy Receives: Drug: PF-06651600; Device: narrow-band UVB phototherapy |
| Extension Cohort 3 | Experimental | Induction dose 1 given QD for 4 weeks followed by maintenance dose A given QD for 20 weeks Receives: Drug: PF-06651600 |
| Extension Cohort 4 | Experimental | Maintenance dose A given QD for 24 weeks Receives: Drug: PF-06651600 |
| Extension Cohort 5 | Experimental | Maintenance dose B given QD for 24 weeks Receives: Drug: PF-06651600 |
| Extension Cohort 6 | No intervention | Observation period for 24 weeks |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Change From Baseline in Central Read Facial-Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) at Week 24 - Dose Ranging (DR) Period
Central read F-VASI was assessed based on the facial photographs taken at the site. Central read F-VASI was calculated using a formula that included contribution of affected facial surface areas showing all 6 different depigmentation rates (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.9 and 1) with a modified method: F-VASI (central read)=Ʃ [Affected Facial Surface Area] × 4 × [Depigmentation Rates]. Face was defined as the area from the hairline on top of the forehead to the jawline at the bottom of the cheeks. F-VASI (central read) ranged from 0.000 to 4.000 by defining the affected Facial Surface Area (expressed as the value between 0.0 to 1.0) being 4% of total Body Surface Area. The higher score of F-VASI signified severer symptoms of non-segmental vitiligo. Percent change from baseline in central read F-VASI = ((post-baseline central read F-VASI - baseline central read F-VASI)/baseline central read F-VASI)×100. A negative percent change from baseline in central read F-VASI signified an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24 (Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to Study Day 18)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) up to Week 24 - DR Period
Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily need to have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An AE was considered a TEAE if the event started during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day and time/start time, if collected, but before the last dose plus the lag time were flagged as TEAEs. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that was considered to be an important medical event. Causality to study treatment was determined by the investigator.
Measured: 24 weeks
Number of Participants With the TEAEs of Anaemia, Neutropenia, Thrombocytopenia and Lymphopenia - DR Period
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily need to have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. The abnormal test findings, clinically significant signs and symptoms of anaemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and lymphopenia were reported as AEs. The clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
An AE was considered a TEAE if the event started during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day and time/start time, if collected, but before the last dose plus the lag time were flagged as TEAEs.
Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Lipid Profile up to Week 24 - DR Period
Participants had to abstain from all food and drink (except water and non-investigational products) for an 8-hour overnight fast prior to fasting lipid profile panel collection. Fasting lipid assessment included total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides. The clinical meaningfulness was determined by the investigator.
Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Liver Function Test Values Meeting the Protocol-Specified Discontinuation Criteria - DR Period
Liver function tests included tests of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and total bilirubin.
Measured: 24 weeks
Number of Participants With TEAEs and SAEs - Extension (Ext) Period
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily need to have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An AE was considered a TEAE if the event started during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day and time/start time, if collected, but before the last dose plus the lag time were flagged as TEAEs. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening (immediate risk of death); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that was considered to be an important medical event. Causality to study treatment was determined by the investigator.
Measured: 24 weeks
Number of Participants With the TEAEs of Anaemia, Neutropenia, Thrombocytopenia and Lymphopenia - Ext Period
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily need to have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. The abnormal test findings, clinically significant signs and symptoms of anaemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and lymphopenia were reported as AEs. The clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
An AE was considered a TEAE if the event started during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day and time/start time, if collected, but before the last dose plus the lag time were flagged as TEAEs.
Measured: 24 weeks
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Lipid Profile - Ext Period
Participants had to abstain from all food and drink (except water and non-investigational products) for an 8-hour overnight fast prior to fasting lipid profile panel collection. Fasting lipid assessment included total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. The clinical meaningfulness was determined by the investigator.
Measured: 24 Weeks
Number of Participants With Liver Function Test Values Meeting the Protocol-Specified Discontinuation Criteria - Ext Period
Liver function tests included tests of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and total bilirubin.
Measured: 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (24)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Central F-VASI75 at Week 24 - DR Period
This outcome measure was the percentage of participants achieving at least 75% improvement from baseline in central read F-VASI (F-VASI75) at Week 24. A negative percent change from baseline in central read F-VASI signified an improvement. The central read F-VASI75 response rate was analyzed by first treating the missing data (non-COVID-19 related) as non responders and then applying Chan and Zhang exact confidence interval (CI) method at Week 24.
Central read F-VASI75=1 if percent change from baseline ≥75; central read F-VASI75=0 if percent change from baseline <75. Percent change from baseline in F-VASI=((post-baseline F-VASI - baseline F-VASI)/baseline F-VASI)×100. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to study Day 18.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving T-VASI50 at Week 24 - DR Period
Total body VASI (T-VASI) was calculated using a formula that included contribution from 6 different body regions (possible range, 0-100) with a modified method: T-VASI= Ʃ[Hand Units]×[Depigmentation]. One hand unit, which encompassed the palm plus the volar surface of all the digits, was approximately 1% of the total body surface area and was used as a guide to estimate the baseline percentage of vitiligo involvement of each body region. The body was divided into 6 separate and mutually exclusive regions: face/neck, hands, upper extremities (excluding hands), trunk, lower extremities (excluding feet), and feet. The extent of depigmentation was expressed by percentages: 0, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90% or 100%. The data below was the percentage of participants achieving at least 50% improvement from baseline in T-VASI (T-VASI50) at Week 24. Negative percent change from baseline in T-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in T-VASI at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The T-VASI was calculated using a formula that included contribution from 6 different body regions (possible range, 0-100) with a modified method: VASI = Ʃ [Hand Units] × [Depigmentation]. One hand unit, which encompassed the palm plus the volar surface of all the digits, was approximately 1% of the total body surface area and was used as a guide to estimate the baseline percentage of vitiligo involvement of each body region. The body was divided into 6 separate and mutually exclusive regions: face/neck, hands, upper extremities (excluding hands), trunk, lower extremities (excluding the feet), and feet. The extent of depigmentation was expressed by the following percentages: 0, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, or 100%. Percent change from baseline in T-VASI=((post-baseline T-VASI - baseline T-VASI)/baseline T-VASI)×100. Negative percent change from baseline in T-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Central Read F-VASI at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The central read F-VASI was assessed based on the facial photographs taken at the site. The central read F-VASI was calculated using a formula that included contribution of affected facial surface areas showing all 6 different depigmentation rates (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.9 and 1) with a modified method: F-VASI (central read)=Ʃ [Affected Facial Surface Area] × 4 × [Depigmentation Rates]. Face was defined as the area from the hairline on top of the forehead to the jawline at the bottom of the cheeks. F-VASI (central read) ranged from 0.000 to 4.000 by defining the affected Facial Surface Area (expressed as the value between 0.0 to 1.0) being 4% of total Body Surface Area.
Percent change from baseline in central read F-VASI = ((post-baseline central read F-VASI - baseline central read F-VASI)/baseline central read F-VASI)×100. Negative percent change from baseline in F-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to Study Day 18.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Local F-VASI at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The site assessment of the F-VASI was calculated using a formula that included contribution from face (possible range, 0.00 4.00): Local F-VASI = [Digit Units] × [Depigmentation] × 0.1. Scalp, neck, eyebrows, eyelashes, and vermilion were excluded from this calculation. The volar surface of 1 digit (the participant's thumb) was approximately 0.1% of the total body surface area and was used as a guide to estimate the baseline percentage of vitiligo involvement of face. The extent of depigmentation was expressed by the following percentages: 0, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, or 100%.
Percent change from baseline in Local F-VASI = ((post baseline Local F-VASI - baseline Local F-VASI)/baseline Local F-VASI)×100. Negative percent change from baseline in F-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percent Change From Baseline in SA-VES at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The Self-Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA-VES) was a validated patient report outcome measurement instrument to provide information about disease extent. Vitiligo Extent Score (VES) was a measure to express the overall vitiligo involvement of the body (extent). Clinical illustrations for 19 separate body areas that reflected different degrees of involvement (1%, 5%, 10%, 25%, 50% and 75% depigmentation) were chosen to represent the participant's skin lesions to get the total extent of the disease. VES was a sum of all surface measurement that was similar to VASI. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 16 and 24
Absolute Change From Baseline in T-VASI at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The T-VASI was calculated using a formula that included contribution from 6 different body regions (possible range, 0-100) with a modified method: VASI = Ʃ [Hand Units] × [Depigmentation]. One hand unit, which encompassed the palm plus the volar surface of all the digits, was approximately 1% of the total body surface area and was used as a guide to estimate the baseline percentage of vitiligo involvement of each body region. The body was divided into 6 separate and mutually exclusive regions: face/neck, hands, upper extremities (excluding hands), trunk, lower extremities (excluding the feet), and feet. The extent of depigmentation was expressed by the following percentages: 0, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, or 100%.
The absolute change from baseline in T-VASI was analyzed using the ANCOVA analysis. Negative change from baseline in T-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving T-VASI50 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
T-VASI was calculated by a formula that included contribution from 6 body regions (possible range, 0-100): T-VASI = Ʃ [Hand Units] × [Depigmentation]. One hand unit, which encompassed the palm plus the volar surface of all the digits, was approximately 1% of the total body surface area and was used as a guide to estimate the baseline percentage of vitiligo involvement of each body region. The body was divided into 6 mutually exclusive regions: face/neck, hands, upper extremities, trunk, lower extremities, and feet. The extent of depigmentation was expressed by the percentages: 0, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90% or 100%. The outcome measure was the percentage of participants achieving at least 50% improvement from baseline in T-VASI (T-VASI50). Percent change from baseline in T-VASI=((post-baseline T-VASI - baseline T-VASI)/baseline T-VASI)×100. Negative percent change from baseline in T-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving T-VASI75 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
T-VASI was calculated by a formula that included contribution from 6 body regions (possible range, 0-100): T-VASI = Ʃ [Hand Units] × [Depigmentation]. One hand unit, which encompassed the palm plus the volar surface of all the digits, was approximately 1% of the total body surface area and was used as a guide to estimate the baseline percentage of vitiligo involvement of each body region. The body was divided into 6 mutually exclusive regions: face/neck, hands, upper extremities, trunk, lower extremities, and feet. The extent of depigmentation was expressed by the percentages: 0, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90% or 100%. The outcome measure was the percentage of participants achieving at least 75% improvement from baseline in T-VASI (T-VASI75). Percent change from baseline in T-VASI=((post-baseline T-VASI - baseline T-VASI)/baseline T-VASI)×100. Negative percent change from baseline in T-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving T-VASI90 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
T-VASI was calculated by a formula that included contribution from 6 body regions (possible range, 0-100): T-VASI = Ʃ [Hand Units] × [Depigmentation]. One hand unit, which encompassed the palm plus the volar surface of all the digits, was approximately 1% of the total body surface area and was used as a guide to estimate the baseline percentage of vitiligo involvement of each body region. The body was divided into 6 mutually exclusive regions: face/neck, hands, upper extremities, trunk, lower extremities, and feet. The extent of depigmentation was expressed by the percentages: 0, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90% or 100%. The outcome measure was the percentage of participants achieving at least 90% improvement from baseline in T-VASI (T-VASI90). Percent change from baseline in T-VASI=((post-baseline T-VASI - baseline T-VASI)/baseline T-VASI)×100. Negative percent change from baseline in T-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving T-VASI100 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
T-VASI was calculated using a formula that included contribution from 6 body regions (possible range, 0-100): T-VASI = Ʃ [Hand Units] × [Depigmentation]. One hand unit, which encompassed the palm plus the volar surface of all the digits, was approximately 1% of the total body surface area and was used as a guide to estimate the baseline percentage of vitiligo involvement of each body region. The body was divided into 6 mutually exclusive regions: face/neck, hands, upper extremities, trunk, lower extremities, and feet. The extent of depigmentation was expressed by the percentages: 0, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90% or 100%. This outcome measure was the percentage of participants achieving 100% improvement from baseline in T-VASI (T-VASI100). Percent change from baseline in T-VASI = ((post-baseline T-VASI - baseline T-VASI)/baseline T-VASI)×100. Negative percent change from baseline in T-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Central Read F-VASI50 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The central read F-VASI was calculated using a formula that included contribution of affected facial surface areas showing all 6 different depigmentation rates (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.9 and 1) with a modified method: F-VASI (central read)=Ʃ [Affected Facial Surface Area] × 4 × [Depigmentation Rates]. Face was defined as the area from the hairline on top of the forehead to the jawline at the bottom of the cheeks. F-VASI (central read) ranged from 0.000 to 4.000 by defining the affected Facial Surface Area (expressed as the value between 0.0 to 1.0) being 4% of total Body Surface Area. Percent change from baseline in F-VASI = ((post-baseline F-VASI - baseline F-VASI)/baseline F-VASI)×100. This outcome measure was the percentage of participants achieving at least 50% improvement in central read F-VASI from baseline (F-VASI50). Negative percent change from baseline in F-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to Study Day 18.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Central Read F-VASI75 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The central read F-VASI was calculated using a formula that included contribution of affected facial surface areas showing all 6 different depigmentation rates (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.9 and 1) with a modified method: F-VASI (central read)=Ʃ [Affected Facial Surface Area] × 4 × [Depigmentation Rates]. Face was defined as the area from the hairline on top of the forehead to the jawline at the bottom of the cheeks. F-VASI (central read) ranged from 0.000 to 4.000 by defining the affected Facial Surface Area (expressed as the value between 0.0 to 1.0) being 4% of total Body Surface Area. Percent change from baseline in F-VASI = ((post-baseline F-VASI - baseline F-VASI)/baseline F-VASI)×100. This outcome measure was the percentage of participants achieving at least 75% improvement in central read F-VASI from baseline (F-VASI75). Negative percent change from baseline in F-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to Study Day 18.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Central Read F-VASI90 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The central read F-VASI was calculated using a formula that included contribution of affected facial surface areas showing all 6 different depigmentation rates (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.9 and 1) with a modified method: F-VASI (central read)=Ʃ [Affected Facial Surface Area] × 4 × [Depigmentation Rates]. Face was defined as the area from the hairline on top of the forehead to the jawline at the bottom of the cheeks. F-VASI (central read) ranged from 0.000 to 4.000 by defining the affected Facial Surface Area (expressed as the value between 0.0 to 1.0) being 4% of total Body Surface Area. Percent change from baseline in F-VASI = ((post-baseline F-VASI - baseline F-VASI)/baseline F-VASI)×100. This outcome measure was the percentage of participants achieving at least 90% improvement in central read F-VASI from baseline (F-VASI90). Negative percent change from baseline in F-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to Study Day 18.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Central Read F-VASI100 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The central read F-VASI was calculated using a formula that included contribution of affected facial surface areas showing all 6 different depigmentation rates (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.9 and 1) with a modified method: F-VASI (central read)=Ʃ [Affected Facial Surface Area] × 4 × [Depigmentation Rates]. Face was defined as the area from the hairline on top of the forehead to the jawline at the bottom of the cheeks. F-VASI (central read) ranged from 0.000 to 4.000 by defining the affected Facial Surface Area (expressed as the value between 0.0 to 1.0) being 4% of total Body Surface Area. Percent change from baseline in F-VASI = ((post-baseline F-VASI - baseline F-VASI)/baseline F-VASI)×100. This outcome measure was the percentage of participants achieving at least 100% improvement in central read F-VASI from baseline (F-VASI100). Negative percent change from baseline in F-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to Study Day 18.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Local F-VASI50 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The site assessment of the F-VASI was calculated using a formula that included contribution from face (possible range, 0-4): Local F-VASI = [Digit Units] × [Depigmentation] × 0.1. Scalp, neck, eyebrows, eyelashes, and vermilion were excluded from this calculation. The volar surface of 1 digit (the participant's thumb) was approximately 0.1% of the total body surface area and was used as a guide to estimate the baseline percentage of vitiligo involvement of face. The extent of depigmentation was expressed by the following percentages: 0, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, or 100%. Percent change from baseline in Local F-VASI = ((post baseline Local F-VASI - baseline Local F-VASI)/baseline Local F-VASI)×100. This outcome measure was the percentage of participants achieving at least 50% improvement in site assessment F-VASI from baseline (F-VASI50). Negative percent change from baseline in F-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Local F-VASI75 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The site assessment of the F-VASI was calculated using a formula that included contribution from face (possible range, 0-4): Local F-VASI = [Digit Units] × [Depigmentation] × 0.1. Scalp, neck, eyebrows, eyelashes, and vermilion were excluded from this calculation. The volar surface of 1 digit (the participant's thumb) was approximately 0.1% of the total body surface area and was used as a guide to estimate the baseline percentage of vitiligo involvement of face. The extent of depigmentation was expressed by the following percentages: 0, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, or 100%. Percent change from baseline in Local F-VASI = ((post baseline Local F-VASI - baseline Local F-VASI)/baseline Local F-VASI)×100. This outcome measure was the percentage of participants achieving at least 75% improvement in site assessment F-VASI from baseline (F-VASI75). Negative percent change from baseline in F-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Local F-VASI90 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The site assessment of the F-VASI was calculated using a formula that included contribution from face (possible range, 0-4): Local F-VASI = [Digit Units] × [Depigmentation] × 0.1. Scalp, neck, eyebrows, eyelashes, and vermilion were excluded from this calculation. The volar surface of 1 digit (the participant's thumb) was approximately 0.1% of the total body surface area and was used as a guide to estimate the baseline percentage of vitiligo involvement of face. The extent of depigmentation was expressed by the following percentages: 0, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, or 100%. Percent change from baseline in Local F-VASI = ((post baseline Local F-VASI - baseline Local F-VASI)/baseline Local F-VASI)×100. This outcome measure was the percentage of participants achieving at least 90% improvement in site assessment F-VASI from baseline (F-VASI90). Negative percent change from baseline in F-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Local F-VASI100 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The site assessment of the F-VASI was calculated using a formula that included contribution from face (possible range, 0-4): Local F-VASI = [Digit Units] × [Depigmentation] × 0.1. Scalp, neck, eyebrows, eyelashes, and vermilion were excluded from this calculation. The volar surface of 1 digit (the participant's thumb) was approximately 0.1% of the total body surface area and was used as a guide to estimate the baseline percentage of vitiligo involvement of face. The extent of depigmentation was expressed by the following percentages: 0, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, or 100%. Percent change from baseline in Local F-VASI = ((post baseline Local F-VASI - baseline Local F-VASI)/baseline Local F-VASI)×100. This outcome measure was the percentage of participants achieving 100% improvement in site assessment F-VASI from baseline (F-VASI100). Negative percent change from baseline in F-VASI signified an improvement. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in Total VitiQoL Score at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The Vitiligo-Specific Quality of Life (VitiQoL) instrument was a reliable and validated vitiligo disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument which measured concepts relevant to vitiligo participants. The VitiQoL was a 15-item PRO measure which measured concepts of symptoms, daily activities, leisure activities, work, personal relationships and treatment. Responses ranged from "not at all" (scored 0) to "most of the time" (scored 6) and gave a minimum and maximum score from 0 to 90, with higher scores representing greater burden. The VitiQoL total score was calculated as sum of items 1-15.
The change from baseline in total VitiQoL score was analyzed using the mixed-effect models repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in VitiQoL Participation Limitation Domain Score at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The VitiQoL was a reliable and validated vitiligo disease specific HRQoL instrument which measured concepts relevant to vitiligo participants. The VitiQoL was a 15-item PRO measure which measured concepts of symptoms, daily activities, leisure activities, work, personal relationships and treatment. Responses ranged from "not at all" (scored 0) to "most of the time" (scored 6) and gave a minimum and maximum score from 0 to 90, with higher scores representing greater burden. The VitiQoL Participation Limitation domain score was the sum of items 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11, 14 and ranged from 0 to 42.
The change from baseline in VitiQoL Participation Limitation Domain Score was analyzed using the MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in VitiQoL Stigma Domain Score at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The VitiQoL was a reliable and validated vitiligo disease specific HRQoL instrument which measured concepts relevant to vitiligo participants. The VitiQoL was a 15-item PRO measure which measured concepts of symptoms, daily activities, leisure activities, work, personal relationships and treatment. Responses ranged from "not at all" (scored 0) to "most of the time" (scored 6) and gave a minimum and maximum score from 0 to 90, with higher scores representing greater burden. The VitiQoL Stigma domain score was the sum of items 1, 2, 5, 7 and 15, and ranged from 0 to 30.
The change from baseline in VitiQoL Stigma Domain Score was analyzed using the MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in VitiQoL Behaviors Domain Score at Designated Time Points - DR Period
The VitiQoL was a reliable and validated vitiligo disease specific HRQoL instrument which measured concepts relevant to vitiligo participants. The VitiQoL was a 15-item PRO measure which measured concepts of symptoms, daily activities, leisure activities, work, personal relationships and treatment. Responses ranged from "not at all" (scored 0) to "most of the time" (scored 6) and gave a minimum and maximum score from 0 to 90, with higher scores representing greater burden. The VitiQoL Behaviors domain score was the sum of items 8, 12 and 13, and ranged from 0 to 18.
The change from baseline in VitiQoL Behaviors Domain Score was analyzed using the MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving sIGA 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-Point Improvement at Week 24 - DR Period
The percentage of participants achieving a static Investigator Global Assessment (sIGA) Score 0/1 and sIGA ≥2-point improvement at Week 24 was presented in this outcome measure. The sIGA score ranged from 0 to 4.
The sIGA Score 0 represented "Clear" with no signs of loss of pigmentation with natural light or with Woods lamp examination.
The sIGA Score 1 represented "Almost Clear" with the following descriptors:
- Faint, barely detectable loss of pigmentation mainly located on dorsal hands, feet, bony prominences, and/or limited areas.
- Approximately 90% pigmentation within lesions.
- No or rare signs of Koebner phenomenon, confetti like or trichrome lesions could be present.
The sIGA Scores 2, 3 and 4 represented "Mild Vitiligo", "Moderate Vitiligo" and "Severe Vitiligo", respectively.
Measured: Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Oct 2018
- Study start26 Nov 2018
- Primary completion5 Feb 2021
- Study completion5 Feb 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Active Non-segmental VitiligoStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Dose ranging period is a parallel design. Extension period is a sequential design.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 366 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03715829
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B7981019
- Other IDs
- 2018-001271-20, 2018
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 25 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Chen Y, Lukic T, Chen AS, Adiri R, Tran H, Schaefer G, Ghosh P, Madhavan S, Soma K, Gamalo M. Automated Measurement of Depigmentation Extent with a New AI Tool Applied to the Example of Vitiligo. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jun;16(6):3139-3149. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01736-8. Epub 2026 May 4.
PubMed 42081176Yamaguchi Y, Peeva E, Duca ED, Facheris P, Bar J, Shore R, Cox LA, Sloan A, Thaci D, Ganesan A, Han G, Ezzedine K, Ye Z, Guttman-Yassky E. Ritlecitinib, a JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, stabilizes active lesions and repigments stable lesions in vitiligo. Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Jul 18;316(7):478. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03182-y.
PubMed 39023568Wojciechowski J, S Purohit V, Huh Y, Banfield C, Nicholas T. Evolution of Ritlecitinib Population Pharmacokinetic Models During Clinical Drug Development. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Dec;62(12):1765-1779. doi: 10.1007/s40262-023-01318-3. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
PubMed 37917289Guttman-Yassky E, Del Duca E, Da Rosa JC, Bar J, Ezzedine K, Ye Z, He W, Hyde C, Hassan-Zahraee M, Yamaguchi Y, Peeva E. Improvements in immune/melanocyte biomarkers with JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor ritlecitinib in vitiligo. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Jan;153(1):161-172.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.09.021. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
PubMed 37777018Ezzedine K, Peeva E, Yamaguchi Y, Cox LA, Banerjee A, Han G, Hamzavi I, Ganesan AK, Picardo M, Thaci D, Harris JE, Bae JM, Tsukamoto K, Sinclair R, Pandya AG, Sloan A, Yu D, Gandhi K, Vincent MS, King B. Efficacy and safety of oral ritlecitinib for the treatment of active nonsegmental vitiligo: A randomized phase 2b clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023 Feb;88(2):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
PubMed 36370907
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE 2B RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER, DOSE-RANGING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY PROFILE OF PF-06651600 WITH A PARTIALLY BLINDED EXTENSION PERIOD TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PF-06651600 AND PF-06700841 IN SUBJECTS WITH ACTIVE NON-SEGMENTAL VITILIGO
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03715829
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B7981019
- Conditions
- Active Non-segmental Vitiligo
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 366 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 26 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Feb 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 25 Mar 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a Phase 2b, randomized, double blind, parallel group, multicenter study with an extension period. The study will have a maximum duration of approximately 60 weeks. This includes an up to 4 weeks Screening Period, a 24 week dose ranging period, an up to 24 week extension period and a 8 week Follow up Period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 12
- Model description
- Dose ranging period is a parallel design. Extension period is a sequential design.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 | Experimental | Drug: PF-06651600Induction dose 1 given once a day(QD) for 4 weeks followed by maintenance dose A given QD for 20 weeks |
| Cohort 2 | Experimental | Drug: PF-06651600Induction dose 2 given QD for 4 weeks followed by maintenance dose A given QD for 20 weeks |
| Cohort 3 | Experimental | Drug: PF-06651600Maintenance dose A given QD for 24 weeks |
| Cohort 4 | Experimental | Drug: PF-06651600Maintenance dose B given QD for 24 weeks |
| Cohort 5 | Experimental | Drug: PF-06651600Maintenance dose C given QD for 24 weeks |
| Cohort 6 | Placebo comparator | Drug: placeboPlacebo given QD for 24 weeks |
| Extension Cohort 1 | Experimental | Drug: PF067008414 week drug holiday (no drug given) followed by PF-06700841 oral tablet QD for 20 weeks |
| Extension Cohort 2 | Experimental | Drug: PF-06651600, Device: narrow-band UVB phototherapyInduction dose 1 given QD for 4 weeks followed by maintenance dose A given QD for 20 weeks in conjunction with narrow band UVB phototherapy |
| Extension Cohort 3 | Experimental | Drug: PF-06651600Induction dose 1 given QD for 4 weeks followed by maintenance dose A given QD for 20 weeks |
| Extension Cohort 4 | Experimental | Drug: PF-06651600Maintenance dose A given QD for 24 weeks |
| Extension Cohort 5 | Experimental | Drug: PF-06651600Maintenance dose B given QD for 24 weeks |
| Extension Cohort 6 | No intervention | –Observation period for 24 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Male or female subjects between 18-65 years of age, inclusive, at time of informed consent.
- Must have moderate to severe active non-segmental vitiligo.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or positive HIV serology at screening,
- Infected with hepatitis B or hepatitis C viruses.
- Have evidence of active or latent or inadequately treated infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PF-06651600Induction dose 1. Oral tablet taken QD | Drug | Cohort 1, Extension Cohort 2, Extension Cohort 3 |
| PF-06651600Induction dose 2. Oral tablet taken QD | Drug | Cohort 2 |
| PF-06651600Maintenance dose A. Oral tablet taken QD | Drug | Cohort 1, Cohort 2, Cohort 3, Extension Cohort 2, Extension Cohort 3, Extension Cohort 4 |
| PF-06651600Maintenance Dose B. Oral tablet taken QD | Drug | Cohort 4, Extension Cohort 5 |
| PF-06651600Maintenance Dose C. Oral tablet taken QD | Drug | Cohort 5 |
| placeboplacebo | Drug | Cohort 6 |
| PF06700841Oral tablet taken QD | Drug | Extension Cohort 1 |
| narrow-band UVB phototherapyPhototherapy will be combined with PF-06651600 | Device | Extension Cohort 2 |
Primary outcome
Percent Change From Baseline in Central Read Facial-Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) at Week 24 - Dose Ranging (DR) Period
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24 (Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to Study Day 18)
Central read F-VASI was assessed based on the facial photographs taken at the site. Central read F-VASI was calculated using a formula that included contribution of affected facial surface areas showing all 6 different depigmentation rates (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.9 and 1) with a modified method: F-VASI (central read)=Ʃ [Affected Facial Surface Area] × 4 × [Depigmentation Rates]. Face was defined as the area from the hairline on top of the forehead to the jawline at the bottom of the cheeks. F-VASI (central read) ranged from 0.000 to 4.000 by defining the affected Facial Surface Area (expressed as the value between 0.0 to 1.0) being 4% of total Body Surface Area. The higher score of F-VASI signified severer symptoms of non-segmental vitiligo. Percent change from baseline in central read F-VASI = ((post-baseline central read F-VASI - baseline central read F-VASI)/baseline central read F-VASI)×100. A negative percent change from baseline in central read F-VASI signified an improvement.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) up to Week 24 - DR Period
Time frame: 24 weeks
Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily need to have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An AE was considered a TEAE if the event started during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day and time/start time, if collected, but before the last dose plus the lag time were flagged as TEAEs. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that was considered to be an important medical event. Causality to study treatment was determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With the TEAEs of Anaemia, Neutropenia, Thrombocytopenia and Lymphopenia - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily need to have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. The abnormal test findings, clinically significant signs and symptoms of anaemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and lymphopenia were reported as AEs. The clinical significance was determined by the investigator. An AE was considered a TEAE if the event started during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day and time/start time, if collected, but before the last dose plus the lag time were flagged as TEAEs. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Lipid Profile up to Week 24 - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Participants had to abstain from all food and drink (except water and non-investigational products) for an 8-hour overnight fast prior to fasting lipid profile panel collection. Fasting lipid assessment included total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides. The clinical meaningfulness was determined by the investigator. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing (Day 1).
Number of Participants With Liver Function Test Values Meeting the Protocol-Specified Discontinuation Criteria - DR Period
Time frame: 24 weeks
Liver function tests included tests of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and total bilirubin.
Number of Participants With TEAEs and SAEs - Extension (Ext) Period
Time frame: 24 weeks
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily need to have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An AE was considered a TEAE if the event started during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day and time/start time, if collected, but before the last dose plus the lag time were flagged as TEAEs. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening (immediate risk of death); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that was considered to be an important medical event. Causality to study treatment was determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With the TEAEs of Anaemia, Neutropenia, Thrombocytopenia and Lymphopenia - Ext Period
Time frame: 24 weeks
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily need to have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. The abnormal test findings, clinically significant signs and symptoms of anaemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and lymphopenia were reported as AEs. The clinical significance was determined by the investigator. An AE was considered a TEAE if the event started during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day and time/start time, if collected, but before the last dose plus the lag time were flagged as TEAEs.
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Lipid Profile - Ext Period
Time frame: 24 Weeks
Participants had to abstain from all food and drink (except water and non-investigational products) for an 8-hour overnight fast prior to fasting lipid profile panel collection. Fasting lipid assessment included total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. The clinical meaningfulness was determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Liver Function Test Values Meeting the Protocol-Specified Discontinuation Criteria - Ext Period
Time frame: 24 weeks
Liver function tests included tests of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and total bilirubin.
24 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving Central F-VASI75 at Week 24 - DR Period
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving T-VASI50 at Week 24 - DR Period
Time frame: Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in T-VASI at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Central Read F-VASI at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Local F-VASI at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percent Change From Baseline in SA-VES at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 16 and 24
Absolute Change From Baseline in T-VASI at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving T-VASI50 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving T-VASI75 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving T-VASI90 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving T-VASI100 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Central Read F-VASI50 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Central Read F-VASI75 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Central Read F-VASI90 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Central Read F-VASI100 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Local F-VASI50 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Local F-VASI75 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Local F-VASI90 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Local F-VASI100 at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in Total VitiQoL Score at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in VitiQoL Participation Limitation Domain Score at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in VitiQoL Stigma Domain Score at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in VitiQoL Behaviors Domain Score at Designated Time Points - DR Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving sIGA 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-Point Improvement at Week 24 - DR Period
Time frame: Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Mar 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42081176Chen Y, Lukic T, Chen AS, Adiri R, Tran H, Schaefer G, Ghosh P, Madhavan S, Soma K, Gamalo M. Automated Measurement of Depigmentation Extent with a New AI Tool Applied to the Example of Vitiligo. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jun;16(6):3139-3149. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01736-8. Epub 2026 May 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39023568Yamaguchi Y, Peeva E, Duca ED, Facheris P, Bar J, Shore R, Cox LA, Sloan A, Thaci D, Ganesan A, Han G, Ezzedine K, Ye Z, Guttman-Yassky E. Ritlecitinib, a JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, stabilizes active lesions and repigments stable lesions in vitiligo. Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Jul 18;316(7):478. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03182-y.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37917289Wojciechowski J, S Purohit V, Huh Y, Banfield C, Nicholas T. Evolution of Ritlecitinib Population Pharmacokinetic Models During Clinical Drug Development. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Dec;62(12):1765-1779. doi: 10.1007/s40262-023-01318-3. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37777018Guttman-Yassky E, Del Duca E, Da Rosa JC, Bar J, Ezzedine K, Ye Z, He W, Hyde C, Hassan-Zahraee M, Yamaguchi Y, Peeva E. Improvements in immune/melanocyte biomarkers with JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor ritlecitinib in vitiligo. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Jan;153(1):161-172.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.09.021. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36370907Ezzedine K, Peeva E, Yamaguchi Y, Cox LA, Banerjee A, Han G, Hamzavi I, Ganesan AK, Picardo M, Thaci D, Harris JE, Bae JM, Tsukamoto K, Sinclair R, Pandya AG, Sloan A, Yu D, Gandhi K, Vincent MS, King B. Efficacy and safety of oral ritlecitinib for the treatment of active nonsegmental vitiligo: A randomized phase 2b clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023 Feb;88(2):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Active Non-segmental Vitiligo
RecruitingObservational study
Ruxolitinib Cream Combined With Corticosteroids for Progressive Non-Segmental Vitiligo: A Multicenter Real-World Study
Non-Segmental Vitiligo (NSV)
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and How IBI3013 is Taken up and Processed by the Body in Healthy Volunteers After Single-dose Administration, and in Non-segmental Vitiligo Patients and Alopecia Areata Patients After Multiple-dose Administration
Healthy, Active Non-segmental Vitiligo
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
92 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing PF-06651600, PF06700841 and narrow-band UVB phototherapy in people with Active Non-segmental Vitiligo, run by Pfizer at 92 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 92 sites in United States, Canada, Australia, Germany, Japan and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Mar 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Change From Baseline in Central Read Facial-Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) at Week 24 - Dose Ranging (DR) Period (time frame: Baseline, Week 24 (Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to Study Day 18)). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03715829, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2022.