AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory Distress SyndromePhase 1SAFE LISANCT03718507

Study on the Effects of Different Premedication for LISA on Stress and Cerebral Tissue Oxygenation in Preterm Infants

A Phase 1 study testing Fentanyl and Sucrose 24% Oral Solution in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Surfactant Deficiency Syndrome Neonatal, run by ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Given the popularity that LISA technique has gainig in worldwide neonatal units, the lack of evidence regarding its premedication is becoming even more relevant to provide the best care to premature infants. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 27 to 29 weeks
What is being tested?
Fentanyl and Sucrose 24% Oral Solution
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
20 May 2019to 20 Feb 2020
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 27 to 29 weeks
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Preterm neonate 27-29+6 weeks AND
  • Need for non-invasive respiratory support (CPAP or nHFT) AND
  • Need for surfactant according to the unit guidelines AND
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • No written informed consent and/or
  • Severe malformation of the upper/lower airways, brain and/or heart and/or lung and/or prenatal cerebral injury.

About this study

Official title: A Single-centre, Randomized Pilot Study on the Effects of Different Premedication Treatments for Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) on Pain, Cerebral Tissue Oxygenation and Cortisol Levels in Preterm Infants

Given the popularity that LISA technique has gainig in worldwide neonatal units, the lack of evidence regarding its premedication is becoming even more relevant to provide the best care to premature infants.

Objective of this clinical trial is to establish the best premedication for LISA procedure considering neonatal pain assessed with premature infants pain scale, salivary cortisol levels as an indicator of stress and crSO2 values as indicators of cerebral oxygenation. Moreover, we aim to verify if sucrose 24% given orally is an effective tool for pain management in preterm neonates also in more invasive procedure, comparable to pharmacological treatment.

Read the detailed description

In the last decades, one of the most relevant interventions which have led to a significant increase in preterm infants survival rate is the introduction of surfactant replacement therapy.

Nowadays, given the trend towards the less invasive respiratory support also for low and extremely low gestational age infants, the use of intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation has been minimized. In fact, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) has been proved to be closely related to prolonged intubation and it is one of the main problem clinicians must face with. This is the reason why the INSURE technique was introduced as a routine care procedure in neonatal units. In fact, INSURE is the acronym for INtubation - SURfactant administration-Extubation. This technique ensures the baby the positive effects of surfactant on respiratory mechanics minimizing the intubation length. However, the INSURE procedure still involves intubation, meaning that it is still invansive and some infants cannot be extubated immediately afterward. Thus, lately new technique for surfactant administration has been introduced. The most extensively studied are the so-called less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST). With these procedures, infants receive non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment, while being given intratracheal surfactant via a feeding tube or small catheter. Although the paucity of literature available to date, for extremely preterm infants LISA has shown to be able to reduce the need for intubation, ventilation and supplemental oxygen when compared with the standard technique of rescue intubation and ventilation. In comparison with the INSURE procedure the less invasive surfactant administration was associated with a reduced need for ventilation and reduced risk of BPD.

Even if this technique can provide the gentlest treatment presently available in administering surfactant, it implies laryngoscopy and somewhat discomfort. The importance of proper care in managing preterm infants, especially during painful procedures, has been well demonstrated and all the caregivers have to be even more committed to this aspect.

Pain in neonates is usually assessed through pain scales and using clinical parameters such as pulse oximetry (SatO2) and Heart Rate (HR). Since pain scores are subject to caregivers' individual perception and parameters can be influenced by other clinical underlying condition, especially in preterm infants, determination of cortisol concentration could be a useful alternative.

Cortisol is the major glucocorticoid produced in the adrenal cortex. Cortisol production has a circadian rhythm, with levels peaking in the early morning and dropping to lowest values at night. Levels rise independently of circadian rhythm in response to stress.

There is convincing evidence that providing neonates with oral glucose during painful procedure reduces the stress related to the procedure itself, without serious side effects or harms related to this intervention. Different concentrations of glucose solution are currently available and have been used in neonatal field.

To date, there is still high debate on the need to provide sedation to babies undergoing LISA, and lack of evidence available regarding the optimal premedication. Some Authors report to use LISA technique without any sort of sedation, while others perform it with the same sedation they use for INSURE method.

Moreover, there is lack of evidence in regard to the effects of this method on cerebral oxygenation, which can be easily monitored using NIRS (near infrared spectroscopy).

Since LISA technique's popularity is increasing, we believe that there is urgent need to better clarify how this approach can be performed in the gentlest way.

Given these premises, we indeed speculate that oral glucose as a premedication for LISA procedure could be an intriguing alternative to standard sedation.

Objective of this clinical trial is to establish the best premedication for LISA procedure considering neonatal pain assessed with premature infants pain scale, salivary cortisol levels as an indicator of stress and crSO2 values as indicators of cerebral oxygenation. Moreover, we aim to verify if sucrose 24% given orally is an effective tool for pain management in preterm neonates also in more invasive procedure, comparable to pharmacological treatment.

Evaluation of the efficacy of non-pharmacological sedation will lead to:

  • a gentler approach for preterm babies and a better understanding of LISA technique
  • an improvement in pain management, where sucrose can be applied for several painful procedures of different degrees of invasiveness, not only in the mildest ones
  • a significant reduction in prolonged ventilation due to surfactant administration's pharmacological sedation
  • a safer use of surfactant administration also in level II neonatal unit, since the risk for subsequent need of invasive respiratory support due to excessive sedation would be considerably reduced
  • a significant economic impact on public health care system, for the inferior cost of oral sucrose
  • a relevant decrease of the onset and subsequent public cost of BPD, if data about LISA technique capability to reduce it will be further confirmed.
  • Primary Outcome:

Verify which is the best premedication for LISA procedure to reduce neonatal pain.

  • Secondary Outcomes:
  • Verify the effects of different forms of premedication on cerebral oxygenation during LISA procedure
  • Verify the effects of different forms of premedication on cortisol levels before and after LISA procedure
  • Verify the efficacy of sucrose 24% in pain control during more invasive procedures
  • Verify the influence of premedication on adverse events' occurrence during LISA procedure
  • Verify the effects of different pre-medications on the ease in administering surfactant with LISA technique (time required, number of attempts, …)

Trial Design:

An investigator-initiated randomized, single center, pilot study that will enroll 20 preterm neonates between 27 and 29+6 weeks of gestation.

Multiple births will be randomised into the same treatment arm.

Trial Interventions:

  • Study group 1: patients will receive atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg i.v. in 5 minutes) before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure
  • Study group 2: patients will be given atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and oral sucrose 24% (0.5 ml) 2 minutes before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure.

All the procedure will be videorecorded and subsequently analyzed

Being tested
Fentanyl, Sucrose 24% Oral Solution
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Pulmonary Atelectasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FentanylDrug

    Also called atropine

    atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg i.v. in 5 minutes)

  • Sucrose 24% Oral SolutionDrug

    Also called atropine

    0.5 ml given orally 2 minutes before LISA procedure

Study groups in NCT03718507
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GROUP FentanylActive comparatorpatients will receive atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg i.v. in 5 minutes) before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure, which will be video-recorded.
Receives: Drug: Fentanyl
GROUP SucroseExperimentalpatients will be given atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and oral sucrose 24% (0.5 ml) 2 minutes before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure, which will be video-recorded.
Receives: Drug: Sucrose 24% Oral Solution

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. PIPP SCALE score

    Verify which is the best premedication for LISA procedure to reduce neonatal pain.

    Measured: during the LISA procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Oct 2018
  2. Study start20 May 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion20 Dec 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion20 Feb 2020 (estimated)

Why it stopped: no recrutiment started

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03718507
Sponsor's protocol ID
SL2018PS
Acronym
SAFE LISA
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
23 Oct 2018
Last updated
4 Aug 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Fentanyl and Sucrose 24% Oral Solution in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Surfactant Deficiency Syndrome Neonatal, run by ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

PIPP SCALE score (time frame: during the LISA procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in