Genetic Diseases, InbornNCT03721458
Whole Genome Sequencing in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
An observational study of Genetic Diseases, Inborn, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This research is being done to see if whole genome sequencing (WGS) improves the diagnosis of patients in the NICU. Using WGS in this way, which is relatively new, researchers at Penn State College of Medicine will look at approximately 5000 genes that are known to be associated with genetic diseases to see if the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 day and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- What is being tested?
- Sequence
- How many people
- 3 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 28 May 2019to 30 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 day and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patient is admitted to the NICU, evaluated by the clinical staff, recommended for participation in this study and consented.
Child:Inclusion Criteria:
- Age: ≤ 180 days
- Sex: male or female
- Admitted to the Hershey Medical Center NICU with a clinical presentation consistent with a genetic disease, e.g. congenital malformations, metabolic disorder, uncontrolled seizures or unexplained abnormal neurological findings.
- Both Biological Parents are involved in the study
Child:Exclusion Criteria:
- Age: > 180 days
- Known genetic mutation.
Biological Parents : Inclusion Criteria
- Age: ≥18 years
- Both biological parents must be willing to participate in the research.
- Fluent in written and spoken English.
Biological Parents: Exclusion Criteria
- Age: <18 years
- Prisoner
- Cognitive impairment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
About this study
This research is being done to see if whole genome sequencing (WGS) improves the diagnosis of patients in the NICU. Using WGS in this way, which is relatively new, researchers at Penn State College of Medicine will look at approximately 5000 genes that are known to be associated with genetic diseases to see if the neonatal patient has a known disease causing mutation. Comparing the parents' DNA with the child's will help the investigators better understand the child's DNA.
Read the detailed description
1.0 Objectives
1.1 Study Objectives The goal of this research project is to assess the potential for applying whole genome sequencing (WGS) as a diagnostic tool in the neonatal intensive care unit. Newborn children who require treatment in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) often suffer from genetic defects, the nature of which is difficult to diagnose. The investigators currently know of more than 5000 genes in which mutations may cause diseases that can affect newborn children, so determining which one is responsible for a new neonatal patient's disease is daunting. However, many of these diseases can be effectively treated if they are diagnosed in a timely fashion. The investigators propose to use new sequencing instrumentation coupled with rapid analytical tools to sequence NICU patients along with both parents to identify whether a patient carries a de novo mutation or compound heterozygous variants in one of the known disease genes. If so, the mutation will be confirmed in an in-house CLIA laboratory and the results provided within 72 hours to attending neonatologists to inform treatment decisions.
1.2 Primary Study Endpoints
The primary goal of this protocol will be an assessment of the degree to which WGS improves diagnosis of patients admitted to the NICU. The investigators propose to perform sequencing on approximately 50 patients over the course of this project. The investigators will evaluate on an ongoing basis the success rate for identifying clinically actionable genetic defects in the selected patients, particularly as that would inform the initial selection criteria used to enroll the patient. This information will be useful to determine whether such sequencing efforts can improve the outcome of NICU patients and which class of patients are most likely to benefit from the procedure.
1.3 Secondary Study Endpoints
A second goal will be an assessment of the effectiveness of targeted sequencing of the whole exome or a panel of 5000 genes in identifying the genetic defects revealed by whole genome sequencing and the relative cost in money and time of the various approaches. This could yield a significantly more efficient and cost effect method over that currently described elsewhere.
Finally, the investigators propose to use the data to begin to develop a cost-benefit analysis of WGS in the NICU. The investigators will assess the extent to which WGS provided a diagnosis distinct from that initially proposed by the neonatologists and the extent to which that change in diagnosis altered the treatment regimen. If the novel diagnosis did, in fact, alter treatment, The investigators would use historical data to assess the degree to which that altered treatment affected the number of days the patient remained in the NICU. The investigators can then estimate the cost savings/loss as the number of NICU days saved times the cost per day of NICU residence versus the cost of performing the sequencing over the entire cohort of sequenced patients. While this is not as rigorous as a randomized clinical trial, it would point to whether this is a methodology worth exploring in more depth.
- Conditions
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Being tested
- Sequence
- Medical subject headings
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SequenceOther
Potentially identifying genetic defects that could have clinical significance
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diagnosis success rate
The investigator will determine the percent of patients for which sequencing provided a correct genetic disease diagnosis, relative to that obtained by standard clinical evaluation.
Measured: 1-2 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Effectiveness of exome sequencing relative to whole genome sequencing.
The investigators will determine whether whole exome sequencing identifies all the genetic disease diagnoses identified by whole genome sequencing.
Measured: 1-2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2018
- Study start28 May 2019
- Primary completion30 Jun 2020
- Study completion30 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Genetic Diseases, InbornStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, James Broach, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Investigators
- James Broach, PhD, Principal investigator, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03721458
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 00007970
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 1 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Whole Genome Sequencing in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03721458
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 00007970
- Conditions
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 28 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research is being done to see if whole genome sequencing (WGS) improves the diagnosis of patients in the NICU. Using WGS in this way, which is relatively new, researchers at Penn State College of Medicine will look at approximately 5000 genes that are known to be associated with genetic diseases to see if the neonatal patient has a known disease causing mutation. Comparing the parents' DNA with the child's will help the investigators better understand the child's DNA.
Detailed description
1.0 Objectives
1.1 Study Objectives The goal of this research project is to assess the potential for applying whole genome sequencing (WGS) as a diagnostic tool in the neonatal intensive care unit. Newborn children who require treatment in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) often suffer from genetic defects, the nature of which is difficult to diagnose. The investigators currently know of more than 5000 genes in which mutations may cause diseases that can affect newborn children, so determining which one is responsible for a new neonatal patient's disease is daunting. However, many of these diseases can be effectively treated if they are diagnosed in a timely fashion. The investigators propose to use new sequencing instrumentation coupled with rapid analytical tools to sequence NICU patients along with both parents to identify whether a patient carries a de novo mutation or compound heterozygous variants in one of the known disease genes. If so, the mutation will be confirmed in an in-house CLIA laboratory and the results provided within 72 hours to attending neonatologists to inform treatment decisions.
1.2 Primary Study Endpoints
The primary goal of this protocol will be an assessment of the degree to which WGS improves diagnosis of patients admitted to the NICU. The investigators propose to perform sequencing on approximately 50 patients over the course of this project. The investigators will evaluate on an ongoing basis the success rate for identifying clinically actionable genetic defects in the selected patients, particularly as that would inform the initial selection criteria used to enroll the patient. This information will be useful to determine whether such sequencing efforts can improve the outcome of NICU patients and which class of patients are most likely to benefit from the procedure.
1.3 Secondary Study Endpoints
A second goal will be an assessment of the effectiveness of targeted sequencing of the whole exome or a panel of 5000 genes in identifying the genetic defects revealed by whole genome sequencing and the relative cost in money and time of the various approaches. This could yield a significantly more efficient and cost effect method over that currently described elsewhere.
Finally, the investigators propose to use the data to begin to develop a cost-benefit analysis of WGS in the NICU. The investigators will assess the extent to which WGS provided a diagnosis distinct from that initially proposed by the neonatologists and the extent to which that change in diagnosis altered the treatment regimen. If the novel diagnosis did, in fact, alter treatment, The investigators would use historical data to assess the degree to which that altered treatment affected the number of days the patient remained in the NICU. The investigators can then estimate the cost savings/loss as the number of NICU days saved times the cost per day of NICU residence versus the cost of performing the sequencing over the entire cohort of sequenced patients. While this is not as rigorous as a randomized clinical trial, it would point to whether this is a methodology worth exploring in more depth.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 day and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patient is admitted to the NICU, evaluated by the clinical staff, recommended for participation in this study and consented.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SequencePotentially identifying genetic defects that could have clinical significance | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Diagnosis success rate
Time frame: 1-2 years
The investigator will determine the percent of patients for which sequencing provided a correct genetic disease diagnosis, relative to that obtained by standard clinical evaluation.
1 secondary outcome
Effectiveness of exome sequencing relative to whole genome sequencing.
Time frame: 1-2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Feb 2021.
Related trials for Genetic Diseases, Inborn
RecruitingObservational study
Familial Mediterranean Fever and Related Disorders: Genetics and Disease Characteristics
Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF), Autoinflammation
RecruitingObservational study
Genome Medical Sequencing for Gene Discovery
Intellectual Disabilities, Congenital Anomaly
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study of NTLA-2001 in ATTRv-PN
Neuromuscular Disease, Neuromuscular Diseases (NMD)
RecruitingObservational study
Long-term Follow-up (LTFU) Study of Participants in Any iECURE Protocol Using an Investigational Product (IP)
Ornithine Transcarbamylase Deficiency, Ornithine Transcarbamylase Deficiency Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Gene Transfer Clinical Trial for Infantile and Late Infantile Krabbe Disease Treated Previously With HSCT
Krabbe Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
James Broach, PhD principal investigator
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Genetic Diseases, Inborn, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diagnosis success rate (time frame: 1-2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.