Cervical DysplasiaPhase 3NCT03721978
REVEAL 2 Trial (Evaluation of VGX-3100 and Electroporation for the Treatment of Cervical HSIL)
A Phase 3 study testing VGX-3100 and CELLECTRA™-5PSP in people with Cervical Dysplasia and Cervical High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, run by Inovio Pharmaceuticals at 53 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
HPV-303 is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of VGX-3100 delivered intramuscularly (IM) followed by electroporation (EP) delivered with CELLECTRA™ 5PSP in adult women with histologically confirmed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Dysplasia, Cervical High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, HSIL
- What is being tested?
- VGX-3100 and CELLECTRA™-5PSP
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 203 participants
- Where
- 53 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Feb 2019to 15 Sep 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women aged 18 years and above
- Confirmed cervical infection with HPV types 16 and/or 18 at screening
- Cervical tissue specimen/slides provided to Study Pathology Adjudication Committee for diagnosis scheduled to be collected within 10 weeks prior to anticipated date of first dose of study drug
- Confirmed histologic evidence of cervical HSIL at screening
- Must be judged by Investigator to be an appropriate candidate for the protocol-specified procedure required at Week 36
- With respect to their reproductive capacity must be post-menopausal or surgically sterile or willing to use a contraceptive method with failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly from screening until Week 36
- Normal screening electrocardiogram (ECG)
Who cannot join
- Microscopic or gross evidence of adenocarcinoma-in-situ (AIS), high grade vulvar, vaginal, or anal intraepithelial neoplasia or invasive cancer in any histopathologic specimen at screening
- Cervical lesion(s) that cannot be fully visualized on colposcopy
- History of endocervical curettage (ECC) which showed cervical HSIL indeterminate, or insufficient for diagnosis
- Treatment for cervical HSIL within 4 weeks prior to screening
- Pregnant, breastfeeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study
- History of previous therapeutic HPV vaccination
Show all 13Show fewer
- Immunosuppression as a result of underlying illness or treatment
- Receipt of any non-study, non-live vaccine within 2 weeks of Day 0
- Receipt of any non-study, live vaccine within 4 weeks of Day 0
- Current or history of clinically significant, medically unstable disease or condition which, in the judgment of the investigator, would jeopardize the safety of the participant, interfere with study assessments or endpoint evaluation, or otherwise impact the validity of the study results
- Presence of acute or chronic bleeding or clotting disorder that would contraindicate IM injections, or use of blood thinners within 2 weeks of Day 0
- Participation in an interventional study with an investigational compound or device within 30 days of signing informed consent
- Less than two acceptable sites available for IM injection
Trial locations and contacts
53 sites in 10 countries.
53 sites in 10 countries
United States27 sites
Augusta University
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
ClinOhio Research Services
Columbus, Ohio, 43213
Nuvance Health
Danbury, Connecticut, 06810
Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, Inc.
Fairfield, Ohio, 45014
Unified Women's Clinical Research - Greensboro
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408
Unified Women's Clinical Research - Hagerstown
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
Altus Research
Lake Worth, Florida, 33461
Praetorian Pharmaceutical Research, LLC
Marrero, Louisiana, 70072
Women's Physician Group Suite 203
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Salom and Tangir LLC
Miramar, Florida, 33027
Unified Women's Clinical Research - Morehead City
Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557
Venus Gynecology, LLC
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Christiana Care Health System
Newark, Delaware, 19713
New Jersey Medical School
Newark, New Jersey, 07103
Meridian Clinical Research Norfolk
Norfolk, Nebraska, 68701
Affinity Clinical Research Institute
Oak Brook, Illinois, 60523
Suffolk Obstetrics and Gynecology
Port Jefferson, New York, 11777
Saginaw Valley Medical Research Group LLC
Saginaw, Michigan, 48604
Frontier Clinical Research-Smithfield
Smithfield, Pennsylvania, 15478
Storks Research
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479
Precision Clinical Research, LLC
Sunrise, Florida, 33351
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10583
Visions Clinical Research- Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Group For Women - Tidewater Clinical Research Inc.
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23456
Lyndhurst Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Brazil5 sites
Hospital Erasto Gaertner
Curitiba, Paraná, 80530-010
Hospital das Clinicas de Goiânia
Goiânia, Goiás, 74605-050
Hospital Amaral Carvalho
Jaú, São Paulo, 17210-120
Hospital Das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - USP
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14048-900
Associação Obras Sociais Irmã Dulce Hospital Santo Antônio
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 40420-000
Spain5 sites
Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
Madrid, 28009
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, 46010
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe de Valencia
Valencia, 46026
Argentina3 sites
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Buenos Aires, C1181ACH
DIM Clinica Privada
Ramos Mejía, B1704ETD
Instituto de Ginecología
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000PBB
Estonia3 sites
Pärnu Hospital
Pärnu, Pärnumaa, EE-80010
East Tallinn Central Hospital Womens Clinic
Tallinn, 10119
Tartu University Hospital
Tartu, 51014
Poland3 sites
Niepubliczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej Profimed
Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship, 20-880
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 w Lublinie
Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship, 20-880
Centrum Medyczne Angelius Provita
Śląskie, 40-611
Finland2 sites
HUS Naistentaudit ja synnytykset
Helsinki, Uusimaa, FI-00290
Northern Savo Hospital District Muncipal Federation
Kuopio, FI-70210
Lithuania2 sites
Vilnius District Central Outpatient Clinic
Vilnius, LT-01117
Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos
Vilnius, LT-08661
South Africa2 sites
University of Cape Town
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7925
Lynette Reynders Private Practice
Centurion, Gauteng, 0157
Puerto Rico1 site
Puerto Rico Translational Research Center (PRTRC)
Rio Piedras, 00935
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study of VGX-3100 Delivered Intramuscularly Followed by Electroporation With CELLECTRA™ 5PSP for the Treatment of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 Related High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) of the Cervix
HPV-303 is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of VGX-3100 delivered intramuscularly (IM) followed by electroporation (EP) delivered with CELLECTRA™ 5PSP in adult women with histologically confirmed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 [CIN2] or grade 3 [CIN3]) of the cervix, associated with human papillomavirus (HPV-16) and/or HPV-18.
- Being tested
- VGX-3100, Matched Placebo, CELLECTRA™-5PSP
- Keywords
- Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), CIN 2, CIN 3, Human papillomavirus (HPV), HPV-16, HPV-18, High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL), papillomavirus
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VGX-3100Biological
1 milliliter (mL) VGX-3100 injected IM.
Matched PlaceboBiological
1 mL of matched Placebo injected IM.
CELLECTRA™-5PSPDevice
CELLECTRA™-5PSP used for EP following IM injection of VGX 3100.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| VGX-3100 + EP | Experimental | Participants received 3 IM injections of 6 mg (in 1 mL) VGX-3100 followed by EP using the CELLECTRA™-5PSP device on Day 0, Week 4, and Week 12. Receives: Biological: VGX-3100; Device: CELLECTRA™-5PSP |
| Matched Placebo + EP | Placebo comparator | Participants received 3 IM injections of 1 mL VGX-3100 matching placebo followed by EP using the CELLECTRA™-5PSP device on Day 0, Week 4, and Week 12. Receives: Biological: Matched Placebo; Device: CELLECTRA™-5PSP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of Cervical HSIL on Histology Sample and No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Cervical Samples
Baseline biomarker-positive participants with no histologic (i.e., biopsies or excisional treatment) evidence of cervical HSIL, no evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 at Week 36, and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders. No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or low-grade intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). Cervical samples for HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 were collected using the ThinPrep™. The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36. The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
Measured: At Week 36
Secondary outcomes (23)
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for Safety Population: Number of Participants With Any Local and Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Pre-existing conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as AEs. Nausea, fatigue, injection site bruising, injection site erythema, injection site haematoma, injection site induration, injection site pain, injection site pruritus, injection site swelling, malaise, pyrexia, arthralgia, myalgia, headache and erythema were considered as local and systemic AEs for baseline biomarker-positive participants for safety population.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 40
Safety Population: Number of Participants With Local and Systemic AEs
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Pre-existing conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as AEs. Nausea, chills, fatigue, injection site bruising, injection site erythema, injection site haematoma, injection site haemorrhage, injection site induration, injection site oedema, injection site pain, injection site paraesthesia, injection site pruritus, injection site swelling, malaise, pain, pyrexia, temperature regulation disorder, arthralgia, myalgia, headache and erythema were considered as local and systemic AEs for safety population.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 40
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for Safety Population: Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent AEs (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs (Including Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction [SUSAR] and Unexpected Adverse Device Effect [UADE])
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious AE (SAE) is any experience that suggested significant hazard, contraindication, side effect/precaution, \& fulfilled any of the following: fatal, life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was medically significant/required intervention to prevent other outcomes. TEAEs are any AEs starting on or after the first administration of any investigational product (IP). TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs. UADE is any SAE on health/safety or any life-threatening problem/death caused by, or associated with a device, if that effect, problem/death was not previously identified in nature, severity/degree of incidence in the investigational plan or application.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 40
Safety Population: Number of Participants With Any TEAEs and Serious TEAEs (Including SUSAR and UADE)
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. SAE is any experience that suggested significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution, and fulfilled any of the following criteria: fatal, life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was medically significant or required intervention to prevent other outcomes. TEAEs are defined as AEs starting on or after the first administration of any IP. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs. UADE is any SAE on health/safety or any life-threatening problem/death caused by, or associated with a device, if that effect, problem/death was not previously identified in nature, severity/degree of incidence in the investigational plan or application.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 40
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of Cervical HSIL on Histology Sample and No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Cervical Samples
Participants with no histologic (i.e., biopsies or excisional treatment) evidence of cervical HSIL, no evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 at Week 36, and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders. No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or low-grade intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). Cervical samples for HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 were collected using the ThinPrep™. The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36. The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
Measured: At Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of Cervical HSIL on Histology Sample
Baseline biomarker-positive participants with no histologic (i.e., biopsies or excisional treatment) evidence of cervical HSIL at Week 36 and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders. No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or LSIL. The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36. The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
Measured: At Week 36
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of Cervical HSIL on Histology Sample
Participants with no histologic (i.e., biopsies or excisional treatment) evidence of cervical HSIL at Week 36 and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders. No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or LSIL. The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36. The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
Measured: At Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Cervical Samples by Type Specific HPV Testing
Baseline biomarker-positive participants with no evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 at Week 36 time frame and participants in whom an excision or biopsy sample was not obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders. Cervical samples for HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 were collected using the ThinPrep™. The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36. The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
Measured: At Week 36
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Cervical Samples by Type Specific HPV Testing
Participants with no evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 at Week 36 and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders. Cervical samples for HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 were collected using the ThinPrep™. The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36. The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
Measured: At Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of LSIL or HSIL on Histology Sample
Baseline biomarker-positive participants with no histologic evidence of cervical HSIL, squamous atypia, or LSIL at Week 36 and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders. No evidence of LSIL was defined as no evidence of cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (CIN1), CIN2, or CIN3 on biopsies or excisional treatment. No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or LSIL. The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36. The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
Measured: At Week 36
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of Histologic LSIL or HSIL on Histology Sample
Participants with no histologic evidence of cervical HSIL, squamous atypia, or LSIL at Week 36 and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders. No evidence of LSIL was defined as no evidence of CIN1, CIN2, or CIN3 on biopsies or excisional treatment. No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or LSIL. The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36. The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
Measured: At Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of LSIL or HSIL on Histology Sample and No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 by Type Specific HPV Testing
Baseline biomarker-positive participants with no histologic evidence of cervical HSIL, squamous atypia, or LSIL, no evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 by type specific HPV testing at Week 36, and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders. No evidence of LSIL was defined as no evidence of CIN1, CIN2, or CIN3 on biopsies or excisional treatment. No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or LSIL. The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36. The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
Measured: At Week 36
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of LSIL or HSIL on Histology Sample and No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 by Type Specific HPV Testing
Participants with no histologic evidence of cervical HSIL, squamous atypia, or LSIL, no evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 by type specific HPV testing at Week 36, and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders. No evidence of LSIL was defined as no evidence of CIN1, CIN2, or CIN3 on biopsies or excisional treatment. No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or LSIL. The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36. The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
Measured: At Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Progression of Cervical HSIL to Cervical Carcinoma
Baseline biomarker-positive participants with no histologic evidence of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or cervical carcinoma at Week 36 relative to baseline and participants in whom an excision or biopsy sample was not obtained between initial dose up to Week 36 were considered as responders. The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36. The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
Measured: From Baseline at Week 36
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Progression of Cervical HSIL to Cervical Carcinoma
Participants with no histologic evidence of cervical AIS or cervical carcinoma at Week 36 relative to baseline and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders. The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36. The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
Measured: From Baseline at Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants Who Have Cleared HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Non-cervical Anatomic Locations
Percentage of baseline biomarker-positive participants who have cleared HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 on specimens from non-cervical anatomic locations (oropharynx, vagina and intra-anal) at Week 36 Visit compared to baseline were reported.
Measured: From Baseline at Week 36
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants Who Have Cleared HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Non-cervical Anatomic Locations
Percentage of participants who have cleared HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 on specimens from non-cervical anatomic locations (oropharynx, vagina, and intra-anal) at Week 36 Visit compared to baseline were reported.
Measured: From Baseline at Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for mITT Population: Serum Concentrations of Anti-HPV-16 and Anti-HPV-18 Antibody
A standardized binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to measure the anti-HPV-16/18 antibody response induced by VGX-3100. E7 is a viral protein produced by cells infected by HPV-16/18.
Measured: At Week 15 and Week 36
mITT Population: Serum Concentrations of Anti-HPV-16 and Anti-HPV-18 Antibody
A standardized binding ELISA was performed to measure the anti-HPV-16/18 antibody response induced by VGX-3100. E7 is a viral protein produced by cells infected by HPV-16/18.
Measured: At Week 15 and Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for mITT Population: Change From Baseline in Interferon-Gamma Response Magnitude at Week 15 and 36
Assessment of cellular immune activity occurred via the application of the Interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (IFN-γ ELISpot). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from whole blood sample were used for analysis. E6 and E7 are viral proteins produced by cells infected by HPV-16/18.
Measured: Baseline; Week 15 and Week 36
mITT Population: Change From Baseline in Interferon-Gamma Response Magnitude at Week 15 and 36
Assessment of cellular immune activity occurred via the application of the IFN-γ ELISpot. PBMCs isolated from whole blood sample were used for analysis. E6 and E7 are viral proteins produced by cells infected by HPV-16/18.
Measured: Baseline; Week 15 and Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for mITT Population: Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry Response Magnitude at Week 15
Assessment of cellular immune activity was measured using the application flow cytometry for the purposes of performing a Lytic Granule Loading Assay. The Lytic Granule Loading assay examines the following external cellular markers: CD3, CD4, CD8 (T cell identification), CD137, CD38, and CD69 (T cell activation markers) as well as PD-1 (exhaustion/activation marker). Here, changes from baseline in the percentage of CD8+CD137+Perforin+, CD8+CD38+Perforin+, and CD8+CD69+Perforin+ are reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 15
mITT Population: Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry Response Magnitude at Week 15
Assessment of cellular immune activity was measured using the application flow cytometry for the purposes of performing a Lytic Granule Loading Assay. The Lytic Granule Loading assay examines the following external cellular markers: CD3, CD4, CD8 (T cell identification), CD137, CD38, and CD69 (T cell activation markers) as well as PD-1 (exhaustion/activation marker). Here, changes from baseline in the percentage of CD8+CD137+Perforin+, CD8+CD38+Perforin+, and CD8+CD69+Perforin+ are reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 15
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2018
- Study start28 Feb 2019
- Primary completion23 Aug 2022
- Study completion15 Sep 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Cervical DysplasiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 203 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Inovio Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jeffrey Skolnik, MD, Study director, Inovio Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03721978
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HPV-303
- Other IDs
- 2018-004114-17, 2018
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 25 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 17 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study of VGX-3100 Delivered Intramuscularly Followed by Electroporation With CELLECTRA™ 5PSP for the Treatment of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 Related High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) of the Cervix
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03721978
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HPV-303
- Keywords
- Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), CIN 2, CIN 3, Human papillomavirus (HPV), HPV-16, HPV-18, High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL), papillomavirus
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 203 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Inovio PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Sep 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 17 Oct 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
HPV-303 is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of VGX-3100 delivered intramuscularly (IM) followed by electroporation (EP) delivered with CELLECTRA™ 5PSP in adult women with histologically confirmed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 [CIN2] or grade 3 [CIN3]) of the cervix, associated with human papillomavirus (HPV-16) and/or HPV-18.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| VGX-3100 + EP | Experimental | Biological: VGX-3100, Device: CELLECTRA™-5PSPParticipants received 3 IM injections of 6 mg (in 1 mL) VGX-3100 followed by EP using the CELLECTRA™-5PSP device on Day 0, Week 4, and Week 12. |
| Matched Placebo + EP | Placebo comparator | Biological: Matched Placebo, Device: CELLECTRA™-5PSPParticipants received 3 IM injections of 1 mL VGX-3100 matching placebo followed by EP using the CELLECTRA™-5PSP device on Day 0, Week 4, and Week 12. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Women aged 18 years and above
- Confirmed cervical infection with HPV types 16 and/or 18 at screening
- Cervical tissue specimen/slides provided to Study Pathology Adjudication Committee for diagnosis scheduled to be collected within 10 weeks prior to anticipated date of first dose of study drug
- Confirmed histologic evidence of cervical HSIL at screening
- Must be judged by Investigator to be an appropriate candidate for the protocol-specified procedure required at Week 36
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Microscopic or gross evidence of adenocarcinoma-in-situ (AIS), high grade vulvar, vaginal, or anal intraepithelial neoplasia or invasive cancer in any histopathologic specimen at screening
- Cervical lesion(s) that cannot be fully visualized on colposcopy
- History of endocervical curettage (ECC) which showed cervical HSIL indeterminate, or insufficient for diagnosis
- Treatment for cervical HSIL within 4 weeks prior to screening
- Pregnant, breastfeeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VGX-31001 milliliter (mL) VGX-3100 injected IM. | Biological | VGX-3100 + EP |
| Matched Placebo1 mL of matched Placebo injected IM. | Biological | Matched Placebo + EP |
| CELLECTRA™-5PSPCELLECTRA™-5PSP used for EP following IM injection of VGX 3100. | Device | Matched Placebo + EP, VGX-3100 + EP |
Primary outcome
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of Cervical HSIL on Histology Sample and No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Cervical Samples
Time frame: At Week 36
Baseline biomarker-positive participants with no histologic (i.e., biopsies or excisional treatment) evidence of cervical HSIL, no evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 at Week 36, and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders. No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or low-grade intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). Cervical samples for HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 were collected using the ThinPrep™. The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36. The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
23 secondary outcomes
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for Safety Population: Number of Participants With Any Local and Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 40
Safety Population: Number of Participants With Local and Systemic AEs
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 40
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for Safety Population: Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent AEs (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs (Including Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction [SUSAR] and Unexpected Adverse Device Effect [UADE])
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 40
Safety Population: Number of Participants With Any TEAEs and Serious TEAEs (Including SUSAR and UADE)
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 40
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of Cervical HSIL on Histology Sample and No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Cervical Samples
Time frame: At Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of Cervical HSIL on Histology Sample
Time frame: At Week 36
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of Cervical HSIL on Histology Sample
Time frame: At Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Cervical Samples by Type Specific HPV Testing
Time frame: At Week 36
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Cervical Samples by Type Specific HPV Testing
Time frame: At Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of LSIL or HSIL on Histology Sample
Time frame: At Week 36
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of Histologic LSIL or HSIL on Histology Sample
Time frame: At Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of LSIL or HSIL on Histology Sample and No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 by Type Specific HPV Testing
Time frame: At Week 36
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of LSIL or HSIL on Histology Sample and No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 by Type Specific HPV Testing
Time frame: At Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Progression of Cervical HSIL to Cervical Carcinoma
Time frame: From Baseline at Week 36
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Progression of Cervical HSIL to Cervical Carcinoma
Time frame: From Baseline at Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants Who Have Cleared HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Non-cervical Anatomic Locations
Time frame: From Baseline at Week 36
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants Who Have Cleared HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Non-cervical Anatomic Locations
Time frame: From Baseline at Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for mITT Population: Serum Concentrations of Anti-HPV-16 and Anti-HPV-18 Antibody
Time frame: At Week 15 and Week 36
mITT Population: Serum Concentrations of Anti-HPV-16 and Anti-HPV-18 Antibody
Time frame: At Week 15 and Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for mITT Population: Change From Baseline in Interferon-Gamma Response Magnitude at Week 15 and 36
Time frame: Baseline; Week 15 and Week 36
mITT Population: Change From Baseline in Interferon-Gamma Response Magnitude at Week 15 and 36
Time frame: Baseline; Week 15 and Week 36
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for mITT Population: Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry Response Magnitude at Week 15
Time frame: Baseline, Week 15
mITT Population: Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry Response Magnitude at Week 15
Time frame: Baseline, Week 15
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Oct 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cervical Dysplasia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Predictive Biomarkers for Precision Management of Pre-cancerous Cervical Neoplasia
HSIL, High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, DNA Methylation
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Exploratory Study of the Efficacy of HAL-PDT in CIN 3
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3
Recruiting
Feasibility Study Comparing Use of One Or Two Probes for Thermal Ablation Among Screen Positive Women Living With HIV in C1001P-CS2 Kenya
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), HPV
Not yet recruitingObservational study
C-3002: Enhancing Cervical Cancer Screening Access and Follow-up Care at 'CASCADE' Clinical Sites in the United States
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Human Papillomavirus (HPV)
Recruiting
Feasibility Study Comparing One vs Two Probes for Thermal Ablation Among Cervical Cancer Screen Positive WLWH in C1001P-CS9 South Africa
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), HPV
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeffrey Skolnik, MD study director
Inovio Pharmaceuticals
53 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing VGX-3100 and CELLECTRA™-5PSP in people with Cervical Dysplasia and Cervical High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, run by Inovio Pharmaceuticals at 53 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 53 sites in United States, Brazil, Spain, Argentina, Estonia and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of Cervical HSIL on Histology Sample and No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Cervical Samples (time frame: At Week 36). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Oct 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.