PoliomyelitisPhase 4NCT03723837
Persistence of IPV Immunity
A Phase 4 study testing Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) in people with Poliomyelitis, run by Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute Of Medicine. at 3 sites in Nepal.
Trial summary
In 2015, Strategic Advisory Group of Experts in Immunization (SAGE) recommended the global switch from trivalent to bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) that does not contain type 2 poliovirus and introduction of a single dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) to maintain population immunity to type 2 polio to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 36 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Poliomyelitis
- What is being tested?
- Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV)
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 502 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesNepal
- Study dates
- 21 Nov 2018to 30 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 36 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- We will be including Nepali infants who fulfil the following criteria:
- Born after 30 April 2016
- Healthy infant or mild illness
- Age groups within one of the following age groups: 7-12 months or >24 months.
- Receipt of one dose of IPV at 3- 6 months of age (if age >24months) or zero doses (if age within 7-12 months). IPV receipt must be validated through immunization card or registry book.
- Parents that consent for participation in the full length of the study.
- Parents those are able to understand and comply with planned study procedures.
Who cannot join
- Parents and infants who are unable to participate in the full length of the study.
- A diagnosis or suspicion of immunodeficiency disorder either in the infant or in an immediate family member.
- A diagnosis or suspicion of bleeding disorder that would contraindicate parenteral administration of IPV or collection of blood by venipuncture.
- Acute infection or illness at the time of enrollment that would require infant's admission to a hospital.
- Evidence of a chronic medical condition identified by a study medical officer during physical exam.
- Known allergy/sensitivity or reaction to polio vaccines.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Discontinuation Criteria
- Withdrawal of consent for participation for any reason.
- Request by parents of participant to terminate all study procedures.
- Identification of immunodeficiency disorder, bleeding disorder or another medical condition for which continued participation, in the opinion of the principal investigator, would pose a risk to the participant to continue in the study.
- Receipt of immunosuppressive medications.
- Receipt of any polio (OPV or IPV) vaccine outside of study after enrollment (as per parent's report).
- Allergic reaction to a dose of polio vaccine.
- Unable to collect or obtain blood at enrollment.
- Premature termination of the study.
- Temporary discontinuation of study activities may occur if there is a mOPV2 campaign.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Nepal3 sites
Kanti Children's Hospital
Kathmandu
Patan Hospital
Kathmandu
Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital
Kathmandu
About this study
Official title: Cross-sectional Study to Assess Persistence of Immunity Conferred by a Single IPV Dose Administered in the Expanded Program on Immunization(EPI) Routine Immunization Schedule
In 2015, Strategic Advisory Group of Experts in Immunization (SAGE) recommended the global switch from trivalent to bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) that does not contain type 2 poliovirus and introduction of a single dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) to maintain population immunity to type 2 polio to reduce the risk of vaccine derived polio. Following SAGE recommendations, Nepal introduced one dose of IPV in routine immunization in 2015 followed by withdrawal trivalent OPV in April 2016. However, Nepal, like many other countries had to stop vaccination by the end of 2016 because of a global shortage of IPV.
Single dose of IPV induces detectable antibodies in 34% to 80% of infants, compared to >90% after three doses and most of seronegative children (84-98%) are "immunologically primed" by the first dose. Primed individuals produce protective antibody levels in serum within one week of exposure to a new dose of IPV or OPV. However, it is unknown whether seroconversion or priming responses persist, and for how long they persist after the single dose of IPV. IPV immunogenicity for vaccine delivered low-resource countries may also be inferior to that observed in clinical trials because of program factors that decrease vaccine efficacy.
Read more
This cross sectional study aims to determine whether the immune response provided by a single dose of IPV delivered through routine immunization services persists for more than a year.
The study will be implemented in three study sites in Kathmandu, Nepal during November 2018- July 2019.
Information generated from this study is expected to allow better estimation of children partially protected (primed) or fully protected against type 2 poliovirus depending on coverage and time since last IPV vaccination. These estimates will help inform the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) on vaccine choices for responding to type 2 vaccine derived poliovirus (VDPV) outbreaks and will help guide decisions on polio immunization schedules for Nepal and for other countries in future.
Read the detailed description
Background and Rationale
Importance of Poliomyelitis and Polioviruses and vaccine
There are three polioviruses types, 1, 2 and 3, with minimal cross-immunity. About 1/200 infections (depending on the type of poliovirus) produce paralytic poliomyelitis. An estimated 5-10% of individuals with paralytic poliomyelitis die and the remaining suffer from lifelong paralysis of one or more limbs without a cure. The presence of detectable antibodies in blood against each type protects against paralytic poliomyelitis, but intestinal immunity develops only after exposure to live poliovirus (vaccine or wild). Oral poliovirus vaccines that contain attenuated poliovirus strains and inactivated poliovirus vaccine both induce humoral immunity and protect against paralysis. OPV can also immunize or boost immunity of close contacts through secondary spread and trivalent OPV (tOPV) with poliovirus types 1, 2 and 3, was the vaccine of choice for polio eradication.
The immunological response to poliovirus vaccines is evaluated by measuring type-specific poliovirus antibodies using neutralization assays and can be detected as early as 1 to 3 days after infection with WPV or receipt of OPV or IPV. Antibody titers usually decline in the first two years (10- to 100-fold reduction) and then plateau, persisting for many years. However, administration of additional doses of vaccine or new exposures to wild poliovirus, induces a quick rise in antibody titers, with a peak reached within one week after the dose due to induction of "priming" or immunological memory.
Changes in polio vaccine use with progress in global polio eradication
Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) reduced polio cases enormously with the use of the tOPV in routine immunization and campaigns and WPV circulation is now limited to a few areas of the world. However, problems related to vaccines emerged. OPV strains may occasionally cause paralysis in vaccinated children and their close contacts (vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis or VAPP). OPV strains can circulate among susceptible individuals for long time in areas with absence of wild poliovirus transmission and suboptimal coverage with routine immunization resulting in low population immunity. Prolonged person-to-person transmission can result in genetic changes and the emergence of circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPV) with neurovirulence and transmissibility characteristics of WPV. Type 2 poliovirus was responsible for about 40% of annual VAPP cases reported, and 85% paralytic cases caused by cVDPVs during 2000-2015. Based on SAGE recommendation this led to removal of type 2 by switching from tOPV to bOPV in primary immunization and introduction of "at least one dose of IPV in routine immunization" in most of the countries of the world.
Rationale for the study and expected outcomes and benefits for the GPEI
Several recent studies have demonstrated that, although a single dose would result in seroconversion to type 2 for a limited number of infants (32% to 80% depending on the age of administration and study), a high proportion (>90%) of those infants who are seronegative, may actually "primed" by that single dose. Although it is not clear whether priming may protect directly against paralysis if a type 2 cVDPV 2 outbreak emerges, primed children should develop protective antibody levels quickly following a new OPV or IPV dose provided as a response to the outbreak.
Studies assessing long-term immunity to IPV or OPV were conducted in individuals receiving three or more doses of poliovirus vaccines who could have been exposed to circulating wild or vaccine poliovirus. It is unknown whether the proportion of children who were seropositive or primed following a single dose of IPV will stay positive or primed, and for how long this immune response will persist. Additionally IPV delivered in clinics and outreach sites in low-resource countries may not produce the same response to those observed in clinical trials due to programmatic issues.
Furthermore, global shortage of IPV resulting in IPV stock out in many countries including Nepal led many children to miss out their IPV dose in routine immunization. Reliable estimates of population immunity in a country or region based upon coverage and estimated immunogenicity of the type of vaccine and vaccination schedules received, are crucial to guide programmatic decisions and manage vaccine supply for outbreak responses to type 2 poliovirus.
Therefore, a cross-sectional study is being conducted to determine whether the immune response provided by a single dose of IPV persists for more than a year, by assessing the proportion of children born after the tOPV-bOPV switch and vaccinated with a single dose of IPV at about 14 weeks in routine immunization who are still seropositive or primed at around two years of age. These new estimates will inform the GPEI on vaccine choices for responding to type 2 VDPV outbreaks and guide decisions on polio immunization schedules after cessation of all OPV types.
Objectives
The study primarily will compare the proportion of infants vaccinated with one dose of IPV after 14 weeks of age who are seropositive or primed against type 2 poliovirus, either > 21 months after vaccination (study group), or one month after vaccination (control group). Also we would determine the proportion of children seropositive to types 1 and 3 following a sequential bOPV-IPV or bOPV alone schedule, delivered through routine immunization services in a low resource country.
Study Design/ Procedures
This is an open-label phase IV clinical trial assessing immunogenicity to IPV. Study participants will be identified through screening of children who attend outpatient clinics at the study sites for well-child visits, immunization or minor illness. After screening, confirmation of eligibility and obtaining consent, children will be allocated to one of the two study arms, and given a dose of IPV after collecting clinical information and obtaining a blood sample. Children will be followed up according to the schedule for study arms to assess study objectives.
Blood sample will be centrifuged within 24 hours of collection, serum aliquoted into two cryovials and stored at Institute of Medicine (IOM) laboratory at -20*C until final shipment to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC), Atlanta. Determination of poliovirus antibodies will be conducted using a microneutralization testing. Titers below 1:8 will be considered negative and the highest detectable titer will be 1:1448.
Sample size and analytic plan:
The sample size will be powered to address the primary objective based on previous trials that have shown 90 - 100% of children to develop detectable immunity to type 2 poliovirus after IPV dose. Using a one-sided test for differences between proportions with a continuity correction Z-test using pooled variance (PASS v14), 237 children will be required in each group to detect a one-sided difference of ≥10% with 90% power and 0.05 alpha. To account for potential 5% drop-outs, the sample will be rounded up to 250 per group or 500 children total.
- Conditions
- Poliomyelitis
- Being tested
- Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV)
- Keywords
- IPV, Routine immunization, Single dose, Persistence of immunity
- Medical subject headings
- Poliomyelitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV)Biological
Children receive one or two doses of IPV based on study arm they fall in
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study Arm A | Active comparator | Children {Age > 24 months and who received a single dose Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) at the time of routine immunization} in this arm will receive an IPV (0.5ml) intramuscularly at the time of enrolment in the trial Receives: Biological: Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) |
| Study arm B | Active comparator | Children {Age 7-12 months and have not received any IPV till date of enrolment} in this arm will receive an Inactivated Polio Vaccine, IPV (0.5 ml) intramuscularly at the time of enrolment in the trial and a repeat dose of IPV (0.5 ml) after 1 month Receives: Biological: Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of children with detectable immunity against type 2 poliovirus
To compare the proportion of infants vaccinated with one dose of IPV after 14 weeks of age who are seropositive or primed against type 2 poliovirus, either > 21 months after vaccination (study group), or one month after vaccination (control group)
Measured: 5 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Proportion of children who seroconvert or boost antibody titers to type 2 poliovirus
To assess the proportion of children who seroconvert or boost antibody titers to type 2 poliovirus 30 days after a second dose of IPV, administered > 1 year after the first dose.
Measured: 5 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2018
- Study start21 Nov 2018
- Primary completion30 Jun 2019
- Study completion30 Jul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (40)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PoliomyelitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 502 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute Of Medicine.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Arun Kumar Sharma, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute Of Medicine.
- Investigators
- Laxman P Shrestha, MD, Principal investigator, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute Of Medicine.Concepcion Estivariz, MD, Principal investigator, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionHarish Verma, DCH, Principal investigator, World Health Organization
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03723837
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 69/2018
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 26 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 7 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Individual Participant Data (IPD) sharing plan is undecided till now because the laboratory analysis is pending at CDC. IPD sharing plan will be revised after all results become available after agreement with collaborators in accordance to WHO and CDC guidelines
Publications
Nathanson N, Kew OM. From emergence to eradication: the epidemiology of poliomyelitis deconstructed. Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec 1;172(11):1213-29. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq320. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
PubMed 20978089Sutter RW, Kew OM, Cochi SL and Aylward RB. Poliovirus vaccine - live. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA and Offit PA, eds. Vaccines. 6th ed: Elsevier, 2013:598-645
Sutter RW, Patriarca PA. Inactivated and live, attenuated poliovirus vaccines: mucosal immunity. In: Kurstak E, ed. Measles and poliomyelitis. Austria: Springer-Verlag, 1993:279-293
Vidor E, Plotkin SA. Poliovirus vaccine - Inactivated. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA and Offit PA, eds. Vaccine. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2013:573-597
Roivainen M, Thoden CJ, Stenvik M, Poyry T, Hovi T. Virus excretion and strain specific antibody responses after oral poliovaccine in previously immunised children. J Med Virol. 1987 Nov;23(3):249-56. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890230307.
PubMed 2828521Dowdle WR, Cochi SL. Global eradication of poliovirus: History and rationale. In: Semler BL, Wimmer E, eds. Molecular Biology of Picornaviruses. Washington: ASM Press, 2002:473-480
Patriarca PA, Linkins RW and Sutter RW. Poliovirus vaccine formulations. In: Kurstak E, ed. Measles and Poliomyelitis. Wiena: Springer-Verlag, 1993:267-277
Patriarca PA, Wright PF, John TJ. Factors affecting the immunogenicity of oral poliovirus vaccine in developing countries: review. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Sep-Oct;13(5):926-39. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.5.926.
PubMed 1660184Sutter RW, John TJ, Jain H, Agarkhedkar S, Ramanan PV, Verma H, Deshpande J, Singh AP, Sreevatsava M, Malankar P, Burton A, Chatterjee A, Jafari H, Aylward RB. Immunogenicity of bivalent types 1 and 3 oral poliovirus vaccine: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Nov 13;376(9753):1682-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61230-5. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
PubMed 20980048Estivariz CF, Anand A, Gary HE Jr, Rahman M, Islam J, Bari TI, Wassilak SG, Chu SY, Weldon WC, Pallansch MA, Heffelfinger JD, Luby SP, Zaman K. Immunogenicity of three doses of bivalent, trivalent, or type 1 monovalent oral poliovirus vaccines with a 2 week interval between doses in Bangladesh: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Aug;15(8):898-904. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00094-8. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
PubMed 26093980Estivariz CF, Pallansch MA, Anand A, Wassilak SG, Sutter RW, Wenger JD, Orenstein WA. Poliovirus vaccination options for achieving eradication and securing the endgame. Curr Opin Virol. 2013 Jun;3(3):309-15. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
PubMed 23759252Dayan GH, Thorley M, Yamamura Y, Rodriguez N, McLaughlin S, Torres LM, Seda A, Carbia M, Alexander LN, Caceres V, Pallansch MA. Serologic response to inactivated poliovirus vaccine: a randomized clinical trial comparing 2 vaccination schedules in Puerto Rico. J Infect Dis. 2007 Jan 1;195(1):12-20. doi: 10.1086/508427. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
PubMed 17152004Resik S, Tejeda A, Lago PM, Diaz M, Carmenates A, Sarmiento L, Alemani N, Galindo B, Burton A, Friede M, Landaverde M, Sutter RW. Randomized controlled clinical trial of fractional doses of inactivated poliovirus vaccine administered intradermally by needle-free device in Cuba. J Infect Dis. 2010 May 1;201(9):1344-52. doi: 10.1086/651611.
PubMed 20350164Mohammed AJ, AlAwaidy S, Bawikar S, Kurup PJ, Elamir E, Shaban MM, Sharif SM, van der Avoort HG, Pallansch MA, Malankar P, Burton A, Sreevatsava M, Sutter RW. Fractional doses of inactivated poliovirus vaccine in Oman. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 24;362(25):2351-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909383.
PubMed 20573923Anand A, Zaman K, Estivariz CF, Yunus M, Gary HE, Weldon WC, Bari TI, Steven Oberste M, Wassilak SG, Luby SP, Heffelfinger JD, Pallansch MA. Early priming with inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) and intradermal fractional dose IPV administered by a microneedle device: A randomized controlled trial. Vaccine. 2015 Nov 27;33(48):6816-22. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.09.039. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
PubMed 26476367
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cross-sectional Study to Assess Persistence of Immunity Conferred by a Single IPV Dose Administered in the Expanded Program on Immunization(EPI) Routine Immunization Schedule
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03723837
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 69/2018
- Conditions
- Poliomyelitis
- Keywords
- IPV, Routine immunization, Single dose, Persistence of immunity
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 502 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute Of Medicine.University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Study start
- 21 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In 2015, Strategic Advisory Group of Experts in Immunization (SAGE) recommended the global switch from trivalent to bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) that does not contain type 2 poliovirus and introduction of a single dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) to maintain population immunity to type 2 polio to reduce the risk of vaccine derived polio. Following SAGE recommendations, Nepal introduced one dose of IPV in routine immunization in 2015 followed by withdrawal trivalent OPV in April 2016. However, Nepal, like many other countries had to stop vaccination by the end of 2016 because of a global shortage of IPV.
Single dose of IPV induces detectable antibodies in 34% to 80% of infants, compared to >90% after three doses and most of seronegative children (84-98%) are "immunologically primed" by the first dose. Primed individuals produce protective antibody levels in serum within one week of exposure to a new dose of IPV or OPV. However, it is unknown whether seroconversion or priming responses persist, and for how long they persist after the single dose of IPV. IPV immunogenicity for vaccine delivered low-resource countries may also be inferior to that observed in clinical trials because of program factors that decrease vaccine efficacy.
This cross sectional study aims to determine whether the immune response provided by a single dose of IPV delivered through routine immunization services persists for more than a year.
The study will be implemented in three study sites in Kathmandu, Nepal during November 2018- July 2019.
Information generated from this study is expected to allow better estimation of children partially protected (primed) or fully protected against type 2 poliovirus depending on coverage and time since last IPV vaccination. These estimates will help inform the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) on vaccine choices for responding to type 2 vaccine derived poliovirus (VDPV) outbreaks and will help guide decisions on polio immunization schedules for Nepal and for other countries in future.
Detailed description
Background and Rationale
Importance of Poliomyelitis and Polioviruses and vaccine
There are three polioviruses types, 1, 2 and 3, with minimal cross-immunity. About 1/200 infections (depending on the type of poliovirus) produce paralytic poliomyelitis. An estimated 5-10% of individuals with paralytic poliomyelitis die and the remaining suffer from lifelong paralysis of one or more limbs without a cure. The presence of detectable antibodies in blood against each type protects against paralytic poliomyelitis, but intestinal immunity develops only after exposure to live poliovirus (vaccine or wild). Oral poliovirus vaccines that contain attenuated poliovirus strains and inactivated poliovirus vaccine both induce humoral immunity and protect against paralysis. OPV can also immunize or boost immunity of close contacts through secondary spread and trivalent OPV (tOPV) with poliovirus types 1, 2 and 3, was the vaccine of choice for polio eradication.
The immunological response to poliovirus vaccines is evaluated by measuring type-specific poliovirus antibodies using neutralization assays and can be detected as early as 1 to 3 days after infection with WPV or receipt of OPV or IPV. Antibody titers usually decline in the first two years (10- to 100-fold reduction) and then plateau, persisting for many years. However, administration of additional doses of vaccine or new exposures to wild poliovirus, induces a quick rise in antibody titers, with a peak reached within one week after the dose due to induction of "priming" or immunological memory.
Changes in polio vaccine use with progress in global polio eradication
Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) reduced polio cases enormously with the use of the tOPV in routine immunization and campaigns and WPV circulation is now limited to a few areas of the world. However, problems related to vaccines emerged. OPV strains may occasionally cause paralysis in vaccinated children and their close contacts (vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis or VAPP). OPV strains can circulate among susceptible individuals for long time in areas with absence of wild poliovirus transmission and suboptimal coverage with routine immunization resulting in low population immunity. Prolonged person-to-person transmission can result in genetic changes and the emergence of circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPV) with neurovirulence and transmissibility characteristics of WPV. Type 2 poliovirus was responsible for about 40% of annual VAPP cases reported, and 85% paralytic cases caused by cVDPVs during 2000-2015. Based on SAGE recommendation this led to removal of type 2 by switching from tOPV to bOPV in primary immunization and introduction of "at least one dose of IPV in routine immunization" in most of the countries of the world.
Rationale for the study and expected outcomes and benefits for the GPEI
Several recent studies have demonstrated that, although a single dose would result in seroconversion to type 2 for a limited number of infants (32% to 80% depending on the age of administration and study), a high proportion (>90%) of those infants who are seronegative, may actually "primed" by that single dose. Although it is not clear whether priming may protect directly against paralysis if a type 2 cVDPV 2 outbreak emerges, primed children should develop protective antibody levels quickly following a new OPV or IPV dose provided as a response to the outbreak.
Studies assessing long-term immunity to IPV or OPV were conducted in individuals receiving three or more doses of poliovirus vaccines who could have been exposed to circulating wild or vaccine poliovirus. It is unknown whether the proportion of children who were seropositive or primed following a single dose of IPV will stay positive or primed, and for how long this immune response will persist. Additionally IPV delivered in clinics and outreach sites in low-resource countries may not produce the same response to those observed in clinical trials due to programmatic issues.
Furthermore, global shortage of IPV resulting in IPV stock out in many countries including Nepal led many children to miss out their IPV dose in routine immunization. Reliable estimates of population immunity in a country or region based upon coverage and estimated immunogenicity of the type of vaccine and vaccination schedules received, are crucial to guide programmatic decisions and manage vaccine supply for outbreak responses to type 2 poliovirus.
Therefore, a cross-sectional study is being conducted to determine whether the immune response provided by a single dose of IPV persists for more than a year, by assessing the proportion of children born after the tOPV-bOPV switch and vaccinated with a single dose of IPV at about 14 weeks in routine immunization who are still seropositive or primed at around two years of age. These new estimates will inform the GPEI on vaccine choices for responding to type 2 VDPV outbreaks and guide decisions on polio immunization schedules after cessation of all OPV types.
Objectives
The study primarily will compare the proportion of infants vaccinated with one dose of IPV after 14 weeks of age who are seropositive or primed against type 2 poliovirus, either > 21 months after vaccination (study group), or one month after vaccination (control group). Also we would determine the proportion of children seropositive to types 1 and 3 following a sequential bOPV-IPV or bOPV alone schedule, delivered through routine immunization services in a low resource country.
Study Design/ Procedures
This is an open-label phase IV clinical trial assessing immunogenicity to IPV. Study participants will be identified through screening of children who attend outpatient clinics at the study sites for well-child visits, immunization or minor illness. After screening, confirmation of eligibility and obtaining consent, children will be allocated to one of the two study arms, and given a dose of IPV after collecting clinical information and obtaining a blood sample. Children will be followed up according to the schedule for study arms to assess study objectives.
Blood sample will be centrifuged within 24 hours of collection, serum aliquoted into two cryovials and stored at Institute of Medicine (IOM) laboratory at -20*C until final shipment to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC), Atlanta. Determination of poliovirus antibodies will be conducted using a microneutralization testing. Titers below 1:8 will be considered negative and the highest detectable titer will be 1:1448.
Sample size and analytic plan:
The sample size will be powered to address the primary objective based on previous trials that have shown 90 - 100% of children to develop detectable immunity to type 2 poliovirus after IPV dose. Using a one-sided test for differences between proportions with a continuity correction Z-test using pooled variance (PASS v14), 237 children will be required in each group to detect a one-sided difference of ≥10% with 90% power and 0.05 alpha. To account for potential 5% drop-outs, the sample will be rounded up to 250 per group or 500 children total.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study Arm A | Active comparator | Biological: Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV)Children {Age > 24 months and who received a single dose Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) at the time of routine immunization} in this arm will receive an IPV (0.5ml) intramuscularly at the time of enrolment in the trial |
| Study arm B | Active comparator | Biological: Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV)Children {Age 7-12 months and have not received any IPV till date of enrolment} in this arm will receive an Inactivated Polio Vaccine, IPV (0.5 ml) intramuscularly at the time of enrolment in the trial and a repeat dose of IPV (0.5 ml) after 1 month |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 to 36 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Born after 30 April 2016
- Healthy infant or mild illness
- Age groups within one of the following age groups: 7-12 months or >24 months.
- Receipt of one dose of IPV at 3- 6 months of age (if age >24months) or zero doses (if age within 7-12 months). IPV receipt must be validated through immunization card or registry book.
- Parents that consent for participation in the full length of the study.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Parents and infants who are unable to participate in the full length of the study.
- A diagnosis or suspicion of immunodeficiency disorder either in the infant or in an immediate family member.
- A diagnosis or suspicion of bleeding disorder that would contraindicate parenteral administration of IPV or collection of blood by venipuncture.
- Acute infection or illness at the time of enrollment that would require infant's admission to a hospital.
- Evidence of a chronic medical condition identified by a study medical officer during physical exam.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV)Children receive one or two doses of IPV based on study arm they fall in | Biological | Study Arm A, Study arm B |
Primary outcome
Proportion of children with detectable immunity against type 2 poliovirus
Time frame: 5 weeks
To compare the proportion of infants vaccinated with one dose of IPV after 14 weeks of age who are seropositive or primed against type 2 poliovirus, either > 21 months after vaccination (study group), or one month after vaccination (control group)
1 secondary outcome
Proportion of children who seroconvert or boost antibody titers to type 2 poliovirus
Time frame: 5 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Apr 2020.
- Background: PubMed 20978089Nathanson N, Kew OM. From emergence to eradication: the epidemiology of poliomyelitis deconstructed. Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec 1;172(11):1213-29. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq320. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
- BackgroundSutter RW, Kew OM, Cochi SL and Aylward RB. Poliovirus vaccine - live. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA and Offit PA, eds. Vaccines. 6th ed: Elsevier, 2013:598-645
- BackgroundSutter RW, Patriarca PA. Inactivated and live, attenuated poliovirus vaccines: mucosal immunity. In: Kurstak E, ed. Measles and poliomyelitis. Austria: Springer-Verlag, 1993:279-293
- BackgroundVidor E, Plotkin SA. Poliovirus vaccine - Inactivated. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA and Offit PA, eds. Vaccine. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2013:573-597
- Background: PubMed 2828521Roivainen M, Thoden CJ, Stenvik M, Poyry T, Hovi T. Virus excretion and strain specific antibody responses after oral poliovaccine in previously immunised children. J Med Virol. 1987 Nov;23(3):249-56. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890230307.
- BackgroundDowdle WR, Cochi SL. Global eradication of poliovirus: History and rationale. In: Semler BL, Wimmer E, eds. Molecular Biology of Picornaviruses. Washington: ASM Press, 2002:473-480
- BackgroundPatriarca PA, Linkins RW and Sutter RW. Poliovirus vaccine formulations. In: Kurstak E, ed. Measles and Poliomyelitis. Wiena: Springer-Verlag, 1993:267-277
- Background: PubMed 1660184Patriarca PA, Wright PF, John TJ. Factors affecting the immunogenicity of oral poliovirus vaccine in developing countries: review. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Sep-Oct;13(5):926-39. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.5.926.
- Background: PubMed 20980048Sutter RW, John TJ, Jain H, Agarkhedkar S, Ramanan PV, Verma H, Deshpande J, Singh AP, Sreevatsava M, Malankar P, Burton A, Chatterjee A, Jafari H, Aylward RB. Immunogenicity of bivalent types 1 and 3 oral poliovirus vaccine: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Nov 13;376(9753):1682-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61230-5. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
- Background: PubMed 26093980Estivariz CF, Anand A, Gary HE Jr, Rahman M, Islam J, Bari TI, Wassilak SG, Chu SY, Weldon WC, Pallansch MA, Heffelfinger JD, Luby SP, Zaman K. Immunogenicity of three doses of bivalent, trivalent, or type 1 monovalent oral poliovirus vaccines with a 2 week interval between doses in Bangladesh: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Aug;15(8):898-904. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00094-8. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
- Background: PubMed 23759252Estivariz CF, Pallansch MA, Anand A, Wassilak SG, Sutter RW, Wenger JD, Orenstein WA. Poliovirus vaccination options for achieving eradication and securing the endgame. Curr Opin Virol. 2013 Jun;3(3):309-15. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
- Background: PubMed 17152004Dayan GH, Thorley M, Yamamura Y, Rodriguez N, McLaughlin S, Torres LM, Seda A, Carbia M, Alexander LN, Caceres V, Pallansch MA. Serologic response to inactivated poliovirus vaccine: a randomized clinical trial comparing 2 vaccination schedules in Puerto Rico. J Infect Dis. 2007 Jan 1;195(1):12-20. doi: 10.1086/508427. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
- Global Polio Eradication Initiative. List of wild poliovirus by country and year.Link provided by the sponsor.
- The Global Polio Eradication Initiative. Data and monitoringLink provided by the sponsor.
- Hickling J, Jones R and Nundy N. Improving the affordability of intactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) for use in low-and middle-income countriesLink provided by the sponsor.
- Global Polio Eradication Initiative. Standard Operating Procedures: responding to a poliovirus event and outbreak, part 2: protocol for poliovirus type 2, 15 August 2016 (Original publication 20 april 2016)Link provided by the sponsor.
- Department of Immunization Vaccines and Biologicals. WHO multi-dose vial policy (MDVP), Revision 2014. WHO/IVB/14.07Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Individual Participant Data (IPD) sharing plan is undecided till now because the laboratory analysis is pending at CDC. IPD sharing plan will be revised after all results become available after agreement with collaborators in accordance to WHO and CDC guidelines
Related trials for Poliomyelitis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of the Diphtheria, Tetanus, Acellular Component Pertussis and Sabin Inactivated Poliomyelitis Vaccine Adsorbed
Diphtheria, Pertussis
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of a Recombinant Poliomyelitis Vaccine (rPV) in Comparison With IPOL Vaccine in Healthy Adults
Polio Immunity
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Virtual Walking on Chronic Pain and Psychological Distress for Individuals With Severe Mobility Impairment
Severe Mobility Impairment, Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Mucosal Intestinal Immunity to Poliovirus Type-2 of nOPV2 at Birth Dose in Healthy IPV Vaccinated Infants
Poliomyelitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Phase II/III Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity, Safety and Lot-to-lot Consistency of LBVD, a Fully Liquid Hexavalent Diphtheria-tetanus-whole Cell Pertussis-hepatitis B-poliovirus-Haemophilus Influenzae Type b Conjugate (DTwP-HepB-IPV-Hib) Vaccine, in Healthy Infants as Primary Series
Diphtheria, Tetanus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Laxman P Shrestha, MD principal investigator
Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute Of Medicine.
Concepcion Estivariz, MD principal investigator
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Harish Verma, DCH principal investigator
World Health Organization
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) in people with Poliomyelitis, run by Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute Of Medicine. at 3 sites in Nepal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Nepal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of children with detectable immunity against type 2 poliovirus (time frame: 5 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03723837, which also lists 40 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.