AzTrials
AzTrials

Stroke, IschemicLAACS-2NCT03724318

Left Atrial Appendage Closure by Surgery-2

A study testing closure of the left atrium appendage in people with Stroke, Ischemic and Atrial Fibrillation, run by Helena DOMINGUEZ at 4 sites in 3 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Atrial fibrillation is a heart rhythm disorder that often occurs after heart surgery. During atrial fibrillation blood cloths may form, predominantly in the left atrial appendage, a small sac in the wall of the left side of the heart. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stroke, Ischemic, Atrial Fibrillation
What is being tested?
closure of the left atrium appendage
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,500 participants
Where
4 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
17 Mar 2019to 31 Oct 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients referred for planned first-time heart surgery:
  • Coronary artery by-pass surgery (CABG)
  • Valve surgery
  • Combined CABG and valve surgery

Who cannot join

  • Endocarditis
  • No possible follow-up
  • Planned closure of the left atrium appendage as part of surgery

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 3 countries.

4 sites in 3 countries

Denmark2 sites
  • Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

    Aarhus

  • Rigshospitalet

    Copenhagen

Other trials in Denmark

Spain1 site
  • Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron

    Barcelona

Other trials in Spain

Sweden1 site
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital

    Gothenburg

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Atrial fibrillation is a heart rhythm disorder that often occurs after heart surgery. During atrial fibrillation blood cloths may form, predominantly in the left atrial appendage, a small sac in the wall of the left side of the heart. Some heart surgeons close this appendage to protect against stroke, particularly in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, yet there is little evidence to support the efficacy and safety of this practice.

We therefore conducted the Left Atrial Appendage Closure by Surgery (LAACS) study (2010-2016) were patients in whom the appendage was closed (by chance) suffered fewer brain damages that patients where it remained open. Although encouraging, these results were not only based on strokes, but also on scars without symptoms found in brain scans. The following LAACS-2 study will include a sufficient number of patients to determine whether future guidelines should advise to close systematically the left atrium appendage during a heart operation.

Read the detailed description

Aim:

The overall aim of the project is to provide lifelong protection against brain damage related to atrial fibrillation, to patients who undergo open heart surgery.

Background:

Formation of thrombi in the left atrium appendage (LAA) during atrial Fibrillation (AF) can provoke strokes, (shortened - references 1-14) The investigators hypothesis is that systematic closure of the LAA, in addition to planned open-heart surgery, can reduce cerebral embolisms derived from thrombus formation in the left atrium. The investigators performed the LAACS study (clinicaltrial.gov NCT02378116) to test this hypothesis, which is the first randomized study that shows a protective effect of closure of the LAA during surgery, against ischemic damage of the brain, a question that has eagerly been sought in the scientific community. 1-3 The results of the LAACS trial demonstrate a benefit including clinical significant stroke and silent infarctions, 15 with 5 (5%) primary events in the LAACS-group and 14 (16%) in the control group (Hazard ratio 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.8, p=0.02). Nevertheless, a limited number of patients were randomized in LAACS (N 187) of whom 141 followed the procedure. Expectedly, differences on stroke were not significant. Hence, although encouraging, results should be proven in a larger trial, before a systematic closure of the LAA can be recommended as a routine procedure during open-heart surgery. The main purpose of LAACS2 is to provide evidence to support or not such procedure.

Methods:

The target population is that of patients older than 18 years, that await their first-time open-heart surgery. The investigators design the project as an open, parallel study where patients will be randomized to closure of the LAA, in addition to planned open heart surgery. The LAA will remain open in the control group.

Inclusion and randomization:

Patients are identified among referrals for thoracic surgery in the respective departments and will receive written information and contacted by telephone prior to their admission. Both, patients with and without previous diagnosis of AF will be invited to participate. For inclusion and exclusion criteria (see 'eligibility').

Since use of anti-coagulants provides protection against thrombus formation, the patients will be stratified by ongoing use of anti-coagulant medications, which includes patients with planned mechanic valve replacement, in blocks of 16 patients randomized 1:1 in each strata.

Beyond closure of the LAA or control, patients will be managed according to general practice, without restrictions on the preferred use of medications for rhythm control, or conversion procedures.

Method of LAA closure:

The LAACS procedure is routinely conducted on patients undergoing per-operative ablation for AF during CABG and valve operations. Nevertheless, insufficient closure of the LAA is of major concern, as an incomplete closure may even be harming3. Accordingly, experimental 16,17 and clinical studies 18,19 support the efficacy of closure of the LAA with a clip device rather than a single suture 2,19,20. Pre-clinic studies using the AtriClip device have complete occlusion, at least, for the first 90 days following the procedure 18,21. Therefore, the standard procedure for LAA closure in the LAACS 2 trial is using AtriClip devices (AtriCure Inc., West Chester, Ohio, USA).

Tissue, blood and urine samples:

During operation, a biopsy from the right atrial appendage (approximately 3 g) is taken from all patients, and from the LAA (approximately 1 g) if patients are ungoing LAACS. Furthermore, approximately 15 mL of venous blood and 30 mL of urine is drawn during surgery.

All samples are immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and transported on dry ice to a -80 °C freezer. Samples will be analyzed when the last sample has been drawn.

Follow-up:

The participants will be followed for at least two years, until the end of the study. Follow-up is based on yearly contact with the patients' hospital records and telephone contact, if medical records are not available.

The first 10 participants in each site will be invited to participate in an imaging study, one year after the operation, to assess the quality of the closure. Imaging will be esophagus echocardiography or a computed tomography scan, according to the imaging facilities available in the site.

All patients with AF onset after the operation, before discharge, where there has not been recorded recurrence of AF by the end of the first year of follow-up will be invited to participate in long-term continuous ambulatory heart-rhythm monitoring (Holter for at least seven days).

Patients may decline to participate in the additional imaging and Holter monitoring and remain in the study for follow-up.

Additionally, sites are requested to perform equivalent imaging of the heart on patients that have undergone closure of the left atrial appendage and experienced strokes, to evaluate the completeness of the LAA closure.

Definition of AF and recurrence of AF:

AF onset in the days following the operation, until discharge, detected in clinical settings are considered as "per-operative AF". Recurrence of AF detected during the first three months following the operation are considered "early recurrence" and recurrence beyond three months after the operation detected in clinical settings are considered "late recurrence". In patients undergoing Holter monitoring in the study, the occurrence of AF for 30 seconds or longer will be considered diagnostic for AF recurrence.

Power calculation for primary endpoint stroke and minor stroke (transitory cerebral ischemia):

Stroke has an incidence of 1-5% in the years following heart surgery 7,22-24. Chang et al. pooled data from studies comparing outcomes after PCI and CABG (from the SYNTAX, BEST and PRECOMBAT trials), which provides an estimate of 3,7% incidence of stroke in the first three years following coronary by-pass operations 25. In the LAACS study, incidence of stroke was 3.2% (3 of n 64) in patients who underwent surgical closure of the LAA, while in control patients in whom LAA remained open, stroke incidence was 11.3% (8 in n 77) after 3,6 median follow-up. A non-randomized study reported a 33% risk reduction of thromboembolic events.

To achieve a corresponding reduction in the LAACS trial, with a significance level of 0.05 and 90% power, over three years, it would be necessary to include 600 patients in each group (calculated manually and using web calculators www.biomath.info/power/chsq.htm, www.dssresearch.com, and www.optimizely.com ).

We deemed a relative risk reduction of 60% with LAA closure plausible. In a balanced design (1:1), with a Chi-square approximation (comparing two independent binomial proportions) with a two-sided significance level of 0.05 and power of 90%, and two years of observation time, the sample size needed is 1302. We include a 'drop-out' rate of 10%, as unexpected intraoperative findings may prompt surgeons to deviate from the allocated treatment, and the primary outcome is subject to death as a competing risk. In total, 1,500 patients should be randomized.

After two years of follow-up, 39 (651*6.0%) and 16 (651*2.4%) primary events are expected in the control and LAA closure groups, respectively. The trial may be extended if 55 primary events have not occurred after two years of follow-up.

The steering committee will decide whether the trial should continue enrolment if more than 55 events have occurred before 1500 patients have been included. Likewise, the committee will decide whether to increase the number of patients included if less than 55 primary events have occurred after the last randomized patient has been followed for two years.

Power calculation for harm of the LAACS procedure:

Incomplete LAA closure may render a more thrombogenic surface than the innate LAA surface.2,19,20 The relative risk for stroke related to incomplete LAA closure has been estimated between 10 to 25% compared to those with complete LAA closure.13,35 Accordingly, the investigators can evaluate whether an equivalent problem occurs in the LAACS2, including between 359 to 1455 patients in the LAACS2 study, with a 90% power and a 0.05 significance level. Hence, the 2000 patients the investigators plan to include, as calculated for the primary endpoint should suffice to evaluate the possible harm of the procedure.

Prespecified substudies The wavECG substudy utilizes a preoperative Myovista electrocardiogram (HeartScienc-es, Southlake, Texas, USA) to diagnose diastolic dysfunction in consecutive patients and will evaluate if these indices can improve current prediction models of (1) postoperative AF and (2) postoperative stroke including TIA. An anticipated 300 patients will be en-rolled.

The biomarker substudy will evaluate blood, urine, and atrial tissue samples in a sub-group of patients to explore systemic signs of atrial cardiomyopathy associated with the development of (1) postoperative AF and (2) postoperative stroke, including TIA. An anticipated 75 patients will be enrolled.

The imaging substudies will evaluate the quality of LAA closures in a subgroup of ten consecutive patients from each site utilizing echocardiography, CT, or MRI according to the availability of imaging facilities. Moreover, imaging control of LAA closures is recommended in patients with LAA closure developing ischemic stroke, including TIA. An antic-ipated 50 patients will be enrolled.

The Holter substudy will be conducted in patients with new-onset AF from surgery until discharge and where another episode of AF has not been recorded approaching the end of follow-up. Patients from selected sites will be invited to participate in long-term continuous ambulatory heart-rhythm monitoring to assess the burden of subclinical recurrent AF. An anticipated 100 patients will be enrolled.

Being tested
closure of the left atrium appendage
Keywords
Left Atrium Appendage, Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke, Heart Surgery
Medical subject headings
Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • closure of the left atrium appendageProcedure or surgery

    closure of the left atrium appendage in addition to the planned Heart operation

Study groups in NCT03724318
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ClosureActive comparatorPatients randomized to the active Group will undergo closure of the left atrium appendage during Heart surgery by means of commercial clips
Receives: Procedure: closure of the left atrium appendage
ControlNo interventionThe left atrium appendage will remain open in patients randomized to the control group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of participants with Stroke occurrence including Transitory cerebral ischemia (TCI)

    Stroke is an acute episode of focal dysfunction of the brain, retina, or spinal cord lasting longer than 24 h, or of any duration if imaging (CT or MRI) or autopsy show focal infarction relevant to the symptoms. Transitory cerebral ischemia (TCI) is defined as above, but with symptoms lasting less than 24 h.

    Endpoints will be assigned by two independent neurologists, who are blinded to what procedure the patient undergo. In case of discrepancy, the events will be assigned by consensus.

    Measured: at least two years, until end of follow-up

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Combined end-point of Stroke, TCI or Silent brain infarction

    Stroke and TCI as above. Silent brain infarction is a fresh lesion on CT or MRI scan or new-onset non-fresh lesion in patients with multiple cans. Bothe ischemic and hemorrhaic types are included Silent Brain infarctions described by radiologists as fresh infarctions found in clinical settings with CT-scans or brain-MRI scans

    Measured: at least two years, until end of follow-up

  2. Ischemic Stroke, including TCI

    Stroke and TCI as above.

    Measured: at least two years, until end of follow-up

  3. Composite outcome of all-cause mortality and stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic)

    Death of any cause

    Measured: at least two years, until end of follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Oct 2018
  2. Study start17 Mar 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2025
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Open-label, parallel, randomized, control trial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,500 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03724318
Sponsor's protocol ID
H-17033253
Acronym
LAACS-2
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
26 Oct 2018
Last updated
16 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Study data will be shared upon reasonable request after study end.

Publications

  • Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, Israel CW, Van Gelder IC, Capucci A, Lau CP, Fain E, Yang S, Bailleul C, Morillo CA, Carlson M, Themeles E, Kaufman ES, Hohnloser SH; ASSERT Investigators. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):120-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105575.

    PubMed 22236222
  • Noelck N, Papak J, Freeman M, Paynter R, Low A, Motu'apuaka M, Kondo K, Kansagara D. Effectiveness of Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion Procedures to Reduce the Risk of Stroke: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Jul;9(4):395-405. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002539. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

    PubMed 27407055
  • Dawson AG, Asopa S, Dunning J. Should patients undergoing cardiac surgery with atrial fibrillation have left atrial appendage exclusion? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;10(2):306-11. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.227991. Epub 2009 Nov 26.

    PubMed 19942634
  • Aguilar MI, Hart R. Oral anticoagulants for preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and no previous history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001927. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001927.pub2.

    PubMed 16034869
  • Frendl G, Sodickson AC, Chung MK, Waldo AL, Gersh BJ, Tisdale JE, Calkins H, Aranki S, Kaneko T, Cassivi S, Smith SC Jr, Darbar D, Wee JO, Waddell TK, Amar D, Adler D; American Association for Thoracic Surgery. 2014 AATS guidelines for the prevention and management of perioperative atrial fibrillation and flutter for thoracic surgical procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Sep;148(3):e153-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.036. Epub 2014 Jun 30. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25129609
  • Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Schotten U, Savelieva I, Ernst S, Van Gelder IC, Al-Attar N, Hindricks G, Prendergast B, Heidbuchel H, Alfieri O, Angelini A, Atar D, Colonna P, De Caterina R, De Sutter J, Goette A, Gorenek B, Heldal M, Hohloser SH, Kolh P, Le Heuzey JY, Ponikowski P, Rutten FH; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Europace. 2010 Oct;12(10):1360-420. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq350. No abstract available.

    PubMed 20876603
  • Lahtinen J, Biancari F, Salmela E, Mosorin M, Satta J, Rainio P, Rimpilainen J, Lepojarvi M, Juvonen T. Postoperative atrial fibrillation is a major cause of stroke after on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Apr;77(4):1241-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.09.077.

    PubMed 15063244
  • Kollar A, Lick SD, Vasquez KN, Conti VR. Relationship of atrial fibrillation and stroke after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: when is anticoagulation indicated? Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Aug;82(2):515-23. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.037.

    PubMed 16863754
  • Nakai T, Chandy J, Nakai K, Bellows WH, Flachsbart K, Lee RJ, Leung JM. Histologic assessment of right atrial appendage myocardium in patients with atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Cardiology. 2007;108(2):90-6. doi: 10.1159/000095936. Epub 2006 Sep 28.

    PubMed 17008797
  • Ahlsson A, Fengsrud E, Bodin L, Englund A. Postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery carries an eightfold risk of future atrial fibrillation and a doubled cardiovascular mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Jun;37(6):1353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.12.033.

    PubMed 20138531
  • Pillarisetti J, Patel A, Bommana S, Guda R, Falbe J, Zorn GT, Muehlebach G, Vacek J, Sue Min Lai, Lakkireddy D. Atrial fibrillation following open heart surgery: long-term incidence and prognosis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Jan;39(1):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9830-6. Epub 2013 Nov 29.

    PubMed 24293173
  • Lee SH, Kang DR, Uhm JS, Shim J, Sung JH, Kim JY, Pak HN, Lee MH, Joung B. New-onset atrial fibrillation predicts long-term newly developed atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft. Am Heart J. 2014 Apr;167(4):593-600.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Jan 4.

    PubMed 24655710
  • Almahameed ST, Khan M, Zuzek RW, Juratli N, Belden WA, Asher CR, Novaro GM, Martin DO, Natale A. Left atrial appendage exclusion and the risk of thromboembolic events following mitral valve surgery. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007 Apr;18(4):364-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00755.x. Epub 2007 Feb 7.

    PubMed 17286567
  • Garcia-Fernandez MA, Perez-David E, Quiles J, Peralta J, Garcia-Rojas I, Bermejo J, Moreno M, Silva J. Role of left atrial appendage obliteration in stroke reduction in patients with mitral valve prosthesis: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 1;42(7):1253-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00954-9.

    PubMed 14522491
  • Park-Hansen J, Holme SJV, Irmukhamedov A, Carranza CL, Greve AM, Al-Farra G, Riis RGC, Nilsson B, Clausen JSR, Norskov AS, Kruuse CR, Rostrup E, Dominguez H. Adding left atrial appendage closure to open heart surgery provides protection from ischemic brain injury six years after surgery independently of atrial fibrillation history: the LAACS randomized study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 May 23;13(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13019-018-0740-7.

    PubMed 29792215

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing closure of the left atrium appendage in people with Stroke, Ischemic and Atrial Fibrillation, run by Helena DOMINGUEZ at 4 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Denmark, Spain, Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of participants with Stroke occurrence including Transitory cerebral ischemia (TCI) (time frame: at least two years, until end of follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03724318, which also lists 37 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in